0% found this document useful (0 votes)
119 views44 pages

Attitude: Presenter:Dr - Manovathi.N Chair Person:Dr - Sivalingam

This document discusses attitudes and their formation and change. It defines attitudes as positive or negative evaluations of objects of thought. Attitudes have affective, behavioral and cognitive components and can be measured on dimensions like centrality, direction and intensity. Attitudes are formed through learning, group influences, personality and exposure to information. While attitudes do not always predict behavior, the relationship is stronger when attitudes are specific, strong and accessible. Theories like cognitive dissonance and self-perception explain how attitudes can change through persuasion or inconsistent behavior.

Uploaded by

Karthik Samy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
119 views44 pages

Attitude: Presenter:Dr - Manovathi.N Chair Person:Dr - Sivalingam

This document discusses attitudes and their formation and change. It defines attitudes as positive or negative evaluations of objects of thought. Attitudes have affective, behavioral and cognitive components and can be measured on dimensions like centrality, direction and intensity. Attitudes are formed through learning, group influences, personality and exposure to information. While attitudes do not always predict behavior, the relationship is stronger when attitudes are specific, strong and accessible. Theories like cognitive dissonance and self-perception explain how attitudes can change through persuasion or inconsistent behavior.

Uploaded by

Karthik Samy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 44

ATTITUDE

PRESENTER:DR.MANOVATHI.N
CHAIR PERSON:DR.SIVALINGAM
DEFINITION
 Attitudes are positive or negative evaluations of
objects of thought.

 Allport –“mental and neural state of readiness,


organized through experience exerting a
dynamic influence upon the individual’s response to
all objects and situations with which it is related”.
 
COMPONENTS
Affective - emotional feelings stimulated by an object of
thought

Behavioral -predispositions to act in certain ways toward


an attitude object

Cognitive -beliefs that people hold about the object of


an attitude.
 
DIMENSIONS
Centrality

Direction

Intensity

Salience

Consistency
FUNCTIONS
 Social adjustment

 Knowledge

 Instrumental

 Value-expressive

 Ego-defensive
NEUROBIOLOGY
 
Motivational attitude entail Striatal processing;

Emotional attitude entail Amygdala processes;

Combining both entails processing by hippocampal


circuit.
 
VARIOUS FACTORS IN ATTITUDE
FORMATION
Motivation

Information Exposure

Group affiliation
-Group belief
_Group values
_Group norms

Personality
.
 
ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR

Lapiere - weak predictors of behavior


Attitude-behavior inconsistency? 
 1) attitude strength, accessibility, and ambivalence
variations not accounted.

2) measured in a general, global way that isn’t likely to


predict specific behaviors.

3) Many behaviors occur spontaneously.

 4) Behavior depends on situational constraints—


subjective perceptions of how people expect you to behave.
(contd….)
Recent research-attitudes do predict behavior under
certain conditions.

Attitude specificity

Attitude strength

Attitude accessibility

Ambivalent attitude
TRYING TO CHANGE ATTITUDES
Factors in Persuasion

 Source- person who sends a communication

Receiver- person to whom the message is sent.

Message - information transmitted by the source.

 Channel -medium through which the message is sent.


SOURCE FACTORS
 
successful when the source has high credibility.
 
Expertise - more influential when arguments are
ambiguous.
 
 Trustworthiness is more important because people
accept messages from trustworthy sources with little
scrutiny.
 
 Likability -increase the effectiveness of a persuasive
source.
MESSAGE FACTORS
Two-sided arguments tend to be more effective

Concentrate on strong arguments and that weak


arguments actually raise doubts

Validity effect: simply repeating a statement causes it


to be perceived as more valid or true.

Persuasive messages frequently attempt to arouse fear.


Antismoking campaigns emphasize the threat of
cancer.
RECEIVER FACTORS
Some are easier to persuade

No personality traits are susceptible to persuasion

Forewarning more influential than personality

Attitude/belief source is trying to change

Stronger attitude resistant to change

Resistance can promote resistance


THEORIES- FORMATION AND
CHANGE
Learning theory

Cognitive Dissonance theory

Balance theory

Self perception theory

Elaboration likelihood model

Osgood and Tannenbaum’s congruity theory


LEARNING THEORY
Evaluative conditioning- classical conditioning
efforts to transfer the emotion attached to UCS to
new CS.

Operant conditioning

Observational learning
BALANCE THEORY
Relation between a person and two attitude objects.

connected by favorable or unfavorable attitudes

 relations may be balanced or unbalanced .

The basic tenet of this theory is that there is a tendency to


maintain or restore balance in one’s attitude structures.

Imbalance will not always be resolved but there is a


tendency towards balance since the unbalanced structures
produce tensions and discomfort
COGNITIVE DISSONSNCE
THEORY
LEON FESTINGER

When an individual’s behavior is inconsistent with their


attitude dissonance occurs.

Change in attitude consistent with the behavior.

 Negative drive state characterized by psychological tension or


discomfort causing increased arousal

Individual attempts to reduce by three ways


Changing behavioral cognitive element- stop smoking

Changing environmental cognitive element – will not


read or hear such facts.

Adding new cognitive element - criticize method of


research and inadequacies of report

COUNTERATTITUDINAL ROLEPLAYING:
people express attitudes publicly that are
opposite to their private attitude which creates high
dissonance and attitude change
EFFORT JUSTIFICATION

The Fox and the Grapes


SELF PERCEPTION THEORY
DARYL BEM – 1967

Proposes that people often infer their attitude from


their behavior.

