3 the Multiple Regression Model- CLASS VERSION- QMF
3 the Multiple Regression Model- CLASS VERSION- QMF
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Estimating the Parameters of the Multiple
Regression Model
5.3 Sampling Properties of the Least Squares
Estimators 5.1, 5.5 and 5.8 are
5.4 Interval Estimation important; new concepts
are introduced.
5.5 Hypothesis Testing 5.2 – 5.4 are repeat of first
5.8 Measuring Goodness-of-fit two lectures; technical
details are not needed for
assessment
5.1.1
The Economic
Model
β2 is the change in monthly sales SALES ($1000) when the
price index PRICE is increased by one unit ($1), and
advertising expenditure ADVERT is held constant
SALES SALES
2
PRICE ADVERT held constant PRICE
5.1.2b
The
MR5. The values of each xtk are not random and are not
exact linear functions of the other explanatory variables
– otherwise, we would have collinearity problem
MR6.
yi ~ N (1 2 xi 2 K xiK ), 2 ei ~ N (0, 2 )
Principles of Econometrics, 4th
Chapter 5: The Multiple Regression Model Page 7
Edition
5.2
Estimating the Parameters of the
Multiple Regression Model
Eq. 5.5 i 1
N
yi β1 β 2 xi 2 β3 xi 3
2
i 1
5.5.2a
Testing for
Elastic Demand
5.5.2a
Testing for
Elastic Demand
To see if demand is price-elastic, set price-
inelastic as null:
1. The null and alternative hypotheses are:
H 0 : 2 0 (demand is unit-elastic or inelastic)
3. At a 5% significance
t.05,72 level, we reject H0 if t
≤ -1.666 (= ) or if the p-value ≤ 0.05
Principles of Econometrics, 4th
Chapter 5: The Multiple Regression Model Page 21
Edition
5.5
Hypothesis Is demand price elastic?
Testing
5.5.2a
Testing for
Elastic Demand
Hypothesis test (Continued) :
4. The test statistic is:
b2 7.908
t 7.215
se b2 1.096
5.5.3
Hypothesis
Testing for a
Linear
Combination of
Coefficients
The marketing adviser claims that dropping the
price by 20 cents will be more effective for
increasing sales revenue than increasing
advertising expenditure by $500
– In other words, she claims that -0.2β2 > 0.5β3,
or -0.2β2 - 0.5β3> 0
– We want to test a hypothesis about the linear
combination -0.2β2 - 0.5β3
5.5.3
Hypothesis
Testing for a
As before:
Linear
Combination of
Coefficients
1. The null and alternative hypotheses are:
H 0 : 0.2β 2 0.5β3 0 (marketer's claim is not correct)
5.5.3
Hypothesis We need the standard error:
Testing for a
Linear
Combination of
se(−0.2𝑏 2 −0.5𝑏
Coefficients
Consistent with P t72 1.622 0.055, a p value > 0.05
SSE
1 implies
SST 0 ≤ R2 ≤ 1
N 2
ˆ
e
Eq. 5.31 1 i 1 i
i 1 yi y
N 2
Interpretation
– 44.8% of the variation in sales revenue is
explained by the variation in price and by the
variation in the level of advertising expenditure
– 55.2% of the variation in revenue is left
unexplained and is due to variation in the error
term