Lattice
Lattice
MATERIALS SCIENCE
Part of & A Learner’s Guide
ENGINEERING
AN INTRODUCTORY E-BOOK
Anandh Subramaniam & Kantesh Balani
Materials Science and Engineering (MSE)
Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur- 208016
Email: [email protected], URL: home.iitk.ac.in/~anandh
http://home.iitk.ac.in/~anandh/E-book.htm
Space LatticeA lattice is also called a Space Lattice (or even Bravais Lattice in some contexts)
The point on the right has one to the left and hence by the requirement of identical
surrounding the one of the left should have one more to the left
By a similar argument there should be one more to the left and one to the right
The infinity on the sides would often be left out from schematics
Note: Basis vector should not be confused with the basis ( the motif)
How can make some 1-D crystals out
Click here
of the lattice we have constructed
2D Lattices
2D Lattices
2D lattices can be generated with two basis vectors
They are infinite in two dimensions
There are five distinct 2D lattices:
1 Square
2 Rectangle
3 Centered Rectangle
4 120 Rhombus
5 Parallelogram (general)
This aspect can be quite confusing
Note that in the classification of lattices, we are considering the shape of the unit
cell and the disposition of lattice points with respect to that unit cell (i.e., “are
there a lattice points only in the corners?”, “is there lattice point at the centre
also?”).
However, at the heart of the classification is the symmetry of the lattice.
To simplify matters:
In this set of slides we will NOT consider symmetries with translation built into them (e.g. glide reflection)
2D Lattices
b
a
b Two distances: a, b
Note how the Square and the Rhombus are in the same level
Rectangle (p’ = 3, c = 1 , t = 2)
ab E.g.
= 90º for Square: there are 3 parameters (p)
and
1 “=“ amongst them (e)
Parallelogram (p’ = 3, c = 0 , t = 3) p’ = (p e) = (3 1) = 2
ab
Now let us consider the 5 lattices one by one
Unit Cell with
1 Square Lattice Symmetry elements
(rotational) overlaid
Rotational + Mirrors
b a
Symmetry
4mm
Lattice parameters: a = b, = 90
4mhmd
Note that these vectors are
translational symmetry
operators (i.e. act repeatedly!)
Why put rotational symmetry elements onto a lattice?
They are NOT ‘mere’ vectors!
(aren’t lattices built just out of translation?)
A note on the symmetry Note that the peridicty of the
lattice is a & b
but the periodicity of the
mirrors along x, y are a/2 and b/2
Rotational + Mirrors
Symmetry
4mm
Rotational + Mirrors
2mm
Lattice parameters: a, b, = 90
Continued…
Centred Rectangular Lattice
Rotational + Mirrors
2mm
We have chosen a different unit cell but this does
not change the structure!
It still remains a centred rectangular lattice
Rotational + Mirrors
6mm
a b
The Hexagon shaped cell
We had seen that there is a rectangle lattice and a centred rectangle lattice.
The natural question which comes to mind is that why are there no centred
square, centred rhombus and centred parallelogram lattices?
We have already answered the question regarding the centred square lattice.
(However, we will repeat the answer here again).
We will also answer the question for the other cases now.
The case of the centred square lattice
4mm
Based on size the smaller blue cell (with half the area) is preferred
This is nothing but a square lattice viewed at 45 !
Based on size the smaller green cell (with half the area) is preferred
Hence this is not a separate case
The case of the centred parallelogram lattice
Based on size the smaller green cell (with half the area) is preferred
Not all these parameters may be independent. Some constraints may be placed on them.
A derivation of the 14 Bravais lattices or the existence of 7 crystal systems will not be shown in this introductory course
There are 14 distinct 3D lattices which come under 7 Crystal Systems
The BRAVAIS LATTICES (with shapes of unit cells as) :
Cube (a = b = c, = = = 90)
Square Prism (Tetragonal) (a = b c, = = = 90)
Rectangular Prism (Orthorhombic) (a b c, = = = 90)
120 Rhombic Prism (Hexagonal) (a = b c, = = 90, = 120)
Parallelepiped (Equilateral, Equiangular)
(Trigonal) (a = b = c, = = 90)
Parallelogram Prism (Monoclinic) (a b c, = = 90 )
Parallelepiped (general) (Triclinic) (a b c, )
To restate:
the 14 Bravais lattices have 7 different Symmetries
(which correspond to the 7 Crystal Systems).
Shape of UC Used as UC for crystal: Lattice Parameters
Cube Cubic (a = b = c, = = = 90)
Square Prism Tetragonal (a = b c, = = = 90)
Rectangular Prism Orthorhombic (a b c, = = = 90)
120 Rhombic Prism Hexagonal (a = b c, = = 90, = 120)
Parallelepiped
(Equilateral, Trigonal (a = b = c, = = 90)
Equiangular)
Parallelogram Prism Monoclinic (a b c, = = 90 )
Parallelepiped (general) Triclinic (a b c, )
Important Note:
do NOT confuse the shape of the unit cell with the definition of crystal
systems (crystal systems are defined based on symmetry).
