4.UMTS RF Channel Fault Detection and Rectification Factors of Impact + Troubleshooting Methods and Tools + Deliverables
4.UMTS RF Channel Fault Detection and Rectification Factors of Impact + Troubleshooting Methods and Tools + Deliverables
2012-07-31
Page 2
Change History
Date Version Description Reviewer Author
Zhang Junjie
Qi Haofeng, Cui Chengxiao, Liu Qiong
2012-7-31 Ver 1.0 Completed the draft. Tang Yuanxian, Wu Wentao, Zhang Qiong
and Hu Wensu Zhang Xianghua
Yi Siwei
Page 5
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential
Channel Definition
Channels are divided into three
segments, as shown in the figure on
the right.
Air-interface channel: path from a UE to
the antenna of a NodeB
Antenna channel: path from the antenna of
the NodeB to the TRX board of the NodeB
Intra-TRX channel: the transmitter and
receiver inside the TRX board
Note 3: Common information for identifying RTWP imbalance includes main and diversity RTWP information.
The criteria for measuring the quality of downlink channels are the standing
wave ratio and transmit power.
The standing wave ratio and transmit power problems can be identified based on alarms and measurement
data.
RTWP Uplink channel Air-interface channel External interference Space characteristics: Regional external interference and site
problems problems exists interference
Time characteristics: intermittent interference and continuous
interference
Signal characteristics: inter-system interference
Antenna channel Engineering Intermodulation interference, incorrect antenna and feeder connection,
problems and damage of antenna and feeder components caused by poor
antenna and feeder quality
Intra-TRX channel Incorrect RF channel configurations: affect the RTWP of all carriers on the RF
configurations channel and include the channel attenuation configuration,
interconnection mode, distributed sector, and single-antenna/dual-
antenna mode
Carrier configurations: affect the RTWP of a carrier and include the initial
RTWP value and desensitization intensity on the carrier channel
Hardware failure Hardware failure of the RF module includes hardware failure alarm
generated on the RF module
Service capacity Air-interface channel Service capacity Heavy traffic impact, version upgrade, feature deployment, and
problems problems interference between neighboring cells
Downlink Standing wave ratio Antenna channel Engineering Standing wave ratio problems caused by poor antenna and feeder
channel problems problems quality.
problems
TRX hardware failure Intra-TRX channel Hardware failure Hardware failure inside the TRX module includes alarm generated for
abnormal transmit channel gain or alarm generated for hardware failure
of the RF module.
Power matching / Engineering The power in swap scenarios does not match the power on original
problems problems networks.
standards on deliverable Step 3. Check possible causes for the RTWP problem. Confirm Checklist:
the operations. Action 10
output.
Checklist:
Step 4. End the problem and output a report. Action 11
Step 1 Action 2: Analyze RNC/NodeB Analyze whether RTWP changes are caused by external operations such as swap,
indexes change.
operation logs. upgrade, reset, or expansion.
Analyze whether the RTWP changes are caused by sudden external events (such as
Action 3: Check sudden factors. indexes change.
traffic increase) and bad weather.
Action 4: Check equipment faults
No condition. Check whether hardware failure occurs.
and alarms.
Action 5: Subdivide problem
causes 1: Analyze the RTWP
Cells need to be analyzed. Analyze possible causes for the problem based on the traffic measurement data.
traffic measurement data in
detail.
Step 2
Action 6: Subdivide problem The main and diversity RTWP information
Analyze possible causes for the problem based on the main and diversity RTWP
causes 2: Analyze the main and needs to be analyzed if the problem is not
symptoms.
diversity RTWP information in solved based on traffic measurement
detail. RTWP analysis.
The analysis results of actions 5 and 6
Action 7: Check parameter
indicate that the problem may be a Check whether the parameter settings are correct.
settings.
configuration problem.
The analysis results of actions 5 and 6
Action 8: Check the antenna and Check whether the antenna and feeder have engineering quality problems, such as
indicate that the problem may be caused
feeder quality. intermodulation interference, incorrect antenna and feeder connection, or cable break.
by poor antenna and feeder quality.
The analysis results of actions 5 and 6
Steps 3 and 4 Action 9: Check external
indicate that the problem may be caused Check whether external interference exists.
interference.
by external interference.
The analysis results of actions 5 and 6
Action 10: Check interference indicate that the problem may be caused
Check whether interference between neighboring cells exists.
between neighboring cells. by interference between neighboring
cells.
