DATA, CONSTRUCTION

OF TABLES AND
INTERPRETATIONS
DECISION-MAKING SKILLS OF SCHOOL HEADS AND
LEARNING ENVIRONMENT IN PUBLIC
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
 DECISION-MAKING SKILLS OF SCHOOL HEADS AND
LEARNING ENVIRONMENT IN PUBLIC
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
Statement of the Problem
The main thrust of the study was to determine the significance of the
relationship between decision-making skills of school heads and learning
environment in public elementary schools in the Municipality of Malungon,
Sarangani Province. Specifically, the study aimed to answer the following questions:
1. What is the level of decision-making skills of school heads in
reference to;
1.1 charismatic
1.2 thinkers
1.3 Skeptics
2. What is the status of learning environment in public elementary schools

in terms of;
2.1 school Culture
2.2 student, Family and Community Support
2.3 professional Growth, Development and
Evaluation?
3. Is there a significant relationship between decision–making skills of
school heads and learning environment in public elementary schools in
the Municipality of Malungon?
 DECISION-MAKING SKILLS OF SCHOOL HEADS IN REFERENCE
TO CHARISMATIC

RESPONDENTS
INDICATORS
MEAN
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TOTAL RANK
AVERAGE
School head:

1. Being fascinated 4 3 4 3 4 5 4 3 4 5 3 4 3 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 79 3.95 1.5

by new ideas

2. Making simple and

straightforward 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 2 3 3 3 4 2 2 2 4 62 3.10 5
arguments

3. Focusing the
3 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 72 3.60 3
discussion on results

4. Making final
decisions based on
4 4 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 3 70 3.50 4
balanced
Information
5. Using visual aids in
stressing the features
and 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 5 5 3 4 3 5 4 3 4 5 4 3 3 79 3.95 1.5
benefits of
teacher’s proposal
TOTAL 18 19 18 16 19 19 19 20 18 18 19 16 18 19 18 18 16 17 16 19 360
AVERAGE 3.6 3.8 3.6 3.2 3.8 3.8 3.8 4 3.6 3.6 3.8 3.2 3.6 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.2 3.4 3.2 3.8
RANK
 Table 1. LEGEND:

LEVEL OF DECISION-MAKING SKILLS OF SCHOOL HEADS IN TERMS OF CHARISMATIC 4.1-5.0 VERY HIGH

INDICATORS MEAN RANK DESCRIPTION 3.1-4.0- HIGH

School head: HIGH 2.1-3.0- MODERATE
3.95 1.5
1. Being fascinated by new ideas 1.1-2.0 – LOW
HIGH 0.1-1.0- VERY LOW
2. Making simple and straightforward arguments 3.10 5
3. Focusing the discussion on results 3.60 3 HIGH
4. Making final decisions based on balanced HIGH
3.50 4
Information
HIGH
5. Using visual aids in stressing the features and
3.95 1.5
benefits of teacher’s proposal
average: 3.62 HIGH

Table 1 presents the data on decision making skills of school heads in terms of charismatic.
Mean and ranking was utilized to treat the data gathered.
It could be seen from the table that the description of the five indicators were all high.
The highest were being fascinated by new ideas and using visual aids in stressing the features
and benefits of teacher’s proposal with the mean of 3.95. it is followed by focusing the
discussion on result with the mean of 3.60. While the lowest is making simple and
straightforward arguments with the mean of 3.10. Generally, in terms of decision making of
school’s head in reference to charismatic the over-all means of 3.62 which indicate high.
This implied that successful charismatic leaders are also compassionate. Charisma alone
may not be enough, because there’s a very real possibility that it can disintegrate into mere hero
worship. Compassion, integrity, honesty, and fortitude are also qualities that successful
 ACTIVITY
Statement of the Problem
The main thrust of the study was to determine the significance of the
relationship between decision-making skills of school heads and learning
environment in public elementary schools in the Municipality of Malungon,
Sarangani Province. Specifically, the study aimed to answer the following
questions:
1. What is the level of decision-making skills of school heads in reference
to;
1.1 charismatic
1.2 thinkers
1.3 Skeptics
 DO IT # 1 : DATA ON DECISION MAKING SKILLS OF SCHOOL HEAD IN
REFERENCE TO SKEPTICS

RESPONDENTS
INDICATORS
TOTA MEAN
RAN
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 AVERA
L GE
K
School head:

