0% found this document useful (0 votes)
367 views35 pages

Legg Calve Perthes Disease: Synonyms

Perthes disease is caused by impaired blood flow to the femoral head in children, causing bone death. It was first described in 1910. Physical therapy focuses on reducing pain and improving range of motion and strength through stretching, strengthening, and functional exercises based on the patient's CLIPer score. Exercises target the hip muscles and progress from non-weight bearing to weight bearing as tolerated.

Uploaded by

Asad Chaudhary
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
367 views35 pages

Legg Calve Perthes Disease: Synonyms

Perthes disease is caused by impaired blood flow to the femoral head in children, causing bone death. It was first described in 1910. Physical therapy focuses on reducing pain and improving range of motion and strength through stretching, strengthening, and functional exercises based on the patient's CLIPer score. Exercises target the hip muscles and progress from non-weight bearing to weight bearing as tolerated.

Uploaded by

Asad Chaudhary
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 35

Legg Calve Perthes

Disease
Synonyms
Perthes Disease
Osteochondritis Deformans Juvenilis
Childhood Aseptic Necrosis of Femoral Head

Dr. P. Ratan khuman (PT)


M.P.T., (Ortho & Sports)
Definition
• Perthes’ disease is a self-limiting form of
osteochondrosis of the capital femoral epiphysis
of unknown aetiology that develops in children
commonly between the ages of 5 – 12 years.
• It is a condition of immature hip caused by
necrosis of the femoral epiphysis; the femoral
head subsequently deforms as necrotic bone is
replaced by living bone.
• It is Hip disease occurring during early childhood
and caused by impaired circulation in the
femoral head.
2
Historical background
• The disease was described almost simultaneously, in
1910, by –
– G. C. Perthes in Germany,
– J. Calve in France
– A.T. Legg in America.
– Hence name – “Legg Calve Perthes Disease”

3
Grade – I
• Only anterolateral quadrant affected

4
Grade - II
• Anterior third or half of the femoral head

5
Grade – III
• Up to 3/4 of the femoral head affected,
• only the most dorsal section is intact

6
Grade – IV
• Whole femoral head affected

7
Physical Therapy
Assessment & Diagnosis

8
Clinical Assessment
• A thorough history and examination be completed to
establish an impairment based physical therapy diagnosis and
individualized plan of care (APTA).
• It is recommended initial evaluation, on a monthly basis or
sooner if the pt demonstrates a change in status, and at
discharge:
– Pain and symptoms
– Lower extremity PROM & AROM
– Lower extremity strength
– Gait
– Balance
– Outcome measures

9
Classification of Phases of Rehab
• It is recommended that the Classification Instrument in
Perthes (CLIPer) be used to place the patient into a
rehabilitation classification phase upon examination.
• The patient should be re-examined using the CLIPer on
a monthly basis to determine the appropriate
progression through the rehab classification stages
• It is recommended the patient is referred back to the
orthopaedic surgeon if the patient’s status worsens
over two consecutive PT sessions

10
Rehabilitation Classification Phase
• Score total 14 to 24: Severe Involvement
• Score total 6 to 13: Moderate Involvement
• Score total 0 to 5: Mild Involvement

11
Goals for Management
CLIPer score 14 to 24 CLIPer score 6 to 13 CLIPer score 0 to 5
• Reduce pain to < 7/10 • Reduce pain to < 4/10 • Reduce pain to 1/10 or
• Increase ROM to >50% • Increase ROM to > 75% of the less
of the uninvolved side uninvolved side • Increase ROM to >90%
• Increase strength to • Increase strength to > 75% of of the uninvolved side
>50% of the uninvolved the uninvolved side • Increase strength to >
side • Progress from use of an 90% of the uninvolved
• Patient to be assistive device if approved by side
independent with the physician and without adverse • Improve balance to
appropriate assistive effects >90% of the maximum
device and weight • Independence with a step to Pediatric Balance Scale
bearing precautions pattern on stairs without UE score or single limb
• Improve balance to support stance of the
>50% of the maximum • Improved efficiency in walking uninvolved side
Pediatric Balance Scale • Improved balance to > 75% of • Ambulation with a non-
score or single limb the maximum Pediatric painful limp with
stance of the Balance Scale score or single normal efficiency
uninvolved side. limb stance of the uninvolved
side

