0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2K views

Mini Project - Analysis of Residential Building Using ETABS

The document discusses analyzing a residential building using ETABS software. It includes modeling the building by defining materials, sections, loads, and assigning structural elements. The building is then analyzed for forces including bending moment, shear, axial and stresses. The results are obtained for maximum design forces in beams, columns, slabs, and their locations. Response spectrum analysis is also performed to check if displacements meet permissible limits, ensuring the structure is safe under earthquake loads.

Uploaded by

Lohit D Kari
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2K views

Mini Project - Analysis of Residential Building Using ETABS

The document discusses analyzing a residential building using ETABS software. It includes modeling the building by defining materials, sections, loads, and assigning structural elements. The building is then analyzed for forces including bending moment, shear, axial and stresses. The results are obtained for maximum design forces in beams, columns, slabs, and their locations. Response spectrum analysis is also performed to check if displacements meet permissible limits, ensuring the structure is safe under earthquake loads.

Uploaded by

Lohit D Kari
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 40

MALNAD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, HASSAN

(An Autonomous Institution under VTU, Belagavi)

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

ANALSIS OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDING USING ETABS – MINI PROJECT


Presented by,
Group 25
Course coordinator: Mrs .Siri Hemanth,
U S N: 4MC18CV038,
Asst. Professor
4MC18CV005,
Dept. Of Civil Engg.
4MC18CV069,
4MC18CV052
Date: 6/7/2021
CONTENTS
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION

OBJECTIVES

METHODOLOGY,PLANNING AND
DRAWING

ANALYSIS USING ETABS

DRAWING USING AUTO CAD AND ETABS

CONCLUSION

REFERENCE
INTRODUTION

The term building in civil engineering is used to mean a structure having

various components like foundation, walls, columns, floors, doors, windows,

ventilator, stairs lifts, various types of surface finishes etc according to national

building codes of India, building are classified into number of groups that are

residential buildings, educational building, institutional building, assembly

building, business building, industrial building, storage building.


Structural analysis is a branch which involves determination of behavior of structures
in order to predict the responses of real structures such as buildings, bridges, trusses
etc, with economy, elegance, serviceability and durability of structure.

A multistoried building is basically framed structure. In a multistoried frame all


members are continuous. Hence multistoried structure is the solution for the growing
business needs in cities where economical construction is possible.

The earthquake forces are distributed effectively as the whole structure behaves as
one unit.
ABSTRACT
The engineering design process is a methodical series of steps that engineers
use in creating functional products and processes.The principle objective of
this project is to analyze and design a multistoried building by using
respective software and Indian standard specifications
In the present study, RCC Residential Structure of G+2 floors will be
analyzed and designed for different load combinations as specified in the
Indian standard codes using E- Tabs software.
E-Tabs software features a state-of-art user interface visualization tools,
powerful analysis and design engines with advanced finite element and
dynamic analysis capabilities.
Types of loads acting on a structure are:
•Dead loads
•Imposed loads
•Wind loads
•Snow loads
•Earthquake loads
•Special loads
ETABS
ETABS is Acronym of EXTENDED 3 DIMENSIONL ANALYSIS OF
BUILDING SYSTEMS. It is developed by CSI in the year of 1984. ETABS
is a sophisticated easy to use, special purpose analysis and design program
developed specifically for building systems.
The advantages of ETABS are following:
•Simple gird system defined by horizontal floors and vertical
column lines can establish building geometry with minimal effort
•The floors levels in buildings are similar. This commonality can be
used numerically to reduce computational effort.
•Auto calculation of reinforcements for beams and columns based
moments.
•Buildings subjected to any number of vertical and lateral load cases
and combinations, including automated seismic loads can
be analysed and designed easily.
•Automated transfer of vertical loads on floors to beams and walls.
•Automated vertical live load reductions.
OBJECTIVES
The following objectives are framed for this study:

To analyse the design of G+2 residential building using ETABS software.

To analyse the behaviour of building when it is subjected to seismic load.

To design the structural components like beam, slab, column and footing manually.

To plan the building, which meets the basic requirements such as safety, durability,
Economy, Aesthetic appearance, Feasibility, Practicability and Acceptability.

To compare the results obtained from software method and manual method.
METHODOLOGY
COLLECTION OF DATA

PLANNING

DRAWING –AUTO CAD

ANALYSIS – ETABS

DESIGNING

FOOTING
COLUMNS
BEAMS
SLABS
STAIRCASE
PLANNING
AND DRAWINGS
ANALYSIS USING ETABS

Modelling of building
1. New file – building setting used
2. Units used –metric SI
3. Steel section data base –INDIAN
4. Steel design code IS800-2007
5. Concrete design code IS456-2000
Storey data No. of storey-4
Typical storey height 3m
bottom storey height 3m
Defining diaphragm
• Assigning Material
Lateral load resisting system

Adding new material according to Indian Standard


1. Concrete grade used M20 for beams and slab
M25 for columns
2. Rebar IS standard i.e, HYSD 500 for longitudinal
reinf.
HYSD 415 for shear reinf.
Defining section properties
1. Define column – 12”x12” Material used M25 concrete
2. Define beam – 14”x 9” Material used M20 concrete

Slab section
Thickness 5”

