Lecture 6-Geometric Design of Highways Annotated
Lecture 6-Geometric Design of Highways Annotated
Design elements:
Number of lanes, lane width, median type (if any) and width,
length of acceleration and deceleration lanes for on-and-off
ramps, truck climbing lanes, curve radii, and the alignment
providing adequate stopping and passing sight distances
Are influenced by the vehicle performance and physical
dimensions
y = ax 2 + bx + c (3.1)
y = roadway elevation at distance x from the beginning of the
vertical curve (the PVC) in stations or ft,
x = distance from the beginning of the vertical curve in stations
or ft
a, b = coefficients defined below, and
c = elevation of the PVC (because x = 0 corresponds to the
PVC) in ft.
dy
First derivative gives slope: 2ax b (3.2)
dx
CE 416: L6-Geometric Design of Highways 10
Vertical Curve Fundamentals (Continued)
At the PVC, x = 0, so, using Eq. 3.2
dy
b = = G1 (3.3)
dx
Second derivative gives rate of change of slope :
2
d y
2
2a (3.4)
dx
The average rate of change of slope, by observation, can
also be written as:
d 2 y G2 G1
2
(3.5)
dx L
a
G2 G1 (3.6)
2L
Note: watch for the units of “a” and “b”
K-value:
(3.10)
xhl = K G1 (3.11)
A SSD 2
Lm for SSD L (3.13)
200 H1 H 2 2
Lm 2 SSD
200 H1 H 2 2
A SSD 2
Lm (3.15)
2158
For SSD > L:
2158
Lm 2 SSD (3.16)
A
CE 416: L6-Geometric Design of Highways 27
Minimum Curve Length Using K-value
If the assumption L>SSD is made,
AS 2 S2
Lm KA with K
2 2
200 H1 H 2 200 H1 H 2
SSD 2 SSD 2
K
2
200 3.5 2.0 2158
SSD 2
K (3.18)
2158
CE 416: L6-Geometric Design of Highways 28
Justification for the Assumption of L>SSD
Assuming SSD > L instead of L>SSD results in two
complications:
If SSD > L the relationship between A and Lm is not linear so
K-values cannot be used in the L = KA formula (Eq. 3.10)
At low values of A, it is possible to get negative minimum
curve lengths (Eq. 3.16).
L > SSD (upon which Eqs. 3.17 and 3.18 are made) is a better
assumption since in many cases:
L is greater than SSD and
when it is not (SSD > L), the use of the L > SSD formula
(Eq. 3.15 instead of Eq. 3.16) gives longer curve lengths and
thus the error is on the conservative, safe side
CE 416: L6-Geometric Design of Highways 29
Design Controls for Crest Vertical Curves Based on Stopping Sight Distance
Minimum length:
100 to 325 ft depending on individual jurisdictional guidelines
or
3 times the design speed (with speed in mph and length in
feet)
H= height of headlight in ft
= inclined angle of headlight beam in degrees
SSD 2
K (3.23)
400 + 3.5 SSD
PSD:
is an issue on crest vertical curves
the view is unobstructed on sag curves, and at night motorists
can see the headlights of oncoming vehicles
For S < L:
AS 2
Lm
H H2 (3.27)
800 H c 1
2
For S > L:
H H2
800 H c 1
2 (3.28)
Lm 2 S
A
Substituting these values for H1 and H2, and S = SSD into Eqs. 3.27 and 3.28 gives
Wp + Ff = Fcp (3.31)
WV 2 WV 2
W sin f s W cos sin cos (3.32)
gRv gRv
V2
tan f s 1 f s tan (3.33)
gRv
The term tan is referred to as the superelevation of the curve
and is denoted e (e = 100 tan )
1
E R 1 (3.37)
cos( / 2)
M R1 cos (3.38)
2
L R (3.39)
180
Ms= the middle ordinate of a curve that has an arc length equal to
the stopping sight distance
Rv = radius measured to the path of vehicle travel (middle
of innermost lane).
CE 416: L6-Geometric Design of Highways 73
SSD and Horizontal Curve Design (Continued)
Equations for computing SSD relationships for horizontal
curves can be derived by first determining the central
angle, s, for an arc equal to the required SSD
180 SSD
SSD Rv s ® s (3.41)
180 Rv
90 SSD
M s Rv 1 cos (3.42)
R v
R v 1 Rv M s
SSD cos (3.43)
90 Rv