1. Being highly
suspicious of every 5 3 3 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 5
information
presented
2. Liking an
aggressive and
confrontational 4 3 4 3 3 1 2 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 5 3 4 4
style of decision-
making
3. Considering
arguments of 2 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3
credible teacher
4. Wanting
proposal from
people they fully 4 3 4 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 3 2 2 1 1 1 4
trusts
5. Making
decisions quickly 4 5 5 4 2 3 1 1 1 1 4 5 3 2 1 4 4 5 4 5
TOTAL                                              
AVERAGE                                              
RANK                                              
 DO IT 2.
DECISION MAKING SKILLS OF SCHOOL HEAD IN
REFERENCE OF SKEPTICS

LEGEND:
INDICATORS MEAN RANK DESCRIPTION
4.1-5.0 VERY
School head:   HIGH

  3.1-4.0- HIGH
1. Being highly suspicious of every 2.1-3.0-
information presented MODERATE
2. Liking an aggressive and   1.1-2.0 – LOW
confrontational style 0.1-1.0- VERY
of decision-making LOW
 
3. Considering arguments of credible
teacher
 
4. Wanting proposal from people they
fully trusts
 

5. Making decisions quickly

Average:      
 DO IT 3.

INTERPRETATION: (WRITE YOUR

INTERPRETATION)
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
______________________
 ANSWER DO IT # 1: DATA ON DECISION MAKING SKILLS OF SCHOOL HEAD IN
REFERENCE OF SKEPTICS

RESPONDENTS
INDICATORS
TOTA MEAN
RAN
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 AVERA
L GE
K
School head:

1. Being highly
suspicious of every 5 3 3 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 5 85  4.25  1 
information
presented
2. Liking an
aggressive and
confrontational 4 3 4 3 3 1 2 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 5 3 4 4  68  3.4  2
style of decision-
making
3. Considering
arguments of 2 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 66  3.3  3
credible teacher
4. Wanting
proposal from
people they fully 4 3 4 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 3 2 2 1 1 1 4  43  2.15 5 
trusts
5. Making
decisions quickly 4 5 5 4 2 3 1 1 1 1 4 5 3 2 1 4 4 5 4 5 64   3.2 4 
TOTAL                                              
AVERAGE                                              
RANK                                              
 ANSWER FOR DO IT # 2.
DECISION MAKING SKILLS OF SCHOOL HEAD IN
REFERENCE OF SKEPTICS
LEGEND:
INDICATORS MEAN RANK DESCRIPTION 4.1-5.0 VERY
HIGH
School head: 3.1-4.0- HIGH
 
4.25  1  Very High 2.1-3.0-
1. Being highly suspicious of every MODERATE
information presented
1.1-2.0 – LOW
2. Liking an aggressive and
confrontational style  3.4  2  High 0.1-1.0- VERY
LOW
of decision-making
3. Considering arguments of credible
 3.3  3  High
teacher
4. Wanting proposal from people they
 2.15 5   Moderate
fully trusts

5. Making decisions quickly  3.2 4   High

Average:      
 ANSWER FOR DO IT # 3.
INTERPRETATION:
Table 2, presents that data on Decision making skills of school
head in reference to skeptics. Mean and Ranking was utilized to
treat the data gathered.
Data revealed that of the five (5) indicators, only one got a
descrptive rating of very high with the mean of 4.25 about the four
(4) of them was described high and among this indicators the
highest is being highly suspicious of every information presented,
with the mean of 4.05 described is highly decision skills of school
heads in terms of skeptic. It is followed by Liking an aggressive and
confrontation style of decision-making, with the mean of 3.4,
described as high. While the lowest among the indicator is wanting
proposal from people they fully trusts, with the mean of 2.15,
described as moderate.
The relevant information is needed in the organization to
harmonize the operation, if the members of the organization are
will inform about the activity their moves and actuation will
synchronized to achieved the goal (Gerencer 2020), .
 DATA ON STATUS OF LEARNING ENVIRONMENT IN PUBLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS IN TERMS OF PROFESSIONAL
GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION

RESPONDENTS

INDICATORS
MEAN
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TOTAL RANK
AVERAGE
The School:
 
