EPM Module 4
EPM Module 4
management
Supritha M
Module 4
• Environmental audit
ENVIRONMENT AUDIT
ISO 19011 is defined as the standard that sets forth guidelines for auditing
management systems.
Communicating findings
Reviewing the results and process
As an environmental auditor, you will be responsible for the regular auditing of all
environmental policies and procedures. This involves working with an audit team
and with staff to get a good picture of how environmental compliance is being
handled. You will be responsible for:
Reviewing the operations of the business being audited and determining how
environmental issues are being handled
Write and compile final audit reports including results of the audit and
recommendations for changes and improvement
Internal audits are conducted by (or on behalf of) the organization itself.
These audits are typically in the context of assessing conformity, evaluating
effectiveness, identifying areas that could be improved, or as requirements
for certain ISO standards specifying that internal audits need to be carried
out.
First-party audits may also be done as a preparation for a 3rd party audit;
however, first party audits can never result in an ISO certification.
• Second-party
For example, a client and vendor have a contract, and goods or services are
being exchanged.
Customers can also request third-party audits, and this will usually be in
order to verify you conform to some specific requirements.
Only third-party audits can be used to get ISO certified. Third-party audits
may also result in other types of registration, recognition, or licensing.
The full scope of the audit system will also depend on the size of the auditee
(company being audited), as well as the nature and complexity of the
management system being audited.
During this stage, audit planning and preparations are made, including review of
all available documented information for the management system being audited,
and establishment of clear audit objectives and criteria.
Work done under the banner of “audit management” goes on to inform and
direct the actions of the auditors during the main audit process.
An important part of audit management is making sure the entire audit party
has adequately reviewed all documented information for the management
system being audited
• Audit process
“Audit process” might be a bit vague, but it basically means everything that
goes into actually conducting the audit, starting from making contact with the
auditee to prepare or request any documented information, and ending with
conducting closing meetings and distributing the completed audit report.
Working from the audit objectives established during the planning stage of
audit management, this basically asks “can we (the auditor) achieve the audit
objectives, based on time, resources, information, and cooperation with the
auditee?”.
The audit process also involves preparing a complete audit plan, preparing
additional documented information for the audit (like reference standards
and documents to bring with you during on-site evidence collection),
preparing for and conducting opening meetings, collecting audit evidence,
evaluating evidence against audit criteria, and preparing the final audit
report.
There‟s a lot that goes into the main audit process; the above points are just
• Competence and evaluation of auditors
The final component of the ISO 19011 standard is aimed at providing
general guidelines for making sure the auditors are competent to do their
job.
Such a process should also consider the specific needs, objectives, and
considerations of the audit program in question.
As with all ISO standards, requirements and guidelines alike, the whole
process of evaluating auditor competence should be adequately
documented, in order to maintain consistency, and ensure fair and reliable
results
• The process for evaluating auditor competence has four main steps:
Determine the level of competence required for the job
Establish some criteria for evaluating competence
Choose a method for evaluating competence
Conduct the evaluation
Following the evaluation, the results will contribute to the ongoing
performance evaluation of the auditors, and can be used to inform
the following decisions:
Selecting the audit team
Determining whether there is a need for improved competence
(e.g. more training)
Competence and evaluation of auditors also feeds back into and
supports the principle of continuous improvement, allowing an
audit team to maintain and improve competence via recurring
participation in audits
• ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT FORM-V (See rule 14) Environmental
Statement for the financial year ending with 31st March PART-A
These deviations can be identified through internal and external audits, customer
complaints, material inspection or routine testing.
A non-conformance report is then prepared. The purpose of the report is to
document the details of a deviation from expectations.
The report helps define the problem in a clear, logical and concise way so that
management can take steps to implement changes. ISO 9001:2015 no longer
requires a documented procedure, but one must still keep records of the
nonconformity and what was done to correct it
• Here are ways to prevent or minimize non-conformance: 1. Management
Review
Management review is akin to getting your car serviced every year even
when there are no overt signs of problems.
An audit is simply another form of testing i.e. comparing things as they are to
how they ought to be. Internal Audits need to be scheduled at regular
intervals to check whether the quality system conforms to requirements and
to ensure the system‟s efficacy.
Unlike an external audit, all the processes need not be audited at the same.
Internal audits can be conducted as a series of smaller audits, with different
processes audited at different times.
The frequency of audit can also be set depending on the process in question.
With changing internal and external dynamics, the criteria for the audit can be
decided prior to the audit rather than the planning stage.
Any previous findings, past audit conclusions, and pre-defined questions all
become valuable data. Observations raised during internal audits could be
classed as preventive actions as they can suggest improvements within the
system to prevent non-conformances from occurring in the future.
• 3.Feedback
It can be a legal obligation, but the term will more commonly apply to voluntary
investigations.
The theory behind due diligence holds that performing this type of investigation
contributes significantly to informed decision making by enhancing the amount
and quality of information available to decision makers and by ensuring that this
information is systematically used to deliberate on the decision at hand and all
its costs, benefits, and risks.
• Example for due diligence Business transactions and corporate finance[edit]