Fundamentals 07 4
Fundamentals 07 4
Crystallography
R.M. Sweet
Brookhaven Biology
Outline for the Lecture
• Remind you how much you already know -- lenses, crystals
• Show why crystals give diffraction spots.
• Develop the idea of “The Reciprocal Lattice”
• Give some idea how we might actually measure diffraction
data
• Show how, given a crystal, we can calculate the diffraction
pattern
• Conversely, show how to calculate the structure from the
diffraction
• Describe the importance of symmetry to diffraction
• Outline the structure-solving methods -- heavy atoms and
MADness
Outline for the Lecture
• Remind you how much you already know -- lenses, crystals
• Show why crystals give diffraction spots.
• Develop the idea of “The Reciprocal Lattice”
• Give some idea how we might actually measure diffraction
data
• Show how, given a crystal, we can calculate the diffraction
pattern
• Conversely, show how to calculate the structure from the
diffraction
• Describe the importance of symmetry to diffraction
• Outline the structure-solving methods -- heavy atoms and
MADness
Creation of a molecule’s image from a crystal has
similarities to creating an image with a lens
LIGHT Detector
Fourier
X-Rays Computer
Synthesis
Object Image
Lens
Visible
Image
plane
You already understand a little about how lenses work
LIGHT Detector
Fourier
X-Rays Computer
Synthesis
Image
plane
Maybe you didn’t know …
LIGHT Detector
Fourier
X-Rays Computer
Synthesis
Diffraction Image
plane plane
We use a crystal to give us diffraction, and
computation to do the rest of the work of the lens.
LIGHT Detector
Fourier
X-Rays Computer
Synthesis
Object Image
Lens
Visible
Diffraction Image
plane plane
We’ll see that the diffraction pattern
gives information about the
dimensions and periodicity of this
one view of the object.
Why do we use x-rays?
Parallelograms
defining crystal
repeat.
We could make a different
choice of repeating unit
Other
parallelograms
defining crystal
repeat.
Why do we use crystals when we’d
like to see one molecule?
• We can’t focus enough x-rays into a small enough
volume to “see” a molecule.
• Even if we could, the x-rays would burn up the
molecule.
• Even if that would work, we don’t have a lens for
the x-rays.
• The crystal amplifies the signal, and gives us a
way to get the phase information back.
Let’s return to our crystal made of
apple trees, and define “planes” in
that crystal.
We can slice the crystal at lattice points:
all planes pass through the same apple
Or like this, at an angle. As before, all planes pass by
the same apple in trees along the oblique row.
And at other angles. Notice:
• planes all pass by the same apple;
• the “stuff” between pairs of planes is always the same.
Outline for the Lecture
• Remind you how much you already know -- lenses, crystals
• Show why crystals give diffraction spots.
• Develop the idea of “The Reciprocal Lattice”
• Give some idea how we might actually measure diffraction
data
• Show how, given a crystal, we can calculate the diffraction
pattern
• Conversely, show how to calculate the structure from the
diffraction
• Describe the importance of symmetry to diffraction
• Outline the structure-solving methods -- heavy atoms and
MADness
Diffraction
Let’s do a thought experiment. Send a beam of x-rays at a
pair of single atoms, suspended in space. If the angle is just
right for the wavelength and distance between the atoms,
the scattered x-rays will be in phase, and they will interfere
constructively.
In phase
In phase
Now, let’s think of the stuff between the lattice planes
as being like those two atoms, and try to write a law
that will show conditions to get diffraction.
Now get rid of
the orchard...
Braggs’ Law describes diffraction as reflection from planes
Wavelength
See: www.journeysunysbedu/ProjectJava/Bragg/home.html
Now let’s use a similar diagram to learn
something new about diffraction from a
crystal
This defines
Reciprocal
Space! The vector
of length 1/d is
perpendicular to
the reflecting plane
that lies θ from the
“rays.”
And Bragg’s Law is obeyed – diffraction will occur – when
that vector of length 1/dhkl, that is perpendicular to the lattice
plane (hkl), touches the Ewald sphere of radius 1/.
