0% found this document useful (0 votes)
114 views

Radiation Exposure AND Safety

Radiation exposure from medical imaging can cause both deterministic and stochastic health effects. Deterministic effects are dose dependent and include skin burns and cataracts, while stochastic effects like cancer are probabilistic with no safe lower dose limit. Factors that influence radiation dose include equipment settings, physician technique, patient body habitus, and distance from the radiation source. The ALARA principle aims to keep patient and staff doses as low as reasonably achievable through collimation, minimal fluoroscopy time, lead shielding, and maintaining distance from the beam. Monitoring radiation exposure through dosimeters helps evaluate safety practices.

Uploaded by

sshansra
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
114 views

Radiation Exposure AND Safety

Radiation exposure from medical imaging can cause both deterministic and stochastic health effects. Deterministic effects are dose dependent and include skin burns and cataracts, while stochastic effects like cancer are probabilistic with no safe lower dose limit. Factors that influence radiation dose include equipment settings, physician technique, patient body habitus, and distance from the radiation source. The ALARA principle aims to keep patient and staff doses as low as reasonably achievable through collimation, minimal fluoroscopy time, lead shielding, and maintaining distance from the beam. Monitoring radiation exposure through dosimeters helps evaluate safety practices.

Uploaded by

sshansra
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

RADIATION EXPOSURE

AND
SAFETY
CORE PRINCIPLE

► There is no amount of radiation that is good for


 You…
 Or for your patients…
 Or for your staff!

Unless you already have cancer!


Characteristics of X-Radiation
► Gamma ray photons
 Photon energy 65 -125 kev
 Less energetic than most clinically used radionucleides
 Cause tissue injury by ionizing atoms in molecules

► Peak kilovoltage(kVp)
 Determines X-ray photon penetrating power
 kVp = penetration image contrast
► Miliamperage(ma)
 Determines the number of X-ray photons produced per unit time
► Pulse width (msec)
 The duration of the X-ray pulse associated with an image frame
(typically 5-8 msec)
 Determines image motion blurring
Factors Affecting Radiation Dose
► Equipment Design and Settings ► Physician Procedure Conduct
 Movement capabilities of C-arm, X-  Positioning of image intensifier
ray source, image intensifier and X-ray source relative to the
 Field-of-view size patient
 Collimator position  Beam orientation and movement
 Beam filtration  Detector field-of-view size
 Fluoroscopy pulse rate and acquisition
frame rate
 Collimation
 Fluoroscopy and acquisition input  Fluoroscopy pulse rate
dose rates  Acquisition frame rate
 Automatic dose-rate control including  Total fluoroscopy time
beam energy management options
 Total acquisition time
 X-ray photon energy spectra
 Use of variable beam filtration
 Software image filters
 Preventative maintenance and  Acquisition and fluoroscopic
calibration technique factors on some units
 Quality control

► Patient Factors
 Patient body weight and habitus
How patients and we get Exposed
THE INVERSE SQUARE LAW
Vertical Plane Scattered Radiation Isodose Curves
Horizontal Plane Scattered Radiation
Isodose Curves
EFFECTS OF X-RAY EXPOSURE

► Deterministic Effects (predictable, dose-related)

 Skin injury and hair loss (most common)


►Hand skin burns at Acute threshold dose 7 Gy

 Eyes (Cataract – 1 to 2 Gy, latent period 1 year)


 Other organs
Threshold Skin Entrance Doses
for Different Skin Injuries
Stochastic Effects (probabilistic, no relationship to dose)
► Neoplasm
► Risk of fatal cancer estimated to be 4% per Sv for long-term exposure.
Lifetime risk of fatal cancer is 20%.
Lifetime risk if exposed to 1 Sv = 24%
Background radiation is 1 mSv/year @ sea level.
Typical patient dose for interventional procedure: 26 mSv
Incremental cancer risk ≈ 0.3% / procedure

 Minimum latent period - leukemia 2 years & solid cancers 5 yrs.


 Newborns are estimated to be 10 to 30 times more sensitive.
 Females are more susceptible than males, because of greater breast and
thyroid sensitivity.
 Pelvic procedures deliver significant doses to the reproductive cells.
The risk for radiation induced heritable effects is approximately 0.01%
affected offspring per 10 mGy (1 rad) absorbed to the gonads.
Pregnancy
► In Utero Effects
 Deterministic Effects
► Central nervous system functional effects
► Malformations
 Stochastic Effects
► Neoplasm, heritable
► Gestation dependence

► The risk for childhood cancers (principally leukemias) from in utero exposure is about
0.06% per 10 mSv (1 rem), but the risk for long-term adult development of induced
cancers is not known.

