Chapter 10 - Propositional Logic
Chapter 10 - Propositional Logic
Some people who do rapid antigen self-tests are negative for the Covid.
All people tested negative for the Covid do not carry the virus.
So, not all people who do rapid antigen self-tests carry the virus.
Standardized argument:
Some people who do rapid antigen self-tests (T) are
negative for Covid people (N).
No negative for Covid people are virus carriers (V).
So, some people who do rapid antigen self-tests are
not virus carriers. (V)
Symbolic argument:
Some T are N
No N are V
So, some T are not V
Venn diagram
Conclusion: valid
Question 1
Some people who do rapid antigen self-tests are negative for the Covid.
All people tested negative for the Covid do not carry the virus.
So, not all people who do rapid antigen self-tests carry the virus.
Standardized argument:
Some people who do rapid antigen self-tests (P) are the covid
negative testers (T).
No the covid negative testers are people who carry the virus
(V).
So, some people who do rapid antigen self-tests are not people
who carry the virus.
Some P are T.
No T are V. Conclusion: This is a valid argument.
So, some P are not V. There is at least one X in the outside area of P.
Question 2
Whoever has a vaccine passport can travel to other countries.
Not all those who travel to other countries are on vacation.
So, there are people with vaccine passports who do not take a vacation.
Standardized argument:
All citizens with vaccine passports (P) are overseas travellers (T).
Some overseas travellers are not vacationers (V).
So, some people with vaccine passports are not vacationers.
Symbolic argument:
Venn diagram
All P are T
Some T are not V
So, some P are not V.
• Standardized argument:
• All active members (A) in my
• Ven Diagram
group are teamwork lovers (L).
• Some people (P) are not active
members(A).
• So, some people (P)are not
teamwork lovers(L).
Symbolic argument:
All A are L
Some P are not A Conclusion: Invalid
So, some P are not L
Question 5
Create a categorical syllogism 1) with the premises containing All & Some and the conclusion containing No, 2) all three statements must be the stylistic variants, and 3) about the
topic of your expectations/predictions for the coming months. Then standardize it and check its validity using Venn Diagram.
Stylistic argument:
Any students who are studying CT are lazy students.
Several lazy students won't pass the upcoming exam.
So, all students who are studying CT won’t pass the
upcoming exam.
Standardized argument:
Symbolic argument:
Conclusion: This is an invalid argument. We expect the area
All S are L. pointed by the arrow to be deleted. However, it is not deleted.
Some L are not P.
So, no S are P.
8
Chapter 10
Propositional Logic
A simple language useful for showing key ideas and definitions
10
Review: Proposition
• The term proposition is sometimes used synonymously
with statement:
- As a simple unit, it expresses a complete idea which
can be evaluated as true or false.
Example: Vietnam is making great efforts in the
Covid-19 battle.
- As a more complex unit, it combines several
statements which can be evaluated as true or false.
1. Conjunction
2. Negation
3. Disjunction
4. Conditional statements
12
Symbolic connectives
or Disjunction
if Implication/conditional
13
Variables and examples of PL statements
Variables: Propositional symbols assigned to different
parts of the argument.
1. p & q 2. p & w
3. x & y 4. r & q
5. r & y 6. y & w
7. x & w 8. q & r
9. p & y 10. r & p
17
1. Conjunction and validity
Rule of validity:
- In a valid argument, it is impossible for all the
premises to be true and the conclusion false.
- If any instance of all true premises is followed by a
false conclusion - an F under the conclusion column -
the argument is invalid.
p q p&q
T T T
T F F
F T F F F F
18
1. CONJUNCTION – Validity
The sky is blue. (p)
The grass is green. (q)
Therefore, the sky is blue and the grass is green.
p q p&q
T T T
T F F
F T F F F
F
19
1. CONJUNCTION – Validity
Symbolic argument:
p* q* p&q C
p
q____ T T T
So, p & q T F F
F T F F F
F
Symbolic argument:
p p* q p&q C
p&q T T T
T F F
F T F F F
F
Symbolic argument:
p&q pC q p&q*
p T T T
T F F
F T F F F
F
22
1. CONJUNCTION – Validity
Tom is short and fat.
Therefore, Tom is short.
p q p&q* pC
Symbolic argument:T T T T
p&q T F F T
p F T F F F F F
F
- p&q
.
