Data Migration Strategy: © 2009 Infosys Technologies Limited
Data Migration Strategy: © 2009 Infosys Technologies Limited
Activities Responsibility
Data Identification Rexam
Transformation Rexam with inputs from
Infosys
Data Cleansing and Preparation Rexam
Data Upload Infosys
(Development/Quality)
Data Reconciliation Infosys
Data Validation Rexam
Data Upload (Production) Rexam
© 2009 Infosys Technologies Limited 4
Options Evaluated
Approach Description Pros Cons
LSMW – Standard SAP mechanism – Best suited for data upload – Not suited for scenarios with
which internally uses one of without any customization variable screen sequence and
Direct input, BDC, BAPI or an – Suited with less complex country-specific screens
IDOC. data (single country) – Separate recording for country
specific requirements; therefore
increased number of objects
BDC – Custom code generated from – Useful when multiple – Relatively more development
pre-recorded SAP countries are involved and testing time
transaction, – Simpler even when screens – Effort required for issue
are customized resolution is relatively more
iDoc/BAPI – Uses standard structures – Standard SAP method for – Requires configuring the source
defined by SAP for pulling the communication and target system ports and
data from source system to RFC settings
SAP. – Complex
Custom – Custom programs are – More flexibility to define – Analysing the error log and
Programs developed using the requirements reprocessing mechanism are
necessary function modules complex and time consuming.
or BAPI and are generally
interfaced with proxies to
allow data exchange between
Legacy and SAP.