► Doses to the conceptus in excess of 50 to 100 mGy place the child at risk for growth
retardation, malformation, resorption, or miscarriage

► Procedures that involve structures above the diaphragm are unlikely to deliver doses
capable of inducing deterministic effects. Uterus only receives scattered radiation and
this is typically much less than 2%.

► Shielding a pregnant woman’s abdomen and pelvis will be ineffective for procedures
in which the chest or head are the principally exposed body regions.
Recommended Dose Limits
► How to estimate your actual dose:
 TLD badge
►Worn outside the lead apron on collar
►Under-apron at the waist

► National Council on Radiation Protection maximum permissible


doses:
 In one year: 50 mSv
 Eye : 150 mSv/year
 Skin: 500 mSv/year
 Operator exposure goal < 0.1 mSv/ case
500 cases per year to exceed maximum permissible dose
30 year career exposure: 1.5 Sv
What Can be done To Protect
Patients, Staff
and Ourselfs ?

2 - 5% radiation is transmitted through 0.5 mm lead


Minimizing Exposure
► ALARA principle
As Low As Reasonably Achievable

► The Inverse Square Law is Your Protection!


Keep your distance from the beam!

► Reduce Fluoroscopy time


Keep it brief!

► Barriers
The Ceiling-Mounted Glass Shield
(Reduces Your upper body exposure by 90%)
How You Position Your System Affects
the Dose to your Patient and to You
Collimator Affects the Dose to the
Patient and to You
Minimizing Radiation exposure
► Minimize beam-on time, both for fluoroscopy and acquisition.
 Never irradiate the patient unless the primary operator’s eyes are on the monitor
 The last image hold feature can be used to study anatomic details without the
need for ongoing radiation exposure

► Position the X-ray source and image receptor optimally


 Distance from the patient to the image detector is minimized
 Position the patient’s heart near the imaging system’s isocenter

► Use least degree of image magnification required for accurate interpretation


 Systems that use conventional image intensifiers, the dose increases
substantially with increasing magnification
 Flat-panel detector systems have a smaller dose increment with magnification

► Understand and utilize the X-ray dose-reduction features provided


 Use the slowest fluoroscopy pulse rate and the lowest fluoroscopy dose rate that
will produce satisfactory images
 Employ beam-hardening filters whenever feasible.
► Vary the site of the radiation entrance port
 Procedures that require long fluoroscopy times, if clinically feasible, change the
radiographic projection so as to minimize the dose to any particular portion of
entrance port skin.

► Record the estimated dose delivered to the patient


 For older units that do not provide this function, the total fluoroscopy and
acquisition times should be recorded

► Maintain X-ray equipment in good repair and calibration


 Aging image intensifiers have reduced light output for a given X-ray input dose.
Thus, an aging image intensifier will automatically require the X-ray system to
deliver an increased dose. Such image intensifiers should be replaced.

► Select X-ray units with sophisticated dose-reduction and monitoring features


ACC Recommendations for Reducing Radiation Exposure
► Equipment factors—incorporate as many as possible
 Pulsed progressive fluoroscopy
 Additional copper filters
 Digital-only cine acquisition
 Last image hold feature
 Image looping
 High frequency generator

► Operator-dependent functions
 Minimize patient exposure
 Limit number and length of cine runs
 Use least amount of fluoroscopy time possible
 Minimize use of magnification
 Use proper collimation of primary beam
 Utilize appropriate shielding: side table, ceiling mounted, mobile “door” shields
 Maintain distance from primary beam
 Keep image intensifier as close to patient as possible
 Maintain source to entrance distance as long as practical (recommended 50 cm)
 Select highest kv that provides the needed contrast
 Avoid use of “boost” or high dose modes
► Laboratory maintenance
 Conduct periodic inspections and testing of X-ray unit(s)
 Inspect X-ray lead shields and lead aprons/thyroid shields at least annually

► Operator shielding
 Wear two-piece lead apron that wraps around body, covering back to protect
from scattered X-rays
 Select proper-fitting lead aprons: minimize armhole openings, cover entire
torso, extend to midthigh
 Wear thyroid shield
 Wear eye protection: leaded eyeglasses with temple shields

► Monitoring
 Wear two badges: under apron at waist and outside lead shields at collar level
 Consider use of a sterilizable ring on arm closest to X-ray tube
 Regularly review personal exposure
 Record fluoroscopic and cine times for each case
Radiation need not be feared
But it must command Your
Respect

THANK YOU

You might also like