100% found this document useful (1 vote)
369 views14 pages

PreCal PriorityStudy Inst

This document summarizes key findings from a study on preheaters and precalciners conducted between 1993-1995. It discusses factors that influence pressure drop in preheaters like cyclone size and capacity. It also covers topics like the optimal number of preheater stages, considerations for precalciner design, and techniques for lowering NOx emissions like utilizing a hot core zone. The document concludes that cyclone dimension ratios, combustion temperature, fuel fineness, and modern precalciner designs are important for achieving low pressure drop and emissions.

Uploaded by

Dilnesa Ejigu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
369 views14 pages

PreCal PriorityStudy Inst

This document summarizes key findings from a study on preheaters and precalciners conducted between 1993-1995. It discusses factors that influence pressure drop in preheaters like cyclone size and capacity. It also covers topics like the optimal number of preheater stages, considerations for precalciner design, and techniques for lowering NOx emissions like utilizing a hot core zone. The document concludes that cyclone dimension ratios, combustion temperature, fuel fineness, and modern precalciner designs are important for achieving low pressure drop and emissions.

Uploaded by

Dilnesa Ejigu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14

Preheaters & Precalciners

Summary: Priority study results


Oct 1993 - Jan 1995

CTS TECHNICAL TRAINING - SHARING OUR CEMENT KNOW-HOW / 1


Objectives:
Preheater & precalciner study
 Present the state of art for preheaters
 Performance expectations
 low pressure drop - investment, operating cost
 capacity flexibility
 number of stages
 combustion eff. with low cost fuels
 NOx reduction

CTS TECHNICAL TRAINING - SHARING OUR CEMENT KNOW-HOW / 2


Low Tower Pressure drop

 Designs of major suppliers very similar


 Most suppliers have upgraded design
 state-of-the-art cyclones, duct, splash box
 have decreased Tower dP
 without negative effect on separation eff.
 Dimension ratios must be maintained
 cyclone inlet and outlet area, etc.

CTS TECHNICAL TRAINING - SHARING OUR CEMENT KNOW-HOW / 3


Cyclone Dimensioning

CTS TECHNICAL TRAINING - SHARING OUR CEMENT KNOW-HOW / 4


Tower Design

CTS TECHNICAL TRAINING - SHARING OUR CEMENT KNOW-HOW / 5


Tower Pressure Drop

 Tower dP directly related to:


 cyclone & duct size
 capacity
 Cyclone chosen according to desired dP
 standardized ranges (steps of approx. 7%)
 no compromise between dP & separation eff.
 Min. dP required to avoid upset conditions within a range or
operation (80-100%)

CTS TECHNICAL TRAINING - SHARING OUR CEMENT KNOW-HOW / 6


Tower Pressure Drop

 Minimum dP
 dP process stage = 22 inWG, 550 mmWG
 dP dedusting stage = 4 inWG, 100 mmWG
 Richmond
 contract = 23.5 inWG, 597 mmWG
 actual is better than guarantee

CTS TECHNICAL TRAINING - SHARING OUR CEMENT KNOW-HOW / 7


Specifying Pressure Drop

 Flexibility
 Capacity increase: dP = kQ2
 Capacity decrease
 smaller sized cyclone selection is better

 Costs
 very low dP is expensive (payback = 8-10 years)
 suppliers will suggest “middle” dP
 higher dP = more flexibility to reduce capacity

CTS TECHNICAL TRAINING - SHARING OUR CEMENT KNOW-HOW / 8


Tower - Number of Stages

 5th stage - yes


 payback = 5-11 years
 fuel cost dependant
 6th stage - no
 only justified under special conditions
 elimination of conditioning tower, bag filter

CTS TECHNICAL TRAINING - SHARING OUR CEMENT KNOW-HOW / 9


Precalciners

 Precalciner retro-fits
 capacity increase
 SHC similar; only 10 kcal/kg less
 Preheater kilns
 difficulty to control & maintain f-CaO > 0.5%
 Current Precalciner designs
 fuel oil design residence time = 1.8 s
 required solid fuel residence time = (min 3.5 s

CTS TECHNICAL TRAINING - SHARING OUR CEMENT KNOW-HOW / 10


Precalciner combustion

 Higher combustion Temp. is better


 Min. solid fuel fineness is required
 R90um = 0.5%VM
 Preheater NOx = 1200- 1300 mg
 Europe norms: NO2 @ 10% O2
 existing - NOx = 800 mg
 existing - NOx = 500 mg
 RMD permit = 450; actual = 200

CTS TECHNICAL TRAINING - SHARING OUR CEMENT KNOW-HOW / 11


Low NOx Principle

 Reduction Zone
 breakdown NOx
 Post-combustion oxidation zone
 to burn all combustibles, reduce CO emissions
 Hot Core
 If Temp. increases 850°C to 1200°C
 NOx reduced by 50%

 CONCLUSION: SEPARATE COMBUSTION CHAMBER

CTS TECHNICAL TRAINING - SHARING OUR CEMENT KNOW-HOW / 12


N2 Fuel

 Fuel NOx cannot be ignored


 N2 content
 ability to form radicals for NOx reduction
 High N2 fuels may be limited in future
 pet-coke
 high N2 coals

CTS TECHNICAL TRAINING - SHARING OUR CEMENT KNOW-HOW / 13


Conclusions

 Cyclone dimension ratios determine dP


 Low dP vs. cost, capacity flexibility
 not selection efficiency
 Precal vs. preheater
 capacity, clk quality, fuel cost, NOx, not SHC
 Good combustion: high temp, & min. fuel fineness
 Modern precal’s required for new emission reg’s.
 Hot core, reduction zone followed by oxidation
 Fuel characteristics important (N2 fuels)

CTS TECHNICAL TRAINING - SHARING OUR CEMENT KNOW-HOW / 14

You might also like