Lecture One
Lecture One
BANKING AND
INSURANCE
• Lecture,
• Group discussions,
• Demonstrations, and
• Seminars
Learning
Materials
• Text books,
• Journals,
• Manual,
• Handout,
• Coursework:
60%
• Assignments: 15%
• Test 1: 20%
• Test 2: 20%
• Quizzes:
5%
• Semester Examination:
40%
Required
Readings
• Reading List:
• Fredric S.Mishikin (1994), Money Banking and Financial
Markets, Prentice-Hall.
• David S. Kidwell, Richard L. Peterson, David W. Blackard (2003),
Financial Institutions Market and Money, McGraw-Hill.
• Fredrick S.Mishkin, Stanley G. Eakins (2006), Financial Markets
and Institutions, Pearson International Edition
Topic 1
• History of money
• Mean and types of money
• Evolution of money
Meaning and types of money
• The word "money" can mean many things. It is used with different
connotations in our everyday speech. On the one hand, if people say
that a person has a lot of money, they usually mean that the person is
wealthy/ Affluent. On the other hand, to economists money has a very
specific meaning. They define money as “anything that is generally
accepted in payment for goods and services or in the repayment for
debts.” (Mishkin, 1992, p.G-7) It should be mentioned at this point
that currency, e.g. the euro (€), is one type of money. However, to
define money merely as currency would be too narrow for economists
Meaning and types of money
• This general acceptability mentioned in the definition is the most
important requirement of money. No matter how precious a material
is, if it is not generally acceptable by the people as a means of
exchange, it will not qualify as money. Thus it is a peculiar feature of
any form of money.
• Generally, money is any thing that can be acceptable for the exchange
as a consideration in payment of goods or service. For instance a trade
man from Tanzania may go to America for trade tripe with his
Tanzanian shilling thus it can’t be easy for this man to transact with
his homeland currency in America due to acceptability constraint.
Meaning and types of money
• After be well acquainted with the meaning of money and salient
feature of it, its time to look various types of money form its essence.
EVOLUTION OF
MONEY
• The barter system
Before the evolution of money, individuals were used to transact in a barter way,
in which the exchange of goods and services were made directly.
Thus in a barter system, exchange was done on the basis of direct exchange of
goods and services.
Barter involves the direct exchange of one good for some quantities of another
good. For example, a horse may be exchanged for a cow, or three sheep or four
goats. Hence, for a transaction to take place there must be a double coincidence
of wants. For instance, if the horse-owner wants a cow, he has to find out a
person who not only possesses the cow but also wants to exchange it with the
horse.
EVOLUTION OF
MONEY
• In other cases, goods are exchanged for services. A doctor may be paid in kind as
payment for his services. For example, he may be paid a cock, or some wheat or
rice or fruit.
• Thus a barter economy is a moneyless economy. It is also a simple economy
where people produce goods either for self-consumption or for exchange with
other goods which they want. Bartering was found in primitive societies. But it is
still practiced at places where the use of money has not spread much. Such non-
monetized areas are to be found in many rural areas of under-developed countries.
• Generally barter system is the system of exchanging goods for goods or goods for
services or service for service.
EVOLUTION OF
MONEY
• Thus, exchanging through barter system perceived to have several difficulties when
trade transactions were to be done and It involves loss of much time and effort on
the part of people trying to exchange goods and services. Thus The barter system is
the most inconvenient method of exchange.
• As a method of exchange, barter system has the following difficulties and
disadvantages:
i) lack of double coincidence
ii) lack of a common measure of value
iii) indivisibility of some goods
iv) difficulty in store value
v) difficulty in making different payments
vi) lack of specialization
LACK OF DOUBLE COINCIDENCE OF
WANTS
The functioning of the barter system requires double coincidence
of wants on the part of those who want to exchange goods or services. It
is necessary for a person who wishes to trade his good or service for
another, find some other person who is not only willing to buy his good
or service, but also possesses that good which the former wants
For example, suppose a person possesses a horse and wants to exchange
it for a cow. In the barter system, he has to find out a person who not
only possesses a cow but also wants a horse. The existence of such a
double coincidence of wants is a remote probability
LACK OF DOUBLE COINCIDENCE OF
WANTS
For it is a very laborious and time-consuming process to find out a
person who wants the other's goods. Often times, the horse-owner
would have to carry through a number of intermediary transactions. He
might have to trade his horse for some sheep, sheep for some goats and
goats for the cow he wants. To be successful, the barter system involves
multilateral transactions which are not possible practically.
Consequently, if the double coincidence of wants is not matched
exactly, no trade is possible under barter. Thus a barter system is time-
consuming and is a great hindrance to the development and expansion
of trade.
LACK OF A COMMON MEASURE OF
VALUE
• Another difficulty under the barter system relates to the lack of a
common unit in which the value of goods and services should be
measured. Even if the two persons who want each other's goods meet
by coincidence, the problem arises as to the proportion in which the
two goods should be exchanged. There being no common measure of
value, the rate of exchange will be arbitrarily fixed according to the
intensity of demand for each other's goods. Consequently, one party is
at a disadvantage in the terms of trade between two goods.
INDIVISIBILITY OF SOME
GOODS
• The bailer is based on the exchange of goods with other goods. It is
difficult to fix exchange rates for certain goods which are indivisible.
Such indivisible goods pose a real problem, under barter. For example A
person may desire a horse and the other a sheep and both may be willing
to trade. The former may demand more than four sheep for a horse but
the other is not prepared to give five sheep and thus there is no exchange.
If a horse had been divisible, a payment of four and a half sheep for a
horse might have been mutually satisfactory. Similarly, if the man with
the horse wants only two sheep, then how will he exchange his horse for
two sheep. As it is not possible to divide his horse, no trade will be
possible between the two persons. Thus indivisibility of certain goods
makes the barter system inoperative.
DIFFICULTY IN STORE
VALUE