Concept of Nation and Nationalism: Imagined Communities by Benedict Anderson
Concept of Nation and Nationalism: Imagined Communities by Benedict Anderson
Nationalism
Imagined Communities by Benedict Anderson
Benedict Richard O’Gorman Anderson was born on August 26, 1936 in Kunming,
China.
Benedict Anderson His parents are James O’Gorman and Veronica Beatrice Mary Anderson
He was also of mixed Irish and Anglo-Irish descent, and his family had been active
in Irish nationalist movements
In 1941, the Anderson family moved to California, where Benedict received his
initial education.
In 1957, he received a B.A. in classics from Cambridge University, England. There,
he developed an immense interest in Asian politics and later enrolled in Cornell
University’s Indonesian studies program.
In 1961, as part of his doctoral research, Anderson went to Jakarta, Indonesia
After the 1965 communist coup and massacres, Anderson published three studies,
one of which was an outline of the coup.
In 1966, “Cornell Paper”, caused Anderson to be barred from Indonesia
indeterminately.
After his exile, he spent a few years in Thailand, taught at Cornell University and
served as director of the Modern Indonesia Program Anderson’s infamous analysis
of nationalism is presented in his book Imagined Communities: Reflections on the
Origin and Spread of Nationalism (1983).
He passed away on 2015
Imagine Communities
In developing his theories, Anderson observes that
the notion of “nation-ness” has become a principal
force in many aspects of modern thought. Both the
rapid expansion of the United Nations and the
political unrest caused by conflict between and
within “sub-nations” around the world are evidence
that nationalism is, indeed, recognized as modern
political moral hegemony.
Yet despite the influence that nationalism has had on
modern society, the origins of the concept, Anderson
finds, are inadequately explained and recorded.
His purpose in writing Imagined Communities is to
provide a historical background for the emergence of
nationalism – its development, evolution, and
reception.
Nationalism
He defines “the nation” as an “imagined political community that is imagined as
both inherently limited and sovereign”
The nation is:
Imagined because “members . . . will never know most of their fellow
members . . . yet in the minds of each lives the image of their communion”. That
is, the possession of citizenship in a nation allows and prompts the individual to
imagine the boundaries of a nation, even though such boundaries may not
physically exist.
Limited because “even the largest of them . . . has finite, if elastic,
boundaries, beyond which lie other nations”. The fact that nationalists are able to
imagine boundaries suggests that they recognize the existence of partition by
culture, ethnicity, and social structure among mankind. They do not imagine the
union of all under one massive, all-encompassing “nationalism” (See Maps in
Colonialism, Geography and Empire).
Sovereign because “the concept was born in an age in which
Enlightenment and Revolution were destroying the legitimacy of the
divinely-ordained, hierarchical dynastic realm . . . nations dream of
being free, and, if under God, directly so”. The sovereign state,
therefore, is symbolic of the freedom from traditional religious
structure. It provides the sense of organization needed for an orderly
society, without relying on the then weakening religious hierarchy.
https://scholarblogs.emory.edu/postcolonialstudies/2014/06/19/anderson-bene
dict/