The document discusses theories of the firm and how they relate to accounting practices. It explains that firms exist to aid rational decision making, and accounting is used as a tool within firms. However, accounting does not measure transaction costs, which are key to maximizing efficiency. The document also examines managerial motivations through various psychological theories, noting drives for individualization and usurpation can impact resource allocation decisions.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
73 views39 pages
Corporate and Managerial Behavior
The document discusses theories of the firm and how they relate to accounting practices. It explains that firms exist to aid rational decision making, and accounting is used as a tool within firms. However, accounting does not measure transaction costs, which are key to maximizing efficiency. The document also examines managerial motivations through various psychological theories, noting drives for individualization and usurpation can impact resource allocation decisions.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 39
Corporate and Managerial
Behavior The Theory of the Firm
The theory of the firm explains why firms come into
existence and the role of accounting in the firm as a tool to aid rational decision making. Thus, the role of accounting within a firm cannot be considered without a consideration of the people involved in that firm since a firm of course consist of a collection of people. The Theory of the Firm Williamson (1970) argues that in any large organization the management of the firm is normally divorced from its ownership; this is a factor which hinders control over decision making. This leads to internal efficiencies within the firm and conflicts of interest, which mean that organizations do not operate efficiently as a meant of transaction cost- minimization and value creating maximization The Theory of the Firm From this analysis Williamson developed what is known as the Organizational Failure Framework. In its simplest form this framework can be summarized as follows: • People are not perfect managers and managers are unlikely to ignore their own self- interest in pursuing the interest of the owners of the firm. • Organizations as resource allocation mechanism are not perfect and inefficiencies arise the size of the firms increase; • Markets are not perfect and cannot by themselves compensate for the other inefficiencies inherent in the organizing of productivity activity into firms. Transaction Cost theory Transaction cost (TCE), and more specifically the version of TCE that has been developed by Oliver Williamson (1975), has become an increasingly important anchor for the analysis of the wide range of strategic and organizational issues of considerable important firms. Organizations are mere substitute for structuring efficient transaction when market fails; they posses unique advantage for governing certain kinds of economics activities through a logic that is very different from that of the market. Transaction Cost theory • Accounting as practiced by firms is based upon the product or service provided by the firm as the basic unit cost. In working in this manner, accounting has been designed to capture the cost that is incurred in the provisions of these products or services and simply to measure the costs that are accumulated in the production process. These cost accumulation from the basis of accounting information which is used for the multiple purpose of the management accounting within the firm. These uses, of course, will include: Transaction Cost theory • Operation planning and control • Decision making • Performance measurement and reporting • The evaluation and rewarding of the managerial performance Transaction Cost theory • Transactional cost theory adds to this theory through an understanding of the transformational process. The starting point for the theory is that all activities of the firm are transactions. This is true whether these activities are carried out by an interaction between the firm and the part of its external environment. Transaction Cost theory • Minimizing the cost of all transaction will inevitably achieve the following: • The maximizing of the efficiency of the operational activity through optimizing the source of all transactions; • The maximizing of the profitability of the firm through the minimizing the cost of the products or service provided; • Minimizing the cost of the transformation undertaken and hence maximizing the value created within the firm. Transaction Cost theory If transaction is reduced in the cost through accommodating them within the firm then they should be carried out within the firm and this could imply a firm engaging in vertical integration as a means of reducing its transaction cost. Another way of reducing cost of any particular type of transaction is by ensuring that economies of scale lead to a reduction in unit transaction cost and this could lead to horizontal integration. Transaction Cost theory • An observation of the economy of any country will show that firms are engage in changing the sources of their transactions through both integration and divestment at all times. The organizational failure framework, however, argues that this is not the case and that communications distortions are bureaucratic mechanisms prevent this from happening efficiently. Transaction Cost theory Accounting as cost accumulating does not, however, measure this transaction cost and does not provide a means of measurement that will facilitate transactional cost minimization. This therefore reveals one problem with the use of accounting information to manage the value creation process of the firm and this accounting does not even measure this key determinant of operation performance The Problems of Transactional Cost theory
