ACCT4007 Corporate Governance: Topic 7 Corporate Social Responsibility
ACCT4007 Corporate Governance: Topic 7 Corporate Social Responsibility
Corporate Governance
Topic 7
Corporate Social Responsibility
1
Agenda
2
Increasing Awareness of CSR
Traditionally:
Focus on achieving economic objective of making profits and
enhancing shareholder wealth.
Criticism:
The narrow focus on achieving economic performance is criticized fo
r ignoring environmental, social, and ethical responsibilities.
3
Increasing Awareness of CSR
Now:
CSR Performance and reporting based on Multiple Bottom Lines (M
BL) have received considerable attention from global business, regulator
s, policy makers, and investment community.
MBL objectives:
◇ Primary objective is to achieve economic performance of creating sha
reholder value.
◇ At the same time, consider environmental, social, and ethical perform
ance for the interests of stakeholders.
E.g., total assets managed by funds following socially responsible investi
ng (SRI) strategies have increased substantially.
ABP, located in Netherlands, is one of the biggest pension fund around the world.
ABP has taken into consideration corporate social responsibility (CSR) among the
companies it invests in, by treating the CSR factor as a risk element in the
sense that a poor CSR company is at a greater risk.
4
Dimensions of Corporate Sustainability
Economic Profits
Governance Traditional CG
Ethical
Environmental CSR
Social
5
Dimensions of Corporate Sustainability
6
Ethical Dimension
Ethics is driven by:
Personal believes
Societal norms
Moral principles and values
How these values are translated into behaviors and actions
◇ Knowing ethics is not sufficient.
◇ How ethics guide people in doing the right things and how the use
of ethics consistently in ever-changing situations is critical.
7
Ethical Dimension
Ethical requirement after CG reforms
The financial scandals (in early 2000s) and the financial crisis (in 2007
-2008) and related regulatory responses and best practices have attra
cted the attention to corporate code of ethics, professional ethics, com
pliance training programs, and ethical judgment.
After CG reforms (SOX and Dodd-Frank), most of public companies:
◇ Adopt the code of ethical conducts for key financial officers.
◇ Offer employee training programs in ethics.
◇ Often appoint chief ethics officers to oversee the establishment
and maintenance of the codes of ethics and ethics programs.
8
Ethical Dimension
Code of ethical conducts
Primary means for companies to communicate the commitm
ent to ethical conducts to both internal and external stake
holders (e.g., shareholders, employees, suppliers, customer
s).
9
Ethical Dimension
Benefits of commitment to ethics
Adherence to professional ethics by corporate gatekeepers (the board
of directors, management, and auditors) can significantly improve cor
porate performance and promote reliability of financial reports.
Companies with the emphasis on ethics and trust attract more talent
ed employees and have higher employee retention rates.
10
Environmental Dimension
11
Environmental Dimension
12
Social Dimension
Caring for communities
Charity and donation
Education/training resources and support
Supplier Responsibility
Whether suppliers follow social criteria
Any negative social impacts in the supply chain
Accessibility
Product accessibility features
Support service provided to persons with disabilities
Diversity
Gender
Ethnic minorities
……
13
Social Dimension
14
Dimensions of Corporate Sustainability
15
Importance of CSR
16
Arguments against CSR
17
Arguments against CSR
18
CSR Reporting
Demands for CSR reporting
With the globalization and economic, social, and technological dev
elopments, stakeholders have increasingly demanded information on
both financial and nonfinancial KPIs based on MBLs in the reporti
ng of corporate sustainability.
20
CSR Reporting
GRI (Global Reporting Initiatives) guidelines
GRI framework is a comprehensive structure that enables greater tran
sparency on environmental and social performance.
More than 8,000 companies worldwide (including Fortune 500) have ad
opted GRI standards for sustainable reporting.
21
Best Practices of CSR
Tone at the top in engaging in sustainability initiatives
The board of directors should consider the opportunities and challe
nges/risks offered by the global move toward sustainability and make s
ustainability issues at the top of board agenda.
This can be achieved in the following ways:
◇ The proxy proposals include the election of at least one director wi
th sustainability interests and skills.
◇ Create a board sustainability committee consisting of directors wit
h adequate sustainability expertise.
◇ The entire board of directors should be required to engage in sustai
nability issues and initiatives, being held accountable for achiev
ing sustainability performance, and to provide the needed sustai
nability leadership.
22
Best Practices of CSR
Executives’ commitment for promoting sustainability
Top executives (particularly CEOs and CFOs) should have full commit
ment in achieving all the five dimensions of sustainability perform
ance, by moving away from greenwashing sustainability and movin
g toward a sustainability strategic imperative.
This can be achieved in the following ways:
◇ Active oversight function of the board of directors demanding su
stainability performance from executives.
◇ Including a sustainability performance target in the executive co
mpensation contract or for the labor market to reward sustainabilit
y executive leadership and punish managerial short-termism.
23
Best Practices of CSR
24
Best Practices of CSR
25
CSR Rating
27
CSR Rating
Example: Thomson Reuters’s Datastream ASSET4 [Continued]
Rating construction process
Research analysts at ASSET4 collect more than 750 evaluation
points for each company from publicly available information
(sustainability reports, company websites, annual reports, proxy
statements, other filings, and various news sources).
The raw data points are equal-weighted and combined into 250 key
performance indicators (KPIs).
The KPIs are organized into 18 categories within four pillars:
economic performance score, environmental performance score,
social performance score, and governance performance score.
The pillar scores are integrated into an overall ASSET4 rating
(ranging between 0 and 100%) for each company in each year.
28
CSR Rating
29
CSR Rating
90.00
83.17
80.57
80.00
75.37
74.12
70.15
68.08 68.93
70.00
62.32
59.10
60.00
54.70 55.81
54.18 54.32 54.20 54.00 54.60
50.00 52.34
51.49 51.03
40.00
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Apple-Overall Mean-Overall
30
CSR Rating
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
30.00
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Apple-Environmental Mean-Environmental
31
CSR Rating
56.03
55.00
54.90
50.00 50.46
49.77
47.91 48.48
47.46
46.23 46.22 46.77 46.34
45.44 45.56 45.81
45.00 44.86 44.44
42.86
35.00
30.00
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Apple-Social Mean-Social
32
CSR Rating
94.39
95.00
91.33 91.43
90.00 87.47
86.39
84.15
85.00
81.06
80.00
75.44 74.85 74.98
75.00
75.35
74.32 73.85
73.43 73.16 72.75 73.42
70.00 72.23
70.95 70.61
65.00
60.00
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Apple-CG Mean-CG
33
CSR Rating
80.00
56.93
60.00 55.70 55.24 55.30
54.10 54.57 53.58 54.00
49.85 51.41 50.19
50.00 46.23
40.00
30.00
22.65
20.55
20.00 16.70
10.82 11.80
10.00
0.00
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Apple-Economic Mean-Economic
34
35