Student 4.2 Practice Variability and Specificity
Student 4.2 Practice Variability and Specificity
Computer: Mobile:
PollEv.com/ Text
shaundaarsenie376 SHAUNDAARSENIE376 to
37607
Practice
Variability
and
Specificity
Kin 322
Practice continued..
Learning Objectives
• Explain the meaning of the term practice variability and its relation to
predictions of theories of motor skill learning
• Discuss ways to implement practice variability in skill learning or
relearning contexts
• Describe how the contextual interference effect relates to organizing
variable practice
• Identify reasons why contextual interference benefits motor skill
learning
• Describe the practice specificity hypothesis and contrast it with the
practice variability hypothesis
Practice Variability
and Specificity
Concept:
• Results:
• Practice trials: No statistically significant difference between the random and
blocked practice groups fr the mean number of trials required to achieve the
performance criterion
• Retention Tests: The Random practice group performed significantly more
successful trials on both retention tests than the blocked group and control group
• * Blocked practice did not differ from the control group on the first retention test
but significantly better on the second retention test
Practical Application in Rehab
• Conclusion: It is possible to create the contextual interference effect
in a clinical setting by interposing other activities between trials or
repetitions of the skill or activity being rehabilitated. The functional
benefit is a longer lasting performance improvement than would
result from repeating repetitions without the intervening activities
Application in the Clinic Setting
• PhysioYoga Classes
• Blocked practice for the first few weeks, then serial, then random
• Next level of class, one week of review/ blocked and then random
• Exercise prescription:
• ??
• Blocked first then random among their others exercises that are added
Limits of the • Research shows much support for the
Contextual contextual interference effect but also shows
Interference that is not NOT apply to all motor skill
learning situations…
Effect
• Characteristics related to the limits of the
effect:
• Motor skill characteristics- in lab when they are
Limits of the more dissimilar than similar it is better, but in
the real world, the opposite is true
Contextual • Ie) Basketball shots from different areas of the court
(High CIE but low for 3 different volleyball skills
Interference • Learner Characteristics
• Ie) Age- __younger__ learners benefit from blocked
Effect practice
• Ie) Skill level- low skill benefits from blocked
• Task difficulty – Higher CI will be optimal for learning
skills with the lowest levels of difficulty, but less
optimal for skills with the highest levels of difficulty.
WHY does • Two Predominant Hypotheses:
Occur?
person to reconstruct an action plan on
subsequent practice trials for each skill variation
(Lee & Magill, 1985)
WHY Does • Regardless of which hypothesis,
two important characteristics have
the been demonstrated:
Contextual • Higher levels of contextual
interference involves greater
Interference attention demands during practice
• People who practice according to a
Effect blocked schedule tend to
_overestimate_ how well they are
Occur learning during practice
• Specificity of practice hypothesis:
• Test performance is directly related to the
similarity between characteristics of the practice
and test conditions
• One of the oldest principles of human learnin-
Practice early 1900s
Specificity
So……..
• Is this hypothesis at odds with the contextual
interference effect?
• 3 Practice – Test Characteristics related to
Practice the practice specificity hypothesis:
1. Sensory/Perceptual Characteristics
Specificity 2. Performance context characteristics
3. Cognitive Processing Characteristics
1. Sensory/ Perceptual Characteristics:
• Motor skill learning is specific to the sources of
sensory/perceptual information available
during practice
Practice • Ie) Use of vision- prefer to use vision when
performing skill – then use vision when
Specificity practicing the skill
• Ie) Watching a skilled performer right vs
left hand – right and left handed shooters
• Watch similar handed athletes
• Ie) Visual Metronome
2. Performance Context Characteristics
• The more memory test context resembles the
practice, the better retention performance will
be
• ___Intentional___ Remembering- when
you must remember specified
Practice characteristics of an environmental context
• _Incidental_ Remembering- remembering
Specificity of related but nonessential parts of the
context
• People learn more about the context than
they are explicitly instructed to learn
• ie) Testing in the same environment as
practice- cues/aids to help them retrieve
information
3. Cognitive Processing Characteristics
• Practice needs some type of cognitive processing
as is required in transfer test
• “Transfer-appropriate processing theory”- the type
Practice
of practice that is best when a person is learning a
skill requires the same type of cognitive processing
activity that will be required in a ___physical
Specificity similarity____, regardless of the physical similarity
between the practice and test skills
• Ie)If test situation requires rapid decision making,
practice should consist of activities that require
rapid decision making.
• Ie) Balance with cognitive task vs just balance
Relating the Practice Variability and
Specificity Hypotheses
• Although they seem at odds, research indicates that each hypothesis
may pertain to specific aspects of the practice context
• The Practice variability hypothesis explains the retention and transfer
benefit associated with practicing multiple variations of a _skill__
• The practice specificity hypothesis explains why retention and transfer
performance tend to be better when the practice and test contexts
are _similar_ relative to 1. Sensory/perceptual info, 2. the
environment context 3. the cognitive processing requirements
• Worth noting: the higher the contextual interference during practice,
the more similar to the test situation.
Especial Skill Effect
• Support aspects of the practice variability and practice specificity
hypotheses, but not fully supported by either one.
• well skilled individuals consistently more accurate from the distance
they are used to performing at
• Ie) Basketball free-throw line, baseball bitchers (60.5 ft), archers ( 18 m)