Group Presentation: Team 2 Binay Chaudhary Diya Adhikari Prabin Rana Radhika Adhikari
Group Presentation: Team 2 Binay Chaudhary Diya Adhikari Prabin Rana Radhika Adhikari
Team 2
Binay Chaudhary
Diya Adhikari
Prabin Rana
Radhika Adhikari
Contents:
I. Factors Affecting Performance Appraisal
II. Performance Appraisal Practices In Nepalese Organization
III. Methods to improve employee performance
IV. Counselling employees with problems on performance
appraisal
Factors affecting performance appraisal
1. Interpersonal (bias): refers to the influence of personal
feelings, preferences, and relationships on one’s judgment and
decisions about others. (Favouritism)
2. Leniency error: Leniency error is when a rater consistently
gives higher ratings or evaluations to individuals regardless of
their actual performance.
3. Halo effect: When our overall impression of someone
influences our perceptions about specific traits or abilities they
possess.
4. Similarity errors: when a rater gives higher ratings to
individuals who are similar to them in terms of background,
interests or attitudes.
5. Recency VS Primacy effect: The primacy effect occurs when
we tend to remember information that we encountered first,
while the recency effect happens when we remember
information that we encountered most recently.
6. Central tendency: It might happen when an interviewer rates
all candidates as average, regardless of their actual
performance.
7. In appropriate substitutes for performance: It could occur
when an interviewer relies on factors like personal appearance
or charisma to evaluate candidates instead of focusing on their
actual skills and qualifications.
8. Attribution error: It might happen when an interviewer
incorrectly attributes a candidate’s success or failure to
internal factors like personality traits, overlooking external
factors like to situation or luck.
9. Unclear Standards: It could lead to biases evaluations if the
interviewer’s criteria for assessing candidates are vague or
subjective.
Performance Appraisal Practices In Nepalese Organization
Performance appraisal (PA) is one of the most important
components in HRM practices. The objective of PA is to decide the
value of work done by an individual or group. Literally, in nay
organization, it is a systematic and objective way to judging
employees contribution.
Features of PA in Nepal:
• The focus of appraisal is mostly dominated by subjective
judgements rather than objective figures and facts
• Most organization in Nepal go through PA once in a year. Only
few organization have practical twice a year
• Only some organized sectors follows formal PA, other follows
informal PA
• In Nepal PA is done only for promotion.
• In Nepal there is no fairness in PA. Nepotism takes place in PA
Conclusion:
Performance appraisal in Nepal has remained unsystematic and
ineffective. Personal biasness and nepotism has affected the PA
practices of Nepal. The system has not motivated employees
towards higher performance. Nor the system is has been used for
employment development based on the results of PA.
Methods to improve employee performance
Thank You