0% found this document useful (0 votes)
116 views

Modeling Using GT-POWER

The document discusses modeling an integrated aftertreatment system using GT-POWER software. The goals are to provide a flexible simulation environment that can handle customized kinetics and facilitate collaboration between domain experts. Specialized aftertreatment components are added as flow components in GT-POWER that can turn it into a reactor. Kinetics are specified using template libraries. Examples of modeling diesel particulate filters and catalysts are provided. Experimental validation of the lumped parameter and 1D models for DPF pressure drop and mass loading are also summarized.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
116 views

Modeling Using GT-POWER

The document discusses modeling an integrated aftertreatment system using GT-POWER software. The goals are to provide a flexible simulation environment that can handle customized kinetics and facilitate collaboration between domain experts. Specialized aftertreatment components are added as flow components in GT-POWER that can turn it into a reactor. Kinetics are specified using template libraries. Examples of modeling diesel particulate filters and catalysts are provided. Experimental validation of the lumped parameter and 1D models for DPF pressure drop and mass loading are also summarized.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 54

Integrated Aftertreatment System

Modeling Using GT-POWER

Syed Wahiduzzaman, Weiyong Tang and Seth Wenzel


Gamma Technologies
10th DOE Crosscut Workshop on Lean Emissions Reduction Simulation
May 1st - 3rd, 2007
Motivations
• Motivations
– Tremendous need for the ability to simulate AT
systems
– Design/development process is increasingly a
collaborative endeavor
– Variety of domain experts (e.g. test, performance,
AT systems, control/calibration) frequently using
disparate tools
– Overall system optimization is ultimately the goal
– A common simulation environment is a necessity
Goals and Approach
• Goals
– Provide an integrated tool
– Flexible environment capable of handling customized kinetics
– Facilitate communication and collaboration between various
domain experts
– Minimize learning curve
– Eliminate the need of users written code to input kinetics

• Approach
– Specialized AT object (DPF, CatalystBrick) as flow component
– Chemistry library templates to input customized kinetics
– Built directly into GT-Power library sharing existing
capabilities, look and feel
Concept: Chemistry Library
Templates

Burner, hydrolysis
Catalyst
ChemKin

Catalyst with storage


Geometric and Thermal
Specifications

Catalyst Brick

Diesel Particulate
Filter

0D or 1D
Kinetics Specification

GlobalReactions
Template
Principle

• Chemistry component turns a flow


component into a reactor when connected
to it
Collaborative Simulations
• Test cell data: Calibration of engine
models, generation maps and fits (e.g.
emissions, mean value, neural network
models)
• Generation of boundary conditions for
standalone simulation of AT unit models
(e.g. simulated test cycle data)
• Validation of unit models
• Integration of unit models into system
model
• Control system modeling
Generation of BC for Standalone
AT Models

EngCylEmisMaps
SpeciesSampler
(from Test cell)
To AT Group
SpeciesSampler Output:

Pressure Concentrations
Temperature
Flow Rate
An standalone Model for
Catalyst Domain Experts

Kinetics

SpeciesSampler or CatalystBrick
Experimental Data
Examples
and
Applications
DPF Model

Lumped model P, T, fm

 Uniform temperature at gas and solid phases


 Uniform wall flow distributions
 Computational efficiency

P1, T1, fm1

1D quasi-steady model Ts

P2, T2, fm2

 Axially different temperature and pressure


 Non-uniform wall flow distributions
 Detailed information
Deep Bed Filtration/Pressure Drop
Deep-Bed Filtration Model
wall flow

Schematic of Pressure Drop


Soot Deposit Inlet Channel

wall flow Wall


min,1

1 mc,1 = E1 x min,1 ∆P1 ∆P2


Plug
∆P3
min,2 = min,1 – mc,1 Wall

Substrate Wall Thickness


2 mc,2 = E2 x min,2
min,3 = min,2 – mc,2 ∆P4
∆P5 ∆P6
• •
• •
• •
n-1 mc,n-1 = En-1 x min,n-1
Outlet Channel
min,n = min,n-1 – mc,n-1
n mc,n = En x min,n
∆Ptotal = ∆P1 + ∆P2 + ∆P3 + ∆P4 + ∆P5 + ∆P6
mout = min,n – mc,n
Channel Length