Because we
have this tool,
the Ewald
sphere and
reciprocal space,
we never need
to think about
lattice planes
and Bragg’s law
again.
How can we define this vector that is perpendicular to
the Bragg plane, and has a length that is the reciprocal
of the distance between the planes?
We’ll define the edges of a unit cell with three vectors.
Start with a and b. We know that the cross product of two
vectors lies perpendicular to the plane of the two vectors.
This is the direction we want. The amplitude of a×b is the
area of the parallelogram defined by the vectors:
a×b = ab sinα
a
α
We’ve described the base of the unit cell of the crystal by
two vectors a and b, and the area of the base is the amplitude
of the cross product of a and b.
Now we’ll include the third vector c. We want the spacing
d(001), between the ab planes [the (001) lattice planes]. It must be
the projection of c on the vector a×b. We know that we get the
product of the projection of one vector on another with the
vector dot product: (a×b)∙c.
a×b
c
d(001) (001) plane
b
a
α
So a×b∙c, known as a vector triple product, is the area of ab
times d(001), the spacing between the planes. That, of course is
the Volume of the unit cell. If we divide this quantity into the
area, we get the reciprocal of the spacing, which is what we
want!!
1/d (001) = a×b / a×b∙c = c*
a×b
c
d(001)
b
a
α
So the reciprocal lattice vector that represents the (001)
planes is
s001 = a×b / a×b∙c and s001 = 1/d(001)
We define each axial reciprocal lattice vector as a
reciprocal unit cell axis:
s100 = a* s010 = b* s001 = c*
a×b
c
d(110)
b
a
shkl = ha* + kb* + lc*
The implication of this is that we
never think about Bragg planes
again, we think only of reciprocal-
lattice vectors.
(h0l) data
Martin Buerger devised a camera geometry
that preserved the shape of reciprocal space.
The precession
photograph
allows us to
view the
diffraction
pattern of the
crystal lattice as
an undistorted
pattern of spots.
The screen was small, but it was very sensitive and could read out
continuously – the x-tal just kept rotating as images came out.
(20yrs ago)
Bram Schierbeek
Bruker-AXS
An important advance was photoluminescent imaging plates.
MAR research, followed by Rigaku, made a successful camera
that worked like electronic x-ray film, but much better. (19 yrs)
The advance that made possible our modern detectors
was made by Ed Westbrook, Sol Gruner, and others:
bonding of a charge-coupled device to a fiber-optic taper
with an x-ray sensitive phosphor in front. (13yrs ago)
PHO SPHO R
SCREEN F IB E R O P T IC T A P E R
CCD
25 m m
1 2 k e V X -ra y 6 5 0 lp h 3 5 lp h 10 e-
Several of these can be bonded together to make a large
detector… (9yrs ago)
Like this one, made
for us by Walter
Phillips
And the modern commercial versions are large,
fast, and very accurate. (4yrs ago)
Detectors like these are the basis for
modern, high-throughput crystallography!
The planes of
spots in reciprocal
space appear as
circles of spots on
an area-sensitive x-
ray detector (film,
IP, CCD-based,
etc.)
Z. Dauter
As the
crystal is
rotated, the
circles are
extended into
“lunes”
Z. Dauter
Rotation sweeps out a strangely-
shaped volume. However...
• Many r.l. points will be
recorded during a single short
rotation.
• Contiguous rotations will cover
much of the reciprocal lattice.
• The “camera” is simple: an
axis, a film, and a shutter.
• It’s easy to substitute a range of
detectors.
Let’s look at a series of images from a CCD-
based detector, each representing one degree
of crystal rotation
Outline for the Lecture
• Remind you how much you already know -- lenses, crystals
• Show why crystals give diffraction spots.
• Develop the idea of “The Reciprocal Lattice”
• Give some idea how we might actually measure diffraction
data
• Show how, given a crystal, we can calculate the
diffraction pattern
• Conversely, show how to calculate the structure from the
diffraction
• Describe the importance of symmetry to diffraction
• Outline the structure-solving methods -- heavy atoms and
MADness
Now we use the Taylor and Lipson figures to see how the
contents of the crystal relate to the diffraction pattern.
