0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views24 pages

Criteria 5

nba c-5

Uploaded by

nandan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views24 pages

Criteria 5

nba c-5

Uploaded by

nandan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

Criteria 5

Faculty
Informatio
n&
Contributio
n
Department of
Computer Science & Engineering
Student Faculty Ratio (SFR)
No. of UG Programs in the Department: 1 No. of PG Programs in the Department: 1
B. TECH IN Computer Science & Engineering CAY(2022-23) CAYm1(2021-22) CAYm2 (2020-21)
CAY CAYm1 CAYm2 Year of Study
(2022-23) (2021-22) (2020-21) Sanction Intake Sanction Intake Sanction Intake
Year of Sanctio Lateral Sanction Lateral Sanctio Lateral
Study n Intake Entry Intake Entry n Intake entry
1st Year 18 18 18
2nd Year 180 18 180 18 120 12
3rd Year 180 18 120 12 120 12 2nd Year 18 18 18
4th Year 120 12 120 12 120 24
Sub- 480 48 420 42 360 48
Total Grand Total 36 36 36
Total 528 462 408

Department of Computer science & Engineering, C5


SFR Description CAY(2022-23) CAYm1 (2021-22) CAYm2 (2020-21)
No. of UG Programs in the Department 1 Total No. of Students in
No. of PG Programs in the Department 1 the UG Department(S) 528 462 408
Total No. of Students in
the PG Department(S) 36 36 36

Total No. of Students in 564 498 444


the Department(S)
(UG+PG)

Table 5.1.1.3: Student – Faculty Ratio (SFR) for assessment period


Description CAY(2022-23) CAYm1 (2021-22) CAYm2 (2020-21)

Total No. of Students in the


Department(S) (UG+PG) 564 498 444
No. of Faculty in
The Department(F) 30 23 24

Student Faculty
Ratio(SFR) 18.80 21.65 18.50
SFR1=S1/F1
Average SFR
SFR=(SFR1+SFR2+SFR3)/3 19.65

F=Total Number of Faculty Members in the Department (excluding first year faculty)
5.2 Faculty Cadre Proportion

Professors Associate Professors Assistant Professors


Year
Required F1 Available Required F2 Available Required F3 Available

19
CAY (2022-23) 2 6 5 0 26

16
CAYm1(2021-22) 2 2 5 0 21

14
CAYm2(2020-21) 2 2 4 0 22

Average
RF1=2 AF1=3.33 RF2=4.67 AF2=0 RF3=16.33 AF3=23.00
Numbers

C5
Department of Computer science & Engineering,
5.3 Faculty Qualifications

ACADEMIC YEAR Ph. D. M. Tech. (Y) Faculty Req. for FQ = 2.5 x [(10X
(X) 1:20 FSR (F) +4Y)/F)]

CAY (2022-23) 6 26 29 14.14

CAYm1 (2022-21) 2 21 25 10.40

CAYm2 (2021-20) 2 22 19 11.74

C5
5.4 Faculty Retention

S.NO ACADEMIC YEAR NO.OF NO. OF % of


FACULTIES FACULTY Faculty
RETAINED Retained
CAY (2022-23)
1. 23 22 95.65

CAYm1 (2021-22)
2. 24 22 91.67

CAYm2 (2020-21)
3. 21 19 90.48

AVERAGE : 92.60

C5
5.5 Innovations by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning
• The Work must be available on institute Website
 The innovative method followed by the faculty
 Awareness among the students about the Innovative method
(Exhibits are image of the method along with URL)

A. Availability of pedagogical initiatives in website:


Table 5.5.4: List of pedagogical initiatives by the faculty members
Acadenic Year: 2021-22 (CAYm1)
S. No Name of the No. of Tearching Learning Link of webpage/blog/ Google
Faculty methodologies used classroom/LMS etc.