“If I said it, it must be true”


Dissonance theory- to reduce the tension
Bem’s theory- to better understand their behavior

primarily works when subjects do not have well-


defined attitudes regarding the issue .
ELABORATION LIKELIHOO MODEL
Richard Petty and John Cacioppo (1986).

central route - content and logic of persuasive messages.

peripheral route - non message factors, such as the attractiveness credibility


of the source.
 
 Both routes lead to persuasion

 but the durability of attitude change depends on the extent to which people
elaborate on (think about) the contents of persuasive communicati

central route to persuasion leads to more enduring attitude change than the
peripheral route

attitudes changed through central processes predict behavior better


 
MEASUREMENT
DIRECT
Thurstone scale
Likert scale
Osgood semantic diferential scale

INDIRECT
Galvanic skin response
Pupil size
EMG

Others –Guttmann’s method of cumulative scaling


Borgadus social distance scale
Sociometry
Thurstone’s method of equally
appearing intervals
Easier to apply
Statements arranged in 11 categories
A B C D E F G H I J K
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
A – Statement with high favorability
E- neutral statement
k- highly unfavorable statement
 Low value- favorable attitude
 High value-unfavorable attitude
LIKERT’S SCALE OF SUMMATED
RATINGS
Comprises a number of statements and subject
indicate his response on a 5 point scale
5-strongly agree, 4-agree, 3-undecided, 2-disagree, 1-
strongly disagree.
Final score- summing the scores for each statement.
Item analysis
More sensitive than the thurstone scale
Interpretation btwn max and min is difficult.
OSGOOD SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL
SCALE
Measuring the meaning of object to an individual
Seven point scale
Studied affective aspects of use of a word and
behavioral changes
Found 50 percent diff by three factors - evaluation,
potency, activity
Good reliability and validity
Used to study process of impression formation, person
perception and communication among lndividuals
Guttmann’s method of cumulative
scaling
scalogram method

Ranks group of statements in such a way that


affirmative answer to any one of them assumes an
affirmative answer to all other ranking on the scale

Highly reliable and consistent

Very difficult to construct


BORGADUS SOCIAL DISTANCE
SCALE
Scale lists no of relationships to which members of the
group might be admitted.

Respondent is asked the relationship to which he would be


willing to admit the members of each group

Attitude is measured by closeness of the relationship he is


willing to accept

Used in comparing the attitude of people towards


untouchability, caste , regionalism, communalism.
INVOLUNTARY BEHAVIORAL
MEASURES
Galvanic skin response - measures the electrical resistance
of the skin. Resistance decreases when a person is
emotionally aroused. But it has never been possible to
distinguish extremely favorable and unfavorable attitudes.

 Pupil size: Expansion of the size of the pupil indicates


exposure to favorable stimuli and Constriction with
unfavorable stimuli.
 
EMG activity of different facial muscle sites produced a
different positive and negative reactions to persuasive
messages whether it distinguishes exact degree is yet to be
determined.
TECHNIQUES FOR IMPROVING THE
ACCURACY OF MEASUREMENT
Bogus pipeline:
Subjects are attached to a special machine and told
that by measuring tiny electrical changes in muscles it
can assume their true opinions.

Once this belief is established, subjects then


cooperate

 Their reports with respect to various issues measured


are then more truthful.
Unobtrusive measures:
Based on the fact that often human behavior leaves
lasting traces of its occurrence

Which provide valuable information about the


attitude of the persons involved.

Further, such knowledge can be gained without


affecting the individuals in any manner

(EX)voting records reveal current political views


INDIAN STUDIES
EDUCATIONAL FIELD:
- Student’s Attitude towards various school subjects,
activities, vocations etc
-attitude of teacher and teacher trainees

FAMILY PLANNING PROGAMMES

 KAP STUDIES – Relation btwn knowledge, attitude,


practice
Results – despite widespread knowledge and favorable
attitude only 5% practice family planning techniques
APPLIED ASPECTS
Cognitive dissonance in education

Cognitive dissonance in therapy

Promoting healthy and prosocial behavior

Dissonance and alcohol


COGNITIVE DISSONANCE IN
EDUCATION
Creating and resolving dissonance- impact on students
motivation and learning.

( ex) researchers used effort justification paradigm to increase


students’ enthusiasm for educational activities by offering no
external reward for students’ efforts

concluded that students who attribute their work to an


external reward stop working in the absence of reward.

while those who are forced to attribute their work to intrinsic


motivation came to find the task genuinely enjoyable.
COGNITIVE DISSONANCE IN
THERAPY
Effectiveness of psychotherapy and psychological intervention
explained thro this theory.

The act of freely choosing a specific therapy, with the effort and
money invested by the client in order to continue to engage in the
chosen therapy, positively influences the effectiveness of therapy.

Demonstrated in a study with overweight children, in which


causing the children to believe that they freely chose the type of
therapy they received resulted in greater weight loss
PROMOTING HEALTHY AND
PRO-SOCIAL BEHAVIOR
 Cognitive dissonance can be used to promote
desirable behavior such as increased condom use.

Also be used to encourage individuals to engage in


prosocial behavior under various contexts such as
campaigning against littering, reducing prejudice to
racial minorities.
DISSONANCE AND ALCOHOL
Used in behavioral modification -preventing alcohol
use
 we can ask a person who abuses alcohol to join an anti
alcohol public campaign.

If he is not willing to stop alcohol then say that he can


continue drinking and the participation is just an
event.

It creates dissonance in a person who consumes


alcohol and causes discomfort, reduced by changing
their attitude ultimately resulting in stopping the
alcohol taking behavior
THANK YOU

You might also like