Large Scale PathLoss Part2
Large Scale PathLoss Part2
Loss – Part 2
ArunKumar Jayaprakasam
Scope: Chapter 4 (4.9 onwards)
Agenda
• Introduction
– Free Scale Path Loss Model
– Log Normal Distribution and Coverage Area
• Outdoor PathLoss Models
• Indoor Pathloss Models
• Outdoor->Indoor
• Noise Figure
• Link Budget Examples
Propagation of RF waves can be divided into two main study areas
4
Median Path Loss Determination
• estimate receive power at distance d from transmitter
N
Ẽ = Ẽd Lk exp jk
k 1
• D- distance in km
• F – frequency in MHz
• Gtx, Grx – Antenna gains in dB
3.9.1 Log Distance Path Loss Model
• average received power decreases logarithmically with distance
• theory & measurements indicate validity for indoors & outdoors
n
Pr ( d ) d
PL( d ) (3.67)
Pt ( d ) d 0
d
PL(dB) PL(d 0 ) 10n log (3.68)
d0
7
Free Space Reference Distance, d0,
• always in antenna’s far-field - eliminate near field effects for
reference path
• must be specified for different environments
Environment d0
large cellular 1km
microcell 1m-10m
Environment n Environment n
free space 2 In building LOS 1.6-1.8
Urban-cellular 2.7-3.5 Obstructed in Building 4-6
Shadowed Urban Cellular 3-5 Obstructed in Factories 2-3
8
3.9.2 Log Normal Shadowing
• surrounding clutter isn’t considered by log distance model
• averaged received power (eqn 3.68) is inconsistent with measured data
• measured PL(d) at any location is random, with log normal distribution
about PL(d ) (normal distribution of log10(•) )
PL(d) = PL(d )
(3.69a)
d
PL(d) (dB) = PL( d 0 ) 10n log Χ σ
d0
9
Log Normal Distribution - describes random shadowing effects
• for specific Tx-Rx, measured signal levels have normal distribution
about distance dependent mean (in dB)
• occurs over many measurements with same Tx-Rx & different
clutter standard deviation, (also measured in dB)
Lognormal Model For Local Shadowing
• typically, dB ranges from 5-12
• let u = median path loss (dB) at distance d from transmitter
distribution xdB of observed path loss has pdf given by:
1
Pr[xdB = x] = f(xdB) = exp xdB u / 2 dB
2
2 dB
it follows that Pr(xdB > x) = f ( x
x
dB )dxdB
1
= exp xdB u / 2 dB
2
x 2 dB
10
Log Normal Graph: Pr(xdB > x) vs Gain/Loss Relative to Median Path Loss
• shown for dB = 4,6,8, 12
median 50% of samples expected to be > median &
50% expected to be < median
• all curves intersect at median
1
dB = 12 dB
Pr (Gain < Abscissa)
0.5 8 dB
10-1 6 dB
4dB
10-2
11
Path Loss Model Parameters for arbitrary location & specified Tx-Rx
• d0 – close in reference distance
• - clutter standard deviation
• n – path loss exponent
Used for system design & analysis simulations to provide estimated Pr(d) at random
locations
12
Q-function is used to determine probability that PR(d) threshold
x2
1 2
Q(z) =
2 e
z
dx 3.70a
Pr (d )
Pr [Pr(d) > ] = Q
3.71
Pr (d )
Pr [Pr(d) < ] = Q 3.72
13
3.9.3 Determination of % Coverage Area
• in a given coverage area, let = desired receive signal level –
could be determined by receiver sensitivity (or visa versa)
• random shadowing effects cause some locations at d to have
received power, Pr(d) <
useful service area (coverage area): U() = % area with Pr(d) >
1
2
U() = Pr[ Pr (r ) ]dA
2R
(3.73)
2 R
1
U() =
2R 2 Pr[ P (r ) ]r
0 0
r dr d
14
Left Axis = % area with Pr(r) > (coverage area-use 3.73)
- Longely Rice
- Durkins Model
- Okumura Model
- Hata Model
- Wideband PCS Microcell
- PCS Extension to Hata Model
- Walfisch – Bertoni Model
17
3.10.1 Longely Rice Model (ITS irregular terrain model)
• used for point-point systems under different types of terrain
• frequency ranges from 40MHz-100GHz
18
Longely Rice Model: available as a computer program
calculates large scale median transmission loss over irregular terrain for
frequencies between 20MHz-10GHz
input parameters include:
• transmission frequency,
• path length & antenna heights,
• polarization,
• surface refractivity
• earth radius & climate
• ground conductivity & ground dielectric constant
