Lesson 4 Internal Environment Analysis
Lesson 4 Internal Environment Analysis
2
The Internal Organization:
In this lecture we will discuss …..
• One of the few firms with more than 100 years of existence
• Historically committed to innovation
– Slogan: The Spirit of Innovation. That’s 3M.
– Relied on skills of scientists and engineers.
– 15% Rule
– 30-plus core technologies basis for > 55,000 products
– Post it Notes, Scotch tape …
– Historically 1/3 annual sales from products introduced into marketplace in most
recent 5 yrs.
– CEO McNerney (formerly of GE) implemented Six-Sigma, to decrease product
defects and increase efficiency
– Six Sigma doesn’t lend itself to creativity / innovation, something imperative in the
R&D arena
– Changing times: by mid-2007 only 25% sales earned from products introduced over
previous 5 yrs – why?
– New CEO Buckley changed the strategy to correct this
4
– In 2012, 3M ranked 3rd on Booz & company’s list of most innovative firms behind
The Internal Organization:
In this lecture we will discuss …..
3–8
Resources, Capabilities and Core Competencies
• Competitive Advantage (CA) foundation includes
– Resources
• Are used to create organizational capabilities
• Also called factors of Production
• 5 Ms and I
• Tangible and intangible (As seen in Figure 3.1)
– Capabilities
• Bundles of resources
• Purposely integrated to achieve a specific task/set of tasks
• Source of a firm’s core competencies and basis for CA
– Core Competencies
• Capabilities that serve as a source of CA for a firm over its rivals
• Distinguish a company from its competitors – the personality9
The Internal Organization:
In this lecture we will discuss …..
20
Importance of Intangible Resources
• Reputation (Brand name is an application of
reputation)
– Is an important sources of sustainable competitive
advantage
– Earned through actions and words of the firm
– Is a product of years of superior market place
competence as perceived by stake holders
– Achieved through innovation aggressive advertising
– Brand name could be exploited
• Harley Davidson motor cloths alone generate US $100
million
• Used with Barbie doll, Hard rock café.
• Sells Sunglasses, jewellery, belts, and hats.
21
Importance of Intangible Resources – Case
of Pepsi
• Pepsi in India – Tarnished brand name
• In 2003,Center for science and Environment found pesticide in
Pepsi 11 to 70 times higher than in Europe
• Sales declined by 40%
• Government agency conducted tests and found pesticide levels
lower’.
• Pepsi says drinking a cup of tea with water available to many
Indians has as much pesticide as 394 bottles of soda
• Pepsi is accused of using excessive amount of ground water
• Faced with such Pepsi is taking actions like digging bore wells fo
citizens, harvesting rain water, teaching better techniques in
farming rice , potatoes – to improve reputation
22
The Internal Organization:
In this lecture we will discuss …..
– Resources
• Are used to create organizational capabilities
• Also called factors of Production
• 5 Ms and I
• Tangible and intangible (As seen in Figure 3.1)
– Capabilities
• Bundles of resources
• Purposely integrated to achieve a specific task/set of tasks
• Source of a firm’s core competencies and basis for CA
– Core Competencies
• Capabilities that serve as a source of CA for a firm over its rivals
• Distinguish a company from its competitors – the personality 24
Capabilities • Firms combine individual tangible
and intangible resources to create
capabilities.
Competitive • Emerge over time through complex
Advantage interactions among tangible and
intangible resources
• Capabilities exist when resources
Core have been purposely integrated to
Competencies
achieve a specific set of tasks
• Human capital is the most
Capabilities :
Teams of Resources important organizational
capabilities
Resources • Capabilities are often developed in
• Tangible
• Intangible functional areas.
