Work Sampling
Work Sampling
The branch of engineering that is concerned with the efficient production of industrial
goods as affected by elements such as plant and procedural design,
management of materials and energy, and the integration of workers in the overall
system.
(2)The purpose of IE
Note: “Muda” means Waste “Mura” means Fluctuation “Muri” means Over burden
3
2. The system of IE (in a narrow sense)
Time (Standard
study time)
Work
measurement
Ratio-delay 1) Continuous reading method
study 2) Snap reading method (Work
Sampling)
4
3. Ratio-delay Study
3-1 The main purpose of Ratio-delay Study
- Investigation of causes of reducing operating rate
- Improvement to enhance the rate of utilization.
5
3-2 Kinds of Ratio-delay Study
There are two types of Ratio-delay Study method. Continuous reading method
6
4. Step of IE for work improvements
An example of the approach of the work
improvement using the IE technique Discovery of problems
9) Discovery of bottle neck processes and analyzing
1) Determination of objects
10) Finding and analyzing “Muda / Muri” works
Understanding of current state or processes
2) PQ analysis
Improvement
3) Process chart analysis
11) Improvement of work methods (Elimination
3) Work Sampling of Muda) ・ Process change etc.
Since it does not require a formalized time study procedure conducted by qualified
stopwatch analysts, it is less costly.
The methodology requires that the observer simply determine whether an employee is
actually working or is idle during any particular observation.
After all the observations are completed, the percentage of working time is computed from
the total number of observations.
The greater the number of observations, the more accurate the technique is.
1. Ratio-delay studies.
Worker’s allowances are determined by calculating the percentage of time
an employee spends in unavoidable delays.
9
5-3 How is work sampling performed?
Higher confidence level or higher accuracy level will increase the required sample size.
The 95% confidence level and ± 5% accuracy level mean that the results of 95 times of work
sampling executed 100 times will be within ±5% of accuracy error margin.
10
Cont… 5-3 How is work sampling performed?
(3) Prepare a random schedule for work observations.
(4) Observe and rate the employee’s work performance.
(5) Totalize the number of produced units and calculate the average time per unit.
(6) Compute the standard time per unit.
12
6-3 The comparison of advantages or disadvantages with other methods.
13
Work Sampling Observation Sheet Name Approved Checked Made by
sheet to be
Operator 8 persons(aaa,bbb, ・・・・・・・・・・,hhh) ○○○Division ××Dept. △△Factory
Equipment □□□Section ***Group
used in Work
Classification Main Work Preparation Reserve time Non-operating
Preparation of materials
Transportaion of parts
Tightening of screws
Arrangement of parts
Preparation of Jigs
Assembling of part
Handling of parts
Repair of defects
Insertion of part
Items
Transportaion
Sampling
Soldering
Meeting
Waiting
Total
Others
Others
Others
Others
Toilet
Chat
Rest
Time
1 8: 23 / / // / / / / 8
2 30 // / / / / / / 8
3 34 // // / / / / 8
Sample 4
5
37
58
/
///
/
/
/ ///
// /
/ /
/
8
8
format of 6
7
9: 27
36
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
// /
// 8
8
recording 8
9
10: 35
11: 16
// /
/ / //
///
//
/ /
/ /
8
8
sheet-1 10
11
20
35
/
//
/
/ //
///
//
/ /
/
/ 8
8
12 13: 15 // / / / / / / 8
13 29 // / / / // / 8
14 41 / // // / / / 8
15 55 /// / / /// 8
16 14: 32 / / //// / 8
17 15: 05 // // // / / 8
18 45 // / / /// / 8
19 16: 02 / / // /// / 8
20 34 // / // // / 8
Total
33 17 9 17 45 2 3 4 4 2 4 2 3 2 4 1 2 2 3 1 160
of each item
% of each item 20.6 10.6 5.6 10.6 28.0 1.3 1.9 2.5 2.5 1.3 2.5 1.3 1.9 1.3 2.5 0.6 1.3 1.3 1.9 0.6 100
Source: Total of each
123 13 18 6 160
IE text in work place classification
By Katsuyoshi ISHIHARA % of each
76.7 8.1 11.4 3.8 100
classification
(Issued by JUSE) 14
Operation analysis totaling sheet
Cont…7. Recording sheet Name of object Taro
Yamada
Approved Checked Made by
A llo w a n ce o f m a n p o w e r
A llo w a n ce in w ork g ro u p
P re p a ra tio n o f m ate ria ls
Classification Main operation Preparation Allowance
A llo w a n ce o f o p e ra tio n
Sample format of
A rra n g e m e n t o f p a rt
T ig h te n in g o f scre w
A sse m b lin g o f p a rt
H a n dlin g o f p a rts
In se rtio n o f p a rt
N o n -o p e ra tin g
Items
recording sheet-2
S o ld e rin g
O th e rs
Date
or
Time
26 Feb.1974(Mon) 33 17 9 17 47 7 4 2 9 6 3 6
27 Feb.1974(Tue) 35 16 11 14 53 6 5 1 7 8 2 2
28 Feb.1974(Wed) 33 15 13 19 48 9 2 2 11 5 0 3
1 Mar. 1974(Thu) 31 19 8 15 54 5 5 0 6 9 4 4
2 Mar.1974(Fri) 38 17 11 21 51 3 1 0 10 5 2 1
P reperation of m aterial
Sample format of
E xchange of punch
S orting of Products
A bsence of w orker
M achine trouble
part assem bling
Items
recording sheet-3
C aulking
O thers
O thers
Total
Worker
Facility
As for two sets of numerical values in two columns, the sequence No.(1-40) is written on the
left column and the hour is written in the right column.