Study deep bed filtration using theories


of uniform spherical collectors
and Brownian diffusion.
Experimental Validations
Table 1: DPF Specifications for Simulation
Type EX-80* CCRT**
Trap Diameter (mm) 229 267
Channel Length (mm) 305 305
Channel Width (mm) 1.5 1.49
Wall Thickness 0.31 0.305
Number of Inlet Channels 6013 8659
Wall Porosity 0.48 0.52
Pore Diameter (mm) 0.0125 0.013
Bulk Density (kg/m3) 1400 1400
Specific Heat (J/kg-K) 1120 1120
Thermal Conductivity (W/m-K) 2.092 2.092

* Uncatalyzed, made by Corning;


** Catalyzed, made by Johnson Matthey.
Experimental Validation:
with an Uncoated EX-80

7 10

Experimental
6 Lumped model

PM Loading Density (g/L)


8
1-D model
Pressure Drop (kPa)

5
6
4
4
3

2
2

1 0
0 1 2 3 4
Time (hr)

Symbols: measurements as Fig. 5 in SAE 2002-01-1019;


Lines: predictions.
Experimental Validations:
with an Coated CCRT
Experimental, Lumped model, 1-D model

14 140 16

14
12 120

Pressure Drop (kPa)


12
Pressure Drop (kPa)

10 100
10

Mass (g)
8 80
8
6 60 experimental
retained mass 6 Lumped model
4 40 1-D model
4
oxidized mass
2 20 2

0 0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Time (hr) Mass Deposited (g)

Symbols: measurements as Figs. 5&6 in SAE 2006-01-0879;


Lines: predictions.
Experimental Validation:
Active Regeneration by Fuel Injection

22 1100
Experimental , inlet X/L = 0/14
20 , X/L = 2/14
1-D model
, X/L = 7/14
Pressure Drop (kPa)

1000
18 , X/L = 10/14

Temperature (K)
16 900
14
800
12
10 700
8
600
6
4 500
0 50 100 150 200 0 50 100 150 200
Time (sec) Time (sec)

Symbols: measurements as Figs. 8&A.2 in SAE 2003-01-0842;


Lines: predictions.
Kinetics Templates
GaseousReactions Template

• Elementary gas-phase kinetic mechanisms


• Reactions can be directly typed into the
template or imported from a file
• Advanced feature set
– Reversible and irreversible reactions
– Generalized Arrhenius formulation (A*f(T)*g(P)*Exp(-Ta/T))
– Pressure-Dependent reactions, including:
• Third-body reactions
• Reactions with low pressure limit
• Troe falloff
• SRI falloff
GlobalReactions Template

• Global kinetic mechanisms


• Arbitrary reaction order and
concentration expression
• Generalized inhibition functions
including Langmuir and Hinshelwood
type
• Support various types of rate
specifications
• Diffusion from and to surface
SurfaceReactions Template

• All relevant features of GlobalReactions


Template
• Coverage calculation
• Supports storage and arbitrary functions
of coverage in the rate specification
Building a SCR Model

Step 2:
1: Link
Placeparts
necessary
to create
flow
a flow
objects
model
into project map

Note reaction kinetics has not yet been specified to the SCR.
Building a SCR Model (Cont.)

Step 3: Input global kinetics to a chemistry template and link


it to flow object SCR-01

Global kinetics
Building a SCR Model (Cont.)
Step 4: Construct associated control and sensor parts

Reaction kinetics

Catalytic device

NH3 injection controller


Species sensors and
NOx conversion cal.
Building a SCR Model (Cont.)
Step 5: Unit model testing, calibration and validation
Building a SCR Model (Cont.)
Step 6: Add subsytems
Building a SCR Model - Advanced

• User can optionally account for NH3 storage using


‘SurfaceReactions’ template:

Absorption: NH3 + S -> S(NH3)

Desorption: S(NH3) -> NH3 + S

• Where ‘S’ represents a general surface site.

• Specific sites can also be studied: WO3, Ti2O, V205


Building a SCR Model - Advanced

• User can optionally account for NH3 storage using


‘SurfaceReactions’ template:
Building a SCR Model - Advanced

Desorption: S(NH3) -> NH3 + S


Steady State
Absorption: NH3 + S -> S(NH3)
Building a SCR Model - Advanced

User can optionally account for NH3 storage using


‘SurfaceReactions’ template:
DOC + LNT Example

Lean Nox Trap (LNT) Reactions:


 NOx storage forming nitrite:
BaCO3 + 2NO2 + .5O2 => Ba(NO3)2 + CO2
BaCO3 + 2NO + 1.5O2 => Ba(NO3)2 + CO2

