SM Lesson 4
SM Lesson 4
ASSESSMENT
CHAPTER 4
After studying this chapter, you should be able
to do the following:
OBJECTIVES 2
"Weak leadership can wreck the soundest strategy."
—Sun Tzu
3
Notable Quotes
THE NATURE OF AN
1 INTERNAL AUDIT
All organizations have strengths and weaknesses in the functional
areas of business. No enterprise is equally strong or weak in all
areas. Internal strengths/weaknesses, coupled with external
opportunities/threats and a clear statement of mission, provide the
basis for establishing objectives and strategies.
Objectives and strategies are established with the intention of
capitalizing upon internal strengths and overcoming weaknesses.
4
“ A firm’s strengths that cannot be easily matched or imitated
by competitors are called distinctive competencies. Building
competitive advantages involves taking advantage of
distinctive competencies. Strategies are designed in part to
improve on a firm’s weaknesses, turning them into strengths
—and maybe even into distinctive competencies.
6
The Process of Gaining Competitive
Advantage in a Firm
7
The Resource-Based View (RBV)
8
Integrating Strategy and Culture
9
Management
10
Management
11
Strength or Weakness????
12
MARKETING
Products Pricing
Distribu
&
Selling -tion
Services
Products & Marketing
Planning
Services Research
Opportunit
Customer
y Analysis
Analysis
Key financial ratios can be classified into the following five types:
1. Liquidity ratios measure a firm’s ability to meet maturing short-term 4. Profitability ratios measure management’s overall effectiveness as shown by the
obligations. returns generated on sales and investment.
Current ratio Gross profit margin
Quick (or acid-test) ratio Operating profit margin
2. Leverage ratios measure the extent to which a firm has been financed by Net profit margin
debt. Return on total assets (ROA)
Debt-to-total-assets ratio Return on stockholders’ equity (ROE)
Debt-to-equity ratio Earnings per share (EPS)
Long-term debt-to-equity ratio Price-earnings ratio
Times-interest-earned (or coverage) ratio 5. Growth ratios measure the firm’s ability to maintain its economic position in the
3. Activity ratios measure how effectively a firm is using its resources. growth of the economy and industry.
Inventory turnover Sales
Fixed assets turnover Net income
Total assets turnover Earnings per share
Accounts receivable turnover Dividends per share
Average collection period
15
FINANCE /ACCOUNTING
Financial ratio analysis must go beyond the actual calculation and interpretation of
ratios. The analysis should be conducted on three separate fronts:
1. How has each ratio changed over time?
2. How does each ratio compare to industry norms?
3. How does each ratio compare with key competitors?
16
FINANCE /ACCOUNTING
17
PRODUCTION/ OPERATIONS
18
PRODUCTION/ OPERATIONS
19
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
20
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
21
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
22
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
23
The Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix
A summary step in conducting an internal strategic-management audit is to construct an
Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix. This strategy-formulation tool summarizes and
evaluates the major strengths and weaknesses in the functional areas of a business, and it also
provides a basis for identifying and evaluating relationships among those areas. Intuitive
judgments are required in developing an IFE Matrix, so the appearance of a scientific
approach should not be interpreted to mean this is an all-powerful technique. A thorough
understanding of the factors included is more important than the actual numbers. Similar to
the EFE Matrix and Competitive Profile Matrix described in Chapter 3, an IFE Matrix can be
developed in five steps:
1. List key internal factors as identified in the internal-audit process. Use a total of
from 10 to 20 internal factors, including both strengths and weaknesses. List
strengths first and then weaknesses. Be as specific as possible, using percentages,
ratios, and comparative numbers. Recall that Edward Deming said, “In God we
trust. Everyone else bring data.”
2. Assign a weight that ranges from 0.0 (not important) to 1.0 (all-important) to each
factor. The weight assigned to a given factor indicates the relative importance of the
factor to being successful in the firm’s industry. Regardless of whether a key factor
is an internal strength or weakness, factors considered to have the greatest effect on
organizational performance should be assigned the highest weights. The sum of all
weights must equal 1.0.
24
3. Assign a 1-to-4 rating to each factor to indicate whether that factor represents a major
weakness (rating = 1), a minor weakness (rating = 2), a minor strength (rating = 3),
or a major strength (rating = 4). Note that strengths must receive a 3 or 4 rating and
weaknesses must receive a 1 or 2 rating. Ratings are thus company-based, whereas
the weights in step 2 are industry-based.
4. Multiply each factor’s weight by its rating to determine a weighted score for each
variable.
5. Sum the weighted scores for each variable to determine the total weighted score for
the organization.
Regardless of how many factors are included in an IFE Matrix, the total weighted
score can range from a low of 1.0 to a high of 4.0, with the average score being 2.5.
Total weighted scores well below 2.5 characterize organizations that are weak internally,
whereas scores significantly above 2.5 indicate a strong internal position. Like
the EFE Matrix, an IFE Matrix should include from 10 to 20 key factors. The number of
factors has no effect upon the range of total weighted scores because the weights
always sum to 1.0.
When a key internal factor is both a strength and a weakness, the factor should be
included twice in the IFE Matrix, and a weight and rating should be assigned to each statement.
25