the effectiveness of the guided

inquiry model with mind mapping

on the science learning outcomes of
grade iv sd students in kudus
district
 Hello!
Siti Khoiriyyana Fadlila
[email protected]

Master of Elememtary Education Study Program,

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education,
University of Muria Kudus

2
 1.
introduction
 This is a slide title

> One of the problems faced in our education world is

the weak learning process. In the learning process,
children are less encouraged to develop thinking
skills.

> Our education is not directed at building and

developing character and potential (Sanjaya, 2011:
1-2).
4
 This is a slide title
> Based on the results of the survey by the Program for
International Student Assessment (PISA) held by the
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD) in 2015, Indonesia is in a low position, ranking
69 out of 76 countries (OECD, 2016)
> The problem of sub-optimal science learning outcomes is a
very important and urgent problem, so it is necessary to
find a solution to the problem in improving the quality of
science learning in grade IV

5
 This is a slide title
The guided inquiry model is one of the innovative
learning models that can solve this problem it’s a model of
inquiry carried out in learning, where the teacher guides
students to carry out activities by giving initial questions and
leading to a discussion.

The application of the quided inquiry model with mind

mapping techniques can provide opportunities for students to
develop their potential in the learning process, so that science
learning outcomes can increase.
>  
6
2 Research
Methods
The population The research
• 4th grade elementary • quasi-experimental
school student of research
Kudus • nonequalivalent
• Sampling technique control group design
used is cluster random • Interview & test
sampling method to obtain data

8
 Same learning model
Experimental class Control class
quided inquiry with mind • quided inquiry
mapping techniques learning model only.

9
> The analytical test performed was instrument
analysis and data analysis. Instrument analysis
includes validity, reliability, level of difficulty and
differentiation. The data analysis method consisted
of initial and final data analysis. Initial data analysis
includes normality test, homogeneity test and a gain
score. The final data analysis used t-test.

10
 Results
and
Discussionss

11
 Result
Table 1 Score of pretest and posttest students' science learning outcomes in the experimental class and
control class
Ideal Min Max P
Data Class N Average Annotation
score score score (%)
E 38 100 60 90 64,50 65 C
Pre-test
C 34 100 50 85 61,00 61 C
E 38 100 65 100 82,50 83 B
Post-test
C 34 100 60 100 72,50 73 B

Table 1 shows that the average initial score of the experimental class learning
outcomes is 64.50 while the control class is 61.00, both of which are in the
moderate category. The score increased after learning, the average score achieved
by the experimental class was 82.50 while the control class was 72.50.

12
 Table 2 Comparison of students' science learning outcomes with the
quided inquiry learning model with mind mapping techniques

Student scores
No Value Interval
Control Class Experiment Class
1 51-60 4 0
2 61-70 9 8
3 71-80 11 9
4 81-90 8 15
5 91-100 2 6
Total 34 38
Completed (≥ 62) 21 30
Not complete (< 62) 13 8
Highest 100 100
Lowest 60 65
Average 72,5 82,5

13
 Table 2 Comparison of students' science learning outcomes with the
quided inquiry learning model with mind mapping techniques

Student scores
No Value Interval
Control Class Experiment Class
1 51-60 4 0
2 61-70 9 8
3 71-80 11 9
4 81-90 8 15
5 91-100 2 6
Total 34 38
Completed (≥ 62) 21 30
Not complete (< 62) 13 8
Highest 100 100
Lowest 60 65
Average 72,5 82,5

14
 Table 3 Gain Score Test Results
Average
Group N-Gain
Pre-test Post-test
Experiment Class 64,50 82,50 0,51

Control Class 61,00 72,50 0,29

The results of the gain test can be concluded that the difference between
the experimental class is higher than the control class so that it can be
concluded that the learning in the experimental class is better than the
control class

15
the conclusion of this study is that there are differences
in student science learning outcomes between students
in classes who use the quided inquiry learning model
with mind mapping techniques and those who only use
the quided inquiry learning model.

16
 Discussion

• Implementation of learning using the guided inquiry learning model

with mind mapping techniques emphasizes active student learning
by carrying out guided investigations to prove the initial hypothesis

• the average level of compliance with the guided inquiry learning

model with mind mapping is 83%

• This shows that the learning plans that have been prepared have
all been implemented even though there are still some students
who do not participate

17
 Discussion

• The inquiry model involves a process of exploring nature which

leads to the process of asking questions, making discoveries,
testing discoveries and solving problems to seek new
understandings, so as to encourage students' scientific reasoning
which is one of the goals of education.

• The quided inquiry learning model requires students to actively

participate with concepts and principles in order to gain experience
and conduct experiments that will lead students to discover the
principles themselves

• In addition, with mind mapping students are more enthusiastic and

enthusiastic in making notes on more creative material with color
combinations on the maps made.

18
Conclusion

19
 Diagrams and infographics
• The guided inquiry learning model with mind mapping
techniques is more effective in using the science learning

• The effectiveness of the guided inquiry learning model with the mind
mapping technique based on the t-test, it is known that the t-count
value of 1.493 is smaller than the t-table value of 1.944.

• It is better if teachers always apply learning that is in accordance with

the material and learning objectives to be achieved

• It will be easier to understand and create a pleasant learning

atmosphere.

20
References
[1] Buzan, T. Buku Pintar Mind Map. Jakarta:
Gramedia. (2013)
[2] Chen, C. T. & She, H., C. The Effectiveness of
Scientific. Inquiry With/Without Integration of
Scientific Reasoning. International Journal of
Science and Mathematics Education. Vol. 2, pp.
98-118 (2013)
[3] Fauzia, M. Y., & Purwantoyo, E. Efektivitas
Strategi Mencatat Kreatif Mind Mapping untuk
Meningkatkan Daya Ingat Siswa SMP Islam Cepu
pada Materi Keanekaragaman Makhluk Hidup.
Unnes Journal of Biology Education, vol. 4 (2),
pp. 215-219 (2015)
[4] OECD. PISA 2015 Results (Volume I):
Excellence and Equity in Education, PISA, OECD
Publishing, Paris (2016)
[5] Panasan, M., & Prasart, N. Learning
Outcomes of Project – Based and Inquiry Based
Learning Activities. Journal of Social Science, vol.
6 (2), pp. 252-255 (2010)

21
[6[ Priyatno, D. Paham Analisa Statistik
Data dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta:
MediaKom (2010)
[7] Putra, S. R. Desain Belajar Mengajar
Kreatif Berbasis Sains. Yogyakarta: Diva
Press (2013)
[8] Sanjaya, W. Strategi Pembelajaran
Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan.
Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media (2011)
[9] Vlassi, M., Alexandra, K. The
comparison between guided inquiry and
traditional teaching method. A case study
for the teaching of the structure of matter
to 8th grade Greek students. Procedia -
Social and Behavioral Sciences vol.93, pp
494 –497 (2013)
[10] Yuniastuti, Euis. 2013. Peningkatan
Keterampilan Proses, Motivasi, dan Hasil
Belajar Biologi dengan Strategi
Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing pada
Siswa Kelas VII SMP Kartika V-1
Balikpapan. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan,
Vol. 14 No. 1, April 2013. (2013)
 
22
 Thanks!
Any questions?
Find me at @username & [email protected]

23