. .q
24
CONJUNCTION – Testing validity
- p&q
.
. .q
p q p&q* qC
T T T T
T F F F
F T F T F F
F F
Example:
26
2. NEGATION
p q ˜p ˜q
T T F F
T F F T
F T T F
F F T T
27
NEGATION: Testing validity
Tina is not tall, but Sarah is tall. So, Tina is not tall.
Symbolic argument: ˜p & q
˜p
p q ˜p ˜p&q* ˜p C
T T F F F
T F F F F
F T T T T
F F T F T
The argument is valid. 28
2. NEGATION: Testing validity (2)
Frank does not drive a truck.
So, Frank does not drive a truck, and Vinny does not drive a van.
Symbolic argument: ˜p
. ˜q
˜p &
T T F F F
T F F T F
F T T F F Invalid
F F T T T 29
3. DISJUNCTION
Two or more statements set apart, usually by the word or.
Example:
- Frank is angry or Hank is tired. (p v q)
- For propositional logic, or has non-exclusive sense.
This means the statement is true if either Frank is angry
or Hank is tired.
p q pvq
T T T
T F T
F T T F F F
30
3. DISJUNCTION – truth table
– Frank is angry or Hank is tired.
– So, Frank is angry.
31
DISJUNCTION and NEGATION – truth table
– Frank is not angry or Hank is tired.
32
DISJUNCTION and NEGATION – truth table
33
DISJUNCTION and NEGATION – truth table
34
CONJUNCTION, NEGATION & DISJUNCTION
It’s not the case that Frank is angry or Hank is tired.
So, Frank is not angry and Hank is not tired.
Symbolic argument:
35
CONJUNCTION, NEGATION & DISJUNCTION
It’s not the case that Frank is angry or Hank is tired.
So, Frank is not angry and Hank is not tired.
36
CONJUNCTION, NEGATION & DISJUNCTION
Consider an argument with three variables that involves
disjunction, negation, and conjunction:
Symbolic argument:
37
CONJUNCTION, NEGATION & DISJUNCTION
Invalid
38
4. CONDITIONAL STATEMENTS
• If-then statements consisting of 2 parts:
antecedent and consequent.
Example:
– If it rained, then the ground is wet. (p q)
p q pq
T T T
T F F
F T T F F T
39
4. CONDITIONAL STATEMENTS
Truth table:
Valid
40
Summary of conjunction (p & q), negation ~(p&q),
disjunction (p v q) and conditional statement (pq)
T T F F T F T T
T F F T F T T F
F T T F F T T T
F F T T F T F T
41
PRACTICE
42
1. Our university is calling but we can’t reach it.
T T F F
T F T T
F T F F
F F T F
43
2. If you want a good score but you don’t work hard enough, then
your want is just wishful thinking.
G H W ˜H G & ˜H G & ˜H W
T T T
T T F
T F T
T F F
F T T
F T F
F F T
F F F 44
2. If you want a good score but you don’t make efforts, your want
is just wishful thinking.
Let:
C: we follow the new normal conditions Symbolic form:
F: the government will fail the Covid-19 control ˜C F & O
C F O ˜C F&O ˜C F & O
T T T
T T F
T F T
T F F
F T T
F T F
F F T
F F F
46
3. If we don’t follow the new normal conditions, the government will fail the
Covid-19 control and the country will be out of order.
Let:
Symbolic form:
C: we follow the new normal conditions
˜C F & O
F: the government will fail the Covid-19 control
O: the country will be out of order
C F O ˜C F&O ˜C F & O
T T T F T T
T T F F F T
T F T F F T
T F F F F T
F T T T T T
F T F T F F
F F T T F F
F F F T F F
47
Exercise 4: Test validity of the argument
4A. If the pandemic doesn’t end and we have to study online next
semester, then we will lose considerable knowledge. The
pandemic does not end soon. So, we will study online next
semester and lose the required knowledge.
48
4A. If the pandemic doesn’t end and we have to study online next semester,
then we will lose considerable knowledge. The pandemic does not end soon.
So, we will study online next semester and lose considerable knowledge.