12
Pain Management

CLIPer • Hot pack with stretching


score • Cryotherapy
14 to 24 • Medications as prescribed by the referring physician for
pain

CLIPer • Hot pack with stretching


score • Cryotherapy
6 to 13 • Medications as prescribed by the referring physician for
pain

CLIPer • Hot pack with stretching


score • Cryotherapy
0 to 5 • Medications as prescribed by the referring physician for
pain

13
ROM Management
• Static stretch for LE musculature with or without hot pack
• Dynamic ROM & AAROM if muscle guarding due to pain and
is unable to achieve end ROM with static stretch.
CLIPer • Perform AROM and AAROM following passive stretching to
score maintain newly gained ROM .
14 to 24 • Stretching for hip – IR, ER, Abd, Extensor, & any other lower
extremity motion that is significantly limited

CLIPer
score • Same as above
6 to 13 • Dosage of may differ based on patient preference &
comfort.
CLIPer
score • Same as above
0 to 5 • Dosage of may differ based on patient preference &
comfort.

14
ROM cont…
• Static Stretching Parameters –
– 2 minutes of stretching/day/muscle group
– 30 second hold time
– 4 repetitions per muscle group
– If not tolerated, may do 10 to 30 second hold time
with repetitions adjusted to meet 2 minute
requirement
• e.g. if holding 15 seconds, would do 8 stretches

15
ROM cont…
• Dynamic Stretch Parameters –
– 5 second hold
– 24 repetitions per muscle group per day to meet 2
minute stretching time required

• Done if patient does not tolerate static stretch

16
Strengthening Ex (CLIPer score 14 to 24)
• Isometric Ex -> Isotonic Ex in gravity lessened
-> Isotonic Ex against gravity.
• It is appropriate to include concentric and
eccentric contractions.

17
Strengthening Ex (CLIPer score 14 to 24)
• Focus on strengthening of HIP (Abd + Flexors + ER
+ IR + Extensors + or any other LE muscle group
that displays significant strength deficits).
• Special attention to gluteus medius to min intra-
articular pain & for pelvic control during single leg
activities and ambulation .
• Weight bearing Vs Non-weight bearing ex is
based on patient’s tolerance to weight bearing
positions, and safety.

18
Strengthening Ex (CLIPer score 14 to 24)
• Closed chain double limb exercises with light
resistance (less than full body weight)
• It is not recommended to perform single limb
closed chain ex on the involved side due to
increased intra-articular pressure in the hip
joint.

19
Strengthening Ex (CLIPer score 6 to 13)
• Isotonic Ex in gravity lessened -> Isotonic Ex
against gravity.
• Include concentric & eccentric contractions.
• Weight bearing and non-weight bearing
activities can be used in combination based on
the patient’s ability and goals of the treatment
session.

20
Strengthening Ex (CLIPer score 6 to 13)
• Upper extremity supported functional
dynamic single limb activities may be
performed.
– e.g. step ups, side steps
• Double limb closed chain ex may be used with
light resistance if weight bearing allows.
– e.g. mini-squats

21
Strengthening Ex (CLIPer score 0 to 5)
• Isotonic Ex in gravity lessened -> Isotonic Ex
against gravity.
• Include concentric & eccentric contractions.
• Functional dynamic single limb activities with
UE support as needed for patient safety may
be performed.
– e.g. step ups, sidesteps
• Closed kinetic chain single limb exercises with
light resistance may be performed.
– E.g. leg press
22
Strengthening Ex Prescription
• Special attention should be given to:
– Hip abductors (especially gluteus medius)
– Hip internal rotators
– Hip external rotators
– Hip flexors
– Hip extensors

