SBM Apat D.O. 83, S. 2012: Marivic A. Somejo Eps-Ftad SBM Coordinator
SBM Apat D.O. 83, S. 2012: Marivic A. Somejo Eps-Ftad SBM Coordinator
Engaging Strengthening
Good
the Institution K to 12 Basic
broad Governance,
through Education
stakeholder Transparency,
BESRA Program
support and
Accountability
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM STRUCTURE
Co l l a b o r a t i o n
Sh a r ed Gov er n a n ce Au t o n o m y
COMMU N I T Y-CE N T E R E D
Tr a n sp a r en cy Ow n e r s h i p
Sh a r ed V / M Acco u n t a b ilit y
S
U Ce n t r a l LG U s D
E
P R e g io n a l N G Os M
P D iv is i o n P r iv a t e A
L Dist r ict Sect or N
D
Y Co m m u n i t y
Gen d er a n d cu lt u r a l
Accessib le
se n sit iv it y
Dev elo p m en t a p p r o p r ia t e E n v i r o n m e n t a l l y S a fe
CH I LD ( LE A R N E R ) -
CE N T E R E D
Le a r n i n g -o r i e n t e d a n d Le a r n e r -
fo c u s e d
SBM
Community
Engagement
& Building
Strategic
Partnerships
K to 12
Self-managing
Self-managing &
& Self-renewing
Self-renewing
Accredit
ss
As s e
Evalu
Ev atee
aluat
Functionally
Literate
Plan Citizen
Mo nitor
Monit or
SSttrruuctu nt
cturre
e meent
lem
Impple
Im
LEARNING COMMUNITY
Resource
Resource Accountability
Accountability &
&
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement
Management
Management
BESRA THRUSTS
NCBTS, ECE, ALS, ETC
CENTRAL,REGION, DIVISION
LEVEL I: DEVELOPING
LEVELS OF PRACTICE
A Child and Community-centered Education Systems
SBM – PASBE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
& COORDINATION ARRANGEMENT
OFFICEOF
OFFICE OFTHE
THE
SECRETARY
SECRETARY
OFFICEOF
OFFICE OFTHE
THE NATIONAL
UNDERSECRETARYFOR
UNDERSECRETARY FOR
ACCREDITATION BOARD
REGIONALOPERATIONS
REGIONAL OPERATIONS
REGIONALOFFICE
OFFICE SECRETARIAT
REGIONAL
DIVISION
DIVISION SCHOOL
100%
• DROP-OUT RATE:
1 – Marginal: At most 2% decrease (0.01 - 2.0)
2 – Average: At most 4% decrease (2.01 – 4.0)
3 – High: Has 0 DR or more than 4% decrease (4.01 – up)
• COMPLETION RATE: ?
1 – Marginal: At least 5% Increase (5.0 – 6.99%)
2 – Average: At least 7% Increase (7.0 – 9.99%)
3 – High: At least 10% Increase (10% - up) or at least 95% CR
Elementary:
1 - Marginal: At least 2% increase (2.0 – 4.99%)
2 – Average: At least 5% increase (5.0 – 6.99%)
3 – High: At least 7% increase (7.0% - up) or at least
75% MPS
Secondary:
1 - Marginal: At least 7% increase (7.0 – 7.99%)
2 – Average: At least 8% increase (8.0 – 9.99%)
3 – High: At least 10% increase (10% - up) or at least
75% MPS
1 – Marginal : 26 – 50%
2 – Average : 51 – 75%
3 – High : 76 – 100%
A Child and Community-centered Education Systems
STEP 2:Compute for validated SBM
Assessment Scores (40%)
Cumulative Scores of
Weight Results
SBM Principles Validators
per Principle
Computation
Numerical
Rating Scale
Description
0 No evidence
Evidence indicates developing structures and
1 mechanisms are in place to demonstrate ACCESs
2 Evidence indicates planned practices and
procedures are fully implemented and aligned to
ACCESs
3 Evidence indicates practices and procedures satisfy
quality standards
(2)
A Child and
opportunity. Community-centered Education
A. LEADERSHIP & GOVERNANCE
2. The development plan (e.g. SIP) is regularly reviewed by the
school community to keep it responsive and relevant to emerging
needs, challenges and opportunity.
