Troubleshooting Guideline For VoLTE - v0.5
Troubleshooting Guideline For VoLTE - v0.5
January, 2016
Version 0.5 - DRAFT
Introduction
Scope
• This document should give guidance of VoLTE monitoring, worst performing cell assessment and further
troubleshooting and remedy actions.
• As VoLTE is a complex service spanning several networks domains (UE, radio access, EPC, IMS, TAS,
user data management etc.), also the monitoring and troubleshooting can point to any of these domain(s).
Neverthless, the primary scope of this document is radio access network. Considering also an embraced
need for mobility (Single Radio Voice Call Continuity - SRVCC) of users between different radio access
network types, that involves LTE, UTRAN & GERAN.
• Proactive KPI monitoring and capacity management out of scope of this guideline.
• VoLTE principles and theoretical background is out of scope of this guideline
2 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
Introduction
Need for document updates
• This version of the document has been issued prior to swap to Nokia. Hence no real VoLTE experience
has been made on Nokia in Orange network.
• For the reason above this version of the document should be treated as draft version, which is as such
rather theoretical. Further versions of document could be enriched by real cases from ORF network
addressing already encountered problems and giving more concrete problem troubleshooting and
resolution hints.
• This version of the document assumes SRAN16.2 (FL16) with some remarks to the next release
SRAN16.10 (FL16A). However, updates are required with every new system release as there could be
new VoLTE related features and counters introduced.
• Any potential changes in parameter baseline (template) shall be reflected in this document is available.
For instance, there could be a new VoLTE related feature globally activated in Orange network. Such
feature can have eventually a dedicated set of counters through which the performance of the feature
could be monitored.
3 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
Monitoring Principles
VoLTE performance monitoring
There are several inputs that could be utilized for VoLTE performance monitoring and assessment:
• OSS KPI’s (focus on EUTRAN KPI’s)
• Drive test KPI’s
• Customer complaints
• Additional KPI’s from EPC, IMS, TAS, PCRF, HSS, UTRAN, GERAN etc.
• Interface traces (from probing system or NE internal traces capturing also IF/protocols terminated at the
particular NE)
The primary scope of this document are EUTRAN KPI’s from OSS. These should be used for initial
KPI monitoring and assessment. The other imputs could be used for enhanced ad hoc troubleshooting if the
OSS KPI’s for EUTRAN aren’t sufficient for root cause analysis.
Important note: EUTRAN KPI’s do not necessarily reflect end-to-end performance. Remember, SIP
signaling (UE<>IMS) is transparent to EUTRAN!
4 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
Monitoring Principles
VoLTE performance monitoring
Similar to any other service, VoLTE performance could be measured, monitored and assessed in several well
known performance areas:
• Accessibility
• Retainability
• Mobility
• Quality/Integrity
Note, these ‘performance areas’ should not be treated as standalone as there’s a relation between them. For
example, if there are issues with VoLTE mobility (failed HO, SRVCC), it can be also reflected in other
areas, such as retainability (drops due to failed or missing HO) or quality/integrity (frequent radio link
related issues and RRC connection reestablishments due missing or failed HO).
Primary goal is to make cell level KPI monitoring, assessment and troubleshooting. Even cell level
approach can capture some wider area (e.g. network-wide) issues, such as global configuration issues etc.
5 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
Monitoring Principles
VoLTE – bearers / protocol stacks
VoLTE utilizes at least the following two EPS bearers:
• Default EPS bearer for IMS PDN connectivity (QCI5 – SIP/SDP)
• Dedicated EPS bearer for VoLTE session/call (QCI1 – RTP/RTCP)
IR.92 requires support of the following radio bearers:
• UE must support: SRB1 + SRB2 + 4 x AM DRB + 1 x UM DRB
• Network must support: SRB1 + SRB2 + 2 x AM DRB + 1 x UM DRB
• QCI5 (Non-GBR) mapped on AM DRB, QCI1 (GBR) mapped on UM DRB
Both, VoLTE control plane (SIP/SDP) and media plane (RTP/RTCP), are
transparent to E-UTRAN (&EPC)! Radio access network treats this kind of
traffic as pure user plane payload with certain QoS.
This makes VoLTE troubleshooting just from EPS less efficient.
6 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
Performance Monitoring
KPI’s to be monitored
Attached workbook lists all the KPIs Aand counters that shall be monitored according to:
• KPI categories (accessibility, retainability,…)
• Purpose (main – for top level KPI monitoring, auxiliary – for drill down analysis)
VoLTE_KPI's_and_
Counters_FL16
7 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
Summary
VoLTE KPI’s in reports available in Reporting Suite (NPM)
System Program (RSLTE000) / System Program (cell level) (RSLTE001)
• System Program report provides an overview of network status. RSLTE000_-_Syste RSLTE001_-_Syste
m_Program m_Program_cell_level
• Contains group ‘VoLTE’ with VoLTE related Top level KPI’s
8 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
Accessibility Appendix A
S1AP release causes
Retainability
Appendix B
Mobility (intra-LTE & inter-RAT) X2AP release causes
Quality / Integrity
Appendix C
VoLTE flow charts per
KPI category
9 © Nokia Solutions
2016 and Networks 2016 Confidential
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Random access & RRC accessibility
• UE attempting to make either SIP registration or VoLTE call (MOC/MTC) could be either in RRC Connected or
RRC Idle state.
UE eNB EPC/IMS
• If UE is initially in RRC Idle state, it has to
go through random access and RRC setup PRACH MAC Random Access Preamble
procedure before it can initiate any SIP
PDCCH MAC RA-RNTI
related procedure ( SIP registration / VoLTE
call setup). PDSCH MAC Random Access Response
• Random access procedure as well as RRC
RRCConnectionRequest
Connection Setup procedure has no
VoLTE specifics. PDSCH MAC Contention Resolution
10 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Random access & RRC accessibility
• By default VoLTE reuses existing RRC establishement causes. Based on these causes it’s not possible to distinguish
between data calls and VoLTE calls. For example, in case of MOC VoLTE call the RRC establishment cause would
be “mo-Data”
• TS 36.331 V12.8.0 (2015-12) introduces new RRC connection establishment cause “mo-VoiceCall”. However, this
cause is not supported in the current Nokia system release (FL16)
VoLTE KPI
‘IMS’ default bearer accessibility
• Every VoLTE UE need to have default bearer for well known APN “IMS” established in order to make
SIP registration. Only when UE is registered in IMS, it can initiate and receive VoLTE calls.
Note1:
E-RAB could be set up either via Initial Context Setup (initial E-RAB)
procedure or E-RAB setup (additional E-RAB) procedure
Note2:
It depends on operator’s trategy whether ‘IMS’ default bearer (QCI5) gets
established prior to ‘internet’ default bearer or not.
12 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
‘IMS’ default bearer accessibility
E-UTRAN E-RAB Setup Success Ratio, QCI5 [LTE_5646a], unit: %
This KPI indicates the setup success ratio of the elementary E-RAB setup procedure, used to set up the E-RAB between MME and UE
for QCI5 DRBs. It indicates the E-UTRAN's contribution to network accessibility for the end user, not the whole end-to-end service
accessibility.
Formula: (Logical)
E-RAB SSR QCI5=(E-RAB setup successes QCI5 / E-RAB setup attempts QCI5)*100%
13 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
‘IMS’ default bearer accessibility
ERAB_INI_SETUP_ATT_QCI5 [M8006C192]
• This measurement provides the number of setup attempts for initial E-RABs of QCI5
• Reception of an S1AP:INITIAL CONTEXT SETUP REQUEST message sent by the MME to the eNB. The counter is updated with the number of
QCI5 bearers contained in the "E-RAB to Be Setup List" IE.
ERAB_INI_SETUP_SUCC_QCI5 [M8006C210]
• This measurement provides the number of successfully established initial E-RABs of QCI5.
• Transmission of an S1AP:INITIAL CONTEXT SETUP RESPONSE message sent by eNB to the MME. The counter is updated with the number of
QCI5 bearers contained in the "E-RAB Setup List" IE.
eNB MME
14 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
‘IMS’ default bearer accessibility
ERAB_ADD_SETUP_ATT_QCI5 [M8006C201]
• This measurement provides the number of setup attempts for additional E-RABs of QCI5.
• Reception of an S1AP:E-RAB SETUP REQUEST message sent by the MME to the eNB. The counter is updated with the number of QCI5 bearers
contained in the "E-RAB to Be Setup List" IE.
ERAB_ADD_SETUP_SUCC_QCI5 [M8006C219]
• This measurement provides the number of successfully established additional E-RABs of QCI5.
• Transmission of an S1AP:E-RAB SETUP RESPONSE message sent by eNB to the MME. The counter is updated with the number of QCI5 bearers
contained in the "E-RAB Setup List" IE.
eNB MME
15 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
‘IMS’ default bearer accessibility
• If E-UTRAN E-RAB Setup Success Ratio, QCI5
[LTE_5646a] equals to ‘0’, check:
- whether there are any QCI5 setup attempts at all: E-UTRAN E-
RAB Setup Attempts, QCI5 [LTE_5641a]
- eNB configuration whether QCI5 is supported
(LNBTS:qciTab5/qciSupp=ENABLE)
>>GTP-TEID M 9.2.2.2 -
UTRAN E-RAB Setup Success Ratio, E-RAB Failed to Setup List O E-RAB List
9.2.1.36
A value for E-
RAB ID shall
YES ignore
(containing at least S1AP) and check the E-RAB for Setup List IE
and E-RAB
‘IMS’ (QCI5) Failed to Setup
cause(s) of the failures in the Criticality Diagnostics O 9.2.1.21
List IE.