1 Dr. A Ramamurthy 1 http://dnrcet.org/2023/cse/5.5/2021-22/1.pdf 2


Mr. B. Nandana Kumar 1 http://dnrcet.org/2023/cse/5.5/2021-22/2.pdf
3 Mr. L Bujji Babu 1 http://dnrcet.org/2023/cse/5.5/2021-22/3.pdf
4 Mrs. P Lalitha Rajeswari 1 http://dnrcet.org/2023/cse/5.5/2021-22/4.pdf
5 Mr. K S R Prasad 1 http://dnrcet.org/2023/cse/5.5/2021-22/5.pdf

C5
• The work must be available for peer review and critique
 Peer reviews screenshots
 No. of view by the different stakeholders

• The work must be reproducible and developed further by other scholars


 Google Scholar, Research Gate, etc., Reads, Views, Citations for the faculty scholar work and its screenshots
• Statement of clear goals, use of appropriate methods, significance of results, effective presentation and reflective
critique
 Usage of ICT facilities for innovative teaching
 Circulars
 Instructional method followed
 Assessment
 Evaluation
Table 5.5.7: Faculty Innovations use of appropriate methods & reflective critique
https://dnrcet.org/web/departments/cse/vision-mission/
1 Software Architecture & Design Pattern https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcvT1bCEUU8
2 MEFA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZNdPVXMz5M
3 CNS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPA2IeFAMTc
4 Compiler Design https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awNHLlO_ayk
5 DataBase Management Systems https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nf1U8me1yFM
6 OOAD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-8EYJEVJB4
7 UNIX https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2lJgVz7JI0
8 Software Engineering https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVZpsVN1K9k
9 Python Programming https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-k0ILYOFqL0
10 M FCS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AU2awohfxPQ
11 MC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZWTe4tf_80
12 CNS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1O6pV0BLtcE
13 Web Technologies https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sTKXN5cbJI
14 Software Project Management https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-sOY9bRqig
5.6 Faculty as participants in Faculty development/training activities/STTPs

Average Assessment over 3 years:31.72

Sum 121 118 95


RF(20:1) 22 19 22
Assessment(3*(Sum/0.5RF)) 33 37.26 24.91

C5
5.7 Research and Development
Number of quality publications in refereed/SCI Journals Faculty Publications:
5.7.1 Academic Research (10)
Table 5.7.1.2: Faculty publications during assessment period (academic year – wise)
Academic Year CAYm1(2021- 22) CAYm2(2020- 21) CAYm3(2019- 20)

No. of 9 7 6
publications

S No. Name of the Faculty CAYm1 (2021-22) CAYm2 (2020-21) CAYm3 (2019-20)

1 Dr. A Ramamurthy 4 2 2
2 Dr. B V S Varma 5 4 1
3 Mr. K S R Prasad - - 1
4 Mr. D D D Suribabu - - 2
5 Mr. E. Yohoshva - 1 -
1.Sponsored Research (5) I
Academic Year: 2021-22(CAYm1)

Project Title Duration Funding Agency Amount

AICTE-SPICES 3 Months AICTE 100000.00

Total Amount(X):100000.00
5.7.3 Development Activities (10)
• Product Development:
Apart from the products and prototypes developed by the students as part of their mini projects and main projects, the faculty
members of the department are collaborating with AICTE on many product developments. Following are the details of the
products developed by the department faculty:
Faculty Name Product Name
Dr. B.V.S.Varma Parental Control Application
Dr. A. Ramamurthy College Students Communications
Mr. B. Nandan Kumar Women Safety App

• Research Laboratories
• Instruction materials
• Working models/charts/monograms
5.7.4 Consultancy (from Industry) (5) Institute Marks:5.00
Table 5.7.4 Details of consultancy done in the department in assessment period

Academic Year: 2021-22 (CAYm1)

Project Title Duration Funding Agency Amount

UR NATIVE ANGULAR JAC 3 MONTHS KURAGAYALAKOTTU.COM 425000.00


5.8 Faculty Performance Appraisal and Development System (FPADS)
5.9 Visiting/Adjunct/ Emeritus Faculty etc. (10/10)

S. No Name of the Visiting Faculty


1 Dr. Padma Raju G. V.
2 Dr. M. M. Naidu
3 Dr. Madhu Murthy

You might also like