0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views

Introduction & Direct Integration Method

1) The document discusses the mechanics of materials course titled Mechanics of Materials II. The objective is to study how materials behave under different types of loading and stresses. 2) Grading will be based on assignments, projects, tests, and a final exam. The maximum number and contribution to the final mark of each is specified. 3) Methods for determining deflection, slope, bending moment, and shear force in beams under various load conditions using direct integration are presented. Sign conventions and examples such as cantilever beams and simply supported beams with different loads are analyzed.

Uploaded by

Malingha Samuel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views

Introduction & Direct Integration Method

1) The document discusses the mechanics of materials course titled Mechanics of Materials II. The objective is to study how materials behave under different types of loading and stresses. 2) Grading will be based on assignments, projects, tests, and a final exam. The maximum number and contribution to the final mark of each is specified. 3) Methods for determining deflection, slope, bending moment, and shear force in beams under various load conditions using direct integration are presented. Sign conventions and examples such as cantilever beams and simply supported beams with different loads are analyzed.

Uploaded by

Malingha Samuel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS II

TMME:3101
Course Instructor.

Name: Dr. Perez Mukasa


Mob: (+256)761 519 346
Email: [email protected]

1
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To study the behavior of materials under various types of loading and stress. This will involve analysis of the deflections
resulting, the stresses & strains setup within the materials thus designing components that will not fail during their service
life.

Grading

Criterion Max Number Contribution to final mark

Assignments 5 10%
Project 1 10%
Tests 2 20%
Final Examination 1 60%

2
Course outline
TOPIC ESTIMATED HOURS
1. Deflection of beams: simply supported & cantilevers
- Direct integration method 4 hours
- Macaulay’s method

2. Deflection of beams: Built – in and continuous beams 4 hours

3. Review of Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) Self - study

4. Elastic stability: Struts 6 hours


5. Thick cylinders 6 hours
6. Strain energy & springs 6 hours
7. Rings, discs and shafts subjected to rotational & thermal 6 hours
gradients
8. Bending of circular plates & diaphragms 4 hours
9. Continuous Assessment Tests 4 hours
10. Tutorials 5 hours
11. Practical lessons: Deflection of beams, struts and thick 30 hours
cylinders 3
References

 Stephens R.C (1988). “Strength of Materials, Theory and Examples”. Edward Arnold Educational, Academic
and Medical Publishing Division of Hodder and Stoughton Limited, 41 Bedford Square, London, UK.
 Hearn J.E (1999). “Mechanics of Materials 2”. An introduction to the mechanics of elastic and plastic
deformation of solids and structural members. Third Edition. Butterworth-Heinemann Linacre House, Jordan
Hill, Oxford OX2 225 Wildwood Avenues, Woburn, MA 01801-2041.A division of Reed Educational and
Professional Publishing Ltd
 Gere J.M and Timoshenko S.P (1990). “Mechanics of Materials, Second SI Edition. Van Nostrand Reinhold
(International) Company Limited. 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P4EE.
 Case .J, Chilver. L and Ross C.T.F (1999). “Strength of Materials and Structures, Fourth Edition. John Wiley
& Sons Inc., 605 Third Avenue, New York, NY10158-0012.

4
SLOPE & DEFLECTION OF BEAMS

Introduction
 In engineering design, there are two types of design limits that are commonly used to size components or
structures:

(a) Stress limits – Set such that component does not fail or yield under the anticipated most severe load
conditions
(b) Maximum deflection limits – Used when the maximum stress does not place the most severe
restriction for the design

 In this section, methods to determine (predict) the deflection of members under lateral loading will be
discussed.

5
Relationship between loading, shear force (SF), bending moment (BM), slope and
deflection

Slope at any point, is

This slope is very small, hence; ,


6
Relationship between loading, shear force (SF), bending moment (BM), slope and
deflection II

Therefore,

From Bending theory;

Substituting for 1/R;

7
Relationship between loading, shear force (SF), bending moment (BM), slope and
deflection III
Consider a small element of a beam carrying a uniformly distributed load,

F F + dF
𝜔
G
H

M M M + dM M + dM

E F

dx F + dF
F

Considering vertical equilibrium of forces

8
Relationship between loading, shear force (SF), bending moment (BM), slope and
deflection IV

F F + dF
𝜔
G
H

M M M + dM M + dM

E F

dx F + dF
F

Taking moments about the right hand end of the element

9
Relationship between loading, shear force (SF), bending moment (BM), slope and
deflection V

Summary

Variable Equation
Deflection
Slope

Bending moment, M

Shear force, F

Loading distribution,

10
Sign convention

Positive shear Positive bending

Negative bending
Negative shear

 If the resultant force to the right of a section is upward (or to the left of a section is downward), this will be
regarded as a positive shearing force and the opposite kind of shearing force will be regarded as negative.

 If the resultant bending moment to the right of a section is clockwise (or to the left is anticlockwise), this is
regarded as a positive bending moment and the opposite kind of bending will be regarded as negative.
Hence, a positive BM bends the beam convex upward and a negative BM bends it convex downward.

11
DIRECT INTEGRATION METHOD

Introduction
 This method is usable if the general expression for BM that applies for the entire beam is known or can be
determined i.e.

From, , then;
and

 Constants A and B are determined from known values of slopes and deflections at particular values of x

12
Cantilever with end concentrated load, P
Taking the fixed end as the origin;
L P

But when, x = 0, hence, A = 0


x

Also when, x = 0, y = 0, hence, B = 0

Maximum slope and deflection


 Maximum slope and deflection in this case occur at the free end; i.e. at x = L
Therefore,
and

13
Cantilever with Uniformly Distributed Load (UDL),
Taking the fixed end as the origin;
L

/unit length
Integrating;
x
But when, x = 0, hence, A = 0

Also when, x = 0, y = 0, hence, B = 0

Maximum slope and deflection


 Maximum slope and deflection in this case occur at the free end; i.e. at x = L

Therefore; and

14
Cantilever with end couple (moment), M
L Taking the fixed end as the origin;

M
x
But when, x = 0, hence, A = 0

Also when, x = 0, y = 0, hence, B = 0

Maximum slope and deflection

 Maximum slope and deflection in this case occur at the free end; i.e. at x = L

Therefore; and

15
Simply supported beam with UDL,
L  The reactions at the supports can be determined with help of
equilibrium equations as; , each
/unit length  Taking the LH side support as the origin;
𝜔𝐿 𝜔𝐿
2 x 2

 Hence,
&  At x = 0, y = 0, hence B = 0
 At x = L, y = 0, hence,

Maximum deflection and slope


 Substituting for A and B;  Max deflection occurs at centre, when x = L/2;
and

 Maximum slope occurs at supports (x = 0 and x = L)

16
Simply supported beam with Central concentrated load, P
L  The reactions at the supports can be determined with help of
𝐿/2 equilibrium concepts as; , each
P
𝑃  To get a BM expression that applies for the entire span, the
𝑃
2 x 2 centre of the beam is taken as origin;

 Hence,
 At x = 0, = 0, hence A = 0
 At x = L/2, y = 0, hence, B

Maximum deflection and slope


 Hence;  Max deflection occurs at centre, when x = 0;
and

 Maximum slope occurs at supports (i.e. x = L/2)

17
Summary of the standard beam conditions covered
Case Magnitude of Maximum Maximum deflection,
slope,

Cantilever with end


concentrated load, P
Cantilever with UDL,

Cantilever with end


couple, M
Simply supported beam
with UDL,
Simply supported beam
with central
concentrated load, P

Note
 With the sign convention used for BM, deflections are positive downwards and slopes are positive
downwards moving away from the origin.
18
Non – uniformly distributed loads
Illustration Example
 Consider a cantilever carrying a load that changes from intensity on one side to on the other

 In this case its convenient to start with the general loading


expression, at x from the fixed end
3𝜔 𝜔𝑥 𝜔
x
Integrating,
L
 SF = 0 at x = L, hence,

Substituting for A and integrating;


 BM = 0 at x = L, the free end. Thus,

19
Non – uniformly distributed loads II
Substituting for B and integrating again;

3𝜔 𝜔𝑥  at x = 0, hence, C = 0.
𝜔
x
 At x = 0, y = 0, hence D = 0
L

Deflection and slope at the free end

 Obtained by substituting, x = L
and

20
“Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over
again and expecting different results.” – Albert
Einstein

21

You might also like