Introduction To Quantitative Genetics
Introduction To Quantitative Genetics
Genetics
The study of heredity The study of how differences between individuals are transmitted from one generation to the next The study of how information in the genes is used in the development and functioning of the adult organism
Parent-offspring relationship
Both parents and offspring may experience the same environmental conditions
Such a situation could arise if there are strong preferences of the offspring for their natal environment. Offspring may return to the same general area for nesting in which there were raised
The phenotype of the offspring may be determined by the phenotype but not the genotype of the parent
the ability of parents to provide food to their offspring depends on their condition which is determined by environmental factors
The correspondence between the phenotype of the offspring and the parents is a consequence, in part, of the genes shared by the individuals
Quantitative Characteristics
Many traits in humans and other organisms are genetically influenced, but do not show single-gene (Mendelian) patterns of inheritance. They are influenced by the combined action of many genes and are characterized by continuous variation. These are called polygenic traits. Continuously variable characteristics that are both polygenic and influenced by environmental factors are called multifactorial traits. Examples of quantitative characteristics are height, intelligence & hair color.
As the number of loci affecting the trait increases, the # phenotypic categories increases.
Number of phenotypic categories = (# gene pairs 2) +1 Connecting the points of a frequency distribution creates a bell-shaped curve called a normal distribution.
Normal Distribution
Standard Deviation
Mean
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
Quantitative Genetics
not discrete Continuous phenotypic variation within populations Whole organism level Causes of variation Genes vs. environment Interactions between genes and environment Components of genetic variation Components of environmental variation
Evolution Does evolution proceed by small steps or big jumps? What is the relative importance of preexisting variation vs. new mutations?
History
Around 1900, there were two camps: Biometricians
Continuous traits
Mendelians
Discrete traits
History
Reconciliation: Multiple loci (genes) contribute to variation!
Is variation caused by a few loci of large effects or many loci with small effects?
Heterosis
Both the parental lines and the F1s are genetically uniform. However, the parental lines are relatively small and weak, a phenomenon called inbreeding depression: Too much homozygosity leads to small, sickly and weak organisms, at least among organisms that usually breed with others instead of self-pollinating. In contrast, the F1 hybrids are large, healthy and strong. This phenomenon is called heterosis or hybrid vigor. The corn planted in the US and other developed countries in nearly all F1 hybrid seed, because it produces high yielding, healthy plants (due to heterosis) and it is genetically uniform (and thus matures at the same time with ears in the same position on every plant).
Heritability
One property of interest is heritability, the proportion of a traits variation that is due to genetics (with the rest of it due to environmental factors). This seems like a simple concept, but it is loaded with problems. The broad-sense heritability, symbolized as H (sometimes H2 to indicate that the units of variance are squared). H is a simple translation of the statement from above into mathematics: H = VG / VT This measure, the broad-sense heritability, is fairly easy to measure, especially in human populations where identical twins are available. However, different studies show wide variations in H values for the same traits, and plant breeders have found that it doesnt accurately reflect the results of selection experiments. Thus, H is generally only used in social science work.
Heritability
Measured using resemblance between relatives
Heritability
(broad-sense) Heritability (broad-sense) is the proportion of a populations phenotypic variance that is attributable to genetic differences
Heritability
(narrow sense)
Heritability (narrow sense) is the proportion of a populations phenotypic variance that is attributable to additive genetic variance as opposed to dominance genetic variance (interaction between alleles at the same locus).
Basic formula: rG = covXY / (varX varY)0.5 rG often used both for additive (rA) and genotypic (rG) correlation! Phenotypic correlation: A combination of genetic and environmental (incl. nonadd gen effects) corr:
rP = hX hY rG + (1-h2X)0.5 (1-h2Y)0.5 rE rP = hX hY rG + eX eY rE
2. Age-age correlation
Relation between a trait at young and mature age. Gives info about when reliable estimations can be achieved.
3. Site-site correlation
Relation between genotype and environment. For deliniation of breeding and seed zones and for optimization of number of trials per zone
If we select for character X, what will be the change of the correlated character Y? CRY = i hX hY rG PY , where CRY = the correlated response in trait Y, i = the intensity of selection, hX and hY = the square root of the h2 rG = the genetic correlation between traits X and Y PY = the phenotypic standard deviation for trait Y. The CRY can be expressed in percent by relating it to the phenotypic mean of variable Y.
Correlated reponse
Indirect selection
When we want to improve character X, but select for another character (Y) and achieve progress due to the correlated response. CRX / RX = (iY rA hY) / (iX hX) Presumptions: HY > HX and strong CR or iY > iX. Usable when difficult to apply selection directly to the desired character: 1) Hard to measure with any precision, which reduces h2 2) The desired trait is costly to measure. Then it would be better to select for an easily measurable, correlated
G x E interaction
1 2
Scale effects
1 2
True interaction
1 2
It is the true interactions that should affect breeding strategies. Scale effects can be handled by transformation prior to analysis to ensure homogenity of among-genotype variances in environments.
The question is whether breeding should be producing genotypes suitable for specific environments or genotypes adapted to a wide range of environments? G x E can be used in practice when interactions and the specific environments are well defined. The smaller G x E, the fewer test sites are needed.
Calculations of G x E
1. ANOVA according to the simple model: = G + E + G E. Y
The model assumes homogenous variances between sites. Scale effects (not true interactions) will generate an interaction! Not independent of whether environment is a fixed or random effect.
2. G x E as genetic correlations:
I. Yamada: r G= varG / (varG + varI)
varG = genetic variance component from ANOVA involving data from two environments and varI = G x E variance component from ANOVA.
Problems:
1) Correlation estimates are biased for unbalanced data and when variances across environments are heterogenous. 2) The estimates are frequently out of the theoretical parameter space due to sampling errors of genetic variances and covariances (rG > 1.0). 3) The correlations are seldom normally distributed unless the test population is large. Std err of genetic correlations are difficult to estimate and are often approximated! Estimates of std err. should be interpreted with caution. However they indicate the relatively reliability.