0% found this document useful (0 votes)
69 views39 pages

COEN 252 Computer Forensics: Incident Response

This document discusses incident response methodology. It describes the key stages of incident response as preparation, detection, containment, eradication, recovery, and follow-up. For each stage, it provides details on the types of activities and procedures that should be carried out, such as shutting down systems, searching for compromised files, restoring from backups, and performing a post-mortem analysis. The overall goal of incident response methodology is to efficiently and systematically deal with security incidents.

Uploaded by

Dudeviswa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
69 views39 pages

COEN 252 Computer Forensics: Incident Response

This document discusses incident response methodology. It describes the key stages of incident response as preparation, detection, containment, eradication, recovery, and follow-up. For each stage, it provides details on the types of activities and procedures that should be carried out, such as shutting down systems, searching for compromised files, restoring from backups, and performing a post-mortem analysis. The overall goal of incident response methodology is to efficiently and systematically deal with security incidents.

Uploaded by

Dudeviswa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 39

COEN 252 Computer Forensics

Incident Response
Incident Response
 Business Continuity Planning: deals with
 Outage: Due to natural disasters, electrical
failures, …
 Incident Response: deals with
 Adverse events that threaten security.
Incident Response
 CIA related incidents:
 Confidentiality
 Integrity
 Availability
 Other Types
 Reconnaissance Attacks
 Repudiation
 Someone takes action and denies it later on.
Incident Response
 Harassment
 Extortion
 Pornography Traficking
 Organized Crime Activity
 Subversion
 Bogus financial server
 Hoaxes
Incident Response
 Incident Response: Actions taken to
deal with an incident.

Detection

Countermeasures

Incident
Response
Rationale for
Incident Response
 Abundance of Security-Related Vulnerabilities.
 Availability of Attack Systems and Networks.
 Actual and Potential Financial Loss
 Potential for Adverse Media Exposure
 Need for Efficiency
 Limitations in Intrusion Detection Capabilities.
 Legal Considerations
 Due care.
 Provisions of Law
Incident Response
Architecture
 Policy
 High-level description of essential elements
of information security.
 Do’s and Don’ts for users and sys admins.
 Sanctions for infractions.
 Describes security stance of the
organization.
 Sanctioning of incident response capability: IR
is a required function of inform
Incident Response
Risk Analysis
 Annual Loss Expectancy (ALE)\
 Quantitative
 Qualitative
Incident Response
Risk Analysis
 No generally accepted methodology for
assessing risks.
 Criteria:
 Monetary costs.
 Operations impact.
 Public relations fallout.
 Impact on humans.
Incident Response
Risk Analysis
 Risk Categories:
 Break-in.
 Break-in in a single system at NASA delayed a launch.
 System was mission critical.
 Needed to be recertified before launch.
 Unauthorized execution of programs or
commands.
 Privilege Escalation.
 Exploitation of CGI
 Web servers have frequently cgi scripts installed for
demonstration purposes.
 These have known weaknesses.
Incident Response
Risk Analysis
 Denial of Service attacks
 Web Defacement
 Virus and worm attacks
 Malicious active content
 Back door attacks
 Spoofing
 Session tampering, hijacking, replay
Incident Response
Risk Analysis
 Determining Risk Probabilities
 Collect data within the organization.
 Collect data by other organizations.
 CERT Coordinating Center
 National Infrastructure Protection Center NPIC
 Vulnerability Analysis
 CERT, ALLDAS, ANTIONLINE
Incident Response
Methodology
 Structure and Organization
 Incidents create pandemonium
 Incidents occur in bursts
 Efficiency
 Facilitates the process of responding to
incidents.
 Facilitates dealing with the unexpected.
 Legal Considerations.
Incident Response
Methodology
 Preparation
 Setting up a reasonable set of defenses
and controls based on threads.
 Creating a set of procedures to deal with
the incident efficiently.
 Obtaining the resources and personnel to
deal with the problem.
 Establish an infrastructure to support
incident response activity.
Incident Response
Methodology
 Detection
 Intrusion Detection Systems
 Detection Software
 Reporting
Incident Response
Methodology
 Containment
 Strategies
 Shutting down a system
 Disconnect from the network
 Change filtering rules of firewalls
 Disabling or deleting compromised accounts
 Increasing monitoring levels
 Setting traps
 Striking back at the attacker’s system 
 Adhering to containment procedures.
 Record all actions
 Define acceptable risks in advance
Incident Response
Methodology
 Eradication: Eliminate the cause of the
incident.
 Software available for most virus, worm
attacks.
 Procedures are very important.
Incident Response
Methodology
 Eradication in UNIX System
 Check .forward for unauthorized entries
 Use ps to find stray processes 
.profile
 Ensure that essential files are not modified  /etc/profile
 /etc/exports

.cshrc
 .login  /etc/rc directory
 .logout  .rhosts
 /etc/hosts.equiv
 at
Incident Response
Methodology
 Eradication in UNIX System
amine system commands for changes
netstat
 Discover real modification times for files
ls
sum
 Discover suid programs
find
diff
 Ensure that all password files are the same
/etc/nsswitch.conf
/etc/resolv.conf
 Ensure that there are no unauthorized entries in the .rhost files
/var/spool/cron
kerb.conf  Ensure that there are no unauthorized services running
Incident Response
Methodology
 Eradication in UNIX System
 Search for all files created or modified during the time of the attack.
 Use the strings command to inspect binaries for clear text that might
indicate mischief
Incident Response
Methodology
 Eradication in Window System
 Ensure that the following have not been modified 
All logon scripts
 Security Accounts Manager (SAM) Database
 The integrity of all registry keys and values below Winlogon and LSA in the registry.

