Fractures of the LL and Management
Fractures of the LL and Management
Dr Tom Sough
Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgeon
Dept. Of Surgery
University of Abuja
Learning objectives
• To define the anatomical region of the lower
limb
• To understand fractures of the lower limbs
and their mechanisms
• To differentiate between various types of
fractures possible in the lower limb
• To outline treatment of the common ones
What region of the body is the lower
limb?
• For the sake of this lecture, we will focus on
fractures of the:
- Femur
- Tibia/fibular
- Foot
Review of General Principles of
fracture management
• First aid
• Resuscitation
• Clinical assessment
• Classification of fracture
• Reduction of fracture
• Immobilization of fracture
• Rehabilitation
• Watch out for complications
Fractures of the femur
• Divisions of the • Methods of
bone treatment
• Proximal • Cast
femur:Neck and • Traction
head • External fixation
• Shaft • Internal fixation
• Distal femur • Why your
Decision???
Fracture Neck of femur
• Relatively common • Will discuss
• Most common in important aspects
the elderly of the fracture
• Clinical assessment
and early
treatment very
important
Anatomy of the proximal femur
• Physeal closure age 16
• Neck-shaft angle
130° ± 7°
• Anteversion
10° ± 7°
• Calcar Femorale
Posteromedial
dense plate of bone
Blood Supply
• Lateral epiphysel artery
– terminal branch MFC artery
– predominant blood supply to
weight bearing dome of head
• Artery of ligamentum teres
– from obturator artery
– supplies anteroinferior head
• Lateral femoral circumflex a.
– less contribution than MFC
Blood Supply
• fracture displacement=vascular disruption
• revascularization of the head
– intact vessels
– vascular ingrowth across fracture site
• importance of quality of reduction
– metaphyseal vessels
Classification fractures of the
femoral neck
• Pauwels [1935]
– Angle describes vertical shear vector
Classification
• Garden [1961]
I Valgus impacted or
incomplete
II Complete I II
Non-displaced
III Complete
Partial displacement
IV Complete
Full displacement
** Portends risk of AVN and
Nonunion III IV
Classification
• Functional Classification
– Stable
• Impacted (Garden I)
• Non-displaced (Garden II)
– Unstable
• Displaced (Garden III and IV)
Treatment
• Goals
– Improve outcome over natural history
– Minimize risks and avoid complications
– Return to pre-injury level of function
– Provide cost-effective treatment
Treatment
• Options
– Non-operative
• very limited role
• Activity modification
• Skeletal traction
– Operative
• ORIF
• Hemiarthroplasty
• Total Hip Replacement
Treatment
Decision Making Variables
• Patient Characteristics
– Young (arbitrary physiologic age < 65)
• High energy injuries
– Often multi-trauma
• High Pauwels Angle (vertical shear pattern)
– Elderly
• Lower energy injury
• Comorbidities
• Pre-existing hip disease
• Fracture Characteristics
– Stable
– Unstable
Treatment
Young Patients
(Arbitrary physiologic age < 65)
– Non-displaced fractures
• At risk for secondary displacement
• Urgent ORIF recommended
– Displaced fractures
• Patients native femoral head best
• AVN related to duration and degree of
displacement
• Irreversible cell death after 6-12 hours
• Emergent ORIF recommended
Treatment
Elderly Patients
• Operative vs. Non-operative
– Displaced fractures
• Unacceptable rates of mortality, morbidity, and poor outcome
with non-operative treatment
– Non-displaced fractures
• Unpredictable risk of secondary displacement
– AVN rate 2X
– Standard of care is operative for all femoral neck fractures
Hemi
ORIF
THR
Intertrochanteric Femur
• Intertrochanteric
Femur
– Extra-capsular
femoral neck
– To inferior border
of the lesser
trochanter
Incidence
• 90% >65y/o
• F>M
• Peak @ 80y/o
Etiology
• Osteoperosis
• High Energy
– Rare
Prevention
• Fall Prevention