SGC
SFA
PTA
●
●
SPG/SSG
Upholds the
Policy-making
SGC
SFA
PTA
DO:
comNo.
mon54,good
s. 2009
&
●
● ●
body
DO:
com
DOs: No.
general
No of
mon the
54,
good
welfare
67, s.2009
2009
of&
ofs.the
●
body
●
school
DOs:
general
the
●
No welfare
faculty 67, s. 2009
of
school
the faculty
1.0 3.0
2.0 4.0
T&D Needs Assessment Program Designing &
Professional Development Program Delivery (PDy)
(TDNA) Resource Development
Planning (PDP) System System
System (PDRD) System
A ChildTraining
and &CDevelopment
ommunity-centered Education
Information System (TDIS)
B. CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
The curriculum learning systems anchored on the
community and learner’s contexts and aspirations are
collaboratively developed and continuously improved.
1. The All types of learners Programs are fully The educational needs of
of the school implemented and closely all type of learners are
curriculum community are
monitored to address being met as shown by
performance continuous improvement
provides for identified, their discrepancies, on learning outcomes
the needs of learning curves benchmark best and products of learning.
assessed; practices, coach low Teachers as well as
all types of performers, mentor students’ performance is
appropriate
learners in programs with its
potential leaders, reward motivated by intrinsic
high achievement, and rewards. The Schools’
the school support materials for maintain environment differentiated program is
community. each type of learner that makes learning, frequently benchmark by
is developed. meaningful and other schools. (3)
(1) enjoyable. (2)
Diverse
IP Education Learners
IP Education
(DO
(DO No.
No. 62,
62, s.
s. 2012)
2012)
Madrasah Science
Science
Education
Education Curriculum
Curriculum
(DO
(DO 40,
40, s.
s. 2011)
2011) (DO
(DO 53
53 &
& 57,
57, s.
s. 2012)
2012)
Sports
Sports
SPED Curriculum
Curriculum
(DO
(DO No.
No. 60,
60, s.
s. 2012)
2012) (DO
(DO 56,
56, s.
s. 2012)
2012)
Tech
Tech Voc Educ.
Educ. Arts Curriculum
Arts Curriculum
(DO
(DO 68,
68, s.
s. 2012)
2012) (DO
(DO 56,
56, s.
s. 2012)
2012)
Foreign Language
Cur.
Cur. for
for Journalism
Journalism
(DO 46, s. 2012)
(DO
(DO 46,
46, s.
s. 2012)
2012)
SPELLING ORTHO-
RULES GRAPHY
L1&L2 PRIMER
DICTIONARY
DICTIONARY
SHORT
STORIES –
BIG BOOKS
INDIGENIZED IMs DEVELOPMENT BASED IN IPKSP FRAMEWORK, Source: Alcosaba, et. al: 2013
IPKSP FRAMEWORK OF THE 5 MAJOR TRIBES
HISTORY OF LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP AND
AND FAMILY
SOCIO-POLITICAL
SOCIO-POLITICAL FLORA AND
PEOPLE AND STRUCTURES/ RELATIONS/
COMMUNITY
STRUCTURES/
JUSTICE
JUSTICE SYSTEM
SYSTEM
FAUNA LIFE CYCLE
RITUALS
SUMMONING LITERATUR SPIRITUAL
AND
THE SPIRITS E BELIEFS
FESTIVITIES
HOUSE AND
TECHNO- HOUSE
LANGUAGE
LOGY STRUCTURES STRUCTURE
Tacurong Anabel D. Besona, Arabic Language and Islamic Values Education Creative
Ph.D. (ALIVE) Program: Its Relation to Pupils’ Performance Thinking
Sul. Kud. Baipina M. Learning Performance of High School Students in Mathematics Using Creative Thinking
Block Model Approach: Basis for Developing Teachers’ Training on & Problem
Balubugan Teaching Strategy Solving
Cot. Exaltacion S. The Use of SIM in Teaching Least Learned Creative Thinking &
Problem Solving
Prov. Velarde Competencies
Source:
B. CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
3. A representative group of school and community stakeholders develop the methods and
materials for developing creative thinking and problem solving.