Action 11: Check capacity The RTWP problem persists after the Check whether the problem is a capacity problem. See the capacity-related topic UMTS
problems. preceding actions are performed. Network Planning and Optimization: Processes + Principles + Tools + Deliverables.
Noise floor analysis: Obtain the noise floor values of multiple carrier cells of the same RF module and obtain the MinRTWP value without
subscribers for analysis.
Note: The minimum RTWP in the RNC traffic measurement is -112.1 dBm. If the NodeB is ever reset or the reported value is
lower than -112 dBm, the value may be -112.1 dBm. If a cell has the value -112.1 dBm occasionally, it is a normal case.
Configuration problems (RF
Check configuration
channel configurations), 60%
Data analysis method: Provide possible causes
problems (described
later) for the problem based on the method in the left
Hardware failure of the RF module, 30%
Too low figure.
1. Noise (lower)
(Non-RF channel configuration problems) Data analysis principle: Problems occurring on
floor
analysis Same for Nor the antenna channel and the intra-TRX channel
(Obtain Configuration problems (RF channel
all cells mal
the noise configurations), 50% are generally shown in all co-antenna or co-RF
floor of Too high Engineering problems module cells. This principle applies to all data
cells with (higher) (intermodulation Intermodulation
the test for sources. However, this principle does not apply
interference), 10%
problem confirmation to the intermodulation interference within the
and Co- External interference, 30%
RF antenna channel because the intermodulation
module interference may not hit configured frequencies.
Non-RF channel configuration problems/hardware failure
cells:
obtain the The value is Note: The sum of all distribution ratios is not
too low or too Configuration problems (carrier configurations), 20%
minRTWP
high for 100% because other causes may exist.
value in a
certain cells. Engineering problems (intermodulation interference), 30%
certain Note: Distributed cells cause a fixed noise floor,
period.)
External interference, 40% Spectrum scanning namely, △RTWP = Increase of 10log(N)dB.
for confirmation
If the RTWP External interference, 10%. You can check The RTWP changes are unrelated to the
varies with the whether the protection zone is too narrow or subscriber quantity; the problem may be caused
subscriber the GSM/UMTS frequency distance is too by external interference.
quantity of cells, small during GSM/UMTS refarming by
2. the RTWP is scanning frequencies or through tracing
Relationship high when the with finer granularity.
between the subscriber
RTWP quantity is large.
Service capacity problems (such as heavy
changes and
traffic and neighboring cell interference),
subscriber
10%
quantity: If the
noise floor
RTWP is
normal, the
RTWP is high
when services If the RTWP External interference, 70%
are used. changes are not The RTWP changes are unrelated to the subscriber
closely related to quantity because the service behavior of a neighbor cell is
the subscriber Engineering problems the same as that of the local cell.
quantity of a cell, (intermodulation interference),
there is no rule 20%. For example, the
for RTWP intermodulation interference of
changes. cells that share the same antenna
and feeder but use different
systems does not show the
service behavior of the local cell.
Note: The RTWP traffic measurement data does not include main and diversity information;
therefore, you cannot check and identify all fault modes and must locate the problem in
combination with the main and diversity RTWP information.
The trends of the main and diversity RTWP are the same, with a fixed
difference N dB. The reflections on all carriers are the same. The channel
Are the reflections on all attenuation is improper.
carriers the same?
are the same, (Y) Antenna channel amplifier or attenuator problems, are mutually complementary.
with a fixed 15% The trends of the main and diversity RTWP are different
and no similar neighboring cell is available. The antenna
1. The difference. Engineering problems (abnormal sector system may be faced with intermodulation interference.
difference interconnection and cross-connection) that can
The trends of the
between be identified based on neighboring cells, 40%
main and
the main The diversity
Main(red)
RTWP
signals
of cell
areAfaced
= Diversity
with interference,
RTWP of cell butB.the main signals are
diversity RTWP Engineering problems (intermodulation not faced with
Diversity
interference.
RTWP of Thecell3G
A =antenna
Main RTWP
is radiated
of cellby
B. the 2G repeater
and antenna of another operator in a short distance. The 3G antenna uses space
are different (not interference), 45%
diversity diversity, but the main antenna is far away from the 2G antenna.
related or loosely
RTWP is External interference (external polarization interference
related). The main or diversity RTWP has no fluctuation, and the
large. (only the main or diversity signals are interfered)), 10% interconnection mode is not configured.
