Scribd
Upload
73 views

Torsion of Opened Cross Sections. Loads On Frame Due To Fuselage Bending

This document summarizes key concepts from a lecture on torsion and shear stresses in aircraft structures: 1) It discusses torsion of closed and opened cross sections, shear center, shear flows under combined bending and torsion, and calculation of twisting angles. 2) Formulas are provided for calculating polar moment of inertia, relative twist angle, and maximum shear stress for thin-walled cross sections under torsion. 3) Vlasov's theory for calculating deplanations or warping in thin-walled beams under torsion is summarized. Analytical values for maximum deplanations are provided for an example cross section. 4) Loading of aircraft fuselage frames due to bending

Uploaded by

LUIS ISAAC LEON PARO
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
73 views

Torsion of Opened Cross Sections. Loads On Frame Due To Fuselage Bending

This document summarizes key concepts from a lecture on torsion and shear stresses in aircraft structures: 1) It discusses torsion of closed and opened cross sections, shear center, shear flows under combined bending and torsion, and calculation of twisting angles. 2) Formulas are provided for calculating polar moment of inertia, relative twist angle, and maximum shear stress for thin-walled cross sections under torsion. 3) Vlasov's theory for calculating deplanations or warping in thin-walled beams under torsion is summarized. Analytical values for maximum deplanations are provided for an example cross section. 4) Loading of aircraft fuselage frames due to bending

Uploaded by

LUIS ISAAC LEON PARO
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17

Lecture #3

Torsion of opened cross sections.


Loads on frame due to fuselage bending
SHEAR STRESSES RELATED QUESTIONS

- shear flows due to the shear force, with no torsion;


- shear center;
- torsion of closed contour;
- torsion of opened contour, restrained torsion and
deplanation;
- shear flows in the closed contour under combined action
of bending and torsion;
- twisting angles;
- shear flows in multiple-closed contours.
2
SHEAR CENTER AND TORSION - ILLUSTRATION

3
TORSION IN MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

The measure of resistance to


torsion is a polar moment of
inertia I.
 d 4
Relative twist angle I 
Mz 32

G  I
Maximal shear stress
Mz
 max    max
I
I    h  b 3
4
TORSION IN THIN-WALLED CROSS SECTIONS

The polar moment of inertia I is calculated as a sum


for rectangular portions of thin-walled cross section.
Relative twist angle Maximal shear stress
Mz Mz
  max    max
G  I I
1
I     bi   i3

3 i

5
TORSION IN THIN-WALLED CROSS SECTION

Torsional moment is 1000 N·m.


Material is steel, G = 77 GPa.
Moment of inertia I = 4.14 cm4.
Shear stress max = 241.3 MPa.
6
CALCULATION OF DEPLANATIONS (WARPING)

Since the hypothesis of planar cross section is not


valid, the beam theory is not applicable.
Thus, specific theory developed by Vlasov is used.

Vlasov’s theory is based on two main hypotheses:


1) The cross section keeps its shape and rotates as a
whole around the shear center.
2) There are no shear strains and stresses at the
middle plane (tz = 0).

7
CALCULATION OF DEPLANATIONS

w u
 tz   0
t z
where w – displacement along z axis (deplanation);
u – displacement along t axis.

w d
     t
t dz
where  – angle of rotation of cross section along z
axis;
 – lever from the shear center to the direction of t
axis at the given point. 8
CALCULATION OF DEPLANATIONS

w  t   w0       t  dt
t
where w0 –displacement at the start point.

If start point is set on the axis of symmetry, we get

w  t       t 
where t – sectorial coordinate (doubled area
covered by rotation of radius-vector):
  t      t   dt
t
9
CALCULATION OF DEPLANATIONS

Analytical values:
Max is 0.67 mm
At the corner is 0.51 mm
10
NORMAL STRESSES AT RESCTRICTED TORSION

Normal stresses could be found using the formula


B
  t     t 
I
where I – sectorial moment of inertia:

I     t     dt
2

B – bimoment (kind of scalar2 force factor):


d
B   2  E  I
d z
11
NORMAL STRESSES AT RESCTRICTED TORSION
The distribution of normal stresses for real structure is
usually quite complex, so it is usually wise to use FEA.

12
COMPARISON OF OPENED AND CLOSED CONTOURS
For a tube of 25 mm diameter and thickness of 2 mm
we get:
For the closed contour we get the polar moment of
inertia of 1.227 cm4, while for opened – 0.021 cm4,
which is 57 times smaller.
If we would increase the diameter, the difference will
be increased dramatically.
Let’s take a thin-walled circle with radius 1 m and
thickness of 2 mm.
For the closed contour we get 628,300 cm4, while for
opened – only 1.67, which is 375 thousands times
smaller.
13
LOADING OF FUSELAGE FRAME DUE TO BENDING OF
FUSELAGE
If the cross section is subjected to bending with
moment Mx , the specific normal force is equal to
dN z Mx 
  z    R  sin   
dt Ix
Here  is effective thickness of
skin (includes stringers);
Ix is moment of inertia for cross
section:
Ix    R 
3

14
LOADING OF FUSELAGE FRAME DUE TO BENDING OF
FUSELAGE
The relative bending angle between two frames x is
equal to Mx a
x 
E  Ix
Here a is a distance between
frames.
Normal stresses have a vertical
projection due to the presence
of bending angle. This projection
tends to compress the frame as
shown at the figure.
15
LOADING OF FUSELAGE FRAME DUE TO BENDING OF
FUSELAGE
The distributed load on the frame could found as
2
dN z  x  M x  a    R
q  2     sin   
dt 2  I x  E

By making few transformations,


we get
q  q0  sin    ;
M a 2
q0  2 x
  R   E
5

16
WHERE TO FIND MORE INFORMATION?

Megson. An Introduction to Aircraft Structural Analysis. 2010


Chapter 17.2

… Internet is boundless …
17

You might also like