0% found this document useful (0 votes)
154 views60 pages

Chapter 3 Analysis and Design of Two Way Slab

The document discusses the analysis and design of two-way slabs and flat slabs. It describes how two-way slabs transfer loads in two directions and are more complex to analyze than one-way slabs. It also outlines the advantages of flat slabs, which are slabs supported directly by columns without beams, and describes the simplified direct method of analyzing flat slabs.

Uploaded by

tamratdugo9
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
154 views60 pages

Chapter 3 Analysis and Design of Two Way Slab

The document discusses the analysis and design of two-way slabs and flat slabs. It describes how two-way slabs transfer loads in two directions and are more complex to analyze than one-way slabs. It also outlines the advantages of flat slabs, which are slabs supported directly by columns without beams, and describes the simplified direct method of analyzing flat slabs.

Uploaded by

tamratdugo9
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 60

Chapter 3

part-I
Analysis and design of two-way slabs
3.1.Introduction
 In reinforced concrete construction, slab used to provide flat,
useful surfaces.
slab is referred to as a two-way slab when
the slab is supported on all four sides and the length L ,
is less than twice the width,
 the slab will deflect in two directions, and
the loads on the slab are transferred to all four supports.
The bending moments and deflections in such slabs are less
than those in one-way slabs.
Analysis and design of two way slabs system is a lot more
complex as load transfer is in two orthogonal directions and
computing the design actions is not straight forward as in one-
way slabs.
Friday, April 12, 2024 2
• In many cases, rectangular slabs are of such proportions
and are supported in such a way that two- way action
results. When loaded, such slab bent in a dished surface
rather than a cylindrical one.

Friday, April 12, 2024 3


3.2. Analysis and design of two-way slabs
• Simply supported slabs

Friday, April 12, 2024 4


The values in the table are derived from the following
equations

Friday, April 12, 2024 5


Rectangular panels with restrained edges

Friday, April 12, 2024 6


Friday, April 12, 2024 7
Friday, April 12, 2024 8
Loads on supporting Beams

Friday, April 12, 2024 9


Friday, April 12, 2024 10
Example
Design a solid slab spanning in two directions and simply supported
along each edge on beams as shown in figure below. The slab is
rectangular in plan and measure 5m by 6m between the center of the
supports. In addition to self-weight the slab carries a characteristic
dead load of 0.5KN/m2 and imposed load of 5KN/m2. Use C25/30,
S400 and Cover 25 mm

Friday, April 12, 2024 11


solution
Step 1: design constants
C25/30 𝑓𝑐𝑑 = 14.1667 𝑀𝑝𝑎 𝑓𝑐𝑡𝑚 = 2.6 𝑚𝑝𝑎

S400 𝑓𝑦𝑑 = = 347.826 𝑀𝑝𝑎

Friday, April 12, 2024 12


Step 2: depth determination

….(1)

….(2)

Assumption: - Slab is lightly reinforced (𝜌 = 0.5 %)


𝜌𝑜 = ∗ 10-3 = ∗ 10-3 = 5 ∗ 10-3
applying equation 1
K=1.0, = 18.5 because we used S400 multiply the value by =1.25
= 18.5 *1.25 =23.125 l=lx =5000mm d = 216.22mm
Using ∅ 10 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 25 𝑚𝑚, D = 216.22 + 25 +
= 246.22mm 𝑈𝑠𝑒 D = 250 𝑚𝑚

Friday, April 12, 2024 13


Step 3: loading
Permanent load
 Slab self weight =0.25*25 = 6.25KN/m2
 Additional dead load = 0.5KN/m2
 Total = 6.75KN/m2
Variable Loading
 Imposed load on slab = 5KN/m2
Design load for the slab
𝑃𝑑 = 1.35 𝐷𝐿 + 1.5 𝐿𝐿 = 1.35 ∗ 6.75 + 1.5 ∗ 5
= 16.613𝐾𝑁⁄𝑚2

Friday, April 12, 2024 14


Step 4: analysis

Msx=αsxpdlx2 , Msy=αsy pdlx2


Ly/lx =6/5 = 1.2
αsx = 0.084 αsy = 0.059 [from table]
Msx=αsxpdlx2 =0.084*16.613*52 =34.89KNm
Msy=αsy pdlx2 =
0.059*16.613*52 =24.5KNm