No. Hour No. Hour No. Hour No. Hour No. Hour
17
Random Time table(1) 40 times for 10 hours Random Time table(2) 40 times for 10 hours
No. Hour No. Hour No. Hour No. Hour No. Hour No. Hour No. Hour No. Hour No. Hour No. Hour
18
Source:“Basics of IE”by Akihisa FUJITA(published by Kogakusha)
Cont….. 8-1 Random Time Table
An example:
The number of days for observation: 5 days
Period of one observation: 8:00~17:45(rest time 12:00~12:45)
When it is felt through daily observations or experiences that there are some doubts about the
results of operating rates, restudy whether or not the way of Work Sampling had problems.
Check the obtained rate of utilization from the following standpoint:
1) There is a large gap between the obtained operating rate and estimated operating
rate from the results of the production volume or the observation on a daily basis.
2) There is a large difference in the operating rate from day to day, and the cause of the
difference cannot be grasped clearly.
3) There is a difference in the operating rate among each of the facilities or workers that are
observed, and the cause of the difference cannot be grasped clearly.
When it was confirmed that Work Sampling was carried out appropriately, confirm the
accuracy and the confidence level of the operating rate by the Work Sampling .
23
10-2 Examination of the accuracy of the operating rate by the work sampling
For example, at first, the observation number “N” is calculated with the accuracy of 3%,
the confidence level of 95% concerning the operating rate of approximately 80%,
4X0.8X(1-0.8)
N= = 712
0.032
Confirm the validity of the way of the Work Sampling in this way.
And watch the results from various viewpoints about operating rate. 24
11. The viewpoint of the results of Work Sampling
1) Check the gap to the standard operating rate.
2) Check the content of non-operation by Pareto analysis and improve non-operation items.
3) Check the change on a day or time.
4) Check the difference of operating rate between workers or facilities
25
13. Case: Implementation of Work Sampling
13-1 The procedure to perform Work Sampling in this case
Procedure 2:
Get the approval by the manager or
the foreman of the target section
Procedure 3:
Determine reliability, accuracy to be
expected for results.
26
Cont… 13-1 The procedure to perform Work Sampling in this case
Procedure 5: 1) Determine the number of the necessary samples.
Make an implementation plan. 2) Determine the sampling period and the sample number per day.
3) Determine a daily interval of rounds depending on the number
of workers or the number of machines for observation.
4) Choose the observation hour at random.
5) Prepare a recording sheet for observation.
27
Source: “IE techniques in a workplace”
by Mr. Kinichi IKENAGA (published by JUSE)
13-2 The cases of Work Sampling
(1) Example 1: The operating rate of trucks for transportation of products
A request for increasing the number of the truck for transportation was delivered to the general
manager by the manager of the shipment section.
Procedure 1: The definition of problem(s)
When the operating rate of the trucks is high, the proposal is appropriate.
When the operating rate is low, an action is necessary to find the causes of low rate of utilization.
It should be decided whether trucks should be increased or not, after verifying the rate of non-
utilization that cannot be avoided.
Therefore the general manager requested the IE section to conduct Work Sampling in order
to grasp the actual situation of the non-operating rate of the trucks.
Procedure 2:Get the approval by the manager or the foreman of the target section.
The staff of the IE section explained the purpose of the investigation to the manager and the
foreman of the shipment section. The shipping section has had no reliable information about
the operating rate of the trucks till now.
Therefore the manager and the foreman cooperated with this investigation proactively.
28
Cont…13-2 The cases of Work Sampling
Procedure 3: Determine the confidence and accuracy to be expected for the result.
Confidence level was set to 95% (95 of 100 times of probability) that is the most common
practice to work sampling. And the absolute accuracy was set to ±3%.
The preliminary sampling was carried out for estimating the non-operating rate P and to know
the approximate causes of non-operating conditions.
→ the observation was made by going around outskirts of a garage and a shipment yard ten times.
As for 14 trucks, 140 samples were provided by 10 observations.
Judgment standard:
・ The absent truck which went out for shipment→ “operating”
・ The truck which is in the garage→ “non-operating”
・ The absent truck for which the shipment instruction is not made →“non-operating”
29
Cont…13-2 The cases of Work Sampling
31
Average of the non-operating rate=36.7%
Cont…13-2 The cases of Work Sampling
The inspection of the abnormal value and check of validity of the non-operating rate
The 3 σ limit was applied to inspect the accuracy of the data on 5 October.
The range of 3 σ in the normal distribution is 99.73% of the entire samples. Therefore, there is
extremely the small probability of deviation from the 3σ limit. Therefore, it should be considered
that some abnormality occurred when the sampled data go out of the 3 σ limit.
The calculation formula for the 3 σ limit(UCL & LCL) for mean P of the non-operating rate
UCL= P+3 P(1-P) LCL= P-3 P(1-P) P=mean % of the non-operating rate
√ n √ n n=mean number of samples in a day
The calculation about the truck
P=(404÷1.148)X100 = 0.35X100 = 35.2 %
n = 1.148 samples÷13 days = 88 samples per day
0.35(1-0.35)
Control limit of P =0.35±3 √ = 0.35±0.15
88
Upper control limit(UCL)=0.35+0.15=0.50=50% The datum (15.5%) of 5 Oct. was excluded,
Lower control limit(LCL)=0.35-0.15=0.20=20% because it was out of the UCL.
Number of workers in this work: 15 women workers The relative accuracy“S” is the
ratio of the absolute accuracy
Mean working hour: 8 hours per day
”e” for the mean P (mean non-
Approximate operating rate : 75% from the past data operating rate)
Expected tolerance by the work sampling:
±4% with the relative accuracy.
Calculating formula of
1) Calculation of the required number of samples relative accuracy “S”
The following books were referred to for preparing this manual on Work Sampling.
35