1 2 10 Alternative Consumer Behaviour
1 2 10 Alternative Consumer Behaviour
• Loss aversion is the idea that people are more sensitive to losses than to
equivalent gains.
• In other words, people are more motivated to avoid a loss than they are to
acquire a similar gain.
• For example, if you give someone $20, they might be relatively unmoved,
but if you take away $20 from them, they’ll likely be upset.
• This is why we see things like "buy one, get one free" promotions - people
are more likely to buy something when it feels like they're avoiding a loss,
even if the overall cost is the same.
• Anchoring bias is when people tend to focus on an initial piece of information (the
"anchor"), and then base their decisions around that anchor, even if it's not the most
relevant or important piece of information.
• This causes them to feel like they're losing out if they stray from the initial anchor.
• Bargain hunting: People often compare a sale price to the original price of an item,
and think they're getting a great deal, even if the sale price isn't really that great. The
original price acts as an anchor that influences their perception of the sale price.
• Negotiation: When negotiating a price or salary, people often anchor on the first
number mentioned, making it difficult to negotiate a lower price or higher salary.
• Framing bias is the idea that the way information is presented can influence
people's decisions and judgments. Here are some common examples:
• The "dread risk" framing: Presenting a risk in terms of "how many people will die"
rather than "how many people will be saved" can lead to different decisions.
• The "choice architecture" framing: Arranging options in a specific order or
highlighting certain options can influence what people choose.
• The "decoy" effect: Offering a less attractive option alongside two more desirable
options can make one of the desirable options seem even more attractive.
• The "scarcity" effect: Highlighting limited availability can create a sense of
urgency and drive people to act quickly.
Most of use choose the same Our menu choices are A default opt-in (or auto
breakfast! predictable enrollment) such as for
pensions and organ
donations can have a
powerful effect
• Confirmation bias: the tendency to seek out and remember information that
confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that contradicts them.
• Anchoring bias: the tendency to rely too heavily on the first piece of
information we receive when deciding.
• Availability bias: the tendency to give more weight to information that is easily
accessible in our memory.
• Overconfidence bias: Tendency to be overconfident in our own abilities and
knowledge
• Sunk cost fallacy: the tendency to continue investing in something because of
the resources we've already invested, even if it's not a good idea
Having choice does not always Pensions are complex products Search costs make it harder to
help consumers make decisions that many don’t understand find the best price in a market
• Heuristics are mental shortcuts that many people use in their day-do-day lives
to simplify complex decisions.
• For example, people may use a heuristic like "buy the cheapest option" or
"choose the most popular brand" rather than doing a complex analysis of cost,
quality, and other factors.
• Heuristics save time and cognitive effort, but they can also lead to suboptimal
decisions. For example, someone who always buys the cheapest option may
end up with lower quality products that don't meet their needs.
• Heuristics help people cut through the noise and make decisions quickly, even
if they're not always perfect.
• Default choices are the options that are automatically selected unless a person
actively chooses something different.
• They're often used in things like workplace retirement plans, car and home insurance
policies, and financial investment portfolios.
• And they matter because research has shown that people are often more likely to stick
with the default option, even if it's not necessarily the best choice for them.
• For example, if a retirement plan automatically enrolls people with a contribution rate
of 3% of their salary, many will stick with that rate even if they could afford to
contribute more and benefit from a higher rate of return in the long run.
• Nudging people towards a different default option - known as "choice architecture" or
"libertarian paternalism" - can be a powerful way to influence behaviour.
• Social norms are collectively held beliefs or customs about what kind of
behaviour is appropriate in each situation
• Examples of social norms:
• Changing the social stigma of drink-driving and speeding
• Queuing behaviour in shops and queuing to enter events
• Impact on behaviour of smoking bans in all public places
• Making seat-belts compulsory – this created conventions which then
became self-sustaining
• Maintaining social distancing and wearing a mask during the pandemic
• Altruism is a term for the act of being selfless and doing something to benefit others, without
expecting anything in return. It can influence behaviour in several ways:
• Social norms: People are often motivated to be altruistic because they want to conform to
social norms and be seen as kind and generous.
• Empathy: When people feel empathy for others, they may be more likely to act altruistically to
help alleviate their suffering.
• Prosocial behaviour: a broad term that describes any action or behavior that benefits others
or society. It can include acts of kindness, cooperation, and generosity, as well as helping
behaviours like volunteering, donating to charity, or advocating for social causes.
• Reciprocity: Altruistic behavior can create a sense of reciprocity and encourage others to act in
a similar manner. It can foster a culture of cooperation and mutual support.
• The ultimatum game is designed to study how people make decisions when there’s an element
of negotiation involved.
• One player (the proposer) is given a sum of money, let’s say $100, and they have to offer a
portion of it to another player (the responder).
• The responder then must decide whether to accept or reject the offer. If they accept, they get
the amount offered, and the proposer gets the remainder. If the responder rejects the offer,
neither player gets anything! This creates a dilemma for both players.
• The proposer wants to offer as little as possible, while still making an offer that the responder
will accept, and the responder must weigh the value of getting something against their
feelings of fairness and how much they feel they “deserve.”
• It turns out that people often reject offers that they perceive as unfair, even if it means they
walk away empty-handed.
• Researchers find that proposers tend to offer around 40-50% of the total sum,
and responders tend to reject offers that are lower than around 30%.
• People seem to have a strong sense of fairness and equity, even if it means
they miss out on some cash.
• Interestingly, there are cultural differences in how people play the game -
some cultures tend to make higher offers, and some cultures are more likely to
reject lower offers.
• This has led some researchers to argue that cultural norms and values play a
big role in how people make economic decisions!
* A Altruistic
* B Boundedly rational
* C Satisficers
* A Ceteris paribus
* B Homo economicus
* C Adam Smith-ite
* D Homo sapien