YES ignore
corresponding S1AP messages:
- INITIAL CONTEXT SETUP RESPONSE E-RAB SETUP RESPONSE
IE/Group Name Presence Range IE type and Semantics Criticality Assigned
- E-RAB SETUP RESPONSE reference description Criticality
Message Type M 9.2.1.1 YES reject
- INITIAL CONTEXT SETUP FAILURE MME UE S1AP ID M 9.2.3.3 YES ignore
eNB UE S1AP ID M 9.2.3.4 YES ignore
E-RAB Setup List 0..1 YES ignore
E-RAB List >E-RAB Setup Item IEs 1 .. <maxnoof E- EACH ignore
IE/Group Presence Range IE type and Semantics Critica Assigned RABs>
Name reference description lity Criticality >>E-RAB ID M -
E-RAB List 1 .. EACH ignore >>Transport Layer Address M 9.2.2.1 -
Item <maxnoofE >>GTP-TEID M 9.2.2.2 eNB TEID. -
-RABs> E-RAB Failed to Setup List O E-RAB List A value for E- YES ignore
>E-RAB ID M 9.2.1.2 - - 9.2.1.36 RAB ID shall
>Cause M 9.2.1.3 - - only be present
once in E-RAB
Setup List IE
E-RAB for and in E-RAB
Failed to Setup
‘IMS’ (QCI5) List IE.
Details on causes are in Appendix A Criticality Diagnostics O 9.2.1.21 YES ignore
17 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
‘IMS’ default bearer accessibility
• For worst performing cells in terms of E- eNB MME
18 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) accessibility
• VoLTE call utilizes dedicated bearer (QCI1) for media plane (RTP/RTCP).
• From EUTRAN perspective VoLTE call setup is represented by E-RAB (QCI1) setup
19 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) accessibility
E-UTRAN E-RAB Setup Success Ratio, QCI1 [LTE_5204b], unit: %
The KPI indicates the setup success ratio for the elementary E-RAB setup procedure, used to set up the E-RAB between MME and UE
for QCI1 DRBs. It indicates the E-UTRAN's contribution to network accessibility for the end user, not the whole end-to-end service
accessibility.
Formula: (Logical)
E-RAB SSR QCI1=(E-RAB setup successes QCI1 / E-RAB setup attempts QCI1)*100%
20 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) accessibility
ERAB_INI_SETUP_ATT_QCI1 [M8006C188]
• This measurement provides the number of setup attempts for initial E-RABs of QCI1
• Reception of an S1AP:INITIAL CONTEXT SETUP REQUEST message sent by the MME to the eNB. The counter is updated with the number of
QCI1 bearers contained in the "E-RAB to Be Setup List" IE.
ERAB_INI_SETUP_SUCC_QCI1 [M8006C206]
• This measurement provides the number of successfully established initial E-RABs of QCI1.
• Transmission of an S1AP:INITIAL CONTEXT SETUP RESPONSE message sent by eNB to the MME. The counter is updated with the number of
QCI1 bearers contained in the "E-RAB Setup List" IE.
eNB MME
21 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) accessibility
ERAB_ADD_SETUP_ATT_QCI1 [M8006C197]
• This measurement provides the number of setup attempts for additional E-RABs of QCI1.
• Reception of an S1AP:E-RAB SETUP REQUEST message sent by the MME to the eNB. The counter is updated with the number of QCI1 bearers
contained in the "E-RAB to Be Setup List" IE.
ERAB_ADD_SETUP_SUCC_QCI1 [M8006C215]
• This measurement provides the number of successfully established additional E-RABs of QCI1.
• Transmission of an S1AP:E-RAB SETUP RESPONSE message sent by eNB to the MME. The counter is updated with the number of QCI1 bearers
contained in the "E-RAB Setup List" IE.
eNB MME
22 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) accessibility
• If E-UTRAN E-RAB Setup Success Ratio, QCI1
[LTE_5204b] equals to ‘0’, check:
- whether there are any QCI1 setup attempts at all: E-UTRAN E-
RAB Setup Attempts, QCI1 [LTE_5205b]
- eNB configuration whether QCI1 is supported
(LNBTS:qciTab1/qciSupp=ENABLE)
>>GTP-TEID M 9.2.2.2 -
UTRAN E-RAB Setup Success Ratio, E-RAB Failed to Setup List O E-RAB List
9.2.1.36
A value for E-
RAB ID shall
YES ignore
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) accessibility
• For worst performing cells in terms of E- eNB MME
25 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) accessibility
• In case the cause of dedicated bearer setup in S1AP is
“Radio Network Layer: Invalid QoS combination”, check:
- eNB configuration whether QCI1 is supported
(LNBTS:qciTab1/qciSupp=ENABLE)
- eNB configuration whether the maximum GBR for downlink and
uplink (LNBTS:qciTab1/maxGbrDl, LNBTS:qciTab1/maxGbrUl)
is greated that what’s requested in E-RAB setup:
E-RAB to be Setup List
BR
ax G
>E-RAB To Be Setup Item IEs
<m
>>E-RAB Level QoS Parameters
R
GB
>>>GBR QoS Information
>>>>E-RAB Guaranteed Bit Rate Downlink / Uplink
26 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public RAC – Radio Admission Control
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) accessibility
• In case the cause of dedicated bearer setup in S1AP is “Radio Network Layer: Radio resources not
available”, check:
- activation status of feature Smart Admission Cotrol (LTE497) (LNBTS:actEnhAcAndGbrServices) and the
corresponding parameterization
LTE497
- settings of counter based RAC (LNCEL:maxNumQci1Drb) if the above listed feature is not enabled
- cell load via the following KPI’s:
• E-UTRAN Average Number of Simultaneous QCI1 E-RABs [LTE_5394a]
RSLTE052_-_VoLT RSLTE054_-_Capa
• E-UTRAN Maximum Number of Simultaneous QCI1 E-RABs [LTE_5610a] E city
• Additional KPI’s as defined in Nokia predefined reports in NPM: RSLTE052 “VoLTE” & RSLTE054 “Capacity”
- If the radio is congested, initiate radio extension feasible for the site under investigation -> capacity management task
27 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public TAC – Transport Admission Control
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) accessibility
• In case the cause of dedicated bearer setup in S1AP is “Transport Layer: Transport Resource
Unavailable”, check:
- parameterization of feature Transport Admission Cotrol (LTE144) and Measurement based TAC (LTE1401)
LTE144 LTE1401
- cell load via the following KPI’s:
• feature related counters (as listed in the feature description document) RSLTE048_-_TAC_
traffic_per_TAC_Interface
• Nokia predefined report in NPM: RSLTE048 “TAC traffic per TAC Interface”
- If the transport is congested, initiate transport extension with corresponding TAC parameter tuning -> capacity
management task
28 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
Accessibility Appendix A
S1AP release causes
Retainability
Appendix B
Mobility (intra-LTE & inter-RAT) X2AP release causes
Quality / Integrity
Appendix C
VoLTE flow charts per
KPI category
29 © Nokia Solutions
2016 and Networks 2016 Confidential
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) retainability
Example of normal VoLTE call clearing
• From EUTRAN perspective VoLTE call is
successfully cleared if dedicated bearer (QCI1) gets
released ‘normally’.
• Any eventual ‘abnormal’ release of dedicated bearer
(QCI1) degrades retainability of VoLTE
• Retainability for data and voice can’t be directly
compared due to different average holding time of
each service: E-RAB (QCI1) release
30 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) retainability
• E-RAB release counters are updated based on specific signaling on S1 interface (S1AP)
• There are two main categories. Each category contains several counters per release cause:
Each bearer of the E-RAB to be Released
eNB initiated E-RAB release EPC initiated E-RAB release
List IE is counted.
eNB MME eNB MME Note: According to IR.92 “IMS Profile for
QCI1 Voice and SMS” only one QC1 bearer can
QCI1
E-RAB RELEASE COMMAND be created for UE:
E-RAB RELEASE INDICATION
“Since the minimum requirement for the
E-RAB RELEASE RESPONSE UE is the support of one (1) UM bearer
which is used for voice (see Section 7.3.1
and Annex B in 3GPP TS 36.331 [52]), the
eNB MME eNB MME network must not create more than one
dedicated bearer for voice media.
UE CONTEXT RELEASE COMMAND Therefore, the UE and network must be
UE CONTEXT RELEASE REQUEST able to multiplex the media streams from
UE CONTEXT RELEASE COMPLETE multiple concurrent voice sessions.”
31 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
32 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
33 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
M8006C89 EPC initiated EPS Bearer EPC_EPS_BEAR_REL_REQ_ The number of EPC-initiated EPS Bearer Release The reception of an S1AP:E-RAB Release Command Integer
Release requests for QCI1 due N_QCI1 requests for QCI1 due to normal release by UE. Each or an S1AP:UE Context Release Command message number
to Normal release by UE bearer of the E-RAB to be Released List IE is sent by the MME to eNB.
counted.