(Obtain the
data of the Configuration problems (interconnection mode and a
cells with single-antenna cell is configured as a dual-antenna
the The main or cell), 60%
problem diversity RTWP
and co-RF has no fluctuation Hardware failure of the RF module (channel fault alarm and
module cable damage), 20%
cells.)
Note 1: This step applies to fault modes that require comparison between the main and diversity RTWP data, for example, antenna and feeder intermodulation
interference, incorrect antenna and feeder connection or antenna and feeder failure, configuration problems, and external interference. A tool is available. The
document describes how to use the tool later.
Note 2: The sum of all ratios is not 100% because other causes may exist.
Continually Configuration problem (incorrect The RTWP is high all the day, which may be
The main and diversity RTWP is too high
high RTWP configurations for the two caused by external interference.
2. The main all the day, which may be caused by
channels), 30%
and diversity incorrect configurations or external
RTWP trends The service capacity is interference.
are the same, continually high (The probability
but high is slim. Observe the service Intermittent interference occurs regularly in
RTWP or capacity in combination with the a period of a day.
peak RTWP traffic measurement), 5%
exists. Short-time
External intermittent interference, Check other TRX cells served by the same RF module.
peak RTWP
50% It is found that their behaviors are the same, which
further verifies that the possible causes are incorrect
Service capacity problems, 40% configurations. The checking results show that the
problem is caused by incorrect configurations.
Configuration problems (incorrect configurations of the
3. The main
channel attenuation and cross-connection mode), 60%
and diversity
RTWP trends
are the same,
but the
RTWP is too Hardware failure of the intra-TRX channel (alarm
low. generated for the excessively low RTWP), 30%
Note 1: As compared with the traffic measurement data, the reporting granularity of main and diversity RTWP data is finer. You can analyze the
signal rule (whether the signal rules on multiple sites are the same) to identify whether external interference exists.
Note 2: For a problem about high RTWP or peak RTWP, if you still cannot locate the cause after excluding configuration, interference, and
intermodulation problems, you can check capacity problems by referring to the X-Board Axe Network Planning and Optimization (Including
Capacity).
Currently, the RTWP log analysis tool can be used to check cross-connections between
sectors, intermodulation between cells, low main or diversity RTWP, small RTWP
fluctuation of a single diversity, and large difference between main and diversity RTWP.
The RTWP log analysis tool cannot detect reverse connection of an entire sector,
simultaneous intermodulation of the main and diversity cells, and intermodulation of
single-antenna reception cells.
Engineering problems:
Parameter MML (R12) MML (R13) Impact Range Check Point or Recommended Value
RF channel LST RXATTEN DSP RXBRANCH RF channel Set this parameter based on the TMA installation and feeder
attenuation value connection. Generally, channel attenuation value TMA gain-
feeder loss.
RTWP Initial DSP DSP RXBRANCH Carrier This parameter is typically set to 0. If the value is not 0, you
RTWP value RTWPINITADJ must check the reason.
RF DSP LST RRU RF channel This parameter is typically set to 0. If the value is not 0, you
desensitization RFDESPARAM must check the reason.
value
Cell DSP DESENS DSP DESENS Carrier This parameter is typically set to 0. If the value is not 0, you
desensitization must check the reason.
intensity
Interconnection LST SEC LST SEC RF channel Set this parameter based on the physical connections and
mode check whether the hardware connection is normal.
Cell mode LST SEC LST SEC RF channel Set this parameter differently in single-antenna, dual-antenna,
and distributed scenarios.
TMA gain value LST TMAGAIN DSP RF channel Set this parameter in combination with the TMA specifications
TMASUBUNIT or the set value.
TMA mode LST TMAMODE DSP RF channel Typically, the TMA mode is Normal.
TMASUBUNIT
Current status on DSP ANTCON DSP RF channel Normally, the power switch is on and has current.
the antenna port ANTENNAPORT
Full-frequency-band
scanning result
High-definition online
carrier scanning result
ALM-26522 Alarm for RTWP/RSSI imbalance on RF receive The main RTWP is different from the diversity RTWP.
channels
ALM-26521 Alarm generated for the lower excessively low The RTWP is too low.
