Software Testing Strategies
Slide Set to accompany
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s
Approach, 7/e
by Roger S. Pressman
Slides copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005, 2009 by Roger S. Pressman
For non-profit educational use only
May be reproduced ONLY for student use at the university level when used in conjunction
with Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach, 7/e. Any other reproduction or use is
prohibited without the express written permission of the author.
All copyright information MUST appear if these slides are posted on a website for student
use.
1
Software
Testing
Testing is the process of
exercising a program with the
specific intent of finding errors
prior to delivery to the end
user.
2
What Testing
Shows
errors
requirements conformance
performance
an indication
of quality
3
Strategic Approach
To perform effective testing, you should conduct
effective technical reviews. By doing this, many errors
will be eliminated before testing commences.
Testing begins at the component level and works
"outward" toward the integration of the entire
computer-based system.
Different testing techniques are appropriate for different
software engineering approaches and at different points
in time.
Testing is conducted by the developer of the software
and (for large projects) an independent test group.
Testing and debugging are different activities, but
debugging must be accommodated in any testing
strategy.
4
V&V
Verification refers to the set of tasks that ensure
that software correctly implements a specific
function.
Validation refers to a different set of tasks that
ensure that the software that has been built is
traceable to customer requirements. Boehm
[Boe81] states this another way:
Verification: "Are we building the product right?"
Validation: "Are we building the right product?"
5
Who Tests the
Software?
developer independent tester
Understands the system Must learn about the system,
but, will test "gently" but, will attempt to break it
and, is driven by "delivery" and, is driven by quality
6
Testing Strategy
System engineering
Analysis modeling
Design modeling
Code generation Unit test
Integration test
Validation test
System test
7
Testing Strategy
We begin by ‘testing-in-the-small’ and
move toward ‘testing-in-the-large’
For conventional software
The module (component) is our initial focus
Integration of modules follows
For OO software
our focus when “testing in the small” changes
from an individual module (the conventional
view) to an OO class that encompasses
attributes and operations and implies
communication and collaboration
8
Strategic Issues
Specify product requirements in a quantifiable
manner long before testing commences.
State testing objectives explicitly.
Understand the users of the software and develop
a profile for each user category.
Develop a testing plan that emphasizes “rapid
cycle testing.”
Build “robust” software that is designed to test
itself (re-route or cleanly terminate)
Use effective technical reviews as a filter prior to
testing
Conduct technical reviews to assess the test
strategy and test cases themselves.
Develop a continuous improvement approach for
the testing process.
9
Unit Testing
module
to be
tested
results
software
engineer
test cases
10
Unit Testing
module
to be
tested
interface
local data structures
boundary conditions
independent paths
error handling paths
test cases
11
Unit Test
Environment
driver
interface
local data structures
Module boundary conditions
independent paths
error handling paths
stub stub
test cases
RESULTS
12
Integration Testing
Strategies
Options:
• the “big bang” approach (all at once)
• an incremental construction strategy
13
Top Down
Integration
A
top module is tested with
stubs
B F G
stubs are replaced one at
a time, "depth first"
C
as new modules are integrated,
some subset of tests is re-run
D E
14
Bottom-Up
Integration
A
B F G
drivers are replaced one at a
time, "depth first"
C
worker modules are grouped into
builds and integrated
D E
cluster
15
Sandwich Testing
A
Top modules are
tested with stubs
B F G
Worker modules are grouped into
builds and integrated
D E
cluster
16
Regression Testing
Regression testing is the re-execution of some subset of
tests that have already been conducted to ensure that
changes have not propagated unintended side effects
Whenever software is corrected, some aspect of the
software configuration (the program, its documentation,
or the data that support it) is changed.
Regression testing helps to ensure that changes (due to
testing or for other reasons) do not introduce
unintended behavior or additional errors.
Regression testing may be conducted manually, by re-
executing a subset of all test cases or using automated
capture/playback tools.
17
Smoke
Testing
A common approach for creating “daily builds” for
product software
Smoke testing steps:
Software components that have been translated into
code are integrated into a “build.”