M8006C98 EPC initiated EPS Bearer EPC_EPS_BEAR_REL_REQ_ The number of EPC-initiated EPS Bearer Release The reception of an S1AP:E-RAB Release Command Integer
Release requests for QCI1 due D_QCI1 requests for QCI1 due to the Detach procedure by the or an S1AP:UE Context Release Command message number
to Detach procedure by UE or UE or the MME. Each bearer of the E-RAB to be sent by the MME to eNB.
MME Released List IE is counted.
M8006C107 EPC initiated EPS Bearer EPC_EPS_BEAR_REL_REQ_ The number of EPC-initiated EPS Bearer Release The reception of an S1AP:E-RAB Release Command Integer
Release requests per QCI1 R_QCI1 requests for QCI1 due to the Radio Network Layer or an S1AP:UE Context Release Command message number
due to Radio Network Layer cause. Each bearer of the E-RAB to be Released List sent by the MME to eNB.
cause IE is counted.
M8006C116 EPC initiated EPS Bearer EPC_EPS_BEAR_REL_REQ_ The number of EPC-initiated EPS Bearer Release The reception of an S1AP:E-RAB Release Command Integer
Release requests for QCI1 due O_QCI1 requests for QCI1 due to Other causes. Each bearer or an S1AP:UE Context Release Command message number
to Other causes of the E-RAB to be Released List IE is counted. sent by the MME to eNB.The counter is updated if the
release request detected does not match any other
failure counter.
M8006C278 EPC initiated QCI1 E-RAB ERAB_REL_EPC_PATH_SWIT This measurement provides the number of QCI1 E- This counter is incremented with the number of QCI1 E- Integer
releases due to Path Switch CH_QCI1 RABs abnormally released in case that EPC has RABs contained in the "E-RAB To Be Released List " of number
failed to perform the UP path switch for at least one, the S1AP: PATH SWITCH ACKNOWLDEGE message,
covered in mobility section of this document but not for all, of the E-RABs included in the preceding which is received from the MME (3GPP TS 36.413).
S1AP: PATH SWITCH REQUEST.
34 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) retainability
• E-RAB release counters per cause for both categories (eNB initiated / EPC initiated) shall be collected on cell level
and distribution shall be made.
• Most frequent ‘abnormal’ causes shall be anaysed and corresponding most typical failure scenarios shall be
identified along with the root causes.
• The essential task is to make categorization of causes - which cause should be considered as ‘normal’ and which
causes as ‘abnormal’
• Following slides provide certain guidance for the E-RAB counters per causes in respect to categorization
‘normal’/’abnormal’ release
• Note: All EPC initiated E-RAB releases are considered as ‘normal’ from E-UTRAN point of view as reflected in KPI
LTE_5572c, LTE_5571d, LTE_5209c. Neverthless, some of the ECP initiated E-RAB release counters are related to
‘abnormal’ behavior of EPC. Hence it is recommended to monitor and assess these counters as well
35 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) retainability
eNB initiated QCI1 E-RAB releases due to loss of connection to the UE [M8006C268]
Released active ERABs QCI1 [M8006C176]
• Release cause: "RNL Radio Connection with UE lost“
• The latter counter considers only releases when there were user data in the queue at the time of release
• Abnormal release from user’s perspective
• Typically related to RLF, e.g. T310 expiry.
• Following features and their tuning can reduce pegging of this counter:
- LTE1617: RLF Triggered Handover
- LTE1569: QCI 1 specific RLF and reestablishment control
- LTE2206: Extended RLF handling
- LTE2098: VoLTE Uplink Coverage Boosting
- Mobility related features (intra-LTE, SRVCC)
36 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) retainability
eNB initiated QCI1 E-RAB releases due to user inactivity [M8006C267]
• Release cause: "User Inactivity"
• Normal / Abnormal release
• Normal release: typically caused by user inactivity during ringtone (if ringtone generated locally in UE). UE goes to RRC idle mode
due to inactivity, for example, during a ringtone, which might last longer than a normal inactivity timer
- Probability increases with lover Inactivity Timer settings
- Could be eliminated with feature LTE2430: QCI1 Establishment Triggered Protection Timer
• Abnormal release: typically indicates mute call (both directions), i.e. no RTP neither RTCP traffic. Note: Prerequisite is that
inactivity is also detected for other established E-RAB’s (e.g. ‘internet’ APN).
- Detailed troubleshooting required
- Media plane (RTP, RTCP) traces need to be analysed on several interfaces involved
• Not considered as abnormal in KPI LTE_5572c, LTE_5209c
37 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) retainability
eNB initiated QCI1 E-RAB releases due to insufficient transport resources [M8006C269]
• Release cause: "Transport Resources Unavailable"
• Abnormal release from user’s perspective
• As this counter is related to E-RAB release not setup, it’s not TAC (Transport Admission Control) related. TAC is done in case of
inter eNB mobility though – see mobility section
• Check transport related alarms for particular eNB(s) and parameterization of GTP-U path supervision (eNB <> S-GW)
• Typical failure scenarios to be identified
38 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) retainability
eNB initiated QCI1 E-RAB releases due to redirect to another cell [M8006C270]
• Release cause: "Inter-RAT redirection", "Redirection towards 1xRTT", "CS Fallback Triggered", "UE Not Available For PS
Service", or "E-UTRAN Generated Reason" if the release cause is set due to an intra-LTE redirect.
• Normal / Abnormal release
• Normal release: from E-UTRAN point of view, redirection is a normal release as per system desing – i.e. conditions for redirection
fulfilled (corresponding A2 measurement event reported by UE)
• Abnormal release: from UE point of view, IRAT redirection during ongoing VoLTE call is abnormal as VoLTE call can’t be
sustained and need to be prematurely terminated. Normal procedure for VoLTE IRAT mobility is SRVCC not redirection!
• Check/optimize:
- Redirection thresholds (A2) and other related parameters
- SRVCC thresholds (A2/B2) and other related parameters
- Status of A2-based redirect for VoLTE calls (LNCEL:a2RedirectQci1)
• Not considered as abnormal in KPI LTE_5572c, LTE_5209c
39 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) retainability
eNB initiated QCI1 E-RAB releases due to E-UTRAN Generated Reason [M8006C271]
• Release cause: "E-UTRAN Generated Reason" sent by the eNB to the MME if the release cause is not set due to an intra-LTE
redirect.
• Abnormal release from user’s perspective
• Typical failure scenarios to be identified
• Collect additional traces (UE, RRC, eNB internal,…) for further troubleshooting
40 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) retainability
eNB initiated QCI1 E-RAB releases due to "Radio Network Layer Cause - Radio resources not available“
[M8006C272]
• Release cause: "Radio resources not available"
• Normal / Abnormal release
• Normal release: from E-UTRAN point of view, QCI1 E-RAB could be intentionally released if there are no radio resources
available.
• Abnormal release from user’s perspective
• As this counter is related to E-RAB release not setup, it’s not RAC (Radio Admission Control) related. RAC is done in case of inter-
cell mobility though – see mobility section
• Collect additional traces (UE, RRC, eNB internal,…) for further troubleshooting
• Not considered as abnormal in KPI LTE_5572c, LTE_5209c
41 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) retainability
There are several Nokia standard KPIs for VoLTE (QCI1) retainability:
E-UTRAN E-RAB QCI1 with data in the queue drop ratio, RAN View, RNL Failure with UE Lost [LTE_5571d], unit: %
This KPI indicates the ratio of a specific E-RAB drop (abnormal release) cause to all E-RAB releases. Cause: E-RAB QCI1 with data in the queue drop ratio, RAN View, RNL
Failure with UE Lost.
E-UTRAN E-RAB QCI1 Normal Release Ratio User Perspective [LTE_5209c], unit: %
This KPI describes the ratio of normally released QCI1 E-RABs from user perspective. This KPI is corresponding to a Connection Completion Ratio.
Important note: Formula versions above refer to FL16 system release. All three formulas have newer versions in FL16A!!!
42 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) retainability
E-UTRAN E-RAB QCI1 Drop Ratio, RAN View [LTE_5572c], unit: %
This KPI describes the ratio of abnormally released (dropped) QCI1 E-RABs from RAN point of view.
Notes:
1. Each QCI1 bearer of the "Bearer to be Released List" IE is counted.
2. RAN point of view means that as abnormal E-RAB drops only those ones initiated by eNB are counted.
3. In the denominator of the formula normal and abnormal E-RAB releases except the successful intra LTE and inter RAT HO are counted.
4. QCI1 E-RAB releases due to S1 RESET are not counted at all.
5. Inter RAT HO to GERAN is excluded from counting on ERAB_REL_HO_PART and ERAB_REL_HO_PART_QCI1 because it is not certain whether the MME will include
the E-RAB with QCI#1 into the "E-RABs to Release List". So the restriction is not only in eNB side but also in EPC side.
