Marginal Costing
Marginal Costing
Specific technique of cost analysis in which cost information's are presented in such a manner so
that it may help the management in cost control and managerial decision.
In this technique, total cost is divided into fixed and variable components.
Fixed expenses remain constant in aggregate amount and do not vary with the increase or
decrease upto a particular level of output.
Variable expenses increase or decrease in proportion to increase or decrease in output and
remain constant per unit of output.
In this context, a special technique known as ‘ MARGINAL COSTING’ has been developed
which excludes fixed cost and help in decision making on the basis of variable or marginal cost.
MARGINAL COSTING
DIRECT MATERIAL
COST
PRODUCT COST
VARIABLE
DIRECT LABOUR
COST
COST
MANUFACTURING
MANUFACTURING
CONCERNS TOTAL
OVERHEAD
COST
SELLLING COST
PERIODS COST
ADMINSTRATION FIXED COST
COST
MANUFACTURING
OVERHEAD
MEANING OF MARGINAL
COSTING
Marginal costing is a costing method which charge the product with only those
costs that vary directly with volume
The ascertainment of marginal cost and the effect on profit of change in volume or
type of output by differentiating between fixed cost and variable cost is known as
marginal costing
Marginal costing is a technique of determining the amount of change in aggregate
cost due to an increase in one unit over the existing level of production.
FEATURES OF MARGINAL
COSTING
Techniques of cost analysis and presentation
Division of cost into fixed and variable cost
Period cost and product cost
Valuation of stock
Determination of profit
Calculation of profit
Recovery of cost
Break even analysis
ASSUMPTION OF MARGINAL
COSTING
All element of cost i.e manufacturing ,administration and selling and distribution
expenses can be divided into fixed and variable component
Per unit variable cost of a product remains constant at all level of output. In other
words total variable cost varies in proportion to volume of output
Per unit selling price remain constant at all level of operating activity
Total fixed cost remains unchanged at all levels of output
In case of production in addition to present level , only marginal or variable cost is
incurred as additional cost
In period cost , total cost amount to ₹ 40,000 and ₹ 50,000 against production of 15,000
units and 20,000 units respectively . How much is marginal cost per unit and how much
fixed cost ?
Total cost amount to ₹ 1,12,000 and ₹1,69,000 for 20,000 units and 36000 units respectively in two periods. Calculate
marginal cost per unit and fixed cost?
The cost of production of 1000 unit is given below:
Materials ₹20000
Labour ₹10,000
Overhead ₹20,000 (60% fixed)
Find out marginal cost in total and per unit and test the equation TC= VQ+F
DETERMINATION OF PROFIT UNDER MARGINAL
COSTING
CONTRIBUTION=SALES –VARIABLE COST
C=S - VC (1)
CONTRIBUTION=FIXED COST+PROFIT
C=F + Pt(2)
S – VC= F + Pt (3)
SOME OTHER EQ. OF VITAL SIGNIFICANCE DERIVED FROM ABOVE EQ.
S= VC + F + Pt
VC= S-C
F= C-Pt
Pt= C+F
FORMULA OF PROFIT
Sales (units) s 100
LESS: variable cost(marginal cost) vc 20
contribution c 80
LESS: fixed cost f 30
profit 50
SALIENT POINT OF
CONTRIBUTION ANALYSIS
IF CONTRIBUTION IS ZERO ,ONLY MARGINAL COST IS COVERED ,THE
LOSS WILL BE EQUAL TO FIXED COST(PERIOD COST)
When contribution is positive but less than fixed cost, there will be loss but at any
rate, it will be less than FC , because some portion of FC will be recovered
c <f , there will be loss less than F
When contri. Is positive but equal to FC ,there will be neither profit nor loss(break
even point) because contri. will just be sufficient to absorb fixed cost leaving no
surplus
C = F, no profit no loss or BEP
From the following information, compute the amount of profit earned using the technique of marginal costing :
A B
₹ ₹
Direct material per unit 7 9
Direct labour per unit 3 5
Selling price per unit 20 30
Output 2000 units 2000 units
Total overhead are ₹16000 out of which ₹12000 are fixed and rest are variable. These overhead are to be apportioned in
the ratio of output.
Meet & company Ltd. has three divisions each of which makes a different product.
The budgeted data for the next year is as follows:
Divisions A B C
Rs. Rs. Rs.
Sales- 1, 12, 000 56, 000 84, 000
Direct material - 14, 000 7, 000 14, 000
Direct labor- 5, 600 7, 000 22, 400
Variable overhead - 14, 000 7, 000 28, 000
Fixed cost- 28, 000 14, 000 28, 000
Total cost- 61, 600 35, 000 92, 400
The management is considering closing down division C. There is no possibility of
reducing variable costs. Advice whether or not division C should be closed down.
Marginal Cost Statement
Division A B C
Rs. Rs, Rs.
Sales 1, 12, 000 56, 000 84, 000
Marginal cost
(Direct material + Direct cost +
Variable overheads)
33, 600 21, 000 64, 400
Contribution 78, 400 35, 000 19, 600
Fixed cost 28, 000 14, 000 28, 000
Profit 50, 400 21, 000 (8, 400)
MARGINAL COST
MARGINAL COST REFER TO VARIABLE COST
VARIABLE COST CONSIST OF DIRECT MATERIALS,DIRECT
LABOUR,VARIABLE DIRECT EXPENSES AND ALL VARIABLE OVERHEAD.