RTWP/RSSI on RF receive channels
ALM-26532 Alarm generated for RF module hardware failure The RTWP is abnormal and the RF module hardware
fails.
ALM-26758 Alarm generated for abnormal TMA running data The TMA gain is abnormal.
ALM-26755 Alarm generated for TMA bypass The TMA gain fails.
[Data analysis]
(1) Obtain cells with high noise floor values from the
[Data analysis]
traffic measurement data, and analyze the
(1) Obtain the main and diversity RTWP
distribution of the cells with abnormal RTWP based [Data analysis]
trends of the neighboring cells to check
on the geographical information to check whether Scan the frequencies for the cells to
whether the RTWP trends of the
Frequency scanning: the cells are faced with regional interference. obtain the frequency information
neighboring cells follow the same rule
high priority (2) Obtain the RTWP trends of the neighboring cells about the cells.
as that of the cells with the problem. If
-> from the traffic measurement data to check whether (2) Analyze the frequency
the RTWP trends follow the same rule
Traffic measurement the RTWP trends of the neighboring cells follow the information to identify interference
and comply with the characteristics of
data: medium priority same rule as that of the cells with the problem. If the characteristics.
external interference, the cells may be
RTWP trends follow the same rule and comply with [Tool]
faced with the same external
the characteristics of external interference, the cells NodeB LMT
interference.
may be faced with the same external interference.
[Tool]
MapInfo
[Tool]
NPMaster and CME
Standing wave ratio High standing wave Standing wave ratio alarm
problems ratio Standing wave ratio test
Power matching Low downlink Traffic measurement data comparison
problems coverage rate for cells before and after swap
A common problem on downlink channels is the high standing wave ratio.
Generally, the high standing wave ratio can be detected by the standing
wave check function of the NodeB or by the SiteMaster tool. In addition,
individual downlink channel hardware faults may occur. Generally, alarms
will be generated for downlink channel hardware faults.
When the standing wave ratio on downlink channels is high, certain
downlink transmit power may be lost, which may decrease the downlink
coverage capability. Therefore, the standing wave ratio of the antenna and
feeder system must comply with the specifications (typically < 1.5).
Action 2: Check the The standing wave ratio does not Check the standing wave ratio problems
standing wave ratio. meet the specifications. to rectify downlink channel faults.
In swap scenarios:
(1) Subscriber quantity
1) Obtain the traffic measurement data of a cell before and after Adjust the downlink
comparison list of cells
Action 3: Check Data source: swap. power for the cells
before and after swap
downlink power traffic 2) Compare the subscriber quantities of the cell before and after the whose subscribers
(2) Provide the check
matching measurement swap. If the subscribers obviously decrease after the swap, decrease to recover the
result for cells whose
problems. Tool: None downlink power matching problems may exist. subscriber quantity
subscribers obviously
3) Adjust the power of the cells whose subscribers obviously before the swap.
decrease.
decrease to recover the subscriber quantity before the swap.
[Data analysis]
1. Compare the subscriber quantities of a cell before and after swap
based on the traffic measurement data.
Traffic 2. If the subscriber quantity of the cell after swap is smaller than 80% of
the subscriber quantity of the cell before swap, a downlink power
measurement: high
matching problem may occur.
priority 1. Increase the pilot power and total downlink transmit power of the cell
at the same time at the increment of 1 dB. Then, compare the
subscriber quantity changes.
[Tool]
None
After locating the problem, provide the faulty cells and sites, check results, and
check experience summary according to the example in the following attachment.
Ending requirement:
Check results must be available for each faulty cell and site.
¡¾XXÏîÄ¿¡¿ÉäÆµÍ¨
µÀ¹ÊÕÏ·ÖÎö±¨¸æÄ£°åV0.3
Prescribed Data Analysis and Symptom Data Analysis Ending Action Effect
Action Conclusion
Identify whether the problem is caused Ask the customer to The customer
Check external by in-band interference or broadband External broadband identify and eliminate confirms that
interference. interference based on the GSM interference exists. the external interference
frequency scanning result. interference. exists.
Action 7: Check parameter settings: Check the configurations based on the networking diagram because it is suspected that
the problem is caused by incorrect configurations. On December 12, the RRU was removed from cell 11491, but the channel
attenuation was not reset, which caused the RTWP to increase suddenly. On December 18, the sector configurations of cell
1486 and cell 1487 were interchanged. Therefore, the noise floor values of the two cells were also interchanged. After the
sector configurations were modified, the problem was solved. Subsequent actions are not performed.
