1-4 (6)
1-4 (6)
Responsiveness to Social
Responsibility
From Social Obligations to Responsiveness
to Responsibility
Social Obligation
• The obligation of a business to meet its economic and legal
responsibilities and nothing more.
Social Responsiveness
• The capacity of a firm to adapt to changing societal conditions
through the practical decisions of its managers in responding to
important social needs.
Social Responsibility
• A firm’s obligations as a moral agent extends beyond its legal and
economic obligations, to the pursuit of long-term goals that are
good for society.
Social obligation is when a firm engages in social actions
because of its obligation to meet certain economic and legal
responsibilities.
• The organization does what it’s obligated to do and
nothing more.
• This idea reflects the classical view of social
responsibility, which says that management’s only social
responsibility is to maximize profits.
• The most outspoken advocate of this approach is
economist and Nobel laureate Milton Friedman. He
argued that managers’ primary responsibility is to operate
the business in the best interests of the stockholders,
whose primary concerns are financial.
Socioeconomic view says that managers’ social responsibilities go
beyond making profits to include protecting and improving
society’s welfare.
• Corporations are not independent entities responsible only to
stockholders.
• Firms have a moral responsibility to larger society to become
involved in social, legal, and political issues.
• “To do the right thing”
Social responsiveness is when a company engages in social actions
in response to some popular social need. Managers are guided by
social norms and values and make practical, market-oriented
decisions about their actions.
• For example Ford Motor Company became the first automaker
to endorse a federal ban on sending text messages while driving.
• A socially responsible organization goes
beyond what it’s obligated to do or chooses to
do because of some popular social need and
does what it can to help improve society
because it’s the right thing to do.
• Social responsibility as a business’s intention,
beyond its legal and economic obligations, to
do the right things and act in ways that are
good for society.
• For example a U.S. business that meets federal
pollution control standards or that doesn’t
discriminate against employees over the age
of 40 in job promotion decisions is meeting its
social obligation because laws mandate these
actions.
• Child care facility or packaging with recycled
papers are some examples that indicate the
socially responsive organizations
Arguments For and Against Social Responsibility
For:
Public expectations
Public opinion now supports businesses pursuing economic and social goals.
Long-run profits
Socially responsible companies tend to have more secure long-run profits.
Ethical obligation
Businesses should be socially responsible because responsible actions are the right thing to do.
Public image
Businesses can create a favorable public image by pursuing social goals.
Better environment
Business involvement can help solve difficult social problems.
Stockholder interests
Social responsibility will improve a business’s stock price in the long run.
Possession of resources
Businesses have the resources to support public and charitable projects that need assistance.
Against:
Dilution of purpose
Pursuing social goals dilutes business’s primary purpose — economic
productivity.
Costs
Many socially responsible actions do not cover their costs and someone must
pay those costs.
Lack of skills
Business leaders lack the necessary skills to address social issues.
Lack of accountability
There are no direct lines of accountability for social actions
Does Social Responsibility Pay?
• Studies appear to show a positive relationship between
social involvement and the economic performance of firms.
Market Approach:
• Firms respond to the preferences of their customers for
environmentally friendly products.
Stakeholder Approach:
• Firms work to meet the environmental demands of multiple
stakeholders—employees, suppliers, and the community.
Activist Approach:
• Firms look for ways to respect and preserve environment and be
actively socially responsible.
Values Based Management
Values-Based Management:
• An approach to managing in which managers establish and
uphold an organization’s shared values.
Rights View:
• Concerned with respecting and protecting individual
liberties and privacy.
• Seeks to protect individual rights of conscience, free
speech, life and safety, and due process.
The Theory of Justice:
• Organizational rules are enforced fairly and
impartially and follow all legal rules and regulations.
– Protects the interests of underrepresented stakeholders
and the rights of employee.
Moral Development:
• A measure of independence from outside influences
– Levels of Individual Moral Development
• Preconventional level
• Conventional level
• Principled level
Labor Standards:
• Principle 3: Freedom of association and the effective recognition of
the right to collective bargaining.
• Principle 4: The elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory
labor.
• Principle 5: The effective abolition of child labor.
• Principle 6: The elimination of discrimination in respect of
employment and occupation.
Environment:
• Principle 7: Support a precautionary approach
to environmental challenges.
• Principle 8: Undertake initiatives to promote
greater environmental responsibility.
• Principle 9: Encourage the development and
diffusion of environmentally friendly
technologies.
Code of Ethics
A formal statement of an organization’s primary
values and the ethical rules it expects its
employees to follow.
• Be a dependable organizational citizen
• Don’t do anything unlawful or improper that
will harm the organization
• Be good to customers
Effective Use of Code of Ethics
• Develop a code of ethics as a guide in handling
ethical dilemmas in decision making.
• Communicate the code regularly to all employees.
• Have all levels of management continually
reaffirm the importance of the ethics code and
the organization’s commitment to the code.
• Publicly reprimand and consistently discipline
those who break the code.
How Managers Can Improve Ethical Behavior
in an Organisation?
1. Hire individuals with high ethical standards.
2. Establish codes of ethics and decision rules.
3. Lead by example.
4. Delineate job goals and performance appraisal
mechanisms.
5. Provide ethics training.
6. Conduct independent social audits.
7. Provide support for individuals facing ethical
dilemmas.
The Value of Ethics Training
1. Training in ethical problem solving can make a
difference in ethical behaviors.
2. Training in ethics increase employee awareness
of ethical issues in business decisions.
3. Ethics training clarifies and reinforces the
organization’s standards of conduct.
4. Employees become more confident that they
will have the organization’s support when
taking unpopular but ethically correct stances.
Ethical Leadership
Managers must provide a good role model by:
• Being ethical and honest at all times.
• Telling the truth; don’t hide or manipulate
information.
• Admitting failure and not trying to cover it up.
• Communicating shared ethical values to employees
through symbols, stories, and slogans.
• Rewarding employees who behave ethically and
punish those who do not.
• Protecting employees (whistleblowers) who bring to
light unethical behaviors or raise ethical issues.
Business Practices and Social Issues
Social Impact Management
• The field of inquiry at the intersection of
business practice and wider societal concerns
that reflects and respects the complex
interdependency of those two realities.
• The question of how to go about increasing
managers’ awareness within their decision-
making processes of how society is impacted
by the conduct and activities of their firms.