Formula: (Logical)
E-RAB QCI1 DR RAN = (abnormal QCI1 E-RAB releases from RAN point of view / all QCI1 E-RABreleases) * 100%
43 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) retainability
E-UTRAN E-RAB QCI1 Drop Ratio, RAN View [LTE_5572c], unit: %
Formula: (NE names)
100*sum([QCI1 E-RABs released due to partial Handover] + [Total number of released QCI1E-RABs initiated by the eNB] - [eNB
initiated QCI1 E-RAB releases due to user inactivity]- [eNB initiated QCI1 E-RAB releases due to redirect to another cell] - [eNB
initiatedQCI1 E-RAB releases due to "Radio Network Layer Cause - Radio resources not available"])
/
sum([Total number of released QCI1 E-RABs initiated by the eNB] + [QCI1 E-RABs releaseddue to partial Handover] + [EPC initiated
EPS Bearer Release requests for QCI1 due toNormal release by UE] + [EPC initiated EPS Bearer Release requests for QCI1 due to
Detachprocedure by UE or MME] + [EPC initiated EPS Bearer Release requests per QCI1 due toRadio Network Layer cause] + [EPC
initiated EPS Bearer Release requests for QCI1 due toOther causes] + [EPC initiated QCI1 E-RAB releases due to Path Switch])
44 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) retainability
E-UTRAN E-RAB QCI1 with data in the queue drop ratio, RAN View, RNL Failure with UE Lost
[LTE_5571d], unit: %
This KPI indicates the ratio of a specific E-RAB drop (abnormal release) cause to all E-RAB releases. Cause: E-RAB QCI1 with data in
the queue drop ratio, RAN View, RNL Failure with UE Lost.
Notes:
1. Each bearer of the "Bearer to be Released List" IE is counted.
2. There is an overlapping in the abnormal E-RABs counted within the LTE_5090d and LTE_5570e but from network planning and optimization point of view it is mandatory
to have also an own indicator dealing with active E-RAB drops with data in the buffer only.
3. The formula LTE_5571d is needed to monitor the VoIP Call Drop Ratio.
4. In the denominator of the formula normal and abnormal E-RAB releases except the successful intra LTE and inter RAT HO are counted.
5. E-RAB releases due to S1 RESET are not counted at all.
6. E-RAB releases due to "No Radio Resources Available" initiated by eNB are counted as normal releases as they are not real drops resulted from any radio quality problems.
7. Inter RAT HO to GERAN is excluded from counting on ERAB_REL_HO_PART and ERAB_REL_HO_PART_QCI1 because it is not certain whether the MME will include
the E-RAB with QCI#1 into the "E-RABs to Release List". So the restriction is not only in eNB side but also in EPC side.
Formula: (Logical)
E-RAB DRCause = (abnormal E-RAB release request_x / all E-RAB releases) * 100%
45 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) retainability
E-UTRAN E-RAB QCI1 with data in the queue drop ratio, RAN View, RNL Failure with UE Lost
[LTE_5571d], unit: %
Formula: (NE names)
100*sum([Released active ERABs QCI1])
/
sum([Total number of released QCI1 E-RABs initiated by the eNB] + [QCI1 E-RABs released due to partial Handover] + [EPC initiated
EPS Bearer Release requests for QCI1 due toNormal release by UE] + [EPC initiated EPS Bearer Release requests for QCI1 due to
Detach procedure by UE or MME] + [EPC initiated EPS Bearer Release requests per QCI1 due toRadio Network Layer cause] +
[EPC initiated EPS Bearer Release requests for QCI1 due toOther causes] + [EPC initiated QCI1 E-RAB releases due to Path
Switch])
46 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) retainability
E-UTRAN E-RAB QCI1 Normal Release Ratio User Perspective [LTE_5209c], unit: %
This KPI describes the ratio of normally released QCI1 E-RABs from user perspective. This KPI is corresponding to a Connection
Completion Ratio.
Notes:
1. Each QCI1 bearer of the "Bearer to be Released List" IE is counted.
2. In both the numerator and denominator of the formula normal E-RAB releases except the successful intra LTE and inter RAT HO are counted.
3. QCI1 E-RAB releases due to S1 RESET are not counted at all.
4. Inter RAT HO to GERAN is excluded from counting on ERAB_REL_HO_PART and ERAB_REL_HO_PART_QCI1 because it is not certain whether the MME will include
the E-RAB with QCI#1 into the "E-RABs to Release List". So the restriction is not only in eNB side but also in EPC side.
Formula: (Logical)
E-RAB QCI1 NRR UP = (normal E-RAB QCI1 releases user perspective / all E-RAB QCI1 releases) * 100%
47 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) retainability
E-UTRAN E-RAB QCI1 Normal Release Ratio User Perspective [LTE_5209c], unit: %
48 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
E-RAB RELEASE INDICATION
VoLTE KPI IE/Group Name
Message Type
Presence
M
Range IE type and
reference
9.2.1.1
Semantics
description
Criticality
YES
Assigned
Criticality
ignore
- E-UTRAN E-RAB QCI1 with data in the queue drop E-RAB RELEASE COMMAND
ratio, RAN View, RNL Failure with UE Lost [LTE_5571d] IE/Group Name Presence Range IE type and Semantics Criticality Assigned
reference description Criticality
- E-UTRAN E-RAB QCI1 Normal Release Ratio User Message Type M 9.2.1.1 YES reject
MME UE S1AP ID M 9.2.3.3 YES reject
Perspective [LTE_5209c] eNB UE S1AP ID M 9.2.3.4 YES reject
UE Aggregate O 9.2.1.20 YES reject
collect traces (containing at least S1AP & X2AP) Maximum Bit Rate
E-RAB To Be Released M E-RAB List A value for E- YES ignore
and check the cause(s) of the failures in the List 9.2.1.36 RAB ID shall
only be present
corresponding S1AP messages: once in E-RAB
To Be Released
List IE.
- E-RAB RELEASE INDICATION NAS-PDU O 9.2.3.5 YES ignore
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) retainability
• For worst performing cells in terms of: UE CONTEXT RELEASE REQUEST
- E-UTRAN E-RAB QCI1 Drop Ratio, RAN View IE/Group Name Presence Range IE type and Semantics Criticality Assigned
reference description Criticality
[LTE_5572c] Message Type M 9.2.1.1 YES ignore
MME UE S1AP ID M 9.2.3.3 YES reject
- E-UTRAN E-RAB QCI1 with data in the queue drop eNB UE S1AP ID M 9.2.3.4 YES reject
Cause M 9.2.1.3 YES ignore
ratio, RAN View, RNL Failure with UE Lost [LTE_5571d] GW Context Release O 9.2.1.84 YES reject
Indication
- E-UTRAN E-RAB QCI1 Normal Release Ratio User
Perspective [LTE_5209c] UE CONTEXT RELEASE COMMAND
collect traces (containing at least S1AP & X2AP) IE/Group Name Presence Range IE type and
reference
Semantics
description
Criticality Assigned
Criticality
and check the cause(s) of the failures in the Message Type
CHOICE UE S1AP IDs
M
M
9.2.1.1 YES
YES
reject
reject
corresponding S1AP messages: >UE S1AP ID pair
>>UE S1AP ID pair M 9.2.3.18
>MME UE S1AP ID
- E-RAB RELEASE INDICATION >>MME UE S1AP
ID
M 9.2.3.3
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) retainability
• For worst performing cells in terms of:
- E-UTRAN E-RAB Setup Success Ratio, QCI1 [LTE5204b]
- E-UTRAN E-RAB QCI1 Normal Release Ratio User Perspective [LTE_5209c]
- E-UTRAN E-RAB QCI1 Normal Release Ratio User Perspective [LTE_5209c]
collect traces (containing at least S1AP & X2AP) and check the cause(s) of the failures in the corresponding X2AP
messages:
- HANDOVER REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGE
- HANDOVER PREPARATION FAILURE
• Handover failures covered in mobility section of this document
51 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Default ‘IMS’ bearer (QCI5) retainability
• As default bearer for ‘IMS’ APN is a default bearer, it should coexist with default bearer for ‘Internet’ APN. From
that perspective, the retainability performance and troubleshooting could be combined for both default bearers. Note,
there could be even more than two default bearers depending on the network specific configuration.
• There’s currently just one counter related to QCI5 E-RAB retainability:
52 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
Accessibility Appendix A
S1AP release causes
Retainability
Appendix B
Mobility (intra-LTE & inter-RAT) X2AP release causes
Quality / Integrity
Appendix C
VoLTE flow charts per
KPI category
53 © Nokia Solutions
2016 and Networks 2016 Confidential
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility
X2 – based
S1 - based
54 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public Example: intra-LTE X2 based mobility
VoLTE KPI UE Source eNB Target eNB MME Serving Gateway
L3 signalling
2. Measurement Reports
User Data
4. Handover Request
- eNB configures measurements in UE
Handover Preparation
5. Admission Control
- UE solicitated measurements with event reporting (A3, A5, A2, B2,…) 6. Handover Request Ack
DL allocation
- HO decision in eNB 7.
