MG 312 Zoom Tutorial 2
MG 312 Zoom Tutorial 2
Understanding change
LEARNING OUTCOMES
• After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
– Understand and evaluate the theories of planned
change.
– Apply the general model of planned change to current
situations.
– Summarise and assess the relevance of the different
types of planned change.
– Critically analyse planned change and construct a
contemporary definition of planned change.
THEORIES OF PLANNED CHANGE
Lewin’s Change Model
Action Research Model
– The action research cycle
– Contemporary adaptations to action research
The Positive Model.
LEWIN’S CHANGE MODEL
• Change, for Lewin, is the result of forces that strive
to maintain the status quo and forces that push for
change
• An early model of change developed by Lewin
described change as a three-stage process:
– The first stage he called ‘unfreezing’. It involved
overcoming inertia and dismantling the existing ‘mind set’.
– In the second stage the change occurs. This is typically a
period of confusion and transition.
– The third and final stage he called ‘freezing’. This is often
now called ‘refreezing’ (see p. 36 text)
LEWIN’S CHANGE
MODEL Refreezing
(CONT.)
Movement
Unfreezing
Critical Questions: What is ‘wrong’ with this diagram?
Can you ‘improve’ it?
ACTION RESEARCH MODEL
• This model is very popular in OD as a way of
planning and implementing a change
• In this model, the planned change is seen as a
cyclical process where action is guided by
preliminary research about the development
needs of the organisation
• Feedback loops allow it to be an iterative process
between gathering information, making changes
and then gathering more information
ACTION RESEARCH CYCLE
CONTEMPORARY ADAPTATIONS TO
ACTION RESEARCH
• Moving from smaller subunits to total systems and
communities: more complex and multiple
stakeholders
• Being applied internationally: needing to find its
‘cultural ‘fit’
• Being applied to achieve positive social change:
community development and global social change
movements
THE POSITIVE MODEL
• Fundamentally different to Lewin’s theory of change
and the action research model
• Rather than focus on what is NOT working, it
focuses on what IS working
• Uses an approach known as Appreciative Inquiry
(AI)
• Everyone is involved in creating the ‘positive vision’
and so is more motivated to be committed to
making the change happen
COMPARISONS OF CHANGE
MODELS
• Similarities
– Change is preceded by diagnosis or preparation
– All involve organisation members in the change process
– All have an evaluation at the end of each process
• Differences
– The role of the OD specialist
– Fixing problems versus building on strengths
approaches
GENERAL MODEL OF PLANNED
CHANGE
GENERAL MODEL OF PLANNED
CHANGE (CONT.)
• Entering and contracting
• Diagnosing
• Planning and implementing
• Evaluating and institutionalising
TYPICAL SEQUENCE OF PLANNED
CHANGE
• Entering, contracting and diagnosing:
– The problem, issue or strength is identified
– Organisation makes commitment of time and resources
– Role of OD practitioner is clarified
– Data is gathered
• Planning and implementing:
– Agreeing on an approach to the agreed change
– Planning the process
– Motivating and sustaining the process to achieve the change
• Evaluating and institutionalising:
– Determining success and limitations of the change
– Embedding change through feedback, training, and rewards
DIFFERENT TYPES OF PLANNED
CHANGE
• Magnitude of change
– Incremental
– Quantum
• Degree of organisation
– Overorganised
– Underorganised
• Domestic versus international settings
CRITIQUE OF PLANNED CHANGE
• In conceptualisation
– Limits to our knowledge about how to change behaviour
– Context is an important variable and current models are
limited in adapting to context
– Change is not linear or rational – emergent conditions
make planned change chaotic
– Evaluation methods are imprecise
• In practice
– Limitations in OD practitioner skill
– Failure in diagnosis
– Unrealistic expectations within the organisation
THE CONTINGENCY APPROACH TO
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
• Dunphy and Stace criticise planned change models
that try to determine the outcome through a fixed
process
• The theory is situational because the changes are
contingent on how ‘. . . to achieve optimum fit with the
changing environment’ (Dunphy & Stace, 1990, p. 54)
• They identify two aspects of change that will assist in
deciding what type of change needs to be made:
scale of change; and management style needed to
achieve a change
TWO ASPECTS: SCALE OF CHANGE
AND STYLE OF MANAGEMENT
THE PROCESS STRATEGY MODEL
OF CHANGE
FOUR TYPES OF PROCESS CHANGE
STRATEGY
• Depending on the mix of the scale of change and
the style of management needed, Dunphy and
Stace identify the following:
– Participative evolution
– Charismatic transformation
– Forced evolution
– Dictatorial transformation