Services  Run entries in registry.

All .dll files
 Dial-in settings

Membership in all privileged groups.

User manager for domain settings.  System and user profiles.
Incident Response
Methodology
 Eradication in Windows 2000
 Ensure that the following have not been modified 
All logon scripts
 Security Accounts Manager (SAM) Database
 All security options
 Services

 All .dll files



All permissions for Active Directory.
 Scheduler

All DNS settings.
 Policy settings.
 Registry keys and values under Winlogon and Run in the registry.
 Membership in privileged groups 
Permissions and ownerships in \%systemroot%\ntds …
Incident Response
Methodology
 Recovery: Return compromised systems
back to its normal mission status.
 Recovery procedures: Safest is:
 Full rebuilt for system files.
 Restore data from last backup.
 Record every action.
 Keep users aware of status.
Incident Response
Methodology
 Recovery: Return compromised systems
back to its normal mission status.
 Advise appropriate people of major
developments that might affect them.
 Adhere to policy regarding media contact.
 Return logging to normal level.
 Install patches for any exploited
vulnerability.
Incident Response
Methodology
 Follow-Up
 Perform a post mortem analysis on each
significant incident.
 Exact description and timeline.
 Adequacy of staff response.
 What information was needed at what time.
 What would the staff do differently.
 How was interaction with management.
 What was the damage?
Incident Response
Methodology
 Follow-Up
 Use for legal reasons: forensically sound
evidence.
 Includes monetary damage.
 Reevaluation and modification of staff
response.
 Example: Break-in at Human Genome database.
 Nobody knew who had called when more info was
needed.
 Gap in procedure was remedied during follow-up.
Incident Response
Methodology
Summary:
 Methodology is needed to deal with quickly
evolving, chaotic situations.
 Takes time to implement and to learn.
 Use mock events for training.
 Stages flow into each other.
 Methodology needs to be tailored to
situation.
 Follow-up needed to improve and adapt
methodology.
Incident Response
Forming and Managing an IR-Team

 Incident response team vs. incident


handlers
Incident Response
Forming and Managing an IR-Team

 Reasons for outsourcing:


 Specialists can maintain and add to a
complex skill set.
 Specialists can charge for service.
 Company might lack resources.
 Small organizations do not need a team.
Incident Response
Forming and Managing an IR-Team

 Reasons for in-house incident response:


 Sensitive data is better handled by
employees.
 In house team responds better to
corporate culture.
Incident Response
Why an incident team?
 Expertise.
 Efficiency.
 Ability to work proactively.
 Ability to meet agency or corporate
requirements.
 Teams serve as liaison.
 Ability to deal with institutional barriers.
Incident Response
Basic Requirements
Control over incidents:
 Full control over incident and data /
resources involved
or
 Control sharing
or
 Advisory role.
Incident Response
Basic Requirements
 Interagency / corporation coordination /
liaison
 Clearinghouse
 Contingency planning and business
continuity services
 Information security development
 Incident response planning and analysis
 Training and awareness
Incident Response:
Determining / Dealing with Constituency

 Identify constituency
 Sys Ads are different than general user
population
 Failure of dealing adequately with
constituency leads to long-term failure
Incident Response:
Determining / Dealing with Constituency

 Failures:
 Not getting back to an incident reporter.
 Spreading misinformation.
 Becoming too intrusive.
 Causing embarrassment or leaking
information without authorization.
 Betrayal.
Incident Response:
Success Metrics
 Good security  No incidents.
 Makes success metrics difficult:
 Nr. of incidents
 Estimated financial loss.
 Self-evaluation / questionnaires
 Written or verbal reports by constituency
 Average time and manpower per incident
 Documentation by team members
 Awards / other forms of external recognition
Incident Response:
Organization of IR Team
 Training the team
 Mentoring
 Self-Study
 Courses
 Library
 Exercises
 Testing the team / procedure
 Dealing with resistance
 Budget: not a revenue source, hard to quantify impact
 Management reluctance
 Organizational resistance: rival organizations, turf warfare
 Internal politics
 User awareness
Incident Response:
Organization of IR Team
 External Coordination
 Law Enforcement
 Media
 Other Incident Response Teams
 Infraguard
 Managing Incidents
 Bursty load: surviving the long haul
 Assigning incident ownership
 Tracking charts
 Priorization
Incident Response:
Role of Computer Forensics
 Determines policies:
 Ethical boundaries of response
 Legal boundaries of response
 To protect right’s of insiders and outsiders
 To preserve evidence as legal evidence
 Rules for thorough documentation
 Protect evidence against accidental or intentional
tampering / destruction
 Technical Response
 How to document
 How to establish chain of custody
 How to gather all possibly important evidence

You might also like