Organizations as resource Allocators
Traditionally organizations base their resource allocation to decisions on the information available to them from their accounting system. However accounting information does not provide information necessary to base decisions concerning the allocation of resources upon the transaction cost associated with individual transactions in the transformational process. The behaviors of the managers do not necessarily have inventive to allocate resources in a way which is optimum for organization itself. The behavior of manager in an organization is further complicated by the way in which accounting information is used to motivate managers and reward them for performance as well as the way as the way in which the accounting information is shaped in its use by managers of the organization themselves. Inefficiencies in the market • Economic theory focuses upon the market as a means of exchange between different individuals or organizations, with the assumption that one party to the exchange offers goods or services whilst the other offers money in payment. These exchanges take place in the market. The market therefore is a shorthand expression for the process by which consumers of goods and services decide upon their needs and the suppliers of these goods and service decide upon their needs and the suppliers of those goods and services decide upon what to provide. The motivation of managers Motivations of manager in terms of psychoanalytic theory from Freudian and Lacanian perspective to consider the implications for managerial needs for individualization. It has been argued that this drive for individuation leads to managerial motivation for the usurpation of primacy. The management of the organization is often treated as a discrete entity but it is important to remember that this entity actually comprises of a set of individuals with their own drives, motivation and desire. Sigmund Freud: Father of psychoanalysis
Sir. Sigmund Freud
Sigmund Freud: Father of psychoanalysis
According to Freud, the personality consists of three
elements: the conscious, the preconscious and the unconscious. The conscious consist of current perception whilst the preconscious contains our memory. The largest, however, consists of the unconscious which contains repressed memories. Sigmund Freud: Father of psychoanalysis Freud was one of the most influential people of the twentieth century and his enduring legacy has influenced not only psychology, but art, literature and even the way people bring up their children. Freud’s lexicon has become embedded within the vocabulary of western society. Words he introduced through his theories are now used by everyday people, such as anal (personality), libido, denial, repression, cathartic, Freudian slip, and neurotic ( Saul McLeod, 2013). Carl Jung: Analytical Psychology Carl Jung: Analytical Psychology • Jung deviated from this interpretation significantly by focusing his concentration upon concentration upon understanding individual behavior through the development of his concept of collective unconscious. This determines the way in which all people act and according o Jung, provides a way of acting in universal in nature and is inherent by all individuals. • The unconscious motivations driving our behavior are present in all of us and consequently from one of the underlying themes of individual existence and behavior. Alfred Adler: the reassertion of the individual Alfred Adler: the reassertion of the individual • Adler argues that each person is endowed with an individual creative power which combines with innate potentialities and environmental influence to help that person overcome the obstacle in the path of life and self-development. Adler’s individual psychology theory is built around the fact that, although a person is born with this free creative power, the interaction of this power with Heredity and environmental influence leads to choose a life style. Alfred Adler: the reassertion of the individual His psychology is built upon the following principles • Teleology, in which he argues that the final goal provides sufficient explanatory reason for everything a person think, feels or does. He therefore rejects causality and determination. • The aggressive drive, which Adler believed to be the main force for self assertion in a person. The lacanian view: the assertion of the Individual • Lacanian theory posits that human subjectivity implicitly seeks to overlook contradiction, difference and ambiguity to fulfill aspirations for a harmonious and complete world. Planning traditionally relies on this “social” desire for its effectiveness in shaping policy frames, or ideological perspectives, from which to strategically orientate urban policy towards the future. This may sit at odds with the conceptualization of the postmodern city as constituted by spaces of difference and diversity. The lacanian view: the assertion of the Individual • Lacanian discourse theory will be used to examine how the beliefs of the planning profession are shaped and then implemented in our urban environments. The implications of addressing diversity as both a fundamental planning reality underlying many of our urban environments and as a major planning ideal, exemplified by