RRC Conn. Reconf. incl.
mobilityControlinformation
Detach from old cell
Deliver buffered and in transit
- HO preparation (resource allocation in the target cell) and
synchronize to new cell
packets to target eNB
Handover Execution
- HO execution (UE moves to target cell) 8. SN Status Transfer
Data Forwarding
- HO completion (path switch, UE context release in the source cell)
Buffer packets from
packet data
packet data
12. Path Switch Request
13. Modify Bearer
Request
End Marker
14. Switch DL path
Handover Completion
KPI’s and counters are related to these phases. End Marker
packet data
15. Modify Bearer
There are no HO counters per failure cause in the current system Response
16.Path Switch Request Ack
release (FL16). 17. UE Context Release
18. Release
Resources
55 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
GROUP: VoLTE handover, intra eNB
VoLTE KPI Preparation
E-UTRAN HO Preparation Success Ratio, intra
eNB for QCI1 %
LTE_5871a
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – KPI’s (intra-LTE)
/ HO prep SR intra eNB QCI1
E-UTRAN HO Preparations, intra eNB for QCI1
%
LTE_5872a / HO preps intra eNB QCI1
E-UTRAN HO Success Ratio, intra eNB for
QCI1 %
• KPI’s (& counters) are updated in the source cell of the LTE_5873a Execution / HO SR intra eNB QCI1
E-UTRAN HO Attempts, intra eNB for QCI1
handover! LTE_5874a / HO att intra eNB QCI1
#
56 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – KPI’s (SRVCC)
• KPI’s (& counters) are updated in the source cell of the handover!
• In FL16 there are no dedicated KPI’s / counters for SRVCC preparation phase, just counters for all IRAT mobility in
connected mode (covering all E-RAB’s). Such counters are introduced in FL16A with feature LTE2140: New
Performance Counters LTE16A
57 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – preparation phase
• Preparation phase means that source eNB which makes a positive HO decision (with known target cell) sends S1AP:
HANDOVER REQUEST or X2AP: HANDOVER REQUIRED message to the target eNB (or RNC/BSC in case of
SRVCC) passing necessary information to prepare the HO at the target side.
• Target side can perform admission control to make sure that resources can be granted by target access system.
• The target access system is responsible for giving exact guidance for the UE on how to make the radio access there
(this includes radio resource configuration, target cell system information etc.). This information is given during the
handover preparation and should be transported completely transparently through the source access system to the
UE.
58 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – preparation phase
• Preparation phase is supervised from source eNB side by corresponding supervision timer:
- Supervision timer preparation intra LTE HO X2-based, LNBTS:tX2RelPrep = 500 (Nokia FL16 hardcoded value)
- Supervision timer preparation intra LTE HO S1-based, LNBTS:tS1RelPrepL = 500 (Nokia FL16 default value)
- Supervision timer for the preparation HO WCDMA, LNBTS:tS1RelPrepU = 2000 (Nokia FL16 default value)
- SupervisiontimerforhandoverpreparationtoGSM, LNBTS:tS1RelPrepG = 1000 (Nokia FL16 default value)
• Timer is started in the source eNB when the S1AP: HANDOVER REQUIRED message is sent to the MME and is
stopped when the S1AP: HANDOVER COMMAND or S1AP: PREPARATION FAILURE message is received in
response. If the timer expires the handover is aborted or cancelled.
59 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – partial HO
• Partial HO means that the HO for the admitted E-RABs was successfully completed, although not all E-RABs were
admitted by the HO target during HO preparation.
• For example, QCI8 & QCI5 E-RAB could be admitted duriong HO while QCI1 E-RAB is rejected (e.g. due to
admission control).
Counter ID Network Element Name NetAct Name Description Updated Unit
M8006C273 QCI1 E-RABs released ERAB_REL_HO_PART_QCI1 This measurement provides the number of Intra-eNB HO: Integer number
due to partial Handover QCI1 E-RABs released due to a partial HO. n.a.
The partial HO means that the HO for the
admitted E-RABs was successfully Inter-eNB HO via X2:
completed, although not all E-RABs were Following the reception of the X2AP:UE CONTEXT RELEASE message, the counter is incremented with the
admitted by the HO target during HO number of QCI1 bearers not admitted by the target eNB of the preceding HO preparation procedure. The bearers,
preparation. The counter is incremented with which are not admitted, are contained in the "E-RABs Not Admitted List" IE of the X2AP:HANDOVER REQUEST
the number of QCI1 E-RABs not admitted by ACKNOWLEDGE message that is received from the target eNB (3GPP TS 36.423).
the HO target. The counter is maintained in
the source cell. Inter-eNB HO via S1/Inter-system HO to UTRAN/SRVCC to UTRAN:
Following the reception of the S1AP:UE CONTEXT RELEASE COMMAND message with the cause "RNL
Successful Handover", the counter is incremented with the number of QCI1 bearers not admitted by the HO target
of the preceding HO preparation procedure. The bearers, which are not admitted, are contained in the "E-RABs to
Release List" IE of the S1AP:HANDOVER COMMAND message that is received from MME (3GPP TS 36.413).
60 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – preparation phase (X2 based HO)
source target
eNB eNB HANDOVER PREPARATION FAILURE
IE/Group Name Presence Range IE type and Semantics Criticality Assigned
reference description Criticality
Message Type M 9.2.13 YES reject
HANDOVER REQUEST Old eNB UE X2AP ID M eNB UE Allocated at YES ignore
X2AP ID the source
9.2.24 eNB
HANDOVER PREPARATION FAILURE Cause M 9.2.6 YES ignore
Criticality Diagnostics O 9.2.7 YES ignore
E-RAB List
IE/Group Name Presence Range IE type Semantic Criticalit Assigned
and s y Criticalit
reference descripti y
on
E-RAB List Item 1 .. EACH ignore
<maxnoofBe
arers>
>E-RAB ID M 9.2.23 – –
>Cause M 9.2.6 – –
61 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – preparation phase (X2 based HO)
HANDOVER REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGE
IE/Group Name Presence Range IE type and Semantics description Criticality Assigned
source target reference Criticality
eNB eNB Message Type M 9.2.13 YES reject
Old eNB UE X2AP ID M eNB UE X2AP ID Allocated at the source YES ignore
9.2.24 eNB
HANDOVER REQUEST
New eNB UE X2AP ID M eNB UE X2AP ID Allocated at the target YES ignore
9.2.24 eNB
Details on causes are in Appendix B Target eNB To Source eNB M OCTET STRING Includes the RRC E- YES ignore
Transparent Container UTRA Handover
Command message as
defined in subclause
10.2.2 in TS 36.331 [9]
This scenario represents partial HO with QCI1 (or/and
QCI5) failure Criticality Diagnostics O 9.2.7 YES ignore
62 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – preparation phase (S1 based HO)
source
eNB MME
HANDOVER PREPARATION FAILURE
IE/Group Name Presence Range IE type and Semantics Criticality Assigned
HANDOVER REQUIRED reference description Criticality
Message Type M 9.2.1.1 YES reject
MME UE S1AP ID M 9.2.3.3 YES ignore
HANDOVER PREPARATION FAILURE eNB UE S1AP ID M 9.2.3.4 YES ignore
Cause M 9.2.1.3 YES ignore
Criticality Diagnostics O 9.2.1.21 YES ignore
HANDOVER FAILURE
63 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – preparation phase (S1 based HO)
source
HANDOVER COMMAND
eNB MME IE/Group Name Presence Range IE type and Semantics Criticality Assigned
reference description Criticality
Message Type M 9.2.1.1 YES reject
HANDOVER REQUIRED MME UE S1AP ID M 9.2.3.3 YES reject
eNB UE S1AP ID M 9.2.3.4 YES reject
Handover Type M 9.2.1.13 YES reject
HANDOVER COMMAND NAS Security Parameters from C- 9.2.3.30 The eNB shall use YES reject
E-UTRAN iftoUTRAN this IE as specified
GERAN in TS 33.401 [15].
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – preparation phase: typical failure scenarios
HANDOVER REQUIRED
Unknown target cell IE/Group Name Presence Range IE type and reference Semantics Criticality Assigned
description Criticality
Message Type M 9.2.1.1 YES reject
• Usually could be recognized by HANDOVER MME UE S1AP ID M 9.2.3.3 YES reject
PREPARATION FAILURE with cause “Radio Network eNB UE S1AP ID M 9.2.3.4 YES reject
Handover Type M 9.2.1.13 YES reject
Layer: Unknown Target ID” Cause M 9.2.1.3 YES ignore
Target ID M 9.2.1.6 YES reject
• More relevant to IRAT mobility as intra-LTE mobility Direct Forwarding Path
Availability
O 9.2.3.15 YES ignore
usually relies on X2 eNB Configuration Update SRVCC HO Indication O 9.2.1.59 YES reject
Source to Target Transparent M 9.2.1.56 YES reject
procedure to keep the configuration data up-to-date in Container
the source eNB Source to Target Transparent O
Target
ContainerIDSecondary
Source to Target
Transparent Container
YES reject
IE/Group Name Presence Range IE type and9.2.1.56 Semantics description Criticality Assigned
• Check whether the target ID exist according to IE in MS Classmark 2 C-ifSRVCCtoGERAN reference 9.2.1.64 YES reject
Criticality
MS Classmark
Target3 ID MC-ifSRVCCtoGERAN 9.2.1.65 YES - ignore
HANDOVER REQUIRED and there is routing via CHOICE
CSG Id O 9.2.1.62 YES -
-
reject
>Target eNB-ID -
serving MME to the target radio access system Cell Access Mode
>>Global eNB ID M
O
9.2.1.37
9.2.1.74 YES
-
reject
-
PS Service Not Available O 9.2.1.77 YES ignore
(RNC/BSC) >>Selected TAI M TAI
9.2.3.16
- -
>Target RNC-ID - -
• Check the topology of network and geographical >>LAI M 9.2.3.1 - -
location of source and target whether such neighbor >>RAC O 9.2.3.2 - -
>>RNC-ID M INTEGER If the Extended RNC-ID IE is - -
relation makes sense (0..4095) included in the Target ID IE, the RNC-
ID IE shall be ignored.