Friday, April 12, 2024 15


Step 5: design for flexure

For short span with reinforcement in bottom layer


d1= 250 -25 -10/2 =220mm
𝑎𝑠 = 78.5 𝑚𝑚2 𝑓𝑐𝑑 = 14.1667 𝑚𝑝𝑎 𝑓𝑦𝑑 = 347.826 𝑚𝑝𝑎
𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 0.26 ∗ 𝑏𝑡𝑑 > 0.0013𝑏𝑡𝑑 = 371.8𝑚𝑚2
As.max =0.04Ac =0.04*1000*220 =8800mm2
= =0.849
Z=0.849*220mm =186.78mm
Friday, April 12, 2024 16
As =537.04mm2

Smin =

Smax400mm
Number of bars = = 6.84 =7

Provide 7∅ 10 𝐶|𝐶 210 𝑚𝑚 per meter

Friday, April 12, 2024 17


For longer span
d2 =250-25-10-10/2 =210mm
= =0.745
Z=0.745*210mm =156.45mm
As =450.22mm2

Smin =

Number of bars = = 5.73 =6


Provide 6∅ 10 𝐶|𝐶 210 𝑚𝑚 per meter

Secondary reinforcement = 20% As main (homework)


Friday, April 12, 2024 18
Step 6: Check for deflection
Control by limiting span/effective depth ratio based on short span for a
two-way spanning slab
ρ = = = 0.00244=0.244%
Basic limiting span /effective depth ratios are,
For concrete lightly stressed(ρ = 0.5%) 20
For concrete highly stressed (ρ = 1.5%) 14
By interpolation at ρ =0.244% 18.98
The actual service steel stress modification factor is
= = =1.279
Therefore ,the permissible span/effective depth ratio is
18.89*1.279 =24.16
Since span not greater than 7m no further adjustment is required.
Actual span/effective depth ratio =5000/220 =22.72 <24.16 ok
Friday, April 12, 2024 19
Step 7: check shear capacity of the slab
Shear resistance of concrete alone, VRd,c

CRD,C =0.18/γc =0.18/1.5 =0.12N/mm2


K= 1+ ≤ 2 =1+ =1.96 ≤2 …ok ,k=1.96, k1=0.15
𝑉𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 0.035𝐾3⁄2𝑓𝑐𝑘1 /2 =0.035*1.963/2*251/2 = 0.4802
Taking minimum reinforcement
𝜌 = = =0.00173 < 0.02

σcp = = ≤ 0.2 fcd = 0 ……..[as there is no axial load]

VRD,C =[0.12*1.96(100*0.00173*25)1/3 +0.15*0]1000*215]


= 82.4KN > 103.243KN[0.4802*1000*215]…..not ok
Therefore, VRD,C =103.243KN
Friday, April 12, 2024 20
Maximum acting shear
𝑉𝑠𝑑 = 𝑃𝑑(0.5𝑙𝑛 - 𝑑)𝑏𝑤
Assuming the beam width to be 200 mm
𝑝𝑑 = 16.613𝐾𝑁⁄𝑚2 𝑙𝑛 = 5 - 0.2 = 4.8𝑚 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔
𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ
𝑉𝑠𝑑 = 16.613(0.5(4.8) - 0.215) ∗ 1
𝑉𝑠𝑑 = 36.3 𝐾𝑁
𝑉𝑅𝐷,𝐶 > 𝑉𝑠𝑑 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑡e

Friday, April 12, 2024 21


Step 8: Detailing
• Reinforcement details only for bottom layer is
shown below

Friday, April 12, 2024 22


step 9: Load transfer to beam
To consider pattern loading, load is transferred separately for dead and live
load cases.
Factored dead load = 1.35 ∗ 6.75 = 9.1125 𝐾𝑁⁄𝑚2
𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 1.5 ∗ 5 = 7.5 𝐾𝑁⁄𝑚2
• Case 1 Dead load
𝑞𝑖 = 9.1125 𝐾𝑁⁄𝑚2

for short span for long span


vsx = βvxpdlx vsy = βvypdlx
βvx = 0.39 βvy =0.33
vsx = 0.39*9.1125*5 vsy = 0.33*9.1125*5
= 17.77KN =15.03KN
• Case 2 Live load
𝑞𝑖 = 7.5 𝐾𝑁⁄𝑚2

vsx = 0.39*7.5*5 vsy = 0.33*7.5*5


Friday, = 14.625KN
April 12, 2024 =12.375KN 23
Part II

3.3.Analysis and design of flat slabs

Friday, April 12, 2024 24


Introduction
What is a flat slab?
A reinforced concrete slab supported directly by concrete
columns without the use of beams