• A build includes all data files, libraries, reusable modules,
and engineered components that are required to implement
one or more product functions.
A series of tests is designed to expose errors that will
keep the build from properly performing its function.
• The intent should be to uncover “show stopper” errors that
have the highest likelihood of throwing the software
project behind schedule.
The build is integrated with other builds and the entire
product (in its current form) is smoke tested daily.
• The integration approach may be top down or bottom up.
18
Object-Oriented
Testing
begins by evaluating the correctness and
consistency of the analysis and design
models
testing strategy changes
the concept of the ‘unit’ broadens due to
encapsulation
integration focuses on classes and their
execution across a ‘thread’ or in the context of
a usage scenario
validation uses conventional black box
methods
test case design draws on conventional
methods, but also encompasses special
features
19
OO Testing
Strategy
class testing is the equivalent of unit
testing
operations within the class are tested
the state behavior of the class is examined
integration applied three different
strategies
thread-based testing—integrates the set of
classes required to respond to one input or
event
use-based testing—integrates the set of
classes required to respond to one use case
cluster testing—integrates the set of classes
required to demonstrate one collaboration
20
WebApp Testing - I
The content model for the WebApp is
reviewed to uncover errors.
The interface model is reviewed to ensure that
all use cases can be accommodated.
The design model for the WebApp is reviewed
to uncover navigation errors.
The user interface is tested to uncover errors in
presentation and/or navigation mechanics.
Each functional component is unit tested.
21
WebApp Testing - II
Navigation throughout the architecture is tested.
The WebApp is implemented in a variety of different
environmental configurations and is tested for
compatibility with each configuration.
Security tests are conducted in an attempt to exploit
vulnerabilities in the WebApp or within its
environment.
Performance tests are conducted.
The WebApp is tested by a controlled and monitored
population of end-users. The results of their interaction
with the system are evaluated for content and
navigation errors, usability concerns, compatibility
concerns, and WebApp reliability and performance.
22
High Order
Testing: Complete
System
Validation testing
Focus is on software requirements
System testing
Focus is on system integration
Alpha/Beta testing
Focus is on customer usage
Recovery testing
forces the software to fail in a variety of ways and verifies that
recovery is properly performed
Security testing
verifies that protection mechanisms built into a system will, in fact,
protect it from improper penetration
Stress testing
executes a system in a manner that demands resources in abnormal
quantity, frequency, or volume
Performance Testing
test the run-time performance of software within the context of an
integrated system
23
Debugging: A Diagnostic
Process
24
The Debugging
Process
25
Debugging Effort
time required
to diagnose the
symptom and
time required determine the
to correct the error cause
and conduct
regression tests
26
Symptoms &
Causes symptom and cause may be
geographically separated
symptom may disappear when
another problem is fixed
cause may be due to a
combination of non-errors
cause may be due to a system
or compiler error
symptom cause may be due to
assumptions that everyone
cause believes
symptom may be intermittent
27
Consequences of
Bugs
infectious
damage
catastrophic
extreme
serious
disturbing
annoying
mild
Bug Type
Bug Categories:
function-related bugs,
system-related bugs, data bugs, coding
violations, etc. design bugs, documentation bugs,
bugs,
standards 28
Debugging
Techniques
brute force / testing
backtracking
induction
deduction
29
Correcting the Error
Is the cause of the bug reproduced in another part of the program? In
many situations, a program defect is caused by an erroneous
pattern of logic that may be reproduced elsewhere.
What "next bug" might be introduced by the fix I'm about to make?
Before the correction is made, the source code (or, better, the
design) should be evaluated to assess coupling of logic and
data structures.
What could we have done to prevent this bug in the first place? This
question is the first step toward establishing a statistical
software quality assurance approach. If you correct the process
as well as the product, the bug will be removed from the
current program and may be eliminated from all future
programs.
30
Final Thoughts
Think -- before you act to correct
Use tools to gain additional insight
If you’re at an impasse, get help from
someone else
Once you correct the bug, use
regression testing to uncover any side
effects
31