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 13


• Defining load pattern
Dead load
live load
Wall load(wl)
Partition wall load (pwl)
Earthquake load (Eqx and Eqy) as per
IS 1893-2002
Floor finish

In assigning of seismic load As per IS 1893-2002


1.Sesmic zone factor =0.36
2. Response reduction factor R=5
3.Importance factor I=1

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 14


DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 15
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 16
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 17
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 18
Defining Mass source

Load pattern and mass multiplier

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 19


ASSINGNING Beams and Columns

BEAMS select 14”x9” as property

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 20


COLUMN select column 12”x12” as property

SLABS thickness 5”

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 21


Assigning loads
Assigning Diaphragms
Wall load
• For external wall select D1 D2 D3 D4 for
corresponding storey
9” wall after deducting opening(20 to
30%)=9kN/m
• For interior wall =4.5kN/m
•For parapet wall =3kN/m
Assigning uniform load
Live load =2kN/m2
Live load for roof floor =1.5kN/m2
For floor finish =1kN/m2
For partition wall load =2kN/m2
For staircase load =10kN/m2
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 22
Assigning floor automesh options
Defining load combinations for
Meshing is done for proper transfer of concrete frame design
loads from slabs to frames

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 23


MODEL CHECK

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 24


Analysis Part
Lock and Run Model Analysis

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 25


Forces Stress Diagram Spring or Support Reaction Select
Combo Load (1.5DL+LL+WL+PWL+FF+Staircase)

Here We get the reactions that will used for Designing of footing

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 26


BMD
Forces Stress Diagram Frame / Pier / Link Forces Use Combo
(1.5DL+LL+WL+PWL+FF+Staircase) Select Max B.M (Moment 3-3)
Include Frames

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 27


SFD
Forces Stress Diagram Frame / Pier / Link Forces Use Combo
(1.5DL+LL+WL+PWL+FF+Staircase) Select Shear 2-2 (Max SF)

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 28


AXIAL FORCE
Forces Stress Diagram Frame / Pier / Link Forces Use
Combo (1.5DL+LL+WL+PWL+FF+Staircase) Axial Forces

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 29


Analysis of BM in Slab
Forces Stress Diagram Shell Stress Force Select
Combo(1.5DL+LL+WL+PWL+FF+Staircase) Select Mmax

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 30


SF in Slab
Forces Stress Diagram Shell Stress Force Select
Combo(1.5DL+LL+WL+PWL+FF+Staircase) SF in Slab

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 31


Analysis Building in Response Spectrum Plot
Select Story response plot Select Eqx, Max Storey Displacment & Storey
Displacement is the total Displacement of the storey with respect to ground
Max Storey Displcement = 0.004*Height of building(9m excluding base)

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 32


Maximum storey displacement =0.004*9
=0.036m=36mm
But here maximum displacement is 15.6mm(Eqx)
therefore lies in the permissable value hence structure is safe.

For earthquake in y direction( Eqy)

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 33


But here maximum displacement along Y direction is 14.66 <36mm
hence safe

Storey drift
It is the ratio of difference
between 2 consecutive storey
displacement to height of the
storey
According to IS 1893-2002 max
permissible storey drift is 0.004
Along Eqx but here max storey
drift is 0.0017<0.004 hence safe

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 34


Along Eqy
Here along Eqy direction max storey drift 0.001623<0.004 hence safe

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 35


Model participating mass ratio ; Here time period lies between 0.1 to
1.1sec hence safe

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 36


Torsional irregularity
Check diaphragm drift
It is the ratio of max diaphragm drift to the avg diaphragm drift
it should not be greater than 1.4

Here ratio is less than 1.4 therefore there is no extreme


torisional irregularity along Eqx hence safe

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 37


Along Eqy
Here ratio <1.4 no extreme torsional irregularity building is safe

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING , MCE, HASSAN 38


CONCLUSIONS
There are three methods to design RCC structure, (working stress method, ultimate method, and limit state
method) out of which the limit state method gave an adequate section to satisfy strength and serviceability criteria.

For all the combinations of loads the classical method such as Kani’s method, moment distribution method etc are
not suitable hence the E-TABS program was used for the analysis of the structure for all the loading combinations.

The detailing of reinforcement is carried as per IS code provision which provides ductility to the structure and
hence better performance.

Initially the dimensions of structural members are assumed; the maximum percentage of reinforcement in all
structural members is less than IS specifications.

All the structural components are checked to satisfy the serviceability criteria and hence provided dimensions of
all structural components are adequate.
Department of Civil Engineering , MCE, Hassan
 

REFERENCE

•Pardeshi Sameer (2016). “study of seismic analysis and design of multi storey
symmetrical and asymmetrical building”, International research journal of
engineering and technology (IRJET). E-ISSSN:2395-0072.
• Mahesh N Patil (2015). “seismic analysis of multi storey building”, International
journal of engineering and innovative technology (IJEIT). ISSN:2277-3754
• T Prashanthi (2017). “ To study of seismic analysis and design for different plan
configuration in structural behaviour of multi storey RC frame building”,
International journal of engineering and innovative technology(IJEIT).
ISSN:2349:6002.
• IS 4928-1993:Indian standard code of practice for earthquake resistant design and
construction of buildings.
• IS 1893-2002:Indian standard code of practice criteria for earthquake resistance
design of structures
Department of Civil Engineering , MCE, Hassan

You might also like