0% found this document useful (0 votes)
234 views

Feedback Control Systems (FCS) : Lecture-18 Steady State Error

This document discusses steady state error in feedback control systems. It defines different types of control systems based on their ability to follow step, ramp, and other inputs without error. Type 0 systems have steady state error for step and ramp inputs, while higher types have zero error for those inputs but may have error for other inputs like parabolic. The document also introduces static error constants that characterize steady state error for different input types, like position error constant Kp for step inputs. Higher error constants indicate lower steady state errors. An example calculates the error constants for a given system and predicts its steady state errors for standard inputs.

Uploaded by

JEDP
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
234 views

Feedback Control Systems (FCS) : Lecture-18 Steady State Error

This document discusses steady state error in feedback control systems. It defines different types of control systems based on their ability to follow step, ramp, and other inputs without error. Type 0 systems have steady state error for step and ramp inputs, while higher types have zero error for those inputs but may have error for other inputs like parabolic. The document also introduces static error constants that characterize steady state error for different input types, like position error constant Kp for step inputs. Higher error constants indicate lower steady state errors. An example calculates the error constants for a given system and predicts its steady state errors for standard inputs.

Uploaded by

JEDP
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 23

Feedback Control Systems (FCS)

Lecture-18
Steady State Error

Dr. Imtiaz Hussain


email: [email protected]
URL :http://imtiazhussainkalwar.weebly.com/
Introduction
• Any physical control system inherently suffers steady-
state error in response to certain types of inputs.

• A system may have no steady-state error to a step input,


but the same system may exhibit nonzero steady-state
error to a ramp input.

• Whether a given system will exhibit steady-state error for


a given type of input depends on the type of open-loop
transfer function of the system.
Classification of Control Systems
• Control systems may be classified according to
their ability to follow step inputs, ramp inputs,
parabolic inputs, and so on.

• The magnitudes of the steady-state errors due


to these individual inputs are indicative of the
goodness of the system.
Classification of Control Systems
• Consider the unity-feedback control system
with the following open-loop transfer function

• It involves the term sN in the denominator,


representing N poles at the origin.

• A system is called type 0, type 1, type 2, ... , if


N=0, N=1, N=2, ... , respectively.
Classification of Control Systems
• As the type number is increased, accuracy is
improved.

• However, increasing the type number


aggravates the stability problem.

• A compromise between steady-state accuracy


and relative stability is always necessary.
Steady State Error of Unity Feedback Systems

• Consider the system shown in following figure.

• The closed-loop transfer function is


Steady State Error of Unity Feedback Systems
• The transfer function between the error signal E(s) and the
input signal R(s) is
E( s ) 1

R( s ) 1  G( s )
• The final-value theorem provides a convenient way to find
the steady-state performance of a stable system.

• Since E(s) is

• The steady state error is


Static Error Constants
• The static error constants are figures of merit of control
systems. The higher the constants, the smaller the steady-
state error.
• In a given system, the output may be the position, velocity,
pressure, temperature, or the like.
• Therefore, in what follows, we shall call the output
“position,” the rate of change of the output “velocity,” and
so on.
• This means that in a temperature control system “position”
represents the output temperature, “velocity” represents
the rate of change of the output temperature, and so on.
Static Position Error Constant (Kp)
• The steady-state error of the system for a unit-step input is

• The static position error constant Kp is defined by

• Thus, the steady-state error in terms of the static position


error constant Kp is given by
Static Position Error Constant (Kp)
• For a Type 0 system

• For Type 1 or higher systems

• For a unit step input the steady state error ess is


Static Velocity Error Constant (Kv)
• The steady-state error of the system for a unit-ramp input is

• The static position error constant Kv is defined by

• Thus, the steady-state error in terms of the static velocity


error constant Kv is given by
Static Velocity Error Constant (Kv)
• For a Type 0 system

• For Type 1 systems

• For type 2 or higher systems


Static Velocity Error Constant (Kv)
• For a ramp input the steady state error ess is
Static Acceleration Error Constant (Ka)
• The steady-state error of the system for parabolic input is

• The static acceleration error constant Ka is defined by

• Thus, the steady-state error in terms of the static acceleration


error constant Ka is given by
Static Acceleration Error Constant (Ka)
• For a Type 0 system

• For Type 1 systems

• For type 2 systems

• For type 3 or higher systems


Static Acceleration Error Constant (Ka)
• For a parabolic input the steady state error ess is
Summary
Example#1
• For the system shown in figure below evaluate the static
error constants and find the expected steady state errors
for the standard step, ramp and parabolic inputs.

100( s  2 )( s  5)
R(S) C(S)
2
s ( s  8)( s  12)
-
Example#1 (Steady Sate Errors)
Kp   Kv   K a  10.4

0

0

 0. 09
Example#1 (evaluation of Static Error Constants)
100( s  2)( s  5)
G( s ) 
s 2 ( s  8)( s  12)
K p  lim G( s )
s 0 K v  lim sG ( s )
s 0
 100( s  2)( s  5) 
K p  lim  2   100s( s  2 )( s  5) 
s 0  s ( s  8)( s  12)  K v  lim  2 
s 0  s ( s  8)( s  12) 
Kp  
Kv  

K a  lim s 2G( s )  100s 2 ( s  2)( s  5) 


K a  lim  2 
s 0  
s 0
 s ( s  8 )( s  12 ) 
 100( 0  2 )( 0  5) 
K a     10. 4
 ( 0  8)( 0  12) 
Example#8 (Lecture-16-17-18)
Figure (a) shows a mechanical vibratory system. When 2 lb of force
(step input) is applied to the system, the mass oscillates, as shown in
Figure (b). Determine m, b, and k of the system from this response
curve.
Example#8 (Lecture-22-23-24)
Figure (a) shows a mechanical vibratory system. When 2 lb of force
(step input) is applied to the system, the mass oscillates, as shown in
Figure (b). Determine m, b, and k of the system from this response
curve.
To download this lecture visit
http://imtiazhussainkalwar.weebly.com/

END OF LECTURES-18

You might also like