Notice (1)
The
symmetry,
and (2) how
the
continuous
diffraction
pattern of
one molecule
(b) is
“sampled” by
the lattice of
diffraction
points.
crystal Coordinates of points diffraction
are “indices.”
Plate 2 from Taylor and Lipson -- Optical Transforms
Here’s another (2D) example with an asymmetric motif
Each spot
represents the
intensity of
reflection
from one set
of planes
cutting
through the
crystal
Note the
inversion
symmetry
Ai
Ao Phase
Ao angle
0 2 Ar r
Randy Read
• Note that the electron density is real but the structure factor
is complex.
• The phase information must be included in the Fourier
synthesis that produces the electron density!
• This has to be recovered, because the diffraction
experiment measures the intensity of diffraction, which is
the square of the structure factor:
I = F2
How does Fourier synthesis work?
Can we produce a trial structure and see how
waves can be summed to give this structure
back?
In the Fourier Synthesis, just a few waves suffice to give a
reasonable approximation to the original pattern
What is the concept of
“resolution?”
Here is the Fourier
synthesis function:
3 × 32 = I
32 = 3-1
3 × 2 = 2’
Point Group is 32
Simple crystal symmetry
Three new
symmetry
operators are
generated
Notice:
exactly two
ducks in the
unit cell
Now let’s try it in three dimensions
c
(h, k, l)
The Laue Point Group for a crystal is
the rotational or mirror symmetry of the
space group, plus Friedel’s Law. For
example:
P2 or P21 → 2/m
Produces a two-fold, a mirror
perpendicular to it, and an inversion
centre in the diffraction pattern /
reciprocal space.
Bijvoet
pair
FP = Σ Fatoms FPH = FP + FH FH
imaginary
f’
f”
Excitation Scans
real
Onethe
We can observe way to measuring
f” by represent
this
the absorption resonance
of the x-rays byisthe
plots of
atom. We measure an in
the shifts “excitation”
the real part (
spectrum. Often we imaginary
f’) and us the part (f”)
fluorescence of the absorbing atom as
of the scattering of x-rays
a measure of absorptivity.
as a function of the
photon energy.
From Ramakrishnan’s study of GH5
Scattering Power
fo
imaginary
f’
f”
imaginary
f’
f”
real
One way to represent
this resonance is plots of
the shifts in the real part (
f’) and imaginary part (f”)
of the scattering of x-rays
as a function of the
photon energy.
From Ramakrishnan’s study of GH5
The tunability of the synchrotron source
allows us to choose precisely the energy
(wavelength) we need.
One can see how to choose wavelengths to get
large phase contrast for MAD phasing
* *
*
* *
* * * Maximum
Real Signal
Maximum
* Imaginary
Signal
*
h+k+l=0
Finally, it's not so hard to see that if the three Fs are large, the sum
of phases should be near zero, as follows. If the only three atoms
in the unit cell were at the corners of the colored triangle in Figure
5, firstly, all three structure factors would be large since all atoms
lie only on the planes, and secondly, since the atoms are on the
planes, the phases would be zero. One can see that it makes sense
that this sum of phases might be constant. If one moves an atom
from one vertex of the colored triangle in the figure to the next
along the green line (the -2,1 plane), one can see that the other two
phases, for the red and blue sets of planes, would shift smoothly
by +2 and -2 respectively, keeping the total constant.
General Scheme for Applying Direct
Methods
• Assign a few phases arbitrarily (this sets the origin).
• Find lots of triplets, where h+k+l = 0.
• Use the sum-of-phases 0 expression to propagate
phases
The modern schemes are much more sophisticated
(Weeks) and deal with the probabilities that the sum is
not precisely zero.
The End
You’ve seen the fundamentals of
crystallography. That’s all there is to it.
I’ll take a few exposures to it for you really to
wrap your mind around all of this.
For example,
• I didn’t really understand the Fourier
transform until I did EM on 2D x-tals
• I didn’t figure out how to explain direct
methods until the 21st Century.
But I can tell you this, if you really
want to learn it…
Teach It!