ding
Early Grade Rea
A ssess m en t ( EG RA) Story Writing
Book and Print
Orientation Observation
Alphabet Test
Questioning
on e m ic A w a re n ess
Ph
Test Formative Test
ya ng Tala s ali t aan
Bata
sa Unang Kita Summative Test
B. CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
4. The learning systems are regularly and collaboratively monitored by the
community using appropriate tools to ensure the holistic growth and
development of the learners and the community.
1.0
2.0 4.0
3.0
Building Basic Effective Crisis
Infrastructure (BPI)
Preventive Measures Protective & Remedial
Management (ECM)
(PM) System Measures (PRM) System
System System
ADOCNo.
hild40,
and Community-centered
s. 2012: Education
DepEd Child Protection Policy
B. CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
The curriculum learning systems anchored on the
community and learner’s contexts and aspirations are
collaboratively developed and continuously improved.
7. Methods and Practices, tools and Practices, tools, and There is continuous
resources are learner materials for developing materials for developing exchange of information,
and community- self- directed learners are self- directed learners are sharing of expertise and
friendly, enjoyable, highly observable in beginning to emerge in materials among the
safe, inclusive, school, but not in the the homes and in the schools, home and
accessible and aimed home or in the community. community for the
community. The program is development of self-
at developing self-
Learning programs are collaboratively directed learners.
directed learners.
designed and developed implemented and The program is
Learners are
to produce learners who monitored by teachers mainstreamed but
equipped with are responsible and and parents to ensure continuously improved to
essential knowledge, accountable for their that it produces desired make relevant to
skills, and values to learning. learners. emergent demands.
assume (1) (2) (3)
responsibility and
accountability for
their own learning.
METHODS : RESOURCE
SUBJECTS STRAT./APPR. S
• ENGLISH • Constructivism • Textbooks / LMs
• FILIPINO • Cooperative Learning • IMs
• SCIENCE • Multiple Intelligence • Classroom
• Interactive Teaching • Computer Lab
• • Speech Lab
MATHEMATIC • Communicative Competence
• School Library
S • Practical Work Approach • School Canteen
• UbD • TLE Room
• ARAL. PAN. • Social Learning • Study Lounge
• MAPEH • CAI (Computer-Aided • Drinking Station
• TLE Inst.) • Guidance Office
• EsP • ICT Integration • AVR
SGC
SFA
PTA
●
●
SPG/SSG
Policy-making
Upholds the
SGC
SFA
PTA
DO:
com No.
mon54,good
s. 2009
&
●
●
SPG/SSG
●
body
DO:
com
DO:
general
● of
NoNo.