multiculturalism, will be explored in this context and found to be of concern without revision to established institutional planning practices and wider societal expectations of urban management Michael Gunder, Obscuring difference through shaping debate: A Lacanian view of planning for diversity, international Planning Studies Language and Power • Swales and Rogers (1995) consider that the language used in the business affairs important as it provides a framing context for the communication of decisions in the history and culture of that organization. • Hanna and Wilson (1984) argue that language is inextricably enter wined in power relationship, stating: Communication is almost always an attempt to control change, either causing it or preventing it. Language and Power These decisions are limited by the following factor: • Available in formation and the way in which it is presented and interprets and accounting information is crucial in this aspect. • The organizational rules and rituals which determine the way decisions are out into effect. • The need to transfer decisions ownership into the public domain within the organization. Language and Power • Accounting has often been describe as the language of business and as such provides the technology by which an organization may be represented by and to its stakeholder. Belkaoui (1978), who argues that accounting is not just a language of business but is actual language in its own right, satisfying grammatical and lexical characteristics of language. • Accounting is a language, according to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, its lexical characteristics and grammatical rules will effect the linguistic and nonlinguistic behavior of users. Four propositions derived from the linguistic relativity paradigm are introduced to conceptually integrate the research findings on the impact of accounting information on the user's behavior. Accounting and other measurements • the objectivistic philosophical assumptions which underlie contemporary research in accountancy, as well as economics and elsewhere, are challenged and an interpretive alternative is proposed. A “hermeneutical” view of decision-making is examined, first with regard to science in general, and then concerning the human sciences in particular, and finally with regard to economics. Accounting and other measurements • Human decisions are not seen as objective, mechanical or behavioristic but as meaningful utterances of minds, as part of a bidirectional communicative process. That is, scientific decisions, like everyday decisions, are mutually interpretive processes of communication in language. Although it is true that much of mainstream neoclassical economics is incompatible with this interpretive approach, the “Austrian” school can be seen as an interpretive version of neoclassicism. Accounting and other measurements • This school of economics indicates a way to understand the communicative function the accounting “language” itself serves in the economic process. The professional judgments made by both accounting researchers and practicing accountants, then, are treated as “matters of interpretation. • Don Lavoie, The accounting of interpretations and the interpretation of accounts: The communicative function of “the language of business”. Green washing
• Green washing is a presentation of activities to look as
though they are socially responsible. The Seven Sins of Greenwashing
In the course of assessing thousands of products in the
United States and Canada, TerraChoice Environmental Marketing categorized marketing claims into the following “seven sins of greenwashing”: The Seven Sins of Greenwashing
• 1. Sin of the hidden trade-off: committed by suggesting a
product is “green” based on an unreasonably narrow set of attributes without attention to other important environmental issues (e.g., paper produced from a sustainably harvested forest may still yield significant energy and pollution costs). • 2. Sin of no proof: committed by an environmental claim that cannot be substantiated by easily accessible supporting information or by a reliable third-party certification (e.g., paper products that claim various percentages of postconsumer recycled content without providing any evidence). The Seven Sins of Greenwashing
• 3. Sin of vagueness: committed by every claim that is so
poorly defined or broad that its real meaning is likely to be misunderstood by the consumer (e.g., “all-natural”). • 4. Sin of irrelevance: committed by making an environmental claim that may be truthful but is unimportant or unhelpful for consumers seeking environmentally preferable products (e.g., “CFC-free” is meaningless given that chlorofluorocarbons are already banned by law). The Seven Sins of Greenwashing
• 5. Sin of lesser of two evils: committed by claims that
may be true within the product category, but that risk distracting the consumer from the greater health or environmental impacts of the category as a whole (e.g., organic cigarettes). • 6. Sin of fibbing: committed by making environmental claims that are simply false (e.g., products falsely claiming to be Energy Star certified). The Seven Sins of Greenwashing
• 7. Sin of false labels: committed by exploiting
consumers’ demand for third-party certification with fake labels or claims of third- party endorsement (e.g., certification-like images with green jargon such as “eco-preferred”). Adapted from: The Seven Sins of Greenwashing: Environmental Claims in Consumer Markets 2 Steve R. Dininno/Images.com Conclusion: • END……………………………………..