Screening Final Presentation 3
Screening Final Presentation 3
DR SAMANTHASRI
DR KARUNYA
1st year postgraduates,
Department of Community
Medicine.
GUIDE - DR.KRISHNA PRASANTH
1
Asst Professor,SBMCH
OVERVIEW
Iceberg Phenomenon Concept of lead time
of disease Screening v/s
Definition diagnostic tests
process of screening Types of screening
Concept of screening Uses of screening
Criteria for screening
test
References
2
BASIS OF SCREENING
BASIS OF SCREENING
Iceberg phenomenon of
disease
tip of the iceberg
CLINICAL DISEASE
submerged portion
HIDDEN BURDEN OF
DISEASE
3
DEFINITION
do not”
Screening is an active search made for -detecting the hidden
disease among apparently healthy individuals in the community by
means of rapidly applied test
5
6
AIMS & OBJECTIVES
8
CONCEPT OF SCREENING
Wide population
Minimal expenditure
Minimal time
Requires less physicians time. In fact the physician is
not required to administer the test, but only to
interpret it
9
Lead Time
First
Disease onset Final critical Usual time of
possible
detection diagnosis diagnosis OUTCOME
point
B
Screening time
Lead time
A – usual outcome of the disease
B – advantage gained by early detection of the disease 11
12
ERRORS WITH SCREENING
13
14
2. LENGTH TIME BIAS
Diseases with a long pre-clinical phase are more likely to be
detected during screening. Moreover, pre-clinical phase for
the same disease may be variable in different individuals .
15
Example
A patient selected with slowly progressing disease are
more likely to be detected during screening
fast progressing disease are not detected by screening
16
17
17
• Screening test - specific technology used to help identify persons with
unrecognized disease or unrecognized risk factors for disease.
• Diagnostic test - use of clinical and/ or laboratory procedures to confirm
the existence of disease or true abnormality in patients with signs and
symptoms presumed to be caused by the disease.
mammogram for ca breast( screening test)
positive
1. MASS SCREENING
22
TYPES OF SCREENING- contd..
4.MULTIPHASIC SCREENING -Two or more screening
tests in combination to a large no of people at one time
than to carry out separately for single disease.
23
TYPES OF SCREENING- contd..
5. MULTISTAGIC SCREENING
When multiple screening tests are applied in stages to screen for a single
disease .
Example: In TB, 1st Monteux test is done if it is positive then chest x-
ray, if positive findings then sputum test .
24
TYPES OF SCREENING- contd..
25
USES OF SCREENING
26
USES OF SCREENING- contd..
27
CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
1. DISEASE
Should be an important health problem(prevalence should be
high)
Detectable and long preclinical stage of disease
Adequately understood natural history of disease
Appropriate test available for early detection of disease
28
CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
Facilities for diagnosis of disease
29
CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
2. SCREENING TEST
Simplicity
Acceptable
Yielding
Validity
Reliable
30
SIMPLICITY
31
ACCECPTABLE
32
YIELDING
➢Observer variation.
➢Biological variation
➢Errors relating to technical methods.
34
SCREENING TEST (CONT) :
Observer variation :
Intra observer: This is variation between repeated
observations by the same observer on the same subject
or material at the same time.
Intra-observer variation can be minimized by taking the
average of several replicate measurements
35
Inter observer: This is variation between different
observers on the same subject or material.
Common in – X-rays, ECG, histo-pathological
specimens, BP readings etc.
we therefore need to be able to express the extent of
agreement in quantitative terms
36
Biological variation :
Intra subject variation : Is the variation in the results
of a test conducted
over a short period of time on the same individual
The difference is due to changes (such as
physiological ,environmental etc.,)
occurring to that individual over that time period.
37
SCREENING TEST (CONT) :
Errors in technical method: variations inherent in the
method
Defective instruments.
Errors in calibration.
Faulty reagents.
Test itself may be inappropriate or unreliable.
38
VALIDITY
Components of VALIDITY:
SENSITIVITY
SPECIFICITY
39
CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
40
REFERENCE
41
42