mon
67,
the
54,
good
s. 2009
welfare
s. of&
2009
body of the of
●
school
DO:
general
the
●
No 67,
facultywelfare
s. 2009
school
the faculty
PARTICIPATORY PERFORMANCE
ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
INPUT
Status of School’s PROCESS OUTPUT
PPAs •Technical
• WSRP ** SitAn (SWOT)
Brigada
• Gulayan sa
Assistance
sa Paaralan *
Guidance
Guidance STRATEGIC • Recognition
• FLO ** LPP
LPP
• Feeding Program *
PLANNING / Project
MIPE Performance
Indicators
• Remedial
Remedial Inst’n
Inst’n ** PPP
PPP STRATEGIC
Praise
• Access: Enrolment DIRECTIONS • Plan
Rate
• Efficiency: DR, CSR,
Adjustment
SIP/AIP A
CR
• Quality: AR
DJUSTMENT
F E E D B A C K
D. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES
Plans
F E E D B A
D. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES
A Child Appropriate
Judicious, and Community-centered Education
and Effective Use of Resources
D. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES
2.4
1.4
QA For AQP QA for PM
Level 3. Strengthened
STHRENGTHENEDNED Partnership RESOURCE
MANAGEME
Level 2. System NT
INTEGRATED Integrated
RESOURCE PROJECT
PROJECT MOBILIZATION IMPLEMENTATIO
PARTNERS • PTAPARTNERS
N MOA
DepED-LGU
• SGC
Signing
• LGU Schools Validation/
Selection
• ABC
• Alumini Community Launch
Invocation
Welcome Remarks (School Head)
Short PPT Presentation of School
Profile (Optional)
SBM-PASBE DCT Leader
Introduction of the SBM-PASBE DCT
Orientation & Overview of the D-O-D
Process
ARTIFACTS Leadership
&
Curriculum
&
Accountabili
ty
Resource
Managemen
Governance Instruction t
Lesson plans / /
Annual reports / / / /
Assessment / / /
tools
Test Results / / / /
Community Mapping / / / /
Computer Lab/ / / / /
Website
Organization Charts / / / /
Development Plans / / / /
Learners’ outputs / /
A Child
INSET and
Completion Community-centered
/ / Education
/ Systems
/
ARTIFACTS VS SBM-ACCESs Principles: D-O-D
ARTIFACTS Leadership
&
Curriculum
&
Accountabil
ity
Resource
Manageme
Governanc Instruction nt
e
Action Researches / / / /
Inst. Sup. Rep. (WSRP/ / / /
SCOPE)
Text2Teach / / / /
IPPD / SPPD / / / /
Financial Reports (IGP, / /
MOOE)
Indigenized IMs / / / /
Guidance Program / / / /
Reports
Solid Waste Mgt. Manual / / /
Co-curricular Act. Report / / / /
BRIGADA Eskwela Report / / / /
A Child and Community-centered Education Systems
THE VALIDATION PROCEDURE: D-O-D
RELEVANCE
ACCURACY
CURRENCY
CONSISTENCY
SUFFICIENCY
Collaboratio ●
Teamwork & shared-leadership
Consensual decision & accountability
n
●
Transparenc ●
Validation of evidence is OPEN
y to stakeholders’ view and review
Reform- ●
DOD comes up with informed
recommendations and action programs that
continuously move the school to higher levels
oriented of practice.
Principle- ●
DOD is guided by the ACCESs
principles.
oriented
A Child and Community-centered Education Systems
RECOGNITION & AWARDS
• Systematic recognition and incentives
program in terms of higher school grant,
capital outlay allocation and
performance-based bonus
• With SBM-PASBE integration, the school
grants will shift from subsidy principle to
leverage and innovation fund.
• The highest recognition after two
consecutive re-accreditation status:
Center of Excellence in specific field –
Technical-Vocational, SPED, Multigrade,
etc.
●
1 to 2 years: with random and/or scheduled interim
PROBATIONAR visit
If satisfactory, 5-year full accreditation inclusive of
Y STATUS
●
the probationary
FULL ●
5 Years
ACCREDITATIO ●
No visit shall be conducted
N
RE- ●
CENTER OF EXCELLENCE
ACCREDITATIO
(Elite recognition to schools)
N
A Child and Community-centered Education Systems
Rewards and Incentives: Probationary
Participatio
n in annual
NAB convention
CERTIFICAT of
E OF accredited
RECOGNITI schools
ON
Participation Priority in
in ANNUAL
SCHOLAR-
CONVENTIO
N
SHIP
NAB
CERTIFICAT
E OF
RECOGNITI
ON MERIT
SYSTEM
Fiscal and Eligibility (e.g. PBB)
some for SBM
administrati
Global
ve
AUTONOMY Fund
Eligibility
for
All benefits CENTER
of full OF
accreditation EXCELLE
status NCE