• Involved Extremity
– Short
– External Rotated
Radiographs
• Plain Films
– AP Pelvis
– Cross
Table Lateral
Radiographs
• Plain Films
– AP Pelvis
– Cross
Table Lateral
Perioperative Medical Management
• Multiple Classifications
– Stable vs Unstable
Classification
• Stable
• Resists Medial &
Compressive Loads
• With Anatomic
reduction and
fixation
Classification
• Unstable
• Collapses in varus
or shaft
medializes
despite anatomic
reduction with
fixation
Treatment options
• Non-operative
• Operative
Implant Options
• Compression Hip
Screw & Side Plate
– Controlled Impaction
of Fracture
– Higher Angles Greater
Tendency for
Impaction
Implant Options
• Intramedullary Sliding
Hip Screw
– Decreased Implant
Bending Strain
– Potential Percutaneus
Technique
– Inter Troch Shaft
– Reverse Obliquity
– Pathologic Shaft
Fracture
Femoral Shaft Fractures
Femur Fractures
• Common injury due to major violent trauma
• 1 femur fracture/ 10,000 people
• More common in people < 25 yo or >65 yo
• Femur fracture leads to reduced activity for 107
days, the average length of hospital stay is 25 days
• Motor vehicle, motorcycle, auto-pedestrian,
aircraft, and gunshot wound accidents are most
frequent causes
Anatomy
• Long tubular bone, anterior bow, flair at femoral
condyles
• Blood supply
– Metaphyseal vessels
– Single nutrient artery in diaphysis enters through the
linea aspera
– Nutrient artery communicates with medullary arteries
in intramedullary canal
– Medullary arteries supply 2/3 of endosteal blood
supply
Femur Fractures
Gluteal muscles
Iliopsoas leads to
flexion of the
proximal fragment
• Operative choice
IM Nail Plate
D D
D = distance
from force to
implant The bending moment for
the plate is greater due to
the force being applied
over a larger distance
Femur Fracture
Management
• Antegrade nailing is still the gold standard
– Highest union rates with reamed nails
– Extraarticular starting point
– Refined technique
• Antegrade nailing problems:
– Varus alignment of proximal fractures
– Trendelenburg gait
– Can be difficult with obese or multiply injured patients
Femur Fracture
Complications
• Hardware failure
• Nonunion - less than 1-2%
• Malunion - shortening, malrotation,
angulation
• Infection
• Neurologic, vascular injury
• Heterotopic ossification
Femur Fracture
Nonunion
Femoral
nonunion
with broken
IM Nail
Union after
exchange,
reamed
IM nail
Subtrochanteric fractures
are from the base of the
lesser trochanter to 5 cm
distal
Low Subtroch Fx’s
• Distal femur
anatomy
• Trapezoidal shape
• Intercondylar notch
• Lateral Epicondyle
larger
Supracondylar Femur Fractures
» Reconstruction of the
articular surface and
III
II
Classification:
Schatzker
IV
VI
V
Urgent Management
• Rule out compartmental syndrome
• Provide temporary external stabilization
– Relieves pain
– Stabilizes bone and soft tissues
• Consider spanning external fixation if:
– Complex fracture pattern
– Large amount of shortening
– Soft tissue conditions or other injuries make
immediate ORIF unsafe
Surgical Indicatons
• Open Fracture – I&D, spanning ex-fix
• Extensive soft tissue contusion – spanning ex-
fix
• Closed fracture
– Varus/valgus instability of the knee
– Varus or valgus tilt of the proximal tibia
– Meniscal injury/previous mensicectomy
– Articular displacement or gapping???
Should You Operate on These
Fractures?
• 4 compartments of leg
• Canal expands and
cortex thins
proximally and
distally at
metaphyseal-
diaphyseal junctions
• Blood supply via single
nutrient artery and periosteal
arteries
Physical Exam
• Pain, inability to bear weight, and deformity may
be seen
• Local swelling and edema variable
• 5-15%
• HISTORY
– Hi-Energy
– Crush
Nerve is the Tissue most Sensitive to
Ischemia
• Intramedullary nail
• External Fixation
Advantages of IM Nail
• Advantages include
less malunion and less
shortening than closed
treatment or ex-fix