Examples of firm’s capabilities
Functional Area Capabilities Company
• Examples
Distribution Effective Logistics Wal-Mart
Management
HR Motivation, Microsoft, Google
Empowerment &
Retention
MIS Inventory control Wal-Mart
through data from
point of sale
Marketing Branding P&G
Customer Service
Manufacturing Design & Toyota, Komatsu
Production
R&D Innovation Caterpillar, Apple
Capabilities – Samsung
• Samsung group contributes 17% to the Korean GDP.
• Employs 370,000 people in 80 countries.
• Largent business is Samsung Electronics with $141 billion in sales in 2012.
• Overtook Apple in smart phone market (29% Vs 22% of Apple)
• Electronics started small by making components for others.
• Semiconductor fabrication plant costs anything up to $ 2 billion to set up.
Once you get going you can sell products to other companies ( provides access
to their customer’s products).
• Samsung produced components for iPhone and over a period built a better a
phone, copying Apple’s technology. ( Court case)
• Imitation strategy. (Motorola sold its cellphone company to google, Nokia is
no more ‘No 1’ in cell phone, Sony-Ericsson partnership dissolved. Palm
merged with HP. Black Berry failed).
• How Samsung succeeded?
– Developed capabilities in building TV and computer screens over time.
– Capabilities in producing incremental products.
– Capability in using knowledge gained from others.
• However some other Chinese company can displace them in future. Their CEO
DJ Lee is aware of that.
Capabilities – Proctor & Gamble
• Two business units
– Beauty and Grooming
– Household care
• 250 branded products – Crest, CoverGirl, Ivory, Bold and Bounce etc.
• 127,000 employees in 80 countries.
• Every person in world spends $12 on P&G products.
• Objectives
– Target for 2015 is to make it $14.
– Target to grow sales from $ 80 billion to $ 100 billion.
– Increase customer base from 4.2 billion to 5 billion.
• How to achieve these targets
– Wants to use its capabilities and competencies to achieve targets and grow
organically.
– Not through acquisitions.
• Capabilities
– Technology, Supply Chain Management (SCM) , marketing, broad product
portfolio, R&D
• 5 core competencies
The Internal Organization:
In this lecture we will discuss …..
– Resources
• Are used to create organizational capabilities
• Also called factors of Production
• 5 Ms and I
• Tangible and intangible (As seen in Figure 3.1)
– Capabilities
• Bundles of resources
• Purposely integrated to achieve a specific task/set of tasks
• Source of a firm’s core competencies and basis for CA
– Core Competencies
• Capabilities that serve as a source of CA for a firm over its rivals
• Distinguish a company from its competitors – the personality 30
Discovering Core Competencies
Discovering
Core
Core
Competencies
Competencies
Sources of
Competitive
Advantage
Capabilities
Teams of
Resources
Resources
* Tangible
* Intangible
Capabilities • Core competencies are resources and
capabilities that serve as the sources
of a firm’s competitive advantage
Competitive
Advantage • Distinguish a firm competitively and
reflect its personality.
• Emerge over time through an
Core organizational process of accumulating
Competencies and learning how to deploy different
resources and capabilities.
Capabilities : • Example: Apple developed two core
Teams of Resources competencies
– Innovation ( by combining tangible, financial
Resources and research labs with intangible Resources ,
• Tangible scientists, engineers and organizational
• Intangible
processes) and
– Customer Service (store design(tangible) and
knowledge and skilled employees)
Building core competencies
• Two Tools (Methods) are used by firms to identify (or
build) which all capabilities are core competencies:
– First: Four criteria that determine which resource or
capability is core competency in a firm
– Second: Value chain analysis to select the value creating
competencies that should be maintained, upgraded or
developed and those to be out sourced.
• How many core competencies a firm must have?
– 3 to 4 – According to McKinsey & Co
– Supporting more will result in loss of focus
Brand as Core Competency
• A source of competitive advantage
• Brand can be defined as ‘ A set of Intangible features that link
a good or service to its customers’
• Early 1990s Coke’s brand value was $100 bn
• Even if all the physical assets are destroyed Coke could borrow
$100bn only on Brand value. Mid 1999 the value came down
to 69 bn due to some quality issues raised in Europe.