Let:
E: the pandemic ends Symbolic argument:
S: we study online next semester ˜E & S L
L: we lose considerable knowledge ˜E
S&L
G* B* T G&B TG&B TC
T T T
T T F
T F T
T F F
F T T
F T F
F F T
F F F
51
4B. My girlfriend's phone at work is busy. My best friend's phone is also busy. If they are talking
to each other, then both phones are busy. Therefore, my girlfriend and my best friend are talking
to each other over the phone.
Symbolic argument:
G = My girlfriend’s phone at work is busy G
B = My best friend’s phone at work is busy B
T = My girlfriend & best friend talk to each other TG&B
So, T
G* B* T G&B T G & B* TC
T T T T T T
T T F T T F
Invalid
T F T F F T
T F F F T F
F T T F F T
F T F F T F
F F T F F T
F F F F T F
52
4C. If Group A doesn’t take the bonus work offer, Group B doesn’t take it, either. If
these groups don’t take it, other groups will get the bonus points. So, if neither of
these groups takes it, other groups will get the bonus points.
Symbolic argument:
A = Group A takes the bonus work offer
B = Group B takes the bonus work offer ~A ~B
G = other groups get the bonus points
~A & ~B G
~A v ~B G
A B G ~A ~B ~A ~B* ~A & ~B ~A&~ B ~Av ~ B ~ A v ~ B GC
G*
T T T
T T F
T F T
T F F
F T T
F T F
F F T
F F F
53
4C. If Group A doesn’t take the bonus work offer, Group B doesn’t take it, either. If
these groups don’t take it, other groups will get the bonus points. So, if neither of
these groups takes it, other groups will get the bonus points.
Symbolic argument:
A = Group A takes the bonus work offer
B = Group B takes the bonus work offer ~A ~B
G = other groups get the bonus points
~A & ~B G
~A v ~B G
A B G ~A ~B ~A ~B* ~A & ~B ~ A & ~ B G* ~Av ~ B ~ A v ~ B GC
T T T F F T F T F T
T T F F F T F F F T
T F T F T T F T T T
T F F F T T F T T F
F T T T F F F T T T
F T F T F F F T T F
F F T T T T T T T T
F F F T F F F T T T
Invalid 54
4D. If our teacher checks attendance, frequently absent students will be blacklisted
and they will be prohibited from the exam. Our teacher doesn’t check attendance, so
frequently absent students will still take the exam.
Symbolic argument:
T = teacher checks attendance
A = absent students will be on the list T A& P
P = absent students will be prohibited ~T
~P
T A P ~T* ~PC A&P T A & P*
T T T F F T T
T T F F T F F
T F T F F F F
T F F F T F F
F T T T F T T Invalid
F T F T T F T
F F T T F F T
F F F T T F T 56
Review
1. Propositions/arguments with 2 variables: a true table of 4 lines
2. Propositions/arguments with 3 variables: a true table of 8 lines
3. For propositions, only set up the truth table.
57
ASSIGNMENT
Instructions:
- The question “Who’s the thief?” is optional. Your weekly assignment includes
5 tasks that follow.
- Delete all the lesson slides and keep only the Assignment slides to resubmit.
Link to submit:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1oOlrqPciG11PVp6RmW-
uuBfj60WnxGzXoJYXlQC2z-Q/edit
Conclusion:
Task 2: If our teacher gives us challenging tasks (T), we’ll make an excuse of
vaccination (V) for not doing them or we’ll just give her our grinning faces (G). We
don’t make an excuse of vaccination for not doing the tasks. So, if our teacher gives us
challenging tasks, we’ll show our grinning faces to her.
Let: Symbolic argument:
Conclusion:
Task 3: If we do group assignments carefully or we do textbook exercises, we’ll be well
prepared for the mid-term exam. We don’t do textbook exercises but we do group
assignments carefully. So, we’ll get ready for the mid-term exam.
Conclusion
Task 4: Create a propositional argument about the topic of technology and young people with two variables including a disjunction and a conditional statement, then turn it into the symbolic argument and evaluate its validity.
Symbolic argument
Your argument
Symbolic argument
Truth table
Add/Delete columns to suit your argument.
Conclusion
Task 5: Create a propositional argument about the topic of how you enjoy life despite the pandemic with three variables including at least conjunction, disjunction and ‘It’s not the case that…’, then turn it into the symbolic argument and evaluate its
validity using the truth table.
Your argument
Truth table
Let
Add/Delete columns to suit your argument.
Symbolic argument
Conclusion:
Thank you
66