0% found this document useful (0 votes)
120 views28 pages

Qualitative vs. Quantitative and Mixed

This document discusses quantitative and qualitative research methods, mixed methods research, and common mixed methods research designs. It provides an overview of the key differences between quantitative and qualitative approaches. Mixed methods research combines both quantitative and qualitative data and methods. Common mixed methods designs include convergent parallel, explanatory sequential, exploratory sequential, and embedded designs. Each design has different purposes, priorities, and sequences for collecting and analyzing quantitative and qualitative data.

Uploaded by

Kris Labayog
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
120 views28 pages

Qualitative vs. Quantitative and Mixed

This document discusses quantitative and qualitative research methods, mixed methods research, and common mixed methods research designs. It provides an overview of the key differences between quantitative and qualitative approaches. Mixed methods research combines both quantitative and qualitative data and methods. Common mixed methods designs include convergent parallel, explanatory sequential, exploratory sequential, and embedded designs. Each design has different purposes, priorities, and sequences for collecting and analyzing quantitative and qualitative data.

Uploaded by

Kris Labayog
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 28

Quantitative vs.

Qualitative
and
Mix Method

Kris Labayog Garcia


QUANTITATIVE QUALITATIVE
• Testing theories and hypothesis • Exploring ideas and formulating a theory or
• Used structured survey instrument that asks all hypothesis
respondents the same questions in order to allow for • Concerned with how people think and feel about the
statistical analysis. topics of concern to the research.

• Analyze through math and statistical analysis • Analyzed by summarizing, categorizing and
interpreting

• Mainly expressed in number, graphs and tables • Mainly expressed in words

* Requires many respondents ( macro- analysis) • Requires few respondents (micro analysis)

• Closed questions • Open-ended questions


Key terms are: Key terms are:
-testing, measurement -understanding, context
-objectivity, replicability - complexity, subjectivity
When to use quantitative or qualitative
research?

 Use QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH if you want


to confirm or test something.

 Use QUALITATIVE RESEARCH if you want


to understand something.
What Is Mixed Methods Research?

A mixed methods research design is a procedure for collecting, analyzing,


and “mixing” both quantitative and qualitative research and methods in a
single study to understand a research problem.
Mixed Methods Research Methodology
 Utilizes both quantitative and qualitative data collection methodologies.
 Examples
 Interviews and Questionnaires
 Performance Tests and Observation
 Questionnaires and follow up Focus groups
 Document analysis, Performance Tests, Questionnaire, and Interviews
Key Characteristics of Mixed Methods
Designs: Rationale
Rationale
 Test findings of first phase
 Explain results of first phase in more detail
 Provide a more complete understanding than either quantitative or
qualitative alone
Collecting both quantitative and qualitative data
 Numeric data
 Text data
Key Characteristics of Mixed Methods Designs:
Priority and Sequence

 Priority
 Equal weight
 QUAN carries more weight than qual
 QUAL carries more weight than quan
 Sequence
 Collect both quantitative and qualitative data at the same time
 Collect quantitative data first, followed by qualitative data
 Collect qualitative data first, followed by quantitative data
Key Decisions In Choosing A Mixed Methods
Study
 The level of interaction between the quantitative and qualitative
strands
 The priority of the strands
 The timing of the strands
 Where and how to mix the strands
The Convergent Parallel Design
Purposes for the Convergent Design

 Obtain a more complete understanding from two databases


 Corroborate results from different methods
 Compare multiple levels within a system
When to Use the Convergent Design

 Need to collect both types of data in one visit to the field


 Both types of data have equal value for understanding the
research problem
 Have quantitative and qualitative research skills
 Can manage extensive data collection activities individually or
with a team
Convergent Design
Philosophical assumptions:
 Best suited to an "umbrella" paradigm such as pragmatism
Common variants:
 Parallel-databases variant
 Data-transformation variant
 Data-validation variant
The Explanatory Sequential Design
Purposes for the Explanatory Design

 To use qualitative data to help explain quantitative results that


need further exploration

 To use quantitative results to purposefully select best


participants for qualitative study
When to Use the Explanatory Design
 Researcher and research problem are quantitatively oriented
 Know important variables and instruments are available
 Participants available for second data collection
 Have time to conduct two phases
 Have limited resources and need to collect and analyze one data type at a
time
 New questions emerge from quantitative results
Explanatory Design
Philosophical assumptions:
 Begin from post positivism for the quantitative phase
 Shift to constructivism for the qualitative phase
Common variants:
 Follow-up explanations variant
 Participant-selection variant
The Exploratory Sequential Design

Qualitative Quantitative
Purposes for the Exploratory Design
 To first explore because variables, theories, hypotheses not
known
 To develop an instrument or typology that is not available
 To assess whether qualitative themes generalize to a population
When to Use the Exploratory Design
 Researcher and research problem are qualitatively oriented
 Important variables not known and instruments not available
 Have time to conduct two phases
 Have limited resources and need to collect and analyze one data type at
a time
 New questions have emerged from qualitative results
Exploratory Design
Philosophical assumptions:
 Begin from constructivism for the qualitative phase
 Shift to post positivism for the quantitative phase
Common variants:
 Theory-development variant
 Instrument-development variant
The Embedded Design Interpretation
Purposes for the Embedded Design

 To address different questions that call for different


methods
 To enhance an experiment such as by
 Improving recruitment procedures
 Examining the intervention process
 Explaining reactions to participation
When to Use the Embedded Design
 Have expertise with the primary design
 Are comfortable with the primary orientation
 Have little prior experience with the supplemental method
 Resources limit placing equal priority on both methods
 Need for a secondary data set emerges
Embedded Design
Philosophical assumptions:
 Worldview may reflect the primary approach, use pragmatism for a concurrent
approach, or shift in a sequential approach
Common variants:
 Embedded experiment
 Embedded correlational
 Embedded instrument development and validation
 Mixed methods case study
 Mixed methods narrative research
 Mixed methods ethnography
REFERENCES:

 Whitley, B.E. & Kite, M.E. (2013). Principles of research in


behavioral science (3rd ed. )Routledge
 John W. Creswell, J. David Creswell. Ph D, Vicki L. Plano Clark,
PhD
 Mixed Methods, Nova SouthEastern University, Abraham S.
Fischler
Third Edition Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
Thank you
And
God Bless

You might also like