• Make necessary corrections (Target ID correction, >>Extended RNC-ID O 9.2.1.14 The Extended RNC-ID IE shall be - -
used if the RNC identity has a value
deletion of neighbor relation) larger than 4095.
>CGI - -
>>PLMN Identity M 9.2.3.8 - -
>>LAC M OCTET 0000 and FFFE not allowed. - -
STRING
(SIZE(2))
>>CI M OCTET - -
65 © Nokia 2016 STRING
(SIZE(2))
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – preparation phase: typical failure scenarios
Incoming HO not supported by the target
• Some or all E-RAB’s might not be supported in the target
• In case of intra-LTE HO, check whether corresponding QCI’s are enabled with corresponding QoS attribute values (max bitrates) in the target cell –
details here (QCI5), here & here (QCI1) and support of conversational voice bearer is activated (LNBTS:actConvVoice=TRUE) Fully correlated with
VoLTE accessibility in the target cell
• In case of IRAT (SRVCC), check feature activation status:
- UTRAN → Insoming SRVCC is enabled via RAN2435: SRVCC from LTE and CSFB with HO (RNFC:SRVCCEnabled=ENABLED)
- GERAN → To perform MS handover from LTE to GSM for speech calls LTE can use SRVCC handover procedure. Inter-System Handover (ISHO) must be
enabled in BSC to support SRVCC handovers (SRVCC handovers are handled and signalled as inter-system handovers in BSC). Corresponding feature
BSS10101 and BSS11107:GSM-WCDMA Interworking
66 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – preparation phase: typical failure scenarios
Congestion in target radio access system
• Ususally could be recognized by one of the following causes:
- “Radio Network Layer: No radio resources available in target cell”
- “Transport Layer - Transport Resource Unavailable”
• Occurrence of this scenario depends on several factors:
- Use and parameterization of Radio Admission Control / Transport Admission Control
- Radio / Transport load in the target
• Analyze this scenario per neighbor cell relationship to see which target cells are the most affected by congestion. As there are currently
no HO preparation counters per neighbor cell relationship, the analysis must be performed from interface traces
• In general, capacity management shall be in place and any eventual action shall be treated as part of it (capacity extensions, overload
handling etc.)
67 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – preparation phase: typical failure scenarios
Supervision timer expiry
• Supervision timer (tX2RelPrep/tS1RelPrep) expiry due to either late or no response from EPC (and/or the target radio access system).
• There are dedicated causes for this scenario: S1AP “ TS1RELOCprep Expiry”, X2AP “TRELOCprep Expiry”
• More details about HO preparation supervision timer here
• S1/X2 traces shall be analyzed for this scenario.
• Check if timer settings are according to Nokia recommendations.
• Consider higher value of the timer to be used.
• Check the delays on the EPC and target RAN side whether they are in expected ranges.
68 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – execution phase
• When HO preparation phase completed, eNB sends handover command (RRC Connection Reconfiguration /
MobilityFromEUTRACommand) to UE
• The UE receives the handover command with necessary parameters and is commanded by the source eNB to
perform the HO. UE performs HO to the target cell, i.e. UE detaches from source cell and synchronize to target cell.
• HO is acknowledged by UE with corresponding RRC message (RRC Connection Reconfiguration Complete,
Handover to UTRAN Complete, Handover Complete).
69 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – execution phase
• HO execution phase could be analyzed per neighbor cell relationship to see if there are any specific neighbor
relations showing low HO success rate.
• Following counters could be used for such analysis:
Counter ID Network Element Name NetAct Name Description Updated Unit
M8017C11 Inter System Handover attempts to UTRAN ISYS_HO_UTRAN_SRVCC_ATT_N This measurement provides the number of Inter System Handover attempts Reception of an S1AP:HANDOVER COMMAND message (source eNB <- Integer number
with SRVCC per neighbor cell relationship B to UTRAN with SRVCC (Single Radio Voice Call Continuity, 3GPP TS MME; 3GPP TS 36.413) in case that this message is received in response to
23.216) per neighbor cell relationship. the preparation of an Inter System Handover to UTRAN with SRVCC (Single
Radio Voice Call Continuity, 3GPP TS 23.216).
M8017C12 Successful Inter System Handover ISYS_HO_UTRAN_SRVCC_SUCC_ This measurement provides the number of successful Inter System Reception of an S1AP:UE CONTEXT RELEASE COMMAND message Integer number
completions to UTRAN with SRVCC per NB Handover completions to UTRAN with SRVCC (Single Radio Voice Call (source eNB <- MME; 3GPP TS 36.413) with Cause value "Radio Network
neighbor cell relationship Continuity, 3GPP TS 23.216) per neighbor cell relationship. Layer (Successful Handover)" in case that this message is received for an
Inter System Handover to UTRAN with SRVCC (Single Radio Voice Call
Continuity, 3GPP TS 23.216).
M8017C13 Failed Inter System Handover attempts to ISYS_HO_UTRAN_SRVCC_FAIL_N This measurement provides the number of failed Inter System Handover Expiration of the guarding timer TS1RELOCoverall (3GPP TS 36.413) in Integer number
UTRAN with SRVCC per neighbor cell B attempts to UTRAN with SRVCC (Single Radio Voice Call Continuity, case that this timer was started because of an Inter System Handover to
relationship 3GPP TS 23.216) per neighbor cell relationship. UTRAN with SRVCC (Single Radio Voice Call Continuity, 3GPP TS
23.216).
M8019C3 Inter System Handover attempts to GERAN ISYS_HO_GERAN_SRVCC_ATT_N This measurement provides the number of Inter System Handover attempts Reception of an S1AP:HANDOVER COMMAND message (source eNB <- Integer number
with SRVCC per neighbor cell relationship B to GERAN with SRVCC (Single Radio Voice Call Continuity, 3GPP TS MME; 3GPP TS 36.413) in case this message is received in response to the
23.216) per neighbor cell relationship. preparation of an Inter System Handover to GERAN with SRVCC (Single
Radio Voice Call Continuity, 3GPP TS 23.216).
M8019C4 Successful Inter System Handover ISYS_HO_GERAN_SRVCC_SUCC_ This measurement provides the number of successful Inter System Reception of an S1AP:UE CONTEXT RELEASE COMMAND message Integer number
completions to GERAN with SRVCC per NB Handover completions to GERAN with SRVCC (Single Radio Voice Call (source eNB <- MME; 3GPP TS 36.413) with Cause value "Radio Network
neighbor cell relationship Continuity, 3GPP TS 23.216) per neighbor cell relationship. Layer (Successful Handover)" in case this message is received for an Inter
System Handover to GERAN with SRVCC (Single Radio Voice Call
Continuity, 3GPP TS 23.216).
M8019C5 Failed Inter System Handover attempts to ISYS_HO_GERAN_SRVCC_FAIL_N This measurement provides the number of failed Inter System Handover Expiration of the guarding timer TS1RELOCoverall (3GPP TS 36.413) in Integer number
GERAN with SRVCC per neighbor cell B attempts to GERAN with SRVCC (Single Radio Voice Call Continuity, case this timer was started because of an Inter System Handover to GERAN
relationship 3GPP TS 23.216) per neighbor cell relationship. with SRVCC (Single Radio Voice Call Continuity, 3GPP TS 23.216).
70 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – execution phase
There is a specific set of timers that guard HO execution phase in the eNB (from receiving HANDOVER COMMAND to receiving of
the UE CONTEXT RELEASE COMMAND)
• X2-based HO (3GPP TS36.423):
- Upon reception of the HANDOVER REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGE message the source eNB shall stop the timer T RELOCprep, start the timer
TX2RELOCoverall and terminate the Handover Preparation procedure. The source eNB is then defined to have a Prepared Handover for that X2 UE-
associated signalling.
- If the UE Context Release procedure is not initiated towards the source eNB from any prepared eNB before the expiry of the timer TX2 RELOCoverall,
the source eNB shall request the MME to release the UE context.
- If the UE returns to source eNB before the reception of the UE CONTEXT RELEASE message or the expiry of the timer TX2 RELOCoverall, the
source eNB shall stop the TX2RELOCoverall and continue to serve the UE.
71 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – execution phase
Supervision timers are calculated in the following way:
• Intra-LTE HO X2-based: TX2RELOCoverall = t304IntraLte + t311 + t301 + tX2RelODelta
• Intra-LTE HO S1-based: TS1RELOCoverall = t304IntraLte + t311 + t301 + tS1RelOvDeltL
• HO to GSM: TS1RELOCoverall = t304InterRATGsm + t311 + t301 + tS1RelOvDeltG
• HO to WCDMA: TS1RELOCoverall = t304InterRAT + t311 + t301 + tS1RelOvDeltU
X2-based HO:
If TX2RELOCoverall expires, eNB sends HANDOVER CANCEL to target eNB.
S1-based HO:
If TS1RELOCoverall expires, eNB sends HANDOVER CANCEL to MME. MME shall reply with HANDOVER CANCEL
ACKNOWLEDGE.
72 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – execution phase
Handover execution has its own supervision timer T304 which supervises the successful completion of a handover or cell change.