(as we have already seen we can always choose a different unit cell for a given
crystal)
Building a 3D cubic lattice Click here to visualize a step by step construction
a = b = c,
= = = 90
a b c,
In special cases some of these numbers may
Any general parallelepiped be equal to each other (e.g. a = b) or equal to
Click here to
know more is space filling a special number (e.g. = 90)
about
(hence we may not require 6 independent numbers to describe a lattice)
Bravais Lattice: various viewpoints
Bravais concluded that there are only 14 possible Space Lattices (with Unit Cells
to represent them). These belong to 7 Crystal systems.
There are 14 Bravais Lattices which are the Space Group symmetries of lattices
A derivation of the 14 Bravais lattices or the existence of 7 crystal systems will not be shown in this introductory course
Time to fasten
you seat-belts the
next few slides
will take you on
a 10 g-force dive
IMPORTANT
Crystals and Crystal Systems are defined
based on Symmetry
& NOT
Based on the Geometry of the Unit Cell
Example
Cubic Crystal
Intrigued!
Does NOT imply a = b = c & = = Want to Know
More?
It implies the existence of two 3-fold axis in the structure
IMPORTANT
If lattices are based on just translation
(Translational Symmetry (t))
then how come other Symmetries (especially
rotational) come into the picture while choosing
Ex the Crystal System & Unit Cell for a lattice?
am
pl
e
Why do we say that End Centred Cubic Lattice does not exist?
Isn’t it sufficient that a = b = c & = = to call something cubic?
A (why do we put End Centred Cubic in Simple Tetragonal?)
ns
w
er
The issue comes because we want to put 14 Bravais lattices into 7 boxes (the 7 Crystal
Systems; the Bravais lattices have 7 distinct symmetries) and further assign Unit Cells
to them
The Crystal Systems are defined based on Symmetries (Rotational, Mirror, Inversion
etc. forming the Point Groups) and NOT on the geometry of the Unit Cell
The Choice of Unit Cell is based on Symmetry & Size (& Convention)
(in practice the choice of unit cell is left to us! but what we call the crystal is not!!)
Continued…
ONCE MORE:
When we say End Centred Cubic
End Centred is a type of Lattice (based on translation)
&
Cubic is a type of Crystal (based on other symmetries)
&
Cubic also refers to a shape of Unit Cell (based on lattice parameters)
AND:
To confuse things further
Cubic crystals can have lower symmetry than the cubic lattice
(e.g. Cubic lattices always have 4-fold axis while Cubic Crystals may not have 4-fold axes)
Feeling lost!?!
hang on! some up-coming examples will make things CRYSTAL clear
To emphasize:
The word Cubic (e.g. in a cubic crystal) refers to 3 things
A type of Lattice (based on translation)
&
A type of Crystal (based on other symmetries)
&
A shape of Unit Cell (based on lattice parameters) Hence the confusion!!
Lattices have the highest symmetry
Another (Which is allowed for it)
IMPORTANT point
Crystals based on the lattice
can have lower symmetry Click here to know more
We will take up these cases one by one
14 Bravais Lattices divided into 7 Crystal Systems (hence do not worry!)
P Primitive
Why are some of the entries missing? I Body Centred
Why is there no C-centred cubic lattice?
Why is the F-centred tetagonal lattice missing? F Face Centred
….? C A/B/C- Centred Continued…
Arrangement of lattice points in the Unit
Cell
& No. of Lattice points / Cell
1 P 8 Corners = [8 (1/8)] = 1
8 Corners
2 I + = [1 (for corners)] + [1 (BC)] = 2
1 body centre
8 Corners
3 F + = [1 (for corners)] + [6 (1/2)] = 4
6 face centres
A/ 8 corners
4 B/ + = [1 (for corners)] + [2 (1/2)] = 2
C 2 centres of opposite faces
P I F C
1 Cubic Cube
I
P
abc 90
4 2
3
m m
F
Lattice point
P I F C
2 Tetragonal Square Prism (general height)
I
P
4 2 2 90
mmm
P I F C
3 Orthorhombic Rectangular Prism (general height)
One convention
abc
I
P
abc
90, 120
abc
90
2
3
m
Some times an alternate hexagonal cell
is used instead of the Trigonal Cell
A trigonal cell can be produced from a cubic
cell by pulling along [111] (the body diagonal)
(keeping the edge length of the cube constant)
One convention
abc abc
90
2
m
P I F C
7 Triclinic Parallelepiped (general)
abc
1
Let us make some 3-D crystals Click here
An important property of a latticesThis aspect might seem trivial here but is very useful to remember!
If one sits at any lattice point the space around looks identical to the person
1D
3D
Hence, if for a given crystal (say with FCC lattice decorated with a single atom motif), the edge centre is a position of an
octahedral void then the set of octahedral void positions will form a FCC lattice
Q: I have seen a different representation of the
same unit cell WITHOUT the 6-folds. How come?
As we know lattices have the highest symmetry and hence a 120 rhombus lattice (noting
that this is actually the shape of the UC) always has 6-fold symmetries
However crystals based on the lattice can have lower symmetry which includes only 3-
fold symmetries
The list of crystals in 2D are (with shapes of UC):
Square Rectangle 120 Rhombus Parallelogram (general)
Unfortunately this does not include a crystal with 3-fold symmetry alone (which could be
called TRIANGULAR analogous to Trigonal in 3D)
Hence the 120 Rhombus lattice always has 6-fold axes while crystals based on the lattice may have only 3-folds
Back
Click here Example of a 3D analogue of this