Syntax: Categories
Syntax: Categories
CATEGORIES
their rather dubious jokes
their rather jokes
rather has a function only in respect of dubious
But
if you omit dubious, rather is left without a function.
why is rather left without a function?
rather just isn’t the kind/category of word that can modify jokes
What is the category of
singular plural
accident, accidents,
man, foot, analysis, sheep men, feet, analyses, sheep.
Non-count nouns (mass nouns)
• Non-count nouns refer to ‘things’ that cannot be counted
Examples: butter, foam, cutlery, furniture, honesty, grace.
• Non-count nouns don’t normally display any of the above
possibilities. They cannot normally appear in:
• plural form (*foams, *butters, *honesties).
• follow a/an (*a foam, *a butter, *a furniture),
• numerals or similar expressions (*one foam, *nine furnitures).
• But they follow some (some foam, some furniture).
• Many nouns are both mass and count. For example, theory can
stand alone or with some (cf. we need to do some theory) as a
mass noun, but it can also be preceded by a and by numerals
and be plural as a count noun (a theory, theories, three
theories). Other examples are suspicion, egg, cake, and charity.
Lexical and phrasal categories
(Noun and Noun Phrase)
• A NP is a phrase that contains, and is centred on, a noun
Their rather dubious jokes
• Why can’t it be of the same category as their or rather or
dubious? The answer crucially involves the notion of head
• Noun Phrases, of course, may contain more than one
noun. But only one noun in a Noun Phrase can function as
its head
• identify the subject NP, then indicate which is the head
noun
• The man devouring the plums is grinning broadly.
• The comedy actress John met in the foyer seemed
excited.
• In an NP, constituents that modify the head noun are
typically optional – they can be omitted without affecting
the well-formedness of either the NP itself or the
sentence in which it appears.
• Their extremely subtle tactics confuse me.
• Their tactics confuse me.
• Tactics confuse me.
• On the one hand, tactics is a noun. On the other hand
wherever possible, sentences should be analysed into a
two-part, NP + VP, structure.
• When single words have the functions that full phrases
have, we need to treat them as full phrases of the
appropriate category. After all, words are just words, but
phrases are sequences, or strings, of words.
Adjectives and adverbs
• Dubious and subtle are adjectives. Any word that has the same
distribution as those words is an adjective. Many adjectives have
characteristic endings, such as -able, -al, -ate, -ful, -ic, -ing, -ish,
-ive, -less, -ous, -y. Examples are:
• capable, economical, Italianate, beautiful, microscopic,
surprising, priggish, inventive, hopeless, eponymous, fluffy.
• More common adjectives tend not to have characteristic endings
(e.g. nice, old, hot, short, tight, full, long, quick) and this goes for
the colour adjectives (blue, yellow, etc.)
• Many adjectives have the morphological possibility of taking a
comparative (-er) and a superlative (-est) suffix, as in newer and
newest, subtler and subtlest. Some others are modified by the
comparative and superlative degree adverbs more and most, less
and least.
• Identify the adjectives and the degree adverbs in the following
passage.
The great architectural interest of the royal
palace didn’t strike William at that precise
moment, grotesque and flamboyant though
it was. He had eyes only for Millie’s
gorgeous purple hair. Could it be artificial? It
was difficult to believe she was so edgy as
to have dyed it such a fantastic hue. She
seemed too modest and shy for that. In
silent admiration, he decided it was entirely
natural.
Adjective Phrases and Adverb
Phrases
• Rather dubious, extremely subtle, and too modest are
Adjective Phrases since they are are centred on adjectives.
beside a stream