The document discusses participatory planning and its advantages and disadvantages. It describes participatory planning as involving the entire community in strategic planning processes to harmonize views and prevent conflict. The key aspects of participatory planning include sharing knowledge, considering different perspectives, teamwork, using tools to aid reflection, and developing shared understanding and plans. The main advantages are increased ownership and credibility, while disadvantages include the process taking more time and potential challenges from determined individuals. The document provides guidance on appropriate levels of participation and key stakeholders to involve.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
65 views
Pelayos Group
The document discusses participatory planning and its advantages and disadvantages. It describes participatory planning as involving the entire community in strategic planning processes to harmonize views and prevent conflict. The key aspects of participatory planning include sharing knowledge, considering different perspectives, teamwork, using tools to aid reflection, and developing shared understanding and plans. The main advantages are increased ownership and credibility, while disadvantages include the process taking more time and potential challenges from determined individuals. The document provides guidance on appropriate levels of participation and key stakeholders to involve.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 37
Plan using participatory
approaches PARTICIPATORY PLANNING
Participatory planning is an urban planning paradigm that
emphasizes involving the entire community in the strategic and management processes of urban planning; or, community-level planning processes, urban or rural. It is often considered as part of community development. Participatory planning aims to harmonize views among all of its participants as well as prevent conflict between opposing parties. In addition, marginalized groups have an opportunity to participate in the planning process. Planning is essential and strategic for any organization or community. With planning, organizations and communities become reflexive, dynamic, responsive, and systematic. A true participatory approach is one in which everyone's perspective is considered. That doesn't mean that people can't challenge others' assumptions, or argue about what the best strategy might be. It does mean, however, that everyone's thoughts are respected, and it isn't necessarily assumed that the professionals or the well -educated automatically know what's best. Everyone gets to participate in the planning process, and has some role in decision-making. The participatory approach involves:
● sharing of knowledge and experience
● recognizing and encompassing different perspectives ● working in teams on practical tasks ● the use of visualization and analytical tools, imagination and drama ● an open-ended creative learning process ● the development of shared understanding and jointly owned plans or other products ● the capacity for reflection and self-assessment BIG IDEAS Many low-income or minority individuals and groups feel that they have no voice in the society, that they are not heard even when they are asked for their opinions. True participation means that everyone has a voice which must be acknowledged. Acknowledgment also implies having enough respect for another's opinion to argue with it. All too often, low income or minority members of a planning team or governing board are treated with reverse condescension, as if anything they say must be true and profound. A truly participatory process would include not only everyone being heard, but also everyone thrashing out ideas and goals, and wrestling with new concepts. ADVANTAGES OF PARTICIPATORY PLANNING APPROACH 01 ● Participation carries with it feelings of ownership, and builds a strong base for the intervention in the community. ● It ensures that the intervention will have more credibility in all segments of the community because it was planned by a group representing all segments of the community. ● A participatory planning approach avoids pitfalls caused by ignorance of the realities of the community or the target population. ● It involves important players from the outset. ● It can provide an opportunity for often- disenfranchised groups to be heard, and teach the community that they have important things to say. ● It teaches skills which last far beyond the planning process, and can help to improve the community over the long term. ● It can bring together and establish ties among community members who might normally have no contact. ● A participatory planning process builds trust, both between your organization and the community and among the individuals involved. ● A participatory planning process generally reflects the mission and goals of grass roots and community-based organizations. ● It implies respect for everyone in the community, and thus sets a standard for community participation and empowerment that other organizations - and the community at large - may feel compelled to follow. Logically, a participatory planning approach should be effective. The fact that it includes the views and perspectives of everyone affected by the intervention should work to assure that all assets and needs are identified and addressed, and that unintended consequences are minimized. Finally, it does things the way they should be done. It respects everyone's intelligence, values everyone's ideas and experience, and affords everyone a measure of control. By empowering the community, and particularly the target population, rather than just superimposing its own ideas on a social structure that already exists, your organization can give substance to its ideals. 02 DISADVANTAGES OF PARTICIPATORY PLANNING APPROACH ● A participatory process takes longer. ● Education may be needed, for community members and the organization. ● One determined individual can wreck the whole process if he's not handled well. ● It may be difficult to assure that all the right people get to the table. Some key people may simply not want to participate. ● A participatory planning process takes patience and commitment on everyone's part. While these disadvantages present potential or real challenges to the success of a participatory planning process, overcoming them may tremendously increase the possibility of designing and carrying out an effective community intervention. LEVELS OF PARTICIPATORY PLANNING Information - The least you can do is tell people what is planned. Consultation - You offer a number of options and listen to the feedback you get. Deciding together - You encourage others to provide some additional ideas and options, and join in deciding the best way forward. Acting together - Not only do different interests decide together what is best, but they form a partnership to