FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS
FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS
ACCOUNTING
PROGRAMME: ODBMC II
Semester: One
1. Ratio analysis.
2. Vertical analysis.
3. Horizontal analysis.
4. Industry comparison.
5. Trend analysis.
1. RATIO ANALYSIS.
Ratio analysis is one of the most important tools for evaluation of financial
statements. It is important to note that an analyst would be interested in gauging the
overall performance and position of the company and not necessarily only the
profitability.
• Horizontal analysis spotlights trends and establishes relationships between items that appear on the
same row of a comparative statement. Horizontal analysis discloses changes on items in financial
statements over time.
•Each item (such as sales) on a row for one fiscal period is compared with the same item in a
different period. Horizontal analysis can be carried out in terms of changes in dollar amounts, in
percentages of change, or in a ration format.
•This indicates comparison of financial statements of a company for the current period with the
previous periods as well as with other companies in the same industry.
Example.
4. INDUSTRY COMPARISON
•Trend analysis involves comparison of a firm’s present ratio with its past and
expected future ratios to determine whether the company’s financial position is
improving or deteriorating over time. Horizontal analysis is an example of trend
analysis.
•A horizontal analysis involves comparing financial ratios or line items in a
financial statement over a period of time. The time analyzed is generally chosen
based on the purpose of analysis. This technique is also referred to as comparative
analysis.
For example, management takes decision based on whether sales are
increasing. But considered alone, this fact may not be very helpful.
•The information that may be pertinent is
•i) Whether the sales have increased compared to the last year?
•ii) If so, by how much percentage has it increased?
LIMITATIONS OF RATIOS ANALYSIS.
A lot of problems are encountered while using the tool of ratio analysis
for assessing the performance of an entity. Some of these problems are
as follows:
1. Ratio analysis is not a very useful tool to determine the future prospects of an
entity.
This is because ratio analysis is generally performed on historical data. Also, the
future prospects of the company depend on various assumptions made by an entity,
relating to sales forecast, investments to be made, etc. Furthermore, there is a time
lag between the period of the financial statements and the time when the financial
statements are published and available for analysis. This would make the ratio
analysis outdated.
2. The ratios can be distorted due to inflation, use of different bases for
valuing assets, or specific price changes. These shortcomings are
basically on account of the limitations of historical cost accounting.
3. Changes in the accounting policies and practices of a company and
differences in accounting policies and practices between two entities
may lead to an incorrect comparison of ratios. If there is a change in
method of depreciation from straight line to reducing balance, the ratios
which are calculated using these figures would also be affected. Another
example is the difference in the basis of valuation of inventory (LIFO,
FIFO or weighted average).
4. Companies may have different accounting periods, due to
which ratio analysis in which the performance of these
companies are compared may not be realistic.
5. There are differences of opinion regarding the various variables used
to compute ratios. For example, the capital gearing ratio can be
calculated as a relation between the long-term debts and: the total long-
term funds (equity + long-term debts) of a company, or the
shareholders’ funds of a company.
6. Entities sometimes apply creative accounting in order to show a good
financial performance or position which can be misleading to the users
of financial accounting. At such times, ratio analysis may not show the
correct position.
7. Ratio analysis in which the performance of an entity is compared with
the industry average may not be possible if the information relating to
industry average not available.