Topic 1 Power Point Slides 2023 Full
Topic 1 Power Point Slides 2023 Full
INTRODUCTION:
1. unlawful conduct
• central concept
• detailed investigation
The 5 Elements of Criminal liability:
1. conduct
2. unlawfulness
3. causation
4. criminal capacity
5. mens rea: intention or negligence
• physical elements
• mental elements
• guilty if and only if he satisfies all 5 elements
Exercise
Example 1 Example 2
• A strong wind blows X • X steals V’s MP3 player.
into V. • At the time X is 9½
• V’s arm is broken in the years old.
collision. • Is x guilty of theft?
• Is X liable for assault? • Element criminal
• Element conduct capacity
• X’s behaviour • Child below 10 does not
involuntary: No criminal possess criminal
conduct by X. capacity.
Exercise
Example 3 Example 4
• X attacks V with the • Y points his gun at X to
intention of raping her. shoot X.
• In an effort to escape, V • X throws an axe at Y.
runs across a busy road. • The axe lodges in Y’s
• V is struck and killed by head and kills him.
a bus. • Is X liable for death of
• Is X liable for V’s death? Y?
• Element causation • Element: unlawfulness.
Tests of Criminal Liability
• Subjective
• Objective
Basic rule:
Exceptions:
• the accused
• the state
• the court
• Charge/indictment
• Plea
• Hearing
• Verdict
• Sentence
Exercise
• The court charged X with murder and sent him to jail for 25 years
• X was found guilty because he could not prove that he did not
steal V’s wallet
What are the Different Theories of Punishment:
• Absolute
• Relative
• Combined
The Presumption of Innocence
Definition?
The presumption of innocence imposes upon the state the onus to
prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.
Onus of Proof
Rests with the State
Exception – Reversal of standard of proof- Defence of Insanity/Pathological
Criminal Incapacity
Standard of Proof
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt (BARD)
• Must be the only reasonable verdict
• State must produce evidence that convinces a reasonable person that X
committed the crime
• Exception – Lowering of standard of proof- Defence of
Insanity/Pathological Criminal Incapacity
Rationale for the Presumption of Innocence:
Manamela 2000 (3) SA 1 (CC)
Meaning? An accused may not be held criminally liable unless her/his conduct was
criminalises at the time of its commission or omission.
What’s the rational of the POL? To protect X against the abuse of state power.
•Solomon 1973 (4) SA 644 (C)
•Smith 1973 (3) SA 945 (C)