Parameter Configured Value Configured Value After Ending Result
Before Reset Reset
RF channel attenuation value 8 0 The noise floor increase of cell 11491 is caused by incorrect configurations. The
problem is solved after the configurations are modified.
File Name RRU Frame. Sec No. UL Frequency Cell ID InterCross_CheckResult >= 8 dB
D:\
606088_Hil
ton_201111 This RRU/RFU Master and Diversity
11 4-8:4-9 5 4162 28008 are consistent. 99.90%
D:\
606088_Hil
ton_201111 This RRU/RFU Master and Diversity
11 4-8:4-9 5 4138 27864 are consistent. 99.94%
Action 7: Check parameter settings: Check the configurations based on the networking diagram in priority because it
is suspected that the problem is caused by incorrect configurations.
Prescribed Action Data Analysis and Symptom Data Analysis Ending Action
Conclusion
(1) The GSM and UMTS systems are configured on
site. The GSM and UMTS use separate modules. The The problem occurs Check whether
Action 7: Check GSM and UMTS work in the main and diversity mode. because no TMA the problem is
parameter (2) The site is configured with TMAs. The GSM is attenuation factor is solved after
settings. configured with a TMA and an attenuation factor; the configured on the modifying the
UMTS is configured with a TMA, but is not configured UMTS. configurations. TMA
with an attenuation factor.
Ending result provided by frontline personnel: The main RTWP and the difference
between the main and diversity RTWP become normal after the TMA attenuation factor
on the UMTS is modified.
Subsequent actions are not performed. GSM UMTS
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 73
Case 3-2 The Diversity RTWP Is Always Low Without
Fluctuation Because the RF Interconnection Mode Is Disabled
Overview
A customer finds that the diversity RTWP of a cell is always -108 dBm.
Action 1: Identify the characteristics of the RTWP problem. This action is not required in health check.
Action 2: Check the RNC or NodeB operation logs: This action is not involved because the problem is not
caused by index changes.
Action 3: Check sudden factors. This action is not involved because the problem is not caused by index changes.
Prescribed Action Data Analysis and Symptom Data Analysis Conclusion Ending Action Effect
The GSM and UMTS systems are
Check whether the
Action 7: Check configured on site. The GSM and UMTS The problem occurs
problem is solved
parameter use separate modules. The two modules because the interconnection
after modifying the
settings. are interconnected, but the mode is not configured.
configurations.
interconnection mode is not configured.
Ending result provided by frontline personnel: The diversity RTWP becomes normal after the RF interconnection mode is set to TRUE.
Subsequent actions are not performed.
Parameter Query Result Check Point or Recommended Value
Query result Interconnection FALSE The actual networking is in the interconnection mode,
mode but the configuration is incorrect.
of parameter
settings Cell mode ANT 2 Set this parameter differently in single-antenna, dual-
antenna, and distributed scenarios.
GSM UMTS
Current status on Power supply If the power supply of the TMA is the BBU, the power
the antenna port off supply is on and has current. If the power supply of TMA
is an external power supply, the power supply is off.
Ending result provided by frontline personnel: After the antenna and feeder system connections are
checked, the RTWP becomes normal. Subsequent actions are not performed.
Action 8: Check the antenna and feeder quality: It is suspected that the antenna and feeder have
engineering quality problems. Check whether cross-connection or intermodulation exists.
Prescribed Action Data Analysis and Symptom Data Analysis Conclusion Ending Action
Ending result provided by frontline personnel: After the frontline personnel solve the antenna
and feeder problem on site, the main and diversity RTWP fluctuations of the cell become
consistent. Subsequent actions are not performed.
Ending result provided by frontline personnel: The problem is solved after the frontline personnel
check the antenna and feeder connections on site. Subsequent actions are not performed.
Prescribed Action Data Analysis and Symptom Data Analysis Ending Action
Conclusion
Check the configurations of the
NodeB. It is found that the cell is a
The noise floor increase is
Check the parameter distributed sector. The number N of
caused by the distributed None
settings. RRUs in the sector is 3; therefore, the
sector.
noise floor increase is 4.7 dB
(△RTWP = 10log(N)dB).
Ending result provided by frontline personnel: The noise floor increase is caused by the distributed
cell. Subsequent actions are not performed.