VC IS INC $ DEC IN TOTAL COST ON ACCOUNT OF INC AND DEC OF
OUTPUT BY ONE UNIT.
V=10000
5000 =₹2
Substituting value of V in eq 1
15000x 2+f=40000
₹10000
ADVANTAGES OF MARGINAL
COSTING
Easiness
Helpful in profit planning
Meaningful managerial reporting
Profitability
Useful to standard and budgetary costing
Convenience in computing fixed overheads
Role in cost control
Helpful in managerial decision
DISADVANTAGES OF
MARGINAL DECISION
Difficulties in division of cost
Ignoring time element
Role of fixed expenses with development of technology
Not suitable for all concerns
Availability of other better techniques of cost control
Inappropriate basis of pricing
MARGINAL COSTING AS A
TOOL FOR DECISION MAKING
Make or buy decision
Change in product mix
Pricing decision
Exploring a new market
Shut down decision
MAKE OR BUY DECISION
stopping the production of the part and buying it from the market
Stopping the purchase of a component and to produce it in own
factory
STOPPING THE PRODUCTION
OF THE PART AND BUYING IT
FROM HE MARKET
A comparison of marginal cost of such production with that of buying price should
be made.
If MC is less than buying price, additional req of the component should be met by
making rather than buying .
If buying price is less MC , it will advantageous to purchase it from market .
Opportunity cost should also be taken into account
When decision goes “making on the basis of MC being less than buying price , the
amt of revenue from the alternative use of production facilities , if released , should
be taken an opportunity cost of making the component
Suppose a component is being manufactured with the help of a machines and 10,000 unit at a cost of ₹ 10 per unit ( of
which ₹ variable) are produced. The same component can be obtained from market @ ₹ 9.50 per unit .
But if machine is released from production (a case of buying the component from the market)and can be hired at an annual
rent of ₹6000
89000
Marginal cost of 10000 units @₹9 90000
saving if brought and machine is hired 1000
• decision whether to manufacture a component or to buy from outside is
“lost opportunity “
• When a component is produced a part of plant capacity is utilized i.e
some contribution is earned
• if company is running in full capacity ,the contribution thus earned will be
lost by not manufacturing the component .
• If company is not working at full capacity , the question of lost
contribution become irrelevant.
STOPPING THE PURCHASE OF
A COMPONENT AND TO
PRODUCE IT IN OWN
FACTORY
If decision for making req the setting up of new and separate factory, supervisory
staff may also needed. It req additional cost.
The price being paid to outsiders should be compared with additional cost which will
have to incurred in the form of raw material wages etc. If such additional cost are
less than the buying price, the component should be manufactured and vice-versa.
NON COST FACTORS ARE REQ
TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT
1. No compromise with respect of quality
2. Reliability of regular supply should definitely be ensured
3. If there are large fluctuation in demand = purchase from outside
4. If demand is likely to inc , own production may be preferred because it will lead
to lower cost in future
Q. A radio manufacturer finds that while its cost ₹6.25 per unit to make component XX-09 the same is available in the
market at ₹ 5.75 each. Continuous supply is also fully assured . The break- down of cost is:
per unit
Materials ₹2.75
Labour ₹1.75
Other variable exp ₹0.05
Depreciation and other fixed cost ₹1.25
6.25
1- will you make or buy ?
2- what would be your decision , if supplier offered the component at ₹4.85 per unit?
Shut down point= net escapable fixed cost/ contribution per unit
• It is also significant to note that a decision regarding temporary closure should not only be based on cost
data ,some other economic and social factor may also be considered.
• SHUT DOWN POINT= avoidable expenses / contribution per unit raw material
PERMANENT CLOSURE
If a business concern may not run profitably and reasonable or minimum return is
not forthcoming on capital employed in the business in the business in spite of
possible efforts being taken to improve it, it may be wise as well as profitable to
close the factory permanently
While taking this decision management should compare the income comingforth
from the following income
1. Income from continuance of the business operation
2. Income from sale or otherwise use of plant , building, etc. in case of complete
closure.
DROPPING A LINE OR
PRODUCT OR DEPARTMENT
Management has to decide whether the production of one or more product or line
should be dropped or curtailed.
If a product /line is dropped ,there will be some disengaged capacity , which may be
left unused or may be used to inc the production of product/line selected to be
continued
If any factor of production is key factor(available in restricted quantity or supply is
short), then contribution should be expressed in terms of per unit of key factor.
Product yielding highest contribution should be accorded top priority in production
programme
No product/ line should be dropped ,if it yield any amount of positive contribution.
VOLUME AND PROFIT RATIO
Profit-volume ratio indicates the relationship between contribution and sales and is
usually expressed in percentage.
The ratio shows the amount of contribution per rupee of sales
Since, in the short-term, fixed cost does not change, the profit-volume ratio also
measures the rate of change of profit due to change in the volume of sales.
P/V ratio helps in studying the profitability of operation of a business.
It is also useful to calculate the break even point , the profit at a given volume of
sales, the sales volume required to earn a desired profit and volume of sales
required to maintain the existing profits if selling price is reduced by a specific
percentage.
• Comparison of P/V ratio for different product can be used to find out which product is more
profitable
• Higher the P/V ratio ,more will be the profit and lower P/V ratio ,lesser will be the profit.
• Thus every concern aims at inc the P/V ratio
Solution:
Sales 50000
Profit 5000
Fixed cost 15000