73 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – execution phase
Handover failure can be a trigger for RRC connection re-
establishment procedure.
There are two main RRC connection re-establishment related timers,
T311 & T301
Timer Start Stop At expiry
T301 Transmission of Reception of Go to RRC_IDLE
RRCConnectionReesta RRCConnectionReestablishment or
bilshmentRequest RRCConnectionReestablishmentRej
ect message as well as when the
selected cell becomes unsuitable
T311 Upon initiating the Selection of a suitable E-UTRA cell Enter RRC_IDLE
RRC connection re- or a cell using another RAT.
establishment
procedure
74 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – execution phase: typical failure scenarios
Bad quality in the target cell
• Scenario 1: IRAT HO to 3G is triggered based on RSCP which is sufficient but EcNo is poor
• Scenario 2: Fast changing radio conditions of the target cell – HO preparation phase takes some time (in the range of
x100ms). During that time the radio conditions in the target cell might have deteriorated.
• Check logs for the actual quality of target cell during UE access. Check the geographical situation
• Optimization of neighbor relation, HO parameterization shall take place.
Example
RSCP=-105dBm
75 © Nokia 2016 EcNo=-18.5dB
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – execution phase: typical failure scenarios
HO prepared in a wrong cell 3G
NB 1
PSC 11
PSC – Primary Scrambling code
76 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – execution phase: typical failure scenarios
UE failures
• UE vendor or chipset vendor specific
• No further details available at this stage
77 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
78 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
79 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – completion phase
FL16 feature LTE439: SGW Relocation with PATH SWITCH ACKNOWLEDGE
X2 Connection introduces support of E-RAB IE/Group Name Presence Range IE type and
reference
Semantics
description
Criticality Assigned
Criticality
80 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility – completion phase
Feature LTE439: SGW Relocation with X2 Connection introduces two counters related to VoLTE mobility (completion
phase):
Counter ID Network Element Name NetAct Name Description Updated Unit
M8006C280 eNB initiated QCI1 E-RAB ERAB_REL_ENB_TNL_UN This measurement provides the number of QCI1
This counter is updated following the transmission Integer
releases due to a failed SP_QCI1 E-RABs released due to a failed Handover of an S1AP:UE CONTEXT RELEASE REQUEST number
Handover Completion Completion phase at the target cell. message sent by the eNB to the MME. The
phase at target cell counter is incremented with the number of QCI1
E-RABs released with the TNL cause "TNL
Unspecified" (3GPP TS 36.413).
M8006C278 EPC initiated QCI1 E-RAB ERAB_REL_EPC_PATH_S This measurement provides the number of QCI1 This counter is incremented with the number of Integer
releases due to Path WITCH_QCI1 E-RABs abnormally released in case that EPC QCI1 E-RABs contained in the "E-RAB To Be number
Switch has failed to perform the UP path switch for at Released List " of the S1AP: PATH SWITCH
least one, but not for all, of the E-RABs included ACKNOWLDEGE message, which is received
in the preceding S1AP: PATH SWITCH from the MME (3GPP TS 36.413).
REQUEST.
81 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility
• Since there are no details per HO failure cause available directly from counters, trace analysis might be inevitable. For that reason
trace collection need to be done: S1_MME, X2, UE logs
• Handover performance could be analyzed per neighbor relation using the following Nokia predefined reports in NPM:
- RSLTE031 “Neighbor HO analysis” – KPI’s are not QCI1 specific!
GROUP: Intra eNB neighbor HO
Intra eNB Neighbor Handover Preparation Success ratio
LTE_706a % Prep SR
/ Adj Intra eNB HO PREP SR
Intra eNB Neighbour Handover Success ratio
% SR
LTE_707a / Adj Intra eNB HO SR
Integer
M8015C1 INTRA_HO_ATT_NB Att
number
Intra eNB Neighbour HO failure ratio
% Cancel R
LTE_708a / Intra eNB NB HO fail ratio
GROUP: Inter eNB neighbor HO
Inter eNB Neighbor Handover Preparation Success ratio
% Prep SR
LTE_12b / Adj Inter eNB HO PREP SR
Inter eNB Neighbour Handover Success ratio
% SR
LTE_13a / Adj Inter eNB HO SR
Integer
INTER_HO_ATT_NB Att
M8015C8 number
Inter eNB Neighbour HO failure ratio
% FR
LTE_14a / Inter eNB NB HO fail ratio
GROUP: Late/Early HO ratio, per neighbor
Late Handover Ratio
# Late HO
LTE_1061a / Late HO R
Early Handover Type 1 Ratio
# Early HO, type 1
LTE_1062a / Early HO type 1 R
Early Handover Type 2 Ratio
82 © Nokia 2016 # Early HO, type 2
LTE_1063a / Early HO type 2 R
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility
- RSLTE044 “HO analysis for UTRAN per neighbor”
GROUP: Int-Sys HO to UTRAN per neighbor
Preparation Inter System HO for UTRAN FR, per neighbour
% Prep FR
LTE_980a / Inter-System HO FR for UTRAN, neighbour
Integer
ISYS_HO_UTRAN_PREP_FAIL_TIM_NB Prep Fails, TIM
M8017C4 number
Integer
ISYS_HO_UTRAN_PREP_FAIL_AC_NB Prep Fails, AC
M8017C5 number
Integer
ISYS_HO_UTRAN_PREP_FAIL_OTH_NB Prep Fails, Other
M8017C6 number
Total Inter-System HO for UTRAN SR, per neighbour
% Total SR
LTE_981a / Total Inter-System HO SR for UTRAN, neighbour
Integer
ISYS_HO_UTRAN_PREP_NB Prep Att
M8017C10 number
Inter-System HO for UTRAN SR, per neighbour
% SR
LTE_982a / Inter-System HO SR for UTRAN, neighbour
Integer
ISYS_HO_UTRAN_ATT_NB Att
M8017C7 number
Inter-System HO for UTRAN FR, per neighbour
% FR
LTE_983a / Inter-System HO FR for UTRAN, neighbour
Integer
ISYS_HO_UTRAN_FAIL_NB Fails
M8017C9 number
83 © Nokia 2016 Int-Sys HO to UTRAN with SRVCC per neighbour cell relationship Failure Ratio
% FR
LTE_1055a / Int-Sys HO UTRAN SRVCC FR
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) mobility
- RSLTE045 “HO to GSM per neighbor”
84 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
Accessibility Appendix A
S1AP release causes
Retainability
Appendix B
Mobility (intra-LTE & inter-RAT) X2AP release causes
Quality / Integrity
Appendix C
VoLTE flow charts per
KPI category
85 © Nokia Solutions
2016 and Networks 2016 Confidential
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) quality/integrity
• Speech signal has to travel E2E which inflicts large variety of degradations to speech signals.
• These degradations include loudness loss, talker and listener echo, temporal gaps on speech signal, filtering,
amplitude clipping, variable delays, distortions, channel errors etc.
• Degradation also may happen due to bit errors on the air interface layer and also by silent gaps caused by, for
example, handovers
• In packet-switched networks variable delays and packet losses inflict other types of problems.
• AMR, WB-AMR and EVS codecs are supported for VoLTE. Duration of one speech frame-block is 20 ms for all
codecs.
86 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) quality/integrity
• Handover performance can affect the overall quality of VoLTE call. Hence the previous section dealing with
mobility is also relevant to quality/integrity.
• VoLTE call quality/integrity could be affected by:
- Late or early handovers
- Handover failures in any phase
- High service interruption time (packet loss) during handovers
• Due to suboptimally performing mobility UE can experience bad radio link quality leading to high BLER.
• SRVCC can meet the 3GPP voice interruption performance target defined in 3GPP TS22.278:
“The user experience shall be as far as possible unaffected by the change of domain and RAT. The RAT change procedure executed to
enable service continuity for an established voice call shall target an interruption time not higher than 300 ms.”
SRVCC
87 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) quality/integrity
• Poor retainability of radio link can have negative impact on the overall quality of VoLTE call. For example, too
frequent radio link failures leading to RRC connection re-establishments would degrade E2E speech quality.
• Basic principle of RRC Connection Reestablishment described here.
• It is recommended to use LTE1617: RLF Triggered Handover in connection with VoLTE
• The following KPI’s available in Nokia NPM could be used to identify cells with high amount of re-establishments
along with re-establishment SR. Please note, these KPI’s are not QCI1 specific!
88 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) quality/integrity
• Poor retainability of radio link could be furter optimized via LTE1569: QCI 1 specific RLF and re-establishment control:
- Introduces dedicated parameters for the radio link failure (RLF) and the radio resource control (RRC) connection re-establishment behavior for
UEs with an established QoS class identifier 1 (QCI1) data radio bearer → n310Qci1, t310Qci1.
- The t310Qci1 and n310Qci1 operator-configurable parameters are signaled together with the t301, t311, and n311 LNCEL parameters, which are
configured for the system information broadcast 2 (SIB2) to the UE during the QCI1 data bearer setup with the RRC connection reconfiguration
message
Con Usage Timer Start Stop At expiry
stant T310 Upon detecting physical Upon receiving N311 If security is not activated: go to
layer problems for the consecutive in-sync indications RRC_IDLE else: initiate the
N310 Maximum number of PCell i.e. upon receiving from lower layers for the PCell, connection re-establishment 1
consecutive "out-of-sync" N310 consecutive out-of- upon triggering the handover procedure 6 . 33
3
indications for the PCell received sync indications from procedure and upon initiating P TS
from lower layers lower layers the connection re-establishment P
3G
procedure
89 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) quality/integrity
• High packet loss on air interface (Uu) is one of the typical factors affecting VoLTE E2E speech quality.