1. Supporting the
long-term
professional growth
1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 5 5 4 5 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 5      

needs of
teachers
2. Aligning teachers
development
priorities and 4 3 4 3 3 1 2 3 4 2 1 1 1 2 2 3 5 3 4 4      
individual growth
plans
3. Improving
teaching
performance based
on
feedback from 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 1 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3      
mentor, students,
peers,
superiors and
others
4. Adopting clearly
defined monitoring
and 4 3 4 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 3 2 2 1 1 1 4      
evaluation
process
5. Using effectively
the teacher’s
evaluation and
individual
professional growth
4 5 5 4 2 3 1 1 1 1 4 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 1 3      
plan to
improve
proficiency
TOTAL                                              
AVERAGE                                              
RANK                                              
 DO IT
3.
DESCRIPTIO
INDICATORS MEAN RANK
N
The School:  
 
1. Supporting the long-term professional growth    
needs of teachers
2. Aligning teachers development priorities and  
individual growth plans
   
3. Improving teaching performance based on  
feedback from mentor, students, peers,    
superiors and others
 
4. Adopting clearly defined monitoring and
evaluation process
   
 
5. Using effectively the teacher’s evaluation and
individual professional growth plan to    
improve proficiency
Average:      
 DO
IT
4.
INTERPRETATION: (WRITE YOUR INTERPRETATION)
 SOP 3.
Is there a significant relationship between decision–
making skills of school heads and learning
environment in public elementary schools in the
Municipality of Malungon?
 DATA ON SOP 3.
RESPONDENTS DECISION MAKING LEARNING INVIRONMENT
1 3.6 4.2
X Y Rx Ry D D₂
2 3.8 4
3.6 4.2 12.5 2.5 10 100
3 3.6 3.8
3.8 4 7 7.5 -0.5 0.25
4 3.2 3.8 3.6 3.8 12.5 13 -0.5 0.25
5 3.8 4 3.2 3.8 18 13 5 25
6 3.8 4 3.8 4 7 7.5 -0.5 0.25
7 3.8 3.6 3.8 4 7 7.5 -0.5 0.25
8 4 4 3.8 3.6 7 18 -11 121
9 3.6 4 4 4 1 7.5 -6.5 42.25
10 3.8 4.2 3.6 4 12.5 7.5 5 25
11 3.2 3.8 3.8 4.2 7 2.5 5.5 30.25
12 3.6 4 3.2 3.8 18 13 5 25
13 3.8 3.8 3.6 4 12.5 7.5 5 25
3.8 3.8 7 13 -6 36
14 3.8 3.6
3.8 3.6 7 18 -11 121
15 3.8 3.6
3.8 3.6 7 18 -11 121
16 3.2 3.6 3.2 18 18 0 0
3.6
17 3.2 3.8 3.2 3.8 18 13 5 25
18 3.4 4.2 3.4 4.2 15 2.5 12.5 156.25
19 3.2 3.6 3.2 3.6 18 18 0 0
20 3.8 4.2 3.8 4.2 7 2.5 4.5 20.25
TOTAL 80.45 80.99 TOTAL: 853.75
Rs= 1-6 (853.75)
20 (20₂-1)
= - 5,122.75
20 (399)
= - 5,122.75
7980
= - 0.64
= - 0.36
 𝒓𝒔 𝒗𝒂𝒍𝒖𝒆 Decision
Variable DF
COMPUTED TABULAR a=.05
Level of decision
making skills
Versus 19 0.36 0.38 NOT SIGNIFICANT
Status learning
environment

The focus of this study was to determine the significance of the relationship between decision-making skil s of school heads and learning environment in public
elementary school heads. Spearman rank order coefficient of correlation was used to treat the data gathered.
As shown in Table, the computed r value of .36 which is lesser than the tabular value of 0.38 at .05level of significance with the degree of freedom which lead to the
acceptance of the null hypothesis. It can be stated therefore that there is no significant relationship between decision-making skil s and learning environment.
It implies that the decision‐making skil s is not a factor that could affect thet status of learning invironment. Teachers wil learn in different ways it could be through
schooling, expediencies, or their wil ingness to adopt the environment. Teachers are good adopter of changes even their leaders are not good decision maker activities as part of
their learning procedure. However, they are not interventions specialized in developing decision‐making skil s. Furthermore, while evaluation reviews for these educational
frameworks have been reported, they focused on the effectiveness of the evaluated projects on promoting knowledge, attitudes and behavioural intentions of participants but
not their decision‐making skil s (Zelezny 1999; Rickinson 2001).