COEN 252 Computer Forensics
COEN 252 Computer Forensics
Forensics Reports
Forensics reports only state findings. If they draw conclusions, than they are expert testimony.
Expert Report
A report that offers an opinion is an expert report. Writer of the report needs to qualify as an expert. An expert report used in court has additional requirements. Experts expertise and trustworthiness are on trial, too.
Expert Report
DAUBERT et ux., individually and as guardians and litem for DAUBERT, et al. v. MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Juries decides on matters of fact, not on matters of law What is placed before a jury is tightly regulated
Rules of Evidence. Most testimony is limited to relaying sensory experiences, interpreted by the jury according to common sense. Experts provide insight that common sense does not offer.
Expert Report
An expert offers an opinion by applying the experts specific knowledge to the specific circumstances of the case. An export can also testify to general scientific or technical principles and leave their application to the jury.
Expert Report
engineers' opinions on whether a product's poor design renders it needlessly unsafe; accountants' opinions on whether someone has followed prudent accounting practices; physicians' opinions on whether some particular bodily insult was the cause of someone's medical condition; economists' opinions on whether a firm possesses monopoly power; statisticians' opinions on whether a firm's employment decisions correlate closely with race or gender; forensic opinions on matches between samples of DNA, blood, hair, etc.; appraisers' estimates of the value of specific property.
http://www.daubertontheweb.com/Chapter_1.htm
Expert Report
scientific evidence is admissible only if the principles on which it is based have gained general acceptance in the scientific community. If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise. Does not mention general acceptance.
Expert Report
Daubert (1993):
Rule 702 does not supplant Frye No definite checklist or test Pertinent factors:
whether the theories and techniques employed by the scientific expert have been tested; whether they have been subjected to peer review and publication; whether the techniques employed by the expert have a known error rate; whether they are subject to standards governing their application; whether the theories and techniques employed by the expert enjoy widespread acceptance
Never get caught lying. If you inhale, admit it, or refuse to tell.
Forensic Reports
Why was the evidence reviewed? How was the evidence reviewed? How did the forensic examiner arrive at conclusions?
Conclusions are
Accurately describe the details of an incident. Be understandable to decision makers. Be able to withstand legal scrutiny. Be unambiguous and not open to misinterpretation. Be easily referenced (Bates numbering) Contains all information required to explain the conclusions Offer valid conclusions, opinions, or recommendations when needed. Be created in a timely manner.
Written notes during an investigation might be discoverable. Notes need to be clear. Missteps in the investigation need to be documented.
Organization of Report
Organization of Report
Use crypt. secure hash to verify all files. Include metadata in report.
Executive Summary
Author, investigators, examiners Why was the investigation undertaken? List significant findings. Include signatures of examiners
Objectives
Detailed description of evidence Linked with evidence tags. If possible, with digital imagery of evidence