23
Isometric Strengthening
• Parameters –
– 10 sec hold + 10 rep/muscle gr, total = 100 sec.
– Can adjust hold time to 5 sec + 20 rep to meet 100
sec requirement
• Intensity –
– Performed at approx. 75% maximal contraction
• Performed with hip in neutral position

24
Isotonic Strengthening
• Parameters –
– High repetitions (10 to 15 reps) and 2 to 3 sets
– Perform both concentric & eccentric contraction
– Low resistance
• Rest 1 to 3 minutes between sets
• Rest can include exercise of a different muscle group or
cessation of activity
• If pt is unable to perform 2 sets of 10 rep, exercise
intensity should be decreased either through weight or
type of exercise
25
Balance training (CLIPer score 14 – 24)
• If weight bearing status & symptoms allow –
– Activities that include double limb stance and a
narrowed base of support on stable surfaces may
be performed.
• It is not recommended to perform single limb
activities due to increased intra-articular
pressure in the hip joint.

26
Balance training
(CLIPer score 6 – 13 & 0 – 5)

• Same as previous stage


• Limit prolonged single limb activities due to
excessive joint compressive forces

27
Gait training (CLIPer Score 14 – 24)
• Follow the referring physician’s guidelines for
weight bearing status.
• Begin gait training with –
– Appropriate assistive device
– Weight bearing status as determined by the
referring physician or
– Based on the patient’s tolerance to full weight
bearing due to pain or safety

28
Gait training (CLIPer Score 6 – 13)
• Continue to follow the referring physician’s
guidelines for weight bearing status.
• Progress to gait training without use of an
assistive device as appropriate, focusing on
minimizing deficits and improving efficiency of
walking.

29
Gait training (CLIPer Score 0 – 5)
• Continue to follow the referring physician’s
guidelines for weight bearing status
• Progress to gait training without the use of
an assistive device as appropriate, focusing
on minimizing deficits and improving the
efficiency of walking.
• Stair negotiation & other functional mobility.
• Progress to walking on uneven surfaces with
an emphasis on safety.
30
Weight Relief
• The load on the hip can basically be relieved
by the following methods:
– Bed rest
– Wheelchair
– Walking with crutches,
– Bracing devices (Thomas splint , Mainz orthosis,
etc.).

31
Petrie Cast

32
Broomstick Cast

33
Classification Instrument in Perthes (CLIPer)
Domains Description Score
7 to10/10 4
Pain with
4 to 6/10 2
ADL
0 to 3/10 0
Less than 50% of uninvolved side for the majority of directions 6
Hip ROM 50 to 75% of uninvolved side for the majority of directions 3
76 to 100% of uninvolved side for the majority of directions 0
Less than 50% of uninvolved side for the majority of muscle groups 6
Hip
50 to 75% of uninvolved side for the majority of muscle groups 3
Strength
76 to 100% of uninvolved side for the majority of muscle groups 0
Pediatric balance score less than 50% of best score (best score=56)
4
OR SLS with eyes open less than 50% of time on uninvolved side
Balance Pediatric balance score 50 to 75% of best score (best score=56) 2
OR SLS with EO of uninvolved side 50 to 75% length of time
Pediatric balance score 76 to 100% of best score (best score=56)
0
OR SLS with EO 76 to 100% of uninvolved side
NWB and uses an assistive device and without AD, displays excessive
4
gait deficits with decreased efficiency
Gait No assistive device & displays excessive deficits without a decrease in 2
efficiency. Uses step to pattern on stairs
Non-painful limp Able to perform reciprocal pattern on stairs 0
Total:

34
References:
• Lee J, Allen M, Hugentobler K, Kovacs C, Monfreda J,
Nolte B, Woeste E; Evidence-Based Care Guideline
Conservative Management of Legg-Calve-Perthes
Disease In children aged 3 to 12 years, Cincinnati
children’s hospital medical center, 2011
• Benjamin Joseph, Paediatric Orthopaedics, A System
Of Decision-making, 2009
• Fritz Hefti, Pediatric Orthopedics in Practice, 2007
• David Wilson (Ed.), Paediatric Musculoskeletal
Disease With an Emphasis on Ultrasound, 2005
35

You might also like