Friday, April 12, 2024 25


Friday, April 12, 2024 26
Friday, April 12, 2024 27
Friday, April 12, 2024 28
Friday, April 12, 2024 29
• Flat slabs with drop panel and column head are suitable
for spans up to 9 m and LL > 5.0 KN/m2 such as in
storage, Warehouses, parking lots, and garages where
structures carry heavy loads. For lighter loads flat plates
are suitable.

Friday, April 12, 2024 30


Advantages of flat slabs
Flexibility in room layout
 Saving in building height
Simplified formwork
Shorter construction time
no beams to obstruct the light and the circulation of air.
Economical construction

Friday, April 12, 2024 31


Flexibility in room layout

Friday, April 12, 2024 32


Saving in building height

Friday, April 12, 2024 33


Analysis of flat slabs
There are two methods for the analysis of flat slabs
Equivalent frame method
Simplified direct method

Friday, April 12, 2024 34


Simplified Direct Method
For analysis purpose, the panel in flat slab is divided
into column strip and middle strip as shown below

Friday, April 12, 2024 35


Friday, April 12, 2024 36
• A column strip is a design strip with a width on each side of a
column centerline equal to 0.25 lx or if drops with dimensions not
less than lx/3 are used, width equal to the drop dimension.
• Middle strip is a design strip bounded by two column strips.
• The drop panels are rectangular or square and influence the
distribution of moments with in the slabs.
• Effective diameter of a column on a column head is defined as the
diameter of a circle whose area equals the cross-sectional area of
the column or, if column heads are used effective head dimensions,
as shown below.

Friday, April 12, 2024 37


Friday, April 12, 2024 38
• The following limitations shall be observed when using
the simplified method:
• Design is based on the single load case of all spans
loaded with the maximum design ultimate load.
• There are at least three rows of panels of
approximately equal span in the direction being
considered.
• Successive span length in each direction shall not
differ by more than one-third of the longer span.
• Maximum offsets of columns from either axis between
center lines of successive columns shall not exceed
10% of the span (in the direction of the offset).

Friday, April 12, 2024 39


• Bending Moment and Shear Force Coefficients for Flat
Slabs using the simplified direct method are given below.

Friday, April 12, 2024 40


Table 3.2.2 Distribution of Design Moments in Panels

Friday, April 12, 2024 41


Design Considerations
Internal panels
• The column and middle strips shall be designed to
withstand the design moments
• Two-thirds of the amount of reinforcement required to
resist the negative design moment in the column strip
shall be placed in a width equal to half that of the
column strip and central with the column.

Edge panels
Same as internal panels
Friday, April 12, 2024 42
Friday, April 12, 2024 43
Design of slabs for punching shear
• The punching shear failure mechanism can occur in any two-
way spanning members which are supported directly by
columns or which are acted on by heavy concentrated loads.

• Thus, for punching shear, the average shear stress becomes:

υ = V/udav
Where u = length of the critical perimeter
dav = average of the two effective depths.
Friday, April 12, 2024 44
Critical shear perimeter

Friday, April 12, 2024 45


• The shear strength, υc, for members subjected to
punching, is calculated differently
υc = 0.5fctdk1k2udav
• Where
k1  1  50  e   2.0
k 2  1.6  d  1.0
d av  d x  d y  2

 e   ex   ey   0.015
1
2

Friday, April 12, 2024 46


• When the punching shear force due to applied loads is
eccentric to the loaded area or the force is combined with a
moment as would happen in an edge or corner column the
adverse effect of the applied load is significantly increased.
• This effect is allowed for by the multiplication of the applied
force, Vsd , by a factor β.

