100% found this document useful (2 votes)
1K views

EIA Methods

The document describes several methods for conducting environmental impact assessments: ad hoc methods based on expert opinion; checklist methods that list potential impacts; matrix methods that show interactions between project activities and environmental impacts; network/tree methods that show direct and indirect cause-effect linkages; and overlay methods using maps of environmental features and project plans. Each method has advantages and disadvantages for identifying and analyzing potential environmental impacts of projects.

Uploaded by

Haneesh Panicker
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
1K views

EIA Methods

The document describes several methods for conducting environmental impact assessments: ad hoc methods based on expert opinion; checklist methods that list potential impacts; matrix methods that show interactions between project activities and environmental impacts; network/tree methods that show direct and indirect cause-effect linkages; and overlay methods using maps of environmental features and project plans. Each method has advantages and disadvantages for identifying and analyzing potential environmental impacts of projects.

Uploaded by

Haneesh Panicker
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17

EIA Methods

Methods of Environmental Imapact


Identification – Warner 1973
 Ad hoc Method
 Checklist
 Matrices
 Overlays
 Networks
Ad hoc method

 Simple method based on subjective environment impact on broad aspects


 Ad hoc method is useful when time constraints and lack of information required
that EIA must rely exclusively on expert opinion
 It gives minimum guidance for total impact assessment while suggesting the
broad areas of possible impacts and the general nature of these possible impacts
 When more scientific methods are available, it is not recommended
Type of ad hoc methods

 Opinion polls
 Expert opinion
 Delphi Methods
Ad hoc method

 Advantage
 Specialist on a particular area will provide guidance
 Disadvantage
 It require experts
 Short/long term impacts are merely examined on guess basis
 Identification, prediction and interpretation of impacts are very poor
Check list method

 Checklist means a listing of potential Environmental Impacts


 This method is done to assess the nature of impact i.e. its type such as
adverse/beneficial, short term/long term, no effect/significant impact,
reversible/irreversible
Type of check list method

 Simple list
 Descriptive Checklist
 Scaling Checklist
 Questionnaire Checklist
Checklists

 Advantages
 Simple to understand and use
 Good for site selection and priority settling
 Disadvantages
 Do not distinguish between direct and indirect impacts
 Do not link action and impact
 Sometimes it is a cumbersome task
Matrices

 Matrices and its variant provide us a framework of interaction of different


actions/activities of a project with potential Environmental Impact cause by them.
 Simple interaction matrix is formed where project actions are listed along one
axis, i.e. vertically and Environmental Impact are listed along otherside, i.e.
horizontally
 It was pioneer by Leopold et al (1971)
 It list about 100 project actions and about 88 environmental characteristic and
conditions
Example
Sectoral Matrix
Network Method

 It uses matrix approach by extending it taking into account primary as well as the
secondary impacts
 Shown in the form of tree called as Relevance/Impact Tree/Sequence Diagram
 Identification of direct/indirect , short term/long term environmental impact is a
crucial and intact basic step of making impact tree
 Used to identify cause effect linkages
 Visual description of linkages
Example
Network Method

 Advantages
 Link action to impact
 Useful in simplified form in checking for second order impacts
 Handles direct and indirect impacts
 Disadvantages
 Can become overlay complex if used beyond simplified version
 Qualitative
Overlay Method

 Rely on a set of maps of a project area’s environmental characteristics covering


physical, social, ecological, aesthetic aspects
 Separate mapping of critical environmental features at the same scale as project’s
site plan
 Older technique: environmental features are mapped on transparent plastic in
different colors
 Newer technique: Geographic Information System (GIS)
Overlay Method

 Advantages
 Easy to understand and use
 Good display method
 Good for site selection setting
 Disadvantages
 Address only direct impacts
 Do not address impact duration or probability
Thank You

You might also like