Parameter Check Result Impact Range Check Point or Recommended Value
Cell mode Distributed cell RF channel A distributed cell causes a fixed noise floor increase.
Ending result provided by frontline personnel: Frontline personnel find that the problem is caused by an incorrect
configuration management express (CME) template. This customer has interconnected sites. When new sites are deployed,
the template for interconnected sites is used by mistake. Consequently, the problem occurs on a batch of sites.
Subsequent actions are not performed.
Parameter Query Result Analysis Conclusion
Action 8: Check the antenna and feeder quality: According to the analysis
results of actions 5 and 6, this action does not need to be performed.
Action 9: Check external interference: Check interference because it is
suspected that the problem is caused by external interference.
Prescribed Action Data Analysis and Data Analysis Ending Action Effect
Symptom Conclusion
Check external
interference or
The 3G FFT frequency scanning
Check external External interference ask the customer
result shows that external
interference. exists. to confirm the
interference exists.
external
interference.
The green part in the left figure stands for -80 to -90 dBm external interference; the right
figure shows a 5 MHz broadband interference whose central frequency is M3 (1960 MHz).
Actions 8 to 11: The following table shows the results of the prescribed actions.
Prescribed Action Data Analysis and Symptom Data Analysis Conclusion Ending Action Effect
(1) Collect the RTWP logs of the sites and analyze the logs
There is no incorrect
Action 8: Check the by using the RTWP log analysis tool. The analysis result The intermodulation test
antenna and feeder
antenna and feeder shows that no cross-connection or intermodulation exists. result on UMTS cells shows
connection. Provide
quality. (2) Perform simulated downlink load test on the UMTS. The that no intermodulation exists.
summary and cases.
test result further indicates that no intermodulation exists.
There is no external
Action 9: Check external The frequency scanning result does not show obvious No external interference is
interference. Provide
interference. external interference. found.
summary and cases.
In a scenario where the subscriber quantity is small but the
1. All neighboring cells are
RTWP increase is large:
correctly configured.
1. The check result shows that all neighboring cells are 1. Adjust and optimize
Action 10: Check 2. When neighboring cells are
correctly configured. neighboring cells.
interference between blocked, the RTWP
2. The traffic measurement data of neighboring cells shows 2. Provide summary
neighboring cells. decreases. This indicates that
that the RTWP is high when the subscriber quantities of the and cases.
interference between
neighboring cells are large. This is similar to the RTWP
neighboring cells exists.
trend of the local cell.
Action 11: Check See the UMTS Network Planning and Optimization:
capacity problems. Processes + Principles + Tools + Deliverables.
Ending result provided by frontline personnel: Frontline personnel deactivate cell 21961. Then, the RTWP of cell
21873 decreases by 5 dB. This indicates that cell 21961 causes interference on cell 21873. The service capacity
problems need to be checked in the service capacity-related topic. The tasks in the channel topic are complete.
Interference whose
bandwidth is about 30 MHz
and central frequency is
1952.6 MHz.
Prescribed Action Data Analysis and Data Analysis Ending Action Effect
Symptom Conclusion
The scanning result provided by External Ask the customer to The customer confirms that
Check external the spectrum analyzer shows that broadband identify and eliminate the interference is from the
interference. broadband external interference interference the external microwave transmission of a
exists. exists. interference. police system.
A frequency is
faced with
interference and
the frequency is
where the GSM is
located.
Prescribed Action Data Analysis and Data Analysis Ending Action Effect
Symptom Conclusion
The GSM frequency scanning Optimize the network and
result shows that a frequency is The UMTS is solve the RTWP problem
Check external
faced with external interference. faced with GSM by reducing the down tilt
interference.
The frequency is a GSM interference. of the UMTS900 antenna
frequency. and feeder system.
Action 9: Check external interference. None None FFT data collection and playback: 10 min/cell
Action 10: Check interference Confirmation of missing neighboring cells or top cells:
Nastar 250 kHz
between neighboring cells. 1-3 min/cell
See the capacity-related topic UMTS Network Planning and Optimization: Processes + Principles + Tools +
Action 11: Check capacity problems.
Deliverables.
[Project xxx] RF Channel Fault Analysis Frontline problem check and analysis
Report Template V1.0 output template
Main and Diversity RTWP Log Analysis Helping analyze main and diversity
Tool RTWP problem symptoms