• Still its brand value is worth $69 bn, the highest (63% of its
market capitalization)
• Microsoft has the second highest brand value $64 bn(21% of
its market capitalization)
Core Competencies
The Four Criteria of Sustainable
Competitive Advantage
Costly to Imitate
Non-substitutable
Table 3.4 The Four Criteria of Sustainable
Advantage
Valuable • Help a firm neutralize threats or exploit opportunities
Capabilities
,
Valuable
• Southwest Airlines.
Outcomes from Combinations of the
Criteria for Sustainable Competitive
Valuable Rare
Imitate
Advantage
Costly to Non-sub-
stitutable
Competitive Performance
Consequences Implications
Below
Competitive
NO NO NO NO Average
Disadvantage
Returns
Competitive Average
YES NO NO YES/NO
Parity Returns
Temporary Aver./Above
YES YES NO YES/NO Competitive Average
Advantage Returns
Sustainable Above
YES YES YES YES Competitive Average
Advantage Returns
The Internal Organization:
In this lecture we will discuss …..
Discovering
Core
Core
Competencies
Competencies
Sources of
Competitive
Advantage
Capabilities
Value
Criteria of Chain
Teams of Sustainable Analysis
Resources Advantages
Resources
* Valuable
* Tangible
* Intangible * Rare
* Costly to Imitate •Outsourcing
* Non-substitutable
Value Chain Analysis
• Allows a firm to understand the parts of its operations
that create value and those that do not.
47
Figure 3.3 A Model of the Value Chain
50
Examining the value-creating potential of
support activities
• Procurement: Activities involving purchase of inputs needed to produce a
firm’s products. example, raw materials and supplies, as well as fixed assets:
machinery, laboratory equipment, office equipment and buildings.
• Technological development: Activities to improve a firm’s product and the
processes used to manufacture it. development, such as process equipment,
basic research and product design, and servicing procedures
• Human resource management: Activities involved with recruiting, hiring,
training, developing and compensating all personnel
. Table 3.10a
The Internal Organization:
In this lecture we will discuss …..
53
Outsourcing Decisions
A firm may outsource
all or only part of one M
or more primary rgin ar
gin
a
M
and/or support
activities.
Technological Development
Human Resource Mgmt.
Service
Support Activities
Firm Infrastructure
Marketing and Sales
Procurement
Outbound Logistics
Operations
Inbound Logistics
Primary Activities
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All rights 3–54
reserved. May not be copied, scanned,
Strategic Rationales for Outsourcing
• Improving business focus
– Helps a firm focus on broader business issues by having outside experts handle
various operational details.
• Providing access to world-class capabilities
– The specialized resources of outsourcing providers makes world-class capabilities
available to firms in a wide range of applications.
• Accelerating re-engineering benefits
– Achieves re-engineering benefits more quickly by having outsiders—who have
already achieved world-class standards—take over process.
• Sharing risks
– Reduces investment requirements and makes firm more flexible, dynamic and
better able to adapt to changing opportunities.
• Freeing resources for other purposes
– Redirects efforts from non-core activities toward those that serve customers more
effectively.
Outsourcing Issues
• Seeking greatest value
– Outsource only to firms possessing a core competence in terms of
performing the primary or supporting the outsourced activity.
• Evaluating resources and capabilities
– Do not outsource activities in which the firm itself can create and
capture value.
• Environmental threats and ongoing tasks
– Do not outsource primary and support activities that are used to
neutralize environmental threats or to complete necessary ongoing
organizational tasks.
• Nonstrategic team resources
– Do not outsource capabilities critical to the firm’s success, even though
the capabilities are not actual sources of competitive advantage.
• Firm’s knowledge base
– Do not outsource activities that stimulate the development of new
The Internal Organization:
In this lecture we will discuss …..