This document discusses traffic loading and its impact on pavement design. It describes two procedures for considering traffic loading: fixed traffic and fixed vehicle. Fixed traffic involves converting multiple wheel loads to an equivalent single wheel load, while fixed vehicle determines pavement thickness based on the number of repetitions of a standard single axle load. The key factors that influence pavement design under both procedures are loading magnitude, configuration, number of repetitions, speed, and contact pressure.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
364 views
Chapter 5-Traffic Loading & Volume
This document discusses traffic loading and its impact on pavement design. It describes two procedures for considering traffic loading: fixed traffic and fixed vehicle. Fixed traffic involves converting multiple wheel loads to an equivalent single wheel load, while fixed vehicle determines pavement thickness based on the number of repetitions of a standard single axle load. The key factors that influence pavement design under both procedures are loading magnitude, configuration, number of repetitions, speed, and contact pressure.
Traffic Volume and loading are the major factors which
influence the standard of a road Traffic volume: the basic criterion used in the geometric design One of the bases for functional classification of roads, ( the design parameters associated with the specific class are used for design, for example: width, alignment, and gradients) Traffic loading: the most important factor in pavement analysis and design, and culvert and bridge structures. Traffic Loading on Pavements 3
The most important traffic loading factors to be
included in the structural design of pavement design are: Loading magnitude Loading configuration Number of repetitions Speed of loading Contact pressure Traffic Loading on Pavements 4
Two different procedures for considering traffic loading
effects are widely used in pavement design: Fixed Traffic: design thickness of pavements is determined by single wheel load magnitude independent of load repetitions. Any wheel configurations are converted to equivalent single wheel load(ESWL). Design is performed based on the largest equivalent single wheel load within all configurations Commonly used for airport and heavy-wheel load, but light traffic volume highways Not commonly used today. Traffic Loading on Pavements 5
Fixed Vehicle: design thickness of pavement is
determined by the number of repetitions of a standard single axle load (80KN). Any axle configuration is converted to equivalent single axle load (80KN) by multiplying the number of repetitions of each configuration by its equivalent axle load factor (EALF) The design traffic load is in terms of equivalent single axle load (ESAL). Because of the great variety of axle loads and traffic, it is the most commonly used method for design today. Traffic Loading on Pavements Fixed Traffic 6
Fixed traffic: involves converting multiple wheel loads to an
equivalent single-wheel load (ESWL). An equivalent single-wheel load is defined as the load on a single tire that will cause an equal magnitude of stress, strain, deflection or distress at a given location within a specific pavement system to that resulting from a multiple-wheel load. Commonly used for airport and heavy-wheel load, but light traffic volume highways Different criteria used for converting multiple-wheel load to a single-wheel load including: Equal vertical stress, Equal vertical deflection, Equal contact pressure, and Equal tensile strain out of which the first three are explained here. Traffic Loading on Pavements Fixed Traffic: Equal vertical Stress ESWL 7
The method of equal vertical subgrade stress is based
upon approximations of stress distribution concepts in an elastic half- space devised by Boyd and Foster. Traffic Loading on Pavements Fixed Traffic: Equal Vertical Stress ESWL 8
The vertical stress factor σz/q presented in
Chapter Two can also be used to determine the theoretical ESWL. For the same vertical subgrade stress, σz.
And for the same contact radius, the contact
pressure is proportional to wheel load, or
In which ps is the single-wheel load, which is the EAWL to be
determined, pd is the load on each of the duals, and qs and qd are the contact pressures under a single wheel and dual wheels, respectively Traffic Loading on Pavements Fixed Traffic: Equal deflection ESWL 9
In this method, the pavement system is considered as homogeneous half-
space and the vertical deflection at a depth equal to the thickness of the pavement can be obtained from Boussinesq solutions. A single-wheel load that has the same contact radius as one of the dual wheel and results in maximum deflection equal to that caused by the dual wheel in the ESWL. Using the vertical deflection factor F presented in Chapter Two the deflections due to single and dual wheel loading are expressed as: Traffic Loading on Pavements Fixed Traffic: Equal interface deflection ESWL 10
In this method , the assumption is that the single wheel
has a different contact radius but the same contact pressure as the dual wheels. The interface deflections for single and dual wheel with the same contact pressure can be written as: Traffic Loading on Pavements Fixed Vehicle 11
Fixed Vehicle Procedure:
The number of repetitions of a standard vehicle or number of standard single-axle load governs the thickness of a pavement. Axle loads which are not equal to the standard single-axle load or consist of tandem or tridem axles are converted to the standard single-axle load by multiplying them with the corresponding EALF to obtain the equivalent effect of a standard single-axle load. An equivalent axle load factor (EALF): the damage per pass to a pavement by the axle in question relative to the damage per pass of a standard single-axle load, usually the 80KN (18Kip) single-axle load. Traffic Loading on Pavements Fixed Vehicle 12 Traffic Loading on Pavements Fixed Vehicle 13
The summation of the ESAL of all axle load during
the design period results in a traffic loading parameter for pavement design. the most commonly used method for design today. EALFs in use today are either based on: AASHTO Road Test Theoretical analysis Traffic Loading on Pavements Fixed Vehicle: AASHTO Equivalent Factors 14 Traffic Loading on Pavements Fixed Vehicle: AASHTO Equivalent Factors 15
Fixed vehicle procedure-AASHTO Equivalent
Factors:
Since EALF is not very sensitive to pavement
thickness, a SN=5 may be used for most cases and a pt value of 2 and 2.5 are assumed. Traffic Loading on Pavements Fixed Vehicle: Theoretical Analysis 16
Fixed Vehicle Procedure-Theoretical Analysis:
Fatigue characteristics and permanent deformation parameters are important factors in pavement design. To limit the failure due to fatigue cracking, the allowable number of load repetition is expressed as: Traffic Loading on Pavements Fixed Vehicle: Theoretical Analysis 17
The constant f2 was determined by Asphalt institute and Shell
and the values are 3.291 and 5.671 respectively. Traffic Loading on Pavements Fixed Vehicle: Theoretical Analysis 18
Further, for single axles, it is reasonable to assume that
tensile strains due to the axles in question and the standard single-axle are directly proportional to axle loads. Using 4 as the value of f2 EALF can be approximated by what is known as the fourth power rule as:
ERA manual
Where: Axle=mass of axle in kg n=a power factor that varies depending
on the pavement construction type and subgrade but which can be assumed to have a value of 4.5 Thank You! 19