 NOx regeneration:

NOx release:
Ba(NO3)2 + 3CO => BaCO3 +2NO + 2CO2
Ba(NO3)2 + H2 + CO2 => BaCO3 +2NO2 + H2O
NOx reduction:
CO + NO => 0.5N2 + 2CO2
NO2 <=> NO + 0.5O2
DOC + LNT Example

Diesel Oxidation Catalyst (DOC) Reactions:

CO + 0.5O2 => CO2


C3H6 + 4.5O2 => 3CO2 + 3H2O
H2 + 0.5O2 => H2O
NO+0.5O2 => NO2
NO2 => NO+0.5O2
HC + 20.8O2 => 14.6CO2 + 12.4H2O

Note HC stands for diesel fuel (C14.6H24.8).


DOC + LNT Example
DOC + LNT Example
DOC + LNT Example

Lean Operation 0-10s Rich Operation 10-20s


Kinetic Parameter
Identification
GlobalReactions Template
Application: Three-Way Catalyst
 CO oxidation:
CO + 0.5O2 => CO2
 HC (unburned and partially burned) oxidations:
CH4 + 2O2 => CO2 + 2H2O
C3H6 + 4.5O2 => 3CO2 + 3H2O
C3H8 + 5O2 => 3CO2 + 4H2O
 NO oxidation:
CO + NO => CO2 + 0.5N2
NO + 0.5O2 => NO2
NO2 => NO + 0.5O2
 H2O formation:
H2 + 0.5O2 => H2O
Kinetics of 3-Way Catalyst
Inhibition Terms:
Global Reaction Scheme

K expressions for near


equilibrium behavior:
Individual Production Rates:
Parameter Identification

• Original kinetic set is not applicable and has to


be calibrated

• Parameter optimization are often carried out on:


1. Pre-exponential factor Ai
2. Activation temperature/energy Ei

• Optimization of a total of 16 parameters


8 reactions x 2 values = 16 parameters

 Design of Experiments (DoE)


TWC: Experimental Inlet Conditions

Minor species inlet mole fractions

Inlet exhaust temperature and mass flow rate


Test Rig Model
Global Reactions
used to define
chemical kinetics
Test Rig Model (Cont.)

Error = Sum{(measured-predicted)^2}
User Defined
Error Function

Input for
Measured Data
DOE Sensitivity Study
• Built-in DOE tools is used to perform sensitivity study
• Latin Hypercube partial factorial
DOE Sensitivity Results

Sensitivities

Error Function value


of
200 experiments
DOE Sensitivity Study
• Discovered that the following 3 equations most
significantly affected results:

R1

– R1 and R4 most sensitive


– R2 also sensitive
R4

R2
Final Optimized Parameters

Pre-exponential factor, Activation temperature,


Ai (mole•K/cm3•S) Ei (K)
R#

Optimum Original Optimum Original


1
1.04E+11 1.0E+11 9828.612 9622
2
1.39E+12 1.39E+13 11000 12500
3
3.66E5 3.66E+6 16000 16000
4
3.37E+7 2.2E+7 11967.34 10171
5
8.00E+6 6.7E+7 2100 2000
6
1.39E+12 1.39E+13 11000 12500
7
1.43E+09 4.5E+9 8419.25 8419.25
8
7.71E+7 1.0E+9 8419.25 8419.25
System Integration and
Simulation
Integrated Model of
Engine, Vehicle and DPF Systems
Typical Results of System
Simulation
Summary I
• Highly comprehensive and flexible solution:
not hardwired
• Specialized models for DPF
• General tools for chemical/catalytic reactions
• Solves user supplied reaction sets
(mechanisms)
• Can be encrypted into a subassembly or
compound object (black-box)
• Integrated tool: multiple catalysts in series
(+engine + vehicle)
Summary II
• Single simulation environment (no third
party tool is needed)
• Built-in DOE optimization for parameter
identification
• Can be run as standalone unit model
• or as integrated simulation in GT-SUITE
New Developments
• Faster Solvers
– Method of lines (Cavendish, Oh, Bissett)
– Quasi-steady hybrid-boundary solution
– Up to two orders of magnitude faster

• 2-D Conduction in
CatalystBrick and DPF

• Kinetics-based combustion
and emissions models
Thank You!

10th DOE Crosscut Workshop on Lean


Emissions Reduction Simulation
May 1st - 3rd, 2007

You might also like