carry it out. Supporting independent community initiatives - You help others do what they want perhaps within a framework of grants, advice and support provided by the resource holder. WHEN IS PARTICIPATORY PLANNING APPROACH APPROPRIATE? INFORMATION ● The course of action has already been decided - by a funder ● You're simply reporting on something that's already in progress ● You're keeping people informed so that they'll have the information to be part of a participatory effort later. CONSULTATION ● You want to evaluate or improve existing services. ● There are limited options, and you're trying to choose among them. ● There are technical reasons - again, perhaps because of a funder - why only certain people or groups can be officially involved in the planning process DECIDING TOGETHER ● It is important that everyone feels ownership of the plan. ● You want fresh ideas from as many sources as possible. ● You can pull in people whom the intervention will directly affect. ● There is a commitment to provide support through the process for those who needs it ● There is enough time ACTING TOGETHER ● The intervention will be more effective than if it were run by a single entity. ● There is a funder's requirement for community oversight. ● There is commitment to the development of a real partnership. ● Everyone benefits from acting together. ● One goal of the intervention is the eventual assumption of leadership or the learning of leadership skills by the target population and/or others in the community SUPPORTING LOCAL INITIATIVES ● There is a commitment to community empowerment. ● The community has the desire and at least some of the tools to start and run a successful intervention. ● There is a commitment to provide training and support where needed. ● Your organization can only provide support, or can only run an intervention for a short time PERSONS INVOLVED IN A PARTICIPATORY PLANNING PROCESS TARGETS OF AGENTS OF CHANGE CHANGE Targets of change are the people for whom the Agents of change are the people intervention is aimed or who make or influence policy or public opinion. These include whom it is intended to actual policy makers, but also benefit. That could be very encompass people influential in specific (e.g. teen mothers, the community at large, who can for a job training program help or block an intervention by aimed at teen parents) or very their support or opposition. general. AGENTS OF CHANGE A. Policy makers ● Local elected or appointed officials ● Local public agency heads (welfare, e.g.) who actually administer policy in the community. A. Influential people in the community ● Members of the business community ● Clergy and religious sectors ● Natural leaders, those whom others respect and listen to ● The media, or others who have a public platform ● Directors or staff of other organizations affected by the problem or issue INTERESTED MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY These might include parents, youth, or school personnel, for instance, for an intervention dealing with youth. Many seniors have the time, the desire, and the experience to be excellent community volunteers. People with a personal or professional interest in the issue may also want to participate - parents whose children have had drug problems, graduate students, retired teachers or doctors. MEMBERS OF THE ORGANIZATION ITSELF
Administrators and line staff,
volunteers, current participants, board members, and supporters. PARTICIPATORY PLANNING PROCESS RECRUIT STAKEHOLDERS 01 A. Identify the stakeholders These should always include, at the very least, members of the organization's staff and Board and the target population. In general, it also makes sense to include members of the community, especially if: - The intervention needs community support or participation in order to succeed - The intervention affect the community as a whole - The community is being asked to change in some way - its attitudes, behavior, assumptions, bylaws, etc. A. Get the word out If you're trying to inform only specific groups in the community, start with people in those groups you already know. They'll help to spread the word to their friends and acquaintances, who'll pass it on further still. They can also help you decide where to place other information so the target groups will be likely to encounter it. Be sure that your message is simple and clear, and in the languages that the community speaks. Be sure also that your message appears in places where it will be seen or heard by those subjectively concern. CONVENE THE PLANNING PROCESS 02 A. Choose someone to convene the process - Regardless of what happen afterwards, someone needs to call people together and run a first meeting. If that person is identified with a particular group, then that group will probably be seen as in charge of the planning process. - Depending upon the community, it could be important to think carefully about who should be in that position.
A. Get the word out
An initial meeting might be open to a very large number of people (the whole community, or all of the target population, for instance) or to a smaller group (one representative from each of several agencies and organizations, a few selected members of the target group, etc.). The time, place, and tone of this meeting are all important in making sure that people will be willing to participate in it and in the process that follows. MAINTAIN THE PLANNING PROCESS 03 A. Choose someone to guide the planning process - Finding the right person to fill this role is extremely important. He has to be able to communicate well with everyone involved, to see the big picture as well as the details, and to deal gracefully with both interpersonal and logistical problems. A. Decide who will issue final approval on a plan - If, as is often the case, the actual planning is done by a relatively small group, there is usually a mechanism to have the plan approved by some larger or governing body. a. A meeting of all stakeholders b. A diverse group chosen to oversee the intervention c. A community meeting d. The Board of the organization e. A very small group - the director and Board chair, for instance, or even just one of them C. Determine how long the planning process will go on - The planning you want to do might be for a single initiative or campaign, or might encompass years of collaboration on working with a large and diverse population. - If the planning group is meant to continue, either to furnish oversight of the final plan, or to keep developing and changing the intervention as circumstances and the community's needs change, an ongoing participatory approach may be even more important to the intervention's success. THANK YOU ANY QUESTIONS? CRÉDITOS: Esta plantilla de presentación fue creada por Slidesgo, que incluye iconos de Flaticon, e infografías e imágenes de Freepik
Por favor conserva esta diapositiva para atribuirnos