Figure 3.2.12 Factor  to allow for eccentricity of loading


Friday, April 12, 2024 47
Example
The floor of a building constructed of flat slab is 30mx24m. The
column centers are 6m in x-direction and 7.5m in y direction and the
building is braced with shear walls. The panels are to have drops of
3mx3m with a thickness of 250mm and the slab thickness away from
the drop is 200mm. Column size 500mmx500mm. design panel S1
and S2 and check for punching failure using C-30 for concrete and S-
300 for reinforcement class I works. Given DL= self weight
+2.5KN/m2 for floor finish and partitions and LL=3.5KN/m2

Friday, April 12, 2024 48


S2

S1

Friday, April 12, 2024 49


solution
Since the slab dimension in each direction are equal and there are
more than three rows of panels in each direction, we can use the
simplified direct design method.
Design load calculation
 DL(self weight of slab) = 6x7.5x0.2x25=225KN
 DL due to weight of drop=4(1/4)x3x3x0.05x25=11.25KN
 DL from floor finish and partitions=6x7.5x2.5=112.5KN
 Total DL=225+11.25+112.5=348.5KN
 LL=3.5x6x7.5=157.5KN
 The total design ultimate load
F=1.35DL+1.5LL=1.35x348.5+1.5x157.5=706.725KN
 Equivalent uniform distributed load wd=F/A=706.725/(6x7.5)=
15.705KN/m2

Friday, April 12, 2024 50


Friday, April 12, 2024 51
Calculation of Design moments

i. Short direction (x-direction)


 Effective diameter of column hc====564.19mm
 L =L1-2/3hc =6-2/3(0.56419) =5.62m
1st interior support moment
M-ve = -0.063FL =-0.063*706.725*5.62 =-250.22KNm
interior support moment
M-ve = -0.055FL =-0.055*706.725*5.62 =-218.45KNm
interior span moment
M+ve = 0.071FL =0.071*706.725*5.62 = 281.99KNm

Friday, April 12, 2024 52


ii. Longer direction (y-direction)
Effective diameter of column hc====564.19mm
 L =L1-2/3hc =7.5-2/3(0.56419) =7.12m
1st interior support moment
M-ve = -0.063FL =-0.063*706.725*7.12 =-317.01KNm
interior support moment
M-ve = -0.055FL =-0.055*706.725*7.12 =-276.75KNm
interior span moment
M+ve = 0.071FL =0.071*706.725*7.12 = 357.26KNm

Friday, April 12, 2024 53


Moment Distribution in to middle and Column strips
Since drop size is equal to width of column strip with out
drop(Lx/2=3m), there is no need for moment adjustment.
c =0.75b -ve
a b d = b - c
c =0.55b +ve
Direction Total BM BM on Column strip BM on Middle strip
X M1-ve=-250.22 -187.665 -62.555
155.09 126.9
M+ve=281.99

M2-ve=-218.45 -54.61
-163.84

Y M1-ve=-317.01 -237.76 -79.25


M+ve=357.26 196.493 160.767

M2-ve=-276.75 -207.56 -69.19

Friday, April 12, 2024 54


Effective depth calculation

Assume ϕ12 bar and clear cover of 15mm used

Friday, April 12, 2024 55


Friday, April 12, 2024 56
Friday, April 12, 2024 57
Friday, April 12, 2024 58
Check for shear punching(internal column slab connection)

Applied punching shear


Vup=F –((500*500 +4(500*1.5d)+π*(1.5d)2)*wd
Vup=706.725 –((500*500 +4(500*1.5*223)+π*(1.5*223)2)*15.705*10-6
=686.77KN
• Allowing for eccentricity using β=1.15 for internal column
• Veff = βVup =1.15*686.77 =789.786KN
Friday, April 12, 2024 59
• Shear strength of concrete Vc
υc = 0.5fctdk1k2udav
use ρe=0.015 b/c ρex and ρey are larger than ρmin=0.0017
k1=1+50 ρe=1+50*0.0015=1.08
k2=1.6-dav=1.6-0.223=1.38
fctk=0.21fck2/3/γc=1.165
υc = 0.5*1.165*1.08*1.38*4101.73*223*10-3=794.09KN

Vc>Veff --------------Ok!!
No need of shear stirrups for punching.

Friday, April 12, 2024 60

You might also like