• path specific parameters: antennas’ horizon distance, horizon elevation
angle, trans-horizon distance, terrain irregularity
20
2-D Propagation Raster data
Representing propagation
Algorithm for line of sight (LOS)
Multiple diffraction computation
3.10.3 Okumura Model – wholly based on measured data - no analytical explanation
• among the simplest & best for in terms of path loss accuracy in
cluttered mobile environment
• disadvantage: slow response to rapid terrain changes
• common std deviations between predicted & measured path loss
10dB - 14dB
• widely used for urban areas
• useful for
- frequencies ranging from 150MHz-1920MHz
- frequencies can be extrapolated to 3GHz
- distances from 1km to 100km
- base station antenna heights from 30m-1000m
25
Okumura developed a set of curves in urban areas with quasi-smooth terrain
• effective antenna height:
- base station hte = 200m
- mobile: hre = 3m
• gives median attenuation relative to free space (Amu)
• developed from extensive measurements using vertical omni-
directional antennas at base and mobile
• measurements plotted against frequency
26
Estimating path loss using Okumura Model
1. determine free space loss, Amu(f,d), between points of interest
2. add Amu(f,d) and correction factors to account for terrain
27
Amu(f,d) & GAREA have been plotted for wide range of frequencies
antenna gain varies at rate of 20dB per decade or 10dB per decade
G(hte) =
hte 10m < hte < 1000m (3.81a)
20 log
200
hre
G(hre) = 10 log hre 3m (3.81b)
3
G(hre) =
h 3m < hre <10m (3.81b)
20 log re
3
model corrected for
• h = terrain undulation height
• isolated ridge height
• average terrain slope
• mixed land/sea parameter
28
Median Attenuation Relative to Free Space = Amu(f,d) (dB)
100
70 Urban Area
ht = 200m 80
60 hr = 3m 70
60
50
50 40
30
d(km)
40 20
Amu(f,d) (dB)
10
30 5
2
1
20
10
35
open area
30
quasi open area
25
suburban area
20
GAREA(dB)
15
10
5
0
30
3.10.4 Hata Model: empirical model of graphical path loss data from
Okumura
- predicts median path loss for different channels
- valid over UHF/VHF band from 150MHz-1.5GHz
- charts used to characterize factors affecting mobile land propagation
- standard formulas for approximating urban propagation loss
- correction factors for some situations
- compares closely with Okumura model as d > 1km large mobile
systems
31
Parameter Comment
L50 50th % value (median) propagation path loss (urban)
fc frequency from 150MHz-1.5GHz
hte, hre Base Station and Mobile antenna height
(hre) correction factor for hre , affected by coverage area
d Tx-Rx separation
(hre) Comment
(1.1log10 fc - 0.7)hre – (1.56log10 fc - 0.8)dB Medium City 3.83
8.29(log10 1.54hre)2 – 1.1 dB Large City (fc 300MHz) 3.84a
3.2(log10 11.75hre)2 – 4.97 dB Large City (fc > 300MHz) 3.84b
33
Example Tables for Okumura-Hata Model
180
170
150
145 20km
140
135 10km
130
125 5km
120
20 60 100 140 180
hte (m) 34
3.10.6 Walfisch & Bertoni Model
2
P0 = (3.90)
4R
P0 = free space path loss between isotropic antennas
Q2 = reduction in rooftop signal due to row of buildings that
immediately shadow hill
P1 = based on diffraction determines signal loss from
roof top to street
35
Walfisch and Bertoni’s model
3.10.7 Wideband PCS Microcell Model
Feuerstien Measured cellular systems in Bay Area
- 20MHz pulsed transmitter at 1900 MHz
- base station antenna heights 3.7m, 8.5m, 13.3m
- mobile antenna heights 1.7m
1 4
df =
16 h h h h
2 2
t r
2
t
2 2
r 16 (3.92a)
37
Average Path Loss – PCS Microcell
38
Measured data from San Francisco
INDOOR PROPAGATION MODELS
3.11 Indoor Propagation Model
• smaller Tx-Rx separation distances than outdoors
• higher environmental variability for much small Tx-Rx separation
- conditions vary from: doors open/closed, antenna position,
- variable far field radiation for receiver locations & antenna types
• strongly influenced by building features, layout, materials
41
Partition Losses – Same Floor
• hard partitions: immovable, part of building
• soft partitions: movable, lower than the ceiling
d
PL(dB) = PL(d 0 ) 10n log (3.93)
d0
• n depends on surroundings and building type
• = normal random variable in dB having std deviation
• identical to log normal shadowing mode (3.69)
42
Partition losses
Partition losses
(1) Ericsson Multiple Breakpoint Model: measurements in multi-floor office building
• uses uniform distribution to generate path loss values between
minimum &maximum range, relative to distance
• 4 breakpoints consider upper and lower bound on path loss
• assumes 30dB attenutation at d0 = 1m
- accurate for f = 900MHz & unity gain anntenae
• provides deterministic limit on range of path loss at given distance
30
50
attenuation (dB)
70
20dB
90
110
1 3 10 20 40 100 meters
45
(2) Attenuation Factor Model (Seidel92b)
• includes effect of building type & variations caused by obstacles
• reduces std deviation for path loss to 4dB
• std deviation for path loss with log distance model 13dB
d
PL(d ) (dB ) PL(d 0 ) (dB ) 10nSF log FAF (dB ) PAF (dB ) 3.94
d0
nSF = exponent value for same floor measurement – must be accurate
FAF = floor attenuation factor for different floor
PAF = partition attenuation factor for obstruction encountered by
primary ray tracing
primary ray tracing = single ray drawn between Tx & Rx
yields good accuracy with good computational efficiency
PAF(1)
Tx PAF(2)
FAF
Rx
46
Path Loss Exponent & Standard Deviation for Typical Building
47
(3) Simple Indoor Path Loss Model
n P Q
r
Lp (dB) = (dB) + 10 log10 WAF ( p ) FAF (q ) 2.4
r0 p 1 q 1 7
• r = distance between transmitter & receiver
• r0 = nominal reference distance (typically 1m)
• WAF(p) is wall attenuation factor, for P floors
• FAF(q) is floor attenuation factor, for Q floors
• n 2 for close distances, larger for greater distances
RF Penetration affected by
- frequency
- height within building
- antenna pattern in elevation plain
51
penetration loss
• decreases with increased frequency
• loss in front of windows is 6dB greater than without windows
• penetration loss decreases 1.9dB with each floor when < 15th
floor
• increased attenuation at >15 floors – shadowing affects from
taller buildings
• metallic tints result in 3dB to 30dB attenuation
• penetration impacted by angle of incidence
52
Penetration Loss vs Frequency for two different building
53
Problems with models
• All models have limitations: e.g. Longley Rice doesn’t
include ionosphere, so limited applicability at lower
frequencies.
• Some skill is needed in choosing the right model for the
right circumstances.
• Accuracy is limited. Different models can give different
answers.
• May need a statistical interpretation
• Need good input data (e.g. terrain models)
• Any model needs fairly universal acceptance, to avoid legal
arguments. Acceptance may be more important than
accuracy.
• But In spite of the difficulties, propagation models have
come a long way. They are the best guides available.
NOISE FIGURE AND LINK BUDGET
EXAMPLES
Noise
• “Any unwanted input”
• Limits systems ability to process weak signals
• Sources:
1. Random noise in resistors and transistors
2. Mixer noise
3. Undesired cross-coupling noise
4. Power supply noise
• Dynamic range – capability of detecting weak signals
in presence of large-amplitude signals
Noise factor
• IEEE Standards: “The noise factor, at a
specified input frequency, is defined as the ratio of
(1) the total noise power per unit bandwidth
available at the output port when noise
temperature of the input termination is standard
(290 K) to (2) that portion of (1) engendered at the
input frequency by the input termination.”
67
Replace FAF with nMF = exponent for multiple floor loss
d
PL( d ) ( dB ) PL( d 0 ) ( dB ) 10nMF log PAF ( dB ) 3.95
d0
Building Path Loss obeys free space + loss factor () (Dev90b)
• loss factor increases exponentially with d
• (dB/m) = attenuation constant for channel
d
PL( d ) ( dB ) PL( d 0 ) ( dB ) 20 log d FAF ( dB ) PAF ( dB ) 3.96
d0
4-story bldg 2-story bldg
f f
850MHz 0.62 850MHz 0.48
1.7GHz 0.57 1.7GHz 0.35
68