Introduction & Direct Integration Method
Introduction & Direct Integration Method
TMME:3101
Course Instructor.
1
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To study the behavior of materials under various types of loading and stress. This will involve analysis of the deflections
resulting, the stresses & strains setup within the materials thus designing components that will not fail during their service
life.
Grading
Assignments 5 10%
Project 1 10%
Tests 2 20%
Final Examination 1 60%
2
Course outline
TOPIC ESTIMATED HOURS
1. Deflection of beams: simply supported & cantilevers
- Direct integration method 4 hours
- Macaulay’s method
Stephens R.C (1988). “Strength of Materials, Theory and Examples”. Edward Arnold Educational, Academic
and Medical Publishing Division of Hodder and Stoughton Limited, 41 Bedford Square, London, UK.
Hearn J.E (1999). “Mechanics of Materials 2”. An introduction to the mechanics of elastic and plastic
deformation of solids and structural members. Third Edition. Butterworth-Heinemann Linacre House, Jordan
Hill, Oxford OX2 225 Wildwood Avenues, Woburn, MA 01801-2041.A division of Reed Educational and
Professional Publishing Ltd
Gere J.M and Timoshenko S.P (1990). “Mechanics of Materials, Second SI Edition. Van Nostrand Reinhold
(International) Company Limited. 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P4EE.
Case .J, Chilver. L and Ross C.T.F (1999). “Strength of Materials and Structures, Fourth Edition. John Wiley
& Sons Inc., 605 Third Avenue, New York, NY10158-0012.
4
SLOPE & DEFLECTION OF BEAMS
Introduction
In engineering design, there are two types of design limits that are commonly used to size components or
structures:
(a) Stress limits – Set such that component does not fail or yield under the anticipated most severe load
conditions
(b) Maximum deflection limits – Used when the maximum stress does not place the most severe
restriction for the design
In this section, methods to determine (predict) the deflection of members under lateral loading will be
discussed.
5
Relationship between loading, shear force (SF), bending moment (BM), slope and
deflection
Therefore,
7
Relationship between loading, shear force (SF), bending moment (BM), slope and
deflection III
Consider a small element of a beam carrying a uniformly distributed load,
F F + dF
𝜔
G
H
M M M + dM M + dM
E F
dx F + dF
F
8
Relationship between loading, shear force (SF), bending moment (BM), slope and
deflection IV
F F + dF
𝜔
G
H
M M M + dM M + dM
E F
dx F + dF
F
9
Relationship between loading, shear force (SF), bending moment (BM), slope and
deflection V
Summary
Variable Equation
Deflection
Slope
Bending moment, M
Shear force, F
Loading distribution,
10
Sign convention
Negative bending
Negative shear
If the resultant force to the right of a section is upward (or to the left of a section is downward), this will be
regarded as a positive shearing force and the opposite kind of shearing force will be regarded as negative.
If the resultant bending moment to the right of a section is clockwise (or to the left is anticlockwise), this is
regarded as a positive bending moment and the opposite kind of bending will be regarded as negative.
Hence, a positive BM bends the beam convex upward and a negative BM bends it convex downward.
11
DIRECT INTEGRATION METHOD
Introduction
This method is usable if the general expression for BM that applies for the entire beam is known or can be
determined i.e.
From, , then;
and
Constants A and B are determined from known values of slopes and deflections at particular values of x
12
Cantilever with end concentrated load, P
Taking the fixed end as the origin;
L P
13
Cantilever with Uniformly Distributed Load (UDL),
Taking the fixed end as the origin;
L
/unit length
Integrating;
x
But when, x = 0, hence, A = 0
Therefore; and
14
Cantilever with end couple (moment), M
L Taking the fixed end as the origin;
M
x
But when, x = 0, hence, A = 0
Maximum slope and deflection in this case occur at the free end; i.e. at x = L
Therefore; and
15
Simply supported beam with UDL,
L The reactions at the supports can be determined with help of
equilibrium equations as; , each
/unit length Taking the LH side support as the origin;
𝜔𝐿 𝜔𝐿
2 x 2
Hence,
& At x = 0, y = 0, hence B = 0
At x = L, y = 0, hence,
16
Simply supported beam with Central concentrated load, P
L The reactions at the supports can be determined with help of
𝐿/2 equilibrium concepts as; , each
P
𝑃 To get a BM expression that applies for the entire span, the
𝑃
2 x 2 centre of the beam is taken as origin;
Hence,
At x = 0, = 0, hence A = 0
At x = L/2, y = 0, hence, B
17
Summary of the standard beam conditions covered
Case Magnitude of Maximum Maximum deflection,
slope,
Note
With the sign convention used for BM, deflections are positive downwards and slopes are positive
downwards moving away from the origin.
18
Non – uniformly distributed loads
Illustration Example
Consider a cantilever carrying a load that changes from intensity on one side to on the other
19
Non – uniformly distributed loads II
Substituting for B and integrating again;
3𝜔 𝜔𝑥 at x = 0, hence, C = 0.
𝜔
x
At x = 0, y = 0, hence D = 0
L
Obtained by substituting, x = L
and
20
“Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over
again and expecting different results.” – Albert
Einstein
21