• Referig to link budget calculation, VoLTE coverage typically uplink limited. Hence the uplink usually suffers worse
quality in terms of packet loss compared to downlink.
• The following KPI’s available in Nokia NPM could be used to identify cells with high packet loss in UL/DL for
QCI1/QCI5:
LTE_5455a E-UTRAN PDCP SDU Loss Ratio in the UL, QCI5 % Loss Ratio, UL
90 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) quality/integrity
• There are several possible ways to resolve quality issues in problematic cells. Nevertheless, it is essential
to get familiar with:
- geographical situation in the area surrounding these cells
- Network topology and coverage including other RAT’s (3G, 2G)
- estimate location of VoLTE users
- Network load → high GBR load can lead to quality deterioration, especially with relaxed admission control for GBR
• There are several Nokia features addressing potential issues with bad VoLTE quality resulting from UL
coverage limitation, such as the following ones available in FL16:
- LTE571: Controlled uplink packet segmentation
- LTE907: TTI Bundling
- LTE2098: VoLTE uplink coverage boosting
91 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
VoLTE KPI
Dedicated bearer (QCI1) quality/integrity
• In some cases mobility optimization can improve VoLTE speech quality. For instance, SRVCC might be
required at different thresolds compared to pure data connections. There are several enhancement
features available in FL16 covering VoLTE mobility:
- LTE1127: Service Based Mobility Trigger
- LTE2112: Dedicated Mobility Thresholds for SRVCC
- LTE64: Service-based Handover Thresholds
- LTE1942: Dedicated VoLTE Inter-frequency Target Frequency List
92 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
Appendix A
S1AP causes
94 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
The purpose of the Cause IE is to indicate the reason for a particular
S1AP causes (2/5) event for the S1AP protocol.
3GPP 36.413 – 9.2.1.3 Cause
IE/Group Name Presence Range IE Type and Reference Semantics
Description
CHOICE Cause Group M
>Transport Layer
>>Transport Layer Cause M ENUMERATED
(Transport Resource Unavailable,
Unspecified,
…)
>NAS
>>NAS Cause M ENUMERATED (Normal Release,
Authentication failure,
Detach,
Unspecified,
…,
CSG Subscription Expiry)
>Protocol
>>Protocol Cause M ENUMERATED
(Transfer Syntax Error,
Abstract Syntax Error (Reject),
Abstract Syntax Error (Ignore and Notify),
Message not Compatible with Receiver State,
Semantic Error,
Abstract Syntax Error (Falsely Constructed Message), Unspecified, …)
>Misc
>>Miscellaneous Cause M ENUMERATED
(Control Processing Overload, Not enough User Plane Processing Resources,
Hardware Failure,
O&M Intervention,
Unspecified, Unknown PLMN, …)
95 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
The meaning of the different cause values is described in the following table. In general, “not
S1AP causes (3/5) supported” cause values indicate that the related capability is missing. On the other hand, “not
available” cause values indicate that the related capability is present, but insufficient
3GPP 36.413 – 9.2.1.3 Cause resources were available to perform the requested action.
96 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
The meaning of the different cause values is described in the following table. In general, “not
S1AP causes (4/5) supported” cause values indicate that the related capability is missing. On the other hand, “not
available” cause values indicate that the related capability is present, but insufficient
3GPP 36.413 – 9.2.1.3 Cause resources were available to perform the requested action.
97 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
The meaning of the different cause values is described in the following table. In general, “not
S1AP causes (5/5) supported” cause values indicate that the related capability is missing. On the other hand, “not
available” cause values indicate that the related capability is present, but insufficient
3GPP 36.413 – 9.2.1.3 Cause resources were available to perform the requested action.
98 © Nokia 2016
Classification : Public
Appendix B
X2AP causes
10 © Nokia 2016
0
Classification : Public
The purpose of the cause information element is to indicate the reason
X2AP causes (2/5) for a particular event for the whole protocol.
3GPP 36.423 – 9.2.6 Cause
IE/Group Name Presence Range IE Type and Reference Semantics Description
CHOICE Cause Group M
>Transport Layer
>>Transport Layer Cause M ENUMERATED
(Transport Resource Unavailable,
Unspecified,
...)
>Protocol
>>Protocol Cause M ENUMERATED
(Transfer Syntax Error,
Abstract Syntax Error (Reject),
Abstract Syntax Error (Ignore and Notify),
Message not Compatible with Receiver State,
Semantic Error,
Unspecified,
Abstract Syntax Error (Falsely Constructed Message),...)
>Misc
>>Miscellaneous Cause M ENUMERATED
(Control Processing Overload,
Hardware Failure,
O&M Intervention,
Not enough User Plane Processing Resources,
Unspecified,...)
10 © Nokia 2016
1
Classification : Public
The meaning of the different cause values is described in the following table. In general, "not
X2AP causes (3/5) supported" cause values indicate that the concerned capability is missing. On the other hand,
"not available" cause values indicate that the concerned capability is present, but insufficient
3GPP 36.423 – 9.2.6 Cause resources were available to perform the requested action.
10 © Nokia 2016
2
Classification : Public
The meaning of the different cause values is described in the following table. In general, "not
X2AP causes (4/5) supported" cause values indicate that the concerned capability is missing. On the other hand,
"not available" cause values indicate that the concerned capability is present, but insufficient
3GPP 36.423 – 9.2.6 Cause resources were available to perform the requested action.
10 © Nokia 2016
3
Classification : Public
The meaning of the different cause values is described in the following table. In general, "not
X2AP causes (5/5) supported" cause values indicate that the concerned capability is missing. On the other hand,
"not available" cause values indicate that the concerned capability is present, but insufficient
3GPP 36.423 – 9.2.6 Cause resources were available to perform the requested action.
10 © Nokia 2016
4
Classification : Public
Appendix C
VoLTE flow charts per KPI category
Flow charts
Introduction
• Flow charts on the following slides show just part of the overall process which is VoLTE specific.
• Refer to “Troubleshooting Guideline – General Aspects” document for overall troubleshooting procedure
and related flow charts
10 © Nokia 2016
6
Classification : Public
Y N
Is UL
impaired?
Check if T310/N310 Y N
optimization can resolve issue
(see also LTE1569) Mobility related
quality issue?
Y N
Abnormal? Y Check: RL supervision
(‘other’,’path Cause redirection? parameters, RLF stats and
switch) features (LTE1617) – take
Pass the symptoms to core necessary actions
network experts
N
N
N Problem resolved in
the previous steps?
Ad Hoc troubleshooting
Y
Y cause “RNL:
Check whether the target ID
Unknown Target
exist and make necessary
ID”
corrections N Y
Failures in HO
N execution
phase?
Y cause RNL/TNL:
Check RNL/TNL congestion
No resources
state in the target → make
available
necessary actions to relief
congestion N
Ad Hoc troubleshooting
NO Check:
LNBTS:qciTab5(1)/ YE
RAC status and config
qciSupp=ENABL S
Cell load
E
Initiate eventual capacity
expansion
Is the cause : TNL: YE
NO
Transport Resource S
Unavailable?
Set to Ad Hoc troubleshooting
LNBTS:qciTab5(1)/qciSupp=
ENABLE NO
Check:
TAC status and config
transport load
Initiate eventual capacity
expansion of transport
Thank You
The contents of this document are proprietary and documentation. Accordingly, if the user of this EVENT FOR ERRORS IN THIS DOCUMENT or for
confidential property of Nokia. This document is document gives Nokia Feedback on the contents of this any loss of data or income or any special, incidental,
provided subject to confidentiality obligations of the document, Nokia may freely use, disclose, reproduce, consequential, indirect or direct damages howsoever
applicable agreement(s). license, distribute and otherwise commercialize the caused, that might arise from the use of this document or
feedback in any Nokia product, technology, service, any contents of this document.
This document is intended for use of Nokia’s customers specification or other documentation.
and collaborators only for the purpose for which this This document and the product(s) it describes
document is submitted by Nokia. No part of this Nokia operates a policy of ongoing development. Nokia are protected by copyright according to the
document may be reproduced or made available to the reserves the right to make changes and improvements to applicable laws.
public or to any third party in any form or means any of the products and/or services described in this
without the prior written permission of Nokia. This document or withdraw this document at any time Nokia is a registered trademark of Nokia Corporation.
document is to be used by properly trained professional without prior notice. Other product and company names mentioned herein
personnel. Any use of the contents in this document is may be trademarks or trade names of their respective
limited strictly to the use(s) specifically created in the The contents of this document are provided "as is". owners.
applicable agreement(s) under which the document is Except as required by applicable law, no warranties of
submitted. The user of this document may voluntarily any kind, either express or implied, including, but not
provide suggestions, comments or other feedback to limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and
Nokia in respect of the contents of this document fitness for a particular purpose, are made in relation to
("Feedback"). Such Feedback may be used in Nokia the accuracy, reliability or contents of